Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution

, Volume 48, Issue 4, pp 381–390 | Cite as

Sampling strategy to develop a core collection of Uruguayan maize landraces based on morphological traits

  • Marcos Malosetti
  • Tabaré Abadie

Abstract

Core collections were suggested to improve germplasmutilization. A core collection is a subset chosen to represent thediversity of a collection with a minimum of redundancies. Becausediversity is distributed between and within groups with differentdegrees of organization, an adequate classification of accessionsinto related groups should be performed prior to the selection of acore collection. Different classification strategies for theUruguayan Maize Collection were compared, and the best one was usedto select a core collection. The following classification strategieswere compared following a multivariate approach using the availablemaize data base: i) racial classification, ii) geographicorigin (south and north of the country), and iii) acombination of kernel type and geographic origin. The third optionwas considered the best classification rule, since it takes intoaccount two points which are closely related to the distribution ofdiversity: genotypic composition and geographic origin. The followingfive groups were identified in the collection: a) pop, b)floury, c) dent, d) southern flint-semiflints, ande) northern flint-semiflints. Eight core collections,each of 90 accessions, were selected, using different strategies toweight the groups in the core and to select the accessions from thegroups. The P, C, and L strategies were used and combined with eitherrandom selection within the group or the Relative Diversity method.Two samples of 90 accessions were obtained at random withoutconsidering the classification. The Relative Diversity methodcombined with the L strategy produced the best core collection, as itretained the highest percentage of the ranges for the 17 variablesincluded in the analysis. On average, 91% of the ranges wereretained in the core, confirming its representativeness.

