Plant and Soil

, Volume 235, Issue 2, pp 221–233

Roots, soil water and crop yield: tree crop interactions in a semi-arid agroforestry system in Kenya

  • H.O. Odhiambo
  • C.K. Ong
  • J.D. Deans
  • J. Wilson
  • A.A.H. Khan
  • J.I. Sprent
Article

Abstract

Variations in soil water, crop yield and fine roots of 3–4 year-old Grevillea robusta Cunn. and Gliricidia sepium (Jacq.) Walp. growing in association with maize (Zea mays L.) were examined in semiarid Kenya during the long rains of 1996 and 1997. Even although tree roots penetrated more deeply than maize roots, maximum root length densities for both tree species and maize occurred in the top 200 mm of the soil profile where soil moisture was frequently recharged by rains. Populations of roots in plots containing trees were dominated by tree roots at the beginning of the growing season but because tree roots died and maize root length increased during the cropping season, amounts of tree and maize roots were similar at the end of the season. Thus, there was evidence of temporal separation of root activity between species, but there was no spatial separation of the rooting zones of the trees and crops within that part of the soil profile occupied by crop roots. Tree root length density declined with increasing distances from rows of trees and with depth in the soil profile. Although Grevillea trees were largest, plots containing G. sepium trees always contained more tree roots than plots containing G. robusta trees and Gliricidia was more competitive with maize than Grevillea. Overall, Gliricidia reduced crop yield by about 50% and Grevillea by about 40% relative to crop yield in control plots lacking trees and reductions of crop yield were greatest close to trees. There was less soil moisture in plots containing trees than in control plots. Such difference between control plots and plots containing trees were maximal at the end of the dry season and there was always less soil moisture close to trees than elsewhere in the plots. Plots containing Gliricidia trees contained less soil water than plots containing Grevillea trees.

crop yield fine root dynamics Gliricidia sepium Grevillea robusta soil moisture Zea mays 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Akinnifesi F K, Kang B T and Ladipo D O 1999 Structural form and fine root distribution of some woody species evaluated for agroforestry systems. Agrofor. Syst. 42, 121–138.Google Scholar
  2. Anonymous 1996 ICRAF Annual report for 1995. International Centre for Research in Agroforestry, Nairobi, Kenya.Google Scholar
  3. Atkinson D 1983 The growth, activity and distribution of the fruit tree root system. Plant Soil 71, 23–35.Google Scholar
  4. Chirwa P W, Nair P K R and Kamara C S 1994 Soil moisture changes and maize productivity under alley cropping with Leucaena and Flemingia hedgerows at Chalimbana near Lusaka, Zambia. For. Ecol. Manage. 64, 231–243.Google Scholar
  5. Daniel J N, Ong C K and Kumar M S 1991 Growth and resource utilization of perennial pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan (L) Millsp) at the tree-crop interface. Agrofor. Syst. 12, 83–98.Google Scholar
  6. De Costa W A J M and Chandrapala A G 1999 Effects of root competition on soil fertility and microclimatic interactions in hedgerow intercrops with different tree species in Sri Lanka. J. Agron. Crop Sci. (in press).Google Scholar
  7. Dinkelaker B, Romheld V and Marschner H 1995 Distribution and function of proteoid roots and other root clusters. Botanica Acta 108, 183–200.Google Scholar
  8. Eastham J and Rose C W 1990 Tree/pasture interactions at a range of tree densities in an agroforestry experiment. 1. Rooting patterns. Austr. J. Agric. Res. 41, 683–695.Google Scholar
  9. Gijsman A J, Floris J, van Noordwijk M and Brouwer G 1991 An inflatable minirhizotron system for root observations with improved soil/tube contact. Plant Soil 134, 261–269.Google Scholar
  10. Govindarajan M, Rao M R, Mathuva M N and Nair P K R 1996 Soil water and root dynamics under hedgerow intercropping in semi-arid Kenya. Agron. J. 88, 513–520.Google Scholar
  11. Gregory P J 1996 Growth and activity of tree roots: the key to understanding agroforestry. Agroforestry forum 72, 4–6.Google Scholar
  12. Heeraman D A and Juma N G 1993 A comparison of minirhizotron methods of quantifying barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) and fababean (Vicia faba L.) root distribution. Plant Soil 148, 29–41.Google Scholar
  13. Hendrick L R and Pregtzer S K 1996 Applications of minirhizotrons to understand the root function in forests and other ecosystems. Plant Soil 185, 293–304.Google Scholar
  14. Howard A 1925 The effect of grass on trees. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B, 284–321.Google Scholar
  15. Howard S B, Ong C K, Black C R and Khan A A H 1997 Using sap flow gauges to quantify water uptake by tree roots beneath the crop rooting zone in agroforestry systems Agrofor. Syst. 35, 15–29.Google Scholar
  16. Huxley P A 1983 Some characteristics of trees to be considered in agroforestry. In Plant Research and Agroforestry, Ed. Huxley P A. pp 3–12. ICRAF, Nairobi.Google Scholar
  17. Huxley P A, Patel R Z, Kabaara A M and Mitchell HW 1974 Tracer studies with 32P on the distribution of functional roots of arabica coffee in Kenya. Annals Appl. Biol. 77, 159–180.Google Scholar
  18. Huxley P A, Pinney A, Akunda E and Muraya P 1994 A tree/crop interface orientation experiment with a Grevillea robusta hedgerow and maize. Agrofor. Syst. 26, 23–45.Google Scholar
  19. Jones M, Sinclair F L and Grime V L 1998 Effect of tree species and crown pruning on root length and soil water content in semi-arid agroforestry. Plant Soil 201, 197–207.Google Scholar
  20. Jonsson K, Fidjeland L, Maghembe J A and Hogberg P 1988 The vertical distribution of fine roots of five tree species and maize in Morogoro, Tanzania. Agrofor. Syst. 6, 63–69.Google Scholar
  21. Huxley P 1999 Tropical agroforestry. Blackwell Science Ltd., Oxford, UK 371 pp.Google Scholar
  22. Kormawa P M, Kamara A Y, Jutzi S C and Sanginga N 1999 Economic evaluation of using mulch from multi-purpose trees in maize based production systems in south-western Nigeria. Experimental Agriculture 35, 101–109.Google Scholar
  23. Lal R 1989 Agroforestry systems and soil surface management of a tropical alfisol I. Soil moisture and crop yields, II water runoff, soil erosion and nutrient loss, III. Changes in soil chemical properties. Agrofor. Syst. 8, 7–29, 97-111 and 113-132.Google Scholar
  24. Laycock D H and Wood R A 1963 Some observations of soil moisture under tea in Nyasaland. 2. The effect of shade trees. Tropical Agriculture (Trinidad) 40, 42–48.Google Scholar
  25. Leverenz J, Deans J D, Ford E D, Jarvis P G, Milne R and Whitehead D 1982 Systematic spatial variation of stomatal conductance in a Sitka spruce plantation. J. Appl. Ecol. 19, 835–851Google Scholar
  26. Livesley S J, Gregory P J and Buresh R J 2000a Competition in tree row agroforestry systems.1. Distribution and dynamics of fine root length and biomass. Plant Soil (in press).Google Scholar
  27. Livesley S J, Gregory P J and Buresh R J 2000b Competition in tree row agroforestry systems. 3. Soil water distribution and dynamics. Plant Soil (in press).Google Scholar
  28. Lott J E, Khan A A H, Ong C K and Black C R 1996 Sap flow measurements of lateral roots in agroforestry systems. Tree Physiol. 16, 995–1001.Google Scholar
  29. Malik R S and Sharma S K 1990 Moisture extraction and crop yield as a function of distance from a row of Eucalyptus tereticornis. Agrofor. Syst. 12, 187–195.Google Scholar
  30. Majdi H 1996 Root sampling methods - applications and limitations of the minirhizotron technique. Plant Soil 185, 255–258.Google Scholar
  31. Mathuva M N, Rao M R, Smithson P C and Coe R 1998 Improving maize (Zea mays) yields in semi-arid Kenya: agroforestry or inorganic fertilizers? Field Crop Res. 55, 57–72.Google Scholar
  32. Mazzarino M J, Szott L and Jimenez M 1993 Dynamics of soil total C and N, microbial biomass and water soluble C in tropical agroecosystems. Soil Biol. Biochem. 25, 205–214.Google Scholar
  33. Mwihomeke S T 1993 A comparative study of the rooting depth of Grevillea robusta interplanted with sugar cane along contour strips. In Grevillea robusta in Agroforestry Systems, Ed. Harwood C E. pp 117–124. ICRAF, Nairobi.Google Scholar
  34. Namirembe S 1999 Tree shoot pruning to control competition for below-ground resources in agroforestry. Ph.D. Thesis, School of agriculture and forest sciences, University of Wales, Bangor, Gwynedd, Wales, UK.Google Scholar
  35. Odhiambo H O, Ong C K, Wilson J, Deans J D, Broadhead J and Black C R 1999 Tree-crop interactions for below-ground resources in drylands: root structure and function. Annals of Arid Zone 38, 221–237.Google Scholar
  36. Ong C K, Deans J D, Wilson J, Mutua J, Khan A A H and Lawson E M 1999 Exploring below ground complementarity in agroforestry using sap flow and root fractal techniques. Agrofor. Syst. 44, 87–103.Google Scholar
  37. Onyewotu L O Z and Stigter C J 1995 Eucalyptus - its reputation and its roots: millet and a Eucalyptus shelterbelt in northern Nigeria. Agrofor. Today 7, 6–8.Google Scholar
  38. Rao M R Muraya P and Huxley P A 1993 Observations of some tree root systems in agroforestry intercrop situations, and their graphical representation. Exp. Agric. 29, 183–194.Google Scholar
  39. Rao M R, Nair P K R and Ong C K 1998 Biophysical interactions in tropical agroforestry systems. Agrofor. Syst. 38, 3–50.Google Scholar
  40. Sanchez P A 1995 Science in agroforestry. Agrofor. Syst. 30, 5–55.Google Scholar
  41. Sanders J L and Brown D A 1978 A new fibre optic technique for measuring root growth of soy beans under field conditions. Agron. J. 70, 1073–1076.Google Scholar
  42. Schroth G 1995 The roots characteristics as criteria of species selection and systems design in agroforestry. Agrofor. Syst. 29, 125–143.Google Scholar
  43. Schroth G and Zech W 1995 Above-and below-ground biomass dynamics in a sole cropping and alley cropping system with Gliricidia sepium in semi-deciduous rainforest zone in West Africa. Agrofor. Syst. 31, 181–198.Google Scholar
  44. Skene K R, Kierans M, Sprent J I and Raven J A 1996 Structural aspects of cluster root development and their possible significance for nutrient acquisition in Grevillea robusta (Proteaceae). Ann. Bot 77, 443–451.Google Scholar
  45. Smith D M, Jackson N A, Roberts J M and Ong C K 1999 Root distributions in a Grevillea robusta-maize agroforestry system in semi-arid Kenya. Plant Soil 211, 191–205.Google Scholar
  46. Smucker A J M, Ellis B G and Kang B T 1995 Root, nutrient, and water dynamics in alley cropping on an alfisol in a forest savanna transition zone. In Alley Farming Research and Development, Eds. Kang B T, Osiname O A and Larbi A. pp 103–121. AFNETA, Ibadan, Nigeria.Google Scholar
  47. Tyndall B 1996 The anatomy of innovative adoption: The case of successful agroforestry in east Africa. Unpublished Ph.D. Thesis, Colorado State University.Google Scholar
  48. van Noordwijk M, Lawson G, Soumare A, Grout J J R and Hariah K 1996 Root distribution of trees and crops Competition and or complementarity. In Tree Crop Interactions CAB International Wallingford England, Eds. C K Ong and P Huxley. 386 pp.Google Scholar
  49. Yamoah C, Choosing suitable intercrops prior to pruning Sesbania hedgerows in an alley configuration. Agrofor. Syst. 13, 87–94.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • H.O. Odhiambo
    • 1
  • C.K. Ong
    • 1
  • J.D. Deans
    • 2
  • J. Wilson
    • 2
  • A.A.H. Khan
    • 1
  • J.I. Sprent
    • 3
  1. 1.International Centre for Research in AgroforestryNairobiKenya
  2. 2.Centre for Ecology and Hydrology, Bush EstatePenicuik, MidlothianScotland, UK
  3. 3.Department of Biological SciencesUniversity of DundeeDundeeScotland UK

Personalised recommendations