Hydrobiologia

, Volume 451, Issue 1–3, pp 27–44

Interactions of pelagic cnidarians and ctenophores with fish: a review

  • Jennifer E. Purcell
  • Mary N. Arai
Article

Abstract

Medusae, siphonophores and ctenophores (here grouped as `pelagic coelenterates') interact with fish in several ways. Some interactions are detrimental to fish populations, such as predation by gelatinous species on pelagic eggs and larvae of fish, the potential competition for prey among pelagic coelenterates and fish larvae and zooplanktivorous fish species, and pelagic coelenterates serving as intermediate hosts for fish parasites. Other interactions are positive for fish, such as predation by fish on gelatinous species and commensal associations among fish and pelagic coelenterates. The interactions range from beneficial for the gelatinous species (food, parasite removal), to negative (predation on them). We review existing information and present new data on these topics. Although such interactions have been documented frequently, the significance to either fish or pelagic coelenterate populations is poorly understood. The effects of pelagic coelenterates on fish populations are of particular interest because of the great importance of fisheries to the global economy. As fishing pressures mount, it becomes increasingly important to understand how they may influence the balance between pelagic coelenterates and fish.

ichthyoplankton predation zooplankton competition parasite commensalism 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Alldredge, A. L., 1983. The quantitative significance of gelatinous zooplankton as pelagic consumers. In Fasham, M. J. R. (ed.), Flow of Enrergy and Materials in Marine Ecosystems: Theory and Practice. Plenum Press, New York: 407–433.Google Scholar
  2. Alvariño, A., 1980. The relation between the distribution of zooplankton predators and anchovy larvae. CalCOFI Rep. 21: 150–160.Google Scholar
  3. Alvariño, A., 1985. Predation in the plankton realm, mainly with reference to fish larvae. Invest. Mar. CICIMAR 2: 1–122.Google Scholar
  4. Arai, M. N., 1988. Interactions of fish and pelagic coelenterates. Can. J. Zool. 66: 1913–1927.Google Scholar
  5. Arai, M. N., 1992. Active and passive factors affecting aggregations of hydromedusae: a review. Sci. mar. 56: 99–108.Google Scholar
  6. Arai, M. N., 1997. A Functional Biology of Scyphozoa. Chapman & Hall, London, 316 pp.Google Scholar
  7. Arai, M. N., 2001. Pelagic coelenterates and eutrophication: a review. Hydrobiologia 451 (Dev. Hydrobiol. 155): 69–87.Google Scholar
  8. Ates, R. M. L., 1988. Medusivorous fishes, a review. Zool. Med. Leiden 62: 29–42.Google Scholar
  9. Auster, P. J., C. A. Griswold, M. J. Youngbluth & T. G. Bailey, 1992. Aggregations of myctophid fishes with other pelagic fauna. Envir. Biol. Fishes 35: 133–139.Google Scholar
  10. Avian, M. & L. Rottini-Sandrini, 1988. Fishery and swarmings of Pelagia noctiluca in the central and northern Adriatic Sea: middle term analysis. Rapp. Comm. Int. Mer Medit. 31: 231.Google Scholar
  11. Azuma, T., 1992. Diel feeding habits of sockeye and chum salmon in the Bering Sea during the summer. Nippon Suisan Gakkaishi 58: 2019–2025.Google Scholar
  12. Azuma, T., 1995. Biological mechanisms enabling sympatry between salmonids with special reference to sockeye and chum in oceanic waters. Fish. Res. (Amst.) 24: 291–300.Google Scholar
