Archives of Sexual Behavior

, Volume 30, Issue 6, pp 615–631

Implicit and Explicit Memory of Neutral, Negative Emotional, and Sexual Information

  • Stephanie I. Bush
  • James H. Geer


Implicit and explicit memory for sexual, negative emotional, and neutral words using Jacoby's process dissociation framework was investigated. This framework provides estimates of conscious (explicit) and automatic (implicit) influences on memory. We found that explicit memory was greater for the sexual words when compared to negative emotional and neutral words and suggest that these results are due to increased saliency of sexual stimuli. Dividing attention did not decrease explicit memory for sexual words, although it did significantly decrease explicit memory for the negative emotional and neutral words. Finally, females used more previously presented emotional words to complete word stems. The genders did not differ in their recall of previously presented sexual and neutral words. A discussion of possible explanations for the various findings is presented.

memory sexual words implicit explicit 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Abrahamson, D. J., Barlow, D. H., Sakheim, D. K., Beck, J. G., and Athansiou, R. (1985a). Effects of distraction on sexual responding in functional and dysfunctional men. Behav. Ther. 16: 503–515.Google Scholar
  2. Abrahamson, D. J., Barlow, D. H., Beck, J. G., Sakheim, D. K., and Kelly, J. P. (1985b). Effects of attentional focus and partner responsiveness on sexual responding: Replication and extension. Arch. Sex. Behav. 14: 361–371.Google Scholar
  3. Beck, J. G., Barlow, D. H., and Sakheim, D. K. (1983). The effects of attentional focus and partner arousal on sexual responding in functional and dysfunctional men. Behav. Res. Ther. 21: 1–8.Google Scholar
  4. Craik, F. I. (1982). Selective changes in encoding as a function of reduced processing capacity. In Klix, F., Hoffman, J., and Meer, E. van der (eds.), Cognitive Research in Psychology, Deutscher Verlag der Wissenschaffen, Berlin.Google Scholar
  5. Geer, J. H., and Fuhr, R. (1976). Cognitive factors in sexual arousal: The role of distraction. J. Cons. Clin. Psychol. 44: 238–243.Google Scholar
  6. Geer, J. H., and McGlone, M. (1990). Sex differences in memory for erotica. Cogn. Emo. 4: 71–78.Google Scholar
  7. Geer, J. H., Bush, S. I., Francingues, N. A., Manguno-Mire, G., and Jackson, S. R. (in press). Using the process-dissociation procedure to separate implicit and explicit influences on the memory of emotional stimuli.Google Scholar
  8. Graf, P., Squire, L., and Mandler, G. (1984). The information that amnestic patients do not forget. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn. 10: 164–178.Google Scholar
  9. Jacoby, L. L. (1983). Remembering the data: Analyzing interactive processes in reading. J. Verb. Learn. Verb. Behav. 22: 485–508.Google Scholar
  10. Jacoby, L. L. (1991). A process dissociation framework: Separating automatic from intentional uses of memory. J. Mem. Lang. 30: 513–541.Google Scholar
  11. Jacoby, L. L., and Kelley, C. M. (1992). Aprocess dissociation framework for investigating unconscious influences: Freudian slips, projective tests, subliminal perception, and signal detection theory. Cur. Dir. Psychol. Sci. 1: 174–178.Google Scholar
  12. Jacoby, L. L., Toth, J. P., and Yonelinas, A. P. (1993). Separating conscious and unconscious influences of memory: Measuring recollection. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 122: 139–154.Google Scholar
  13. Jacoby, L. L. (1994). In Umilta, C., and Moscovitch, M. (eds.), Attention and Performance XV, Bradford, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  14. Kirsch-Rosenkrantz, J., and Geer, J. H. (1991). Gender differences in memory for a sexual story. Arch. Sex. Behav. 20: 295–305.Google Scholar
  15. Lewis, R. J., Gibbons, F. X., and Gerrard, M. (1986). Sexual experience and recall of sexual vs. nonsexual information. J. Pers. 54: 676–693.Google Scholar
  16. Mish, F. C. (ed.) (1989). The New Mirriam-Webster Dictionary, Mirriam-Webster, Springfield, MA.Google Scholar
  17. Morris, C. D., Bransford, J. D., and Franks, J. J. (1977). Levels of processing versus transfer appropriate processing. J. Verb. Learn.Verb. Beh. 16: 519–533.Google Scholar
  18. Nielson, S. L., and Sarason, I. G. (1981). Emotion, personality, and selective attention. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 41: 945–960.Google Scholar
  19. Przybyla, D., and Byrne, D. (1984). The mediating role of cognitive processes in self-reported sexual arousal. J. Res. Psychol. 18: 54–63.Google Scholar
  20. Roediger, H. L., Weldon, M. S., and Challis, B. H. (1989). Explaining dissociations between implicit and explicit measures of retention: A processing account. In Roedinger, H. L., and Craik F. I. (eds.), Varieties of Memory and Consciousness: Essays in Honor of Endel Tulving, Earlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.Google Scholar
  21. Schacter, D. L. (1987). Implicit memory: History and current status. J. Exp. Psychol. 13: 501–518.Google Scholar
  22. Squire, L. R. (1986). Mechanisms of memory. Science 232: 1612–1619.Google Scholar
  23. Tulving, E. (1985). How many memory systems are there? Am. Psychologist 40: 375–398.Google Scholar
  24. Warrington, E. K., and Weiskrantz, L. (1974). The effect of prior learning on subsequent retention in amnesic patients. Neuropsychologia 12: 419–428.Google Scholar
  25. Weiskrantz, L. (1989). Remembering dissociation. In Roediger, H. L., and Craik, F. I. (eds.), Varieties of Memory and Consciousness: Essays in Honor of Endel Tulving, Earlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • Stephanie I. Bush
    • 1
  • James H. Geer
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of PsychologySt. Bonaventure UniversitySt. Bonaventure
  2. 2.Louisiana State UniversityBaton Rouge

Personalised recommendations