Core collection Germplasm utilization Landrace Maize Uruguay Zea mays 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Abadie T., Vivo G. and Olveyra M. 1997. Uruguay LAMP final report. In: Salhuana W. et al. (eds), LAMP final report. Pioneer Hi-Bred Intl. Spec. Publ. G12083, Johnston, IA 94–110.Google Scholar
  2. Abadie T., Magalhaea J.R., Cordeiro C., Parentoni S.N. and de Andrade R.V. 1998. A classification for Brazilian maize landraces. Plant Genetic Resources Newsletter 114: 43–44.Google Scholar
  3. Abadie T., Magalhaes J.R., Parentoni S.N., Cordeiro C. and de Andrade R.V. 1999. The core collection of maize germplasm of Brazil. Plant Genetic Resources Newsletter 117: 55–56.Google Scholar
  4. Allard R.W. 1992. Predictive methods for germplasm identification. In: Stalker H.T. and Murphy J.P. (eds), Plant Breeding in the 1990's. CAB International, Wallingford, Oxon, UK, pp. 119–146.Google Scholar
  5. Balfourier F., Prosperi J.M., Charmet G., Goulard M. and Monestiez P. 1999. Using spatial patterns of diversity to develop core collections. In: Johnson R.C. and Hodgkin T. (eds), Core collections for today and tomorrow. International Plant Genetic Resources Institute, Rome, Italy, pp. 37–48.Google Scholar
  6. Basigalup D.H., Barnes D.K. and Stucker R.E. 1995. Development of a Core Collection for perennial Medicago plant introductions. Crop Sci. 35: 1163–1168.Google Scholar
  7. Brieger F.G., Gurgel J.T.A., Paterniani E., Blumenschein A. and Alleoni M.R. 1958. Races of Maize in Brazil and other Eastern South American countries. National Academy of Science-National Research Council, Washington, D.C, Publication 593.Google Scholar
  8. Brown A.H.D. 1989a. The case for core collections. In: Brown A.H.D., Frankel O.H., Marshall D.R. and Williams J.R. (eds), The Use of Plant Genetic Resources. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, pp. 136–156.Google Scholar
  9. Brown A.H.D. 1989b. Core Collection: A practical approach to genetic resources management. Genome 30: 818–824.Google Scholar
  10. Brown A.H.D. 1995. The core collection at the crossroads. In: Hodgkin T., Brown A.H.D., van Hintum T.J.L. and Morales E.A.V. (eds), Core Collections of Plant Genetic Resources. John Wiley and Sons, New York, pp. 3–20.Google Scholar
  11. Crossa J., Taba S., Eberhart S.A., Bretting P. and Vencovsky R. 1994. Practical considerations for maintaining germplasm in maize. Theor. Appl. Gen. 89: 89–95.Google Scholar
  12. Crossa J., DeLacy I.H. and Taba S. 1995. The use of multivariate methods in developing a Core Collection. In: Hodgkin T., Brown A.H.D., van Hintum T.J.L. and Morales E.A.V. (eds), Core Collections of Plant Genetic Resources. John Wiley and Sons, New York, pp. 77–89.Google Scholar
  13. De María F., Fernández G. and Zoppolo G., Universidad de la RepúblicaUruguay 1979. Caracterización agronómica y clasificación racial de las muestras de maíz colectadas en Uruguay bajo el Proyecto IBPGR y Facultad de Agronomía. Tesis Ing. Agr.Google Scholar
  14. Diwan N., McIntosh M.S. and Bauchan G.R. 1995. Methods of developing a core collection of annual Medicago species. Theor. Appl. Gen. 90: 755–761.Google Scholar
  15. Fernández G., Frutos E. and Maiola C. 1983. Catálogo de Recursos Genéticos de Maíz de Sudamérica-Uruguay. E.E.R.A.-Pergamino INTA CIRF, Pergamino, Argentina.Google Scholar
  16. Frankel O.H. and Brown A.H.D. 1984. Plant genetic resources today: a critical appraisal. In: Holden J.H.W. and Williams J.T. (eds), Crop Genetic Resources: Conservation and Evaluation. Allen and Unwin, London, UK, pp. 249–257.Google Scholar
  17. Frankel O.H., Brown A.H.D. and Burdon J.J. 1995. The Conservation of Plant Biodiversity. Cambridge University Press, UK.Google Scholar
  18. Goodman M.M. 1976. Maize. In: Simmonds N.W (ed.), Evolution of Crop Plants. Longman Inc., New York, pp. 128–136.Google Scholar
  19. Goodman M.M. and Bird McK. 1977. The Races of Maize IV: Tentative Grouping of 219 Latin American Races. Economic Botany 31: 204–221.Google Scholar
  20. Hair, Jr. J., Anderson R., Tatham R. and Black W. 1995. Multivariate Data Analysis: with Readings. 4th edn. A. Simon & Schuster Company, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey.Google Scholar
  21. Hamon S., Dussert S., Noirot M., Anthony F. and Hodgkin T. 1995. Core Collections-accomplishments and challeges Plant Breeding Abstracts 1995. 65 no. 8.Google Scholar
  22. Harch B.D., Brasford K.E., DeLacy I.H., Lawrence P.K. and Cruickshank A. 1995. Patterns of diversity in fatty acid composition in the Australian groundnut germplasm collection. Genet. Res. and Crop Evol. 42: 243–256.Google Scholar
  23. van Hintum T.J.L. 1995. Hierarchical approaches to the analysis of genetic diversity in crop plants. In: Hodgkin T., Brown A.H.D., van Hintum T.J.L. and Morales E.A.V. (eds), Core Collections of Plant Genetic Resources. John Wiley and Sons, New York, pp. 23–34.Google Scholar
  24. van Hintum T.J.L. 1999. The general methodology for creating a core collection. In: Johnson R.C. and Hodgkin T. (eds), Core collections for today and tomorrow. International Plant Genetic Resources Institute, Rome, Italy, pp. 10–17.Google Scholar
  25. Hodgkin T., Brown A.H.D., van Hintum T.J.L. and Morales E.A.V. 1995. Future directions. In: Hodgkin T., Brown A.H.D., van Hintum T.J.L. and Morales E.A.V. (eds), Core Collections of Plant Genetic Resources. John Wiley and Sons, New York, pp. 253–259.Google Scholar
  26. Hodgkin T. 1997. Some current issues in the conservation and use of plant genetic resources. In: Ayad W.G., Hodgkin T., Jaradat A. and Rao V.R. (eds), Molecular genetic techniques for plant genetic resources. Report of an IPGRI Workshop, 9-11 October 1995. Rome, Italy, pp. 3–10.Google Scholar
  27. Holbrook C.C., Anderson W.F. and Pittman R.N. 1993. Selection of a Core Collection from the US Germplasm Collection of Peanut. Crop Science 33: 859–861.Google Scholar
  28. Johnson R.C., Johnston W.J., Nelson M.C., Simon C.J. and Golob C.T. 1999. Core utilization and development-an example with Poa pratensis L. In: Johnson R.C. and Hodgkin T. (eds), Core collections for today and tomorrow. International Plant Genetic Resources Institute, Rome, Italy, pp. 49–60.Google Scholar
  29. Kleka W. 1980. Discriminant analysis Sage University Paper series on Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences. Sage Publications, Beverly Hills and London 07-019.Google Scholar
  30. Malosetti M., Abadie T. and Germán S. 2000. Comparing strategies for selecting a core subset for the Uruguayan Barley Collection. Plant Genetic Resources Newsletter 121: 20–26.Google Scholar
  31. Paterniani E. and Goodman M.M. 1977. Races of maize in Brazil and adjacent areas. CIMMYT, Mexico, D.F.Google Scholar
  32. Salhuana W., Pollak L.M., Ferrer M., Paratori O. and Vivo G. 1998. Breeding Potential of Maize Accessions from Argentina, Chile, USA, and Uruguay. Crop Sci. 38: 866–872.Google Scholar
  33. Schoen D.J. and Brown A.H.D. 1991. Intraspeci.c variation in a population diversity and effective population size correlates with the mating system. Proc. Nac. Acad. of Sci. USA 88: 4494–4497.Google Scholar
  34. Spagnoletti Zeuli P.L. and Qualset C.O. 1995. The durum wheat core collection and the plant breeder. In: Hodgkin T., Brown A.H.D., van Hintum T.J.L. and Morales E.A.V. (eds), Core Collections of Plant Genetic Resources. John Wiley and Sons, New York, pp. 213–228.Google Scholar
  35. Spagnoletti Zeuli P.L. and Qualset C.O. 1993. Evaluation of five strategies for obtaining a core subset from a large genetic resource of durum wheat. Theor. Appl. Gen. 78: 295–304.Google Scholar
  36. Yonezawa K., Nomura T. and Morishima M. 1995. Sampling strategies for use in strati.ed germplasm collections. In: Hodgkin T., Brown A.H.D., van Hintum T.J.L. and Morales E.A.V. (eds), Core Collections of Plant Genetic Resources. John Wiley and Sons, New York, pp. 35–53.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • Marcos Malosetti
    • 1
  • Tabaré Abadie
    • 1
  1. 1.Plant Biology Department, Facultad de AgronomíaUniversidad de la RepúblicaMontevideoUruguay

Personalised recommendations