  13. Bailey, K. M., 1984. Comparison of laboratory rates of predation on five species of marine fish larvae by three planktonic invertebrates: effects of larval size on vulnerability. Mar. Biol. 79: 303–309.Google Scholar
  14. Bailey, K. M. & R. S. Batty, 1983. A laboratory study of predation by Aurelia aurita on larval herring (Clupea harengus): experimental observations compared with model predictions. Mar. Biol. 72: 295–301.Google Scholar
  15. Bailey, K. M. & R. S. Batty, 1984. Laboratory study of predation by Aurelia aurita on larvae of cod, flounder, plaice and herring: development and vulnerability to capture. Mar. Biol. 83: 287–291.Google Scholar
  16. Bailey, K. M. & E. D. Houde, 1989. Predation on eggs and larvae of marine fishes and the recruitment problem. Adv. mar. Biol. 25: 1–83.Google Scholar
  17. Beamish, R. J., K. D. Leask, O. A. Ivanov, A. A. Balanov, A.M. Orlov & B. Sinclair, 1999. The ecology, distribution and abundance of midwater fishes of the subarctic Pacific gyres. Prog. Oceanogr. 43: 399–442.Google Scholar
  18. Behrends, G. & G. Schneider, 1995. Impact of Aurelia aurita medusae (Cnidaria, Scyphozoa) on the standing stock and community composition of mesozooplankton in the Kiel bight (western Baltic Sea). Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 127: 39–45.Google Scholar
  19. Biggs, D. C., 1976. Nutritional ecology of Agalma okeni and other siphonophores from the epipelagic western North Atlantic Ocean. Ph.D. Thesis, WHOI-MIT Joint Program: 141 pp.Google Scholar
  20. Black, E. A. & C. J. Low, 1983. Ctenophores in salmon diets. Trans. am. Fish. Soc. 112–728.Google Scholar
  21. Bowman, R., R. Eppi & M. Grosslein, 1984. Diet and consumption of spiny dogfish in the Northwest Atlantic. ICES (Int. Counc. Explor. Sea) cm 1984/G:27.Google Scholar
  22. Breitburg, D. L., K. A. Rose & J. H. Cowan, Jr., 1999. Linking water quality to larval survival: predation mortality of fish larvae in an oxygen-stratified water column. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 178: 39–54.Google Scholar
  23. Brodeur, R. D., 1998. In situ observations of the association between juvenile fishes and scyphomedusae in the Bering Sea. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 163: 11–20.Google Scholar
  24. Brodeur, R. D. & W. G. Pearcy, 1992. Effects of environmental variability on trophic interactions and food web structure in a pelagic upwelling ecosystem. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 84: 101–110.Google Scholar
  25. Bühler, H., 1930. Die Verdauungsorgane der Stromateidae (Teleost). Zeitschr. Morphol. Okolog. Tiere 19: 59–115.Google Scholar
  26. Caddy, J. F., 1993. Toward a comparative evaluation of human impacts on fishery ecosystems of enclosed and semi-enclosed seas. Rev. Fish. Sci. 1: 57–95.Google Scholar
  27. Caddy, J. F., J. Csirke, S. M. Garcia & R. J. R. Grainger, 1998. How pervasive is “Fishing down marine food webs”? Science 282: 1383a.Google Scholar
  28. Carrasson, M. & J. Matallanas, 1990. Preliminary data about the feeding habits of some deep-sea Mediterranean fishes. J. Fish. Biol. 36: 461–463.Google Scholar
  29. Cowan, J. H., Jr. & E. D. Houde, 1992. Size-dependent predation on marine fish larvae by ctenophores, scyphomedusae and planktivorous fish. Fish. Oceanogr. 1: 113–126.Google Scholar
  30. Cowan, J. H., Jr. & E. D. Houde, 1993. Relative predation potentials of scyphomedusae, ctenophores and planktivorous fish on ichthyoplankton in Chesapeake Bay. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 95: 55–65.Google Scholar
