Molecular Biology Reports

, Volume 28, Issue 1, pp 35–41

Molecular cloning and sequence analyses of calcium/calmodulin- dependent protein kinase II from fetal and adult human brain – Sequence analyses of human brain calcium/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase II

  • Guangyu Li
  • Aicha Laabich
  • L. Olivia Liu
  • Jin Xue
  • Nigel G.F. Cooper


The aims of this study were to characterize specific mRNAs and the expression pattern for isoforms of calcium/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase II (CaMKII) in the human brain. We cloned and sequenced the CaMKII α and β subunit cDNAs, and used them to study the CaMKII expression in human brain. Four distinct isoforms of CAMKII were isolated. Two of them were characterized as CaMKII α and β subunits. The other two showed similar nucleotide sequences, but one had a 33-bp insertion relative to the α subunit, and the other had a 75-bp deletion relative to the β subunit. These alterations are located within the variable regions. These two isoforms were characterized as CaMKII αB and βe. Northern blot analysis showed that a 4.4-kb messenger RNA for the α isoform and a 3.9-kb messenger RNA for the β isoform were expressed in both human fetal and adult brain to different degrees. The results indicate that CaMKII expression is developmentally regulated. The CaMKII isoform expression was confirmed in human fetal and adult brain using RT-PCR with specific primers, which flanked the CaMKII variable regions. The CaMKII α, αB, β, β′ and βe isoforms were characterized in both human fetal and adult brain.

alternative splicing gene isoform messenger RNA 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Bennett MK & Kennedy MB (1987) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 84: 1794–1798Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Benson DL, Isackson PJ, Gall CM & Jones EG (1992) Neurosc. 46: 825–849Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Brocke L, Srinivasan M & Schulman H (1995) J. Neurosc. 15: 6797–6808Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Burgin KE, Waxham MN, Rickling S, Westgate SA, Mobley WC & Kelly PT (1990) J Neurosc 10: 1788–1798Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hanley RM, Means AR, Ono T, Kemp BE, Burgin KE, Waxham N & Kelly PT (1987) Science 237: 293–297Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kelly PT, Shields S, Conway K, Yip R & Burgin K (1987) J Neurochem 49: 1927–1940Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Laabich A, Li G & Cooper NGF (2000). Mol Brain Res 76: 253–265Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Li G, Liu N, Liu OL, Mower GD, Gregg RG & Cooper NGF (1998) J Mol Neurosc 11: 135–139Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    McKee AC, Kosik KS, Kennedy MB & Kowall NW (1990) J Neuropathol Exp Neurol 49: 49–63Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Nghiem P, Saati SM, Martens CL, Gardner P & Schulman H (1993) J Biol Chem 268: 5471–5479Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Sahyoun N, LeVine H, Burgess SK, Blanchard S, Chang KJ & Cuatrecasas P (1985) Res Commun 132: 878–884Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Tobimatsu T, Kameshita I & Fujisawa H (1988) J Biol Chem 263: 16082–16086Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Tobimatsu T & Fujisawa H (1989) J Biol Chem 264: 17907–17912Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Tombes RM & Krystal GW (1997) Biochim Biophys Acta 1355: 281–292Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Wang P, W YL, Zhou TH, Sun Y & Pei G (2000) FEBS Lett 475: 107–110Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • Guangyu Li
    • 1
  • Aicha Laabich
    • 1
  • L. Olivia Liu
    • 2
  • Jin Xue
    • 2
  • Nigel G.F. Cooper
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Anatomical Sciences and NeurobiologyUSA
  2. 2.Department of Ophthalmology and Visual SciencesUniversity of Louisville School of MedicineLouisvilleUSA

Personalised recommendations