  31. Cowan, J. H., Jr., E. D. Houde & K. A. Rose, 1996. Size-dependent vulnerability of marine fish larvae to predation: an individualbased numerical experiment. ICES J. mar. Sci. 53: 23–37.Google Scholar
  32. Cowan, J. H., Jr., K. A. Rose & E. D. Houde, 1997. Size-based foraging success and vulnerability to predation: selection of survivors in individual-based models of larval fish populations. In Chambers, R. C. & E. A. Trippel (eds), Early Life History and Recruitment in fish populations. Chapman & Hall, London: 357–386.Google Scholar
  33. Cowan, J. H., Jr., R. S. Birdsong, E. D. Houde, J. S. Priest, W. C. Sharp & G. B. Mateja, 1992. Enclosure experiments on survival and growth of black drum eggs and larvae in lower Chesapeake Bay. Estuaries 15: 392–402.Google Scholar
  34. Davis, N. D., K.W. Myers & Y. Ishida, 1998. Caloric values of highseas salmon prey organisms and simulated salmon ocean growth and prey consumption. NPAFC (North Pacific Anadromous Fish Commission) Bull. 1: 146–162.Google Scholar
  35. Deason, E. E., 1982. Mnemiopsis leidyi (Ctenophora) in Narragansett Bay, 1975–79: abundance, size composition and estimation of grazing. Estuar. coast. shelf Sci. 15: 121–134.Google Scholar
  36. De Lafontaine, Y. & W. C. Leggett, 1987. Effect of container size on estimates of mortality and predation rates in experiments with macrozooplankton and larval fish. Can. J. Fish. aquat. Sci. 44: 1534–1543.Google Scholar
  37. De Lafontaine, Y. & W. C. Leggett, 1988. Predation by jellyfish on larval fish: an experimental evaluation employing in situ enclosures. Can. J. Fish. aquat. Sci. 445: 1173–1190.Google Scholar
  38. Duffy, D. C., 1988. Predator-prey interactions between common terns and butterfish. Ornis Scand 19: 160–163.Google Scholar
  39. Duffy, J. T. C. E. Epifanio & L. A. Fuiman, 1997. Mortality rates imposed by three scyphozoans on red drum (Linnaeus) larvae in field enclosures. J. exp. mar. Biol. Ecol. 212: 123–131.Google Scholar
  40. Eggeling, H., 1908. Dünndarmrelief und Ernährung bei Knochen-fischen. Jena. Z. Naturwiss. 43: 417–529.Google Scholar
  41. Ellis, J. R., M. G. Pawson & S. E. Shackley, 1996. The comparative feeding ecology of six species of shark and four species of ray (Elasmobranchii) in the North-east Atlantic. J. mar. biol. Ass. U. K. 76: 89–106.Google Scholar
  42. Fancett, M. S., 1988. Diet and prey selectivity of scyphomedusae from Port Phillip Bay, Australia. Mar. Biol. 98: 503–509.Google Scholar
  43. Fancett, M. S. & G. P. Jenkins, 1988. Predatory impact of scyphomedusae on ichthyoplankton and other zooplankton in Port Phillip Bay. J. exp. mar. Biol. Ecol. 116: 63–77.Google Scholar
  44. Feigenbaum, D. & M. Kelly, 1984. Changes in the lower Chesapeake Bay food chain in presence of the sea nettle Chrysaora quinquecirrha (Scyphomedusa). Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 19: 39–47.Google Scholar
  45. Frank, K. T. & W. C. Leggett, 1985. Reciprocal oscillations in densities of larval fish and potential predators: a reflection of present or past predation? Can. J. Fish. aquat. Sci. 42: 1841–1849.Google Scholar
  46. Gamble, J. C. & S. J. Hay, 1989. Predation by the scyphomedusan Aurelia aurita on herring larvae in large enclosures: effects of predator size and prey starvation. Rapp. P.-v. Réun. Cons. Int. Explor. Mer 191: 366–375.Google Scholar
  47. Gaevskaya, A. V. & T. N. Mordvinova, 1993. Parasitism of nematode larvae in Mnemiopsis mccradyi in the Black Sea. Gidrobiol. Zh. 29: 104–105.Google Scholar
  48. Gerhart, D. J. & J. C. Coll, 1993. Pukalide, a widely distributed octocoral diterpenoid, induces vomiting in fish. J. Chem. Ecol. 19: 2697–2704.Google Scholar
  49. Gerritsen, J. & J. R. Strickler, 1977. Encounter probabilities and community structure in zooplankton: a mathematical model. J. Fish. Res. Bd Can. 34: 73–82.Google Scholar
  50. Gilchrist, J. D. F., 1922. Note on the oesophageal teeth of the Stromateidae. Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist. Ser. 9(9): 249–255.Google Scholar
  51. Girola, C. V., S. R. Martorelli & N. H. Sardella, 1992. Presencia de metacercarias de Monascus filiformis (Digenea, Fellodistomidae) en hidromedusas del Océano Atlántico Sur. Rev. Chilena Hist. Nat. 65: 409–415.Google Scholar
  52. Greene, C. H., 1986. Patterns of prey selection: Implications of predator foraging tactics. Am. Nat. 128: 824–839.Google Scholar
  53. Greve, W. & T. R. Parsons, 1977. Photosynthesis and fish production: hypothetical effects of climatic change and pollution. Helgol. wiss. Meeresunters. 30: 666–672.Google Scholar
  54. Haddock, S. H. D. & J. F. Case, 1995. Not all ctenophores are bioluminescent: Pleurobrachia. Biol. Bull. 189: 356–362.Google Scholar
  55. Hamner, W. M., M. S. Jones & P. P. Hamner, 1995. Swimming, feeding, circulation and vision in the Australian blox jellyfish Chironex fleckeri (Cnidaria: Cubozoa). Aust. J. mar. Freshwat. Res. 46: 985–990.Google Scholar
  56. Harbison, G. R., 1993. The potential of fishes for the control of gelatinous zooplankton. ICES (Int. Counc. Explor. Sea) CM S(1993/L:74): 1–10.Google Scholar
  57. Hay, S. J., J. R. G. Hislop & A. M. Shanks, 1990. North Sea scyphomedusae: summer distribution, estimated biomass and significance particularly for 0-group gadoid fish. Neth. J. Sea Res. 25: 113–130.Google Scholar
  58. Healey, M. C., 1991. Diets and feeding rates of juvenile pink, chum and sockeye salmon in Hecate Strait, British Columbia. Trans. am. Fish. Soc. 120: 303–318.Google Scholar
  59. Howe, J. C., 1993. A comparative analysis of the feeding apparatus in pomacanthids, with special emphasis of oesiphageal papillae in Genicanthus personatus. J. Fish Biol. 43: 593–602.Google Scholar
  60. Isokawa, S., K. Kubota, T. Kosakai, I. Satomura, M. Tsubouchi & A. Sera, 1965. Some contributions to study of esophageal sacs and teeth of fishes. J. Nihon Univ. Sch. Dent. 7: 103–111.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. Johnson, S. & E. A. Widder, 1998. Transparency and visibility of gelatinous zooplankton from the Northwestern Atlantic and Gulf of Mexico. Biol. Bull. (Woods Hole) 195: 337–348.Google Scholar
  62. Jenkins, R. L., 1983. Observations on the commensal relationship of Nomeus gronovi with Physalia physalis. Copeia 1983: 250–252.Google Scholar
  63. Kashkina, A. A., 1986. Feeding of fishes on salps (Tunicata, Thaliacea). J. Ichthyol. (Engl. Transl. Vopr. Ikhtiol.) 26: 57–64.Google Scholar
  64. Kingsford, M. J., 1993. Biotic and abiotic structure in the pelagic environment: importance to small fishes. Bull. mar. Sci. 53: 393–415.Google Scholar
  65. Koie, M., 1975. On the morphology and life history of Opechona bacillaris (Molin, 1859) Looss, 1907 (Trematoda, Lepocreadiidae). Ophelia 13: 63–86.Google Scholar
  66. Koie, M., 1991. Aspects of the morphology and life cycle of Lecithocladium excisum (Digenea, Hemiuridae), a parasite of Scomber spp. Int. J. Parasit. 21: 597–602.Google Scholar
  67. Koie, M., 1993. Aspects of the life cycle and morphology of Hysterothylacium aduncum (Rudolphi, 1802) (Nematoda, Ascaridoidea, Anisakidae). Can. J. Zool. 71: 1289–1296.Google Scholar
  68. Koeller, P. A., P. C. F. Hurley, P. Perley & J. D. Neilson, 1986. Juvenile fish surveys on the Scotian Shelf: implications for yearclass size assessments. J. Cons. int. Explor. Mer. 43: 59–76.Google Scholar
  69. Kremer, P., 1979. Predation by the ctenophore Mnemiopsis leidyi in Narragansett Bay, Rhode Island. Estuaries 2: 97–105.Google Scholar
  70. Kuipers, D. R., U. Gaedke, L. Enserink & H. Witte, 1990. Effect of ctenophore predation on mesozooplankton during a spring outburst of Pleurobrachia pileus. Neth. J. Sea Res. 26: 111–124.Google Scholar
  71. Larson, R. J., 1976. Cubomedusae: feeding-functional morphology, behavior and phylogenetic position. In Mackie, G. O. (ed.), Coelenterate Ecology and Behavior. Plenum Press, New York: 237–245.Google Scholar
  72. Larson, R. J., 1987a. Daily ration and predation by medusae and ctenophores in Saanich Inlet, B.C., Canada. Neth. J. Sea Res. 21: 35–44.Google Scholar
  73. Larson, R. J., 1987b. First report of the little-known scyphomedusa Drymonema dalmatinum in the Caribbean Sea, with notes on its biology. Bull. mar. Sci. 40: 437–441.Google Scholar
  74. Larson, R. J., 1991. Diet, prey selection and daily ration of Stomolophus meleagris, a filter-feeding scyphomedusa from the NE Gulf of Mexico. Estuar. coast. shelf Sci. 32: 511–525.Google Scholar
  75. Lauchner, G., 1980a. Diseases of Cnidaria. In Kinne, O. (ed.), Diseases of Marine Animals. Vol. 1. General Aspects, Protozoa to Gastropoda. John Wiley and Sons, New York: 167–237.Google Scholar
  76. Lauchner, G., 1980b. Diseases of Ctenophora. In Kinne, O. (ed.), Diseases of Marine Animals. Vol. 1. General Aspects, Protozoa to Gastropoda. John Wiley and Sons, New York: 239–252.Google Scholar
  77. Legović, T., 1991. Causes, consequences and possible control of massive occurrence of jellyfish Pelagia noctiluca in the Adriatic Sea. In UNEP: Jellyfish blooms in the Mediterranean. Proc. II Workshop on Jellyfish in the Mediterranean Sea. MAP Tech. Rep. Ser. 47: 128–132.Google Scholar
  78. Longhurst, A. R., 1985. The structure and evolution of plankton communities. Prog. Oceanogr. 15: 1–35.Google Scholar
  79. Mackie, G. O., 1995. Defensive strategies in planktonic coelenterates. Mar. Fresh. Behav. Physiol. 26: 119–129.Google Scholar
  80. Madin, L. P., 1988. Feeding behavior of tentaculate predators: in situ observation and a conceptual model. Bull. mar. Sci. 43: 413–429.Google Scholar
  81. Mansueti, R., 1963. Symbiotic behaviour between small fishes and jellyfishes, with new data on that between the stromateid, Peprilus alepidotus, and the scyphomedusae, Chrysaora quinquecirrha. Copeia 1963: 40–80.Google Scholar
  82. Marcogliese, D. J., 1995. The role of zooplankton in the transmission of helminth parasites to fish. Rev. Fish Biol. Fish. 5: 336–371.Google Scholar
  83. Martin, J. W. & H. G. Kuck, 1991. Faunal associates of an undescribed species of Chrysaora (Cnidaria, Scyphozoa) in the Southern California Bight, with notes on unusual occurrences of other warm water species in the area. Bull. South. Calif. Acad. Sci. 90: 89–101.Google Scholar
  84. Martorelli, S. R., 1996. First record of encysted metacercariae in hydrozoan jellyfishes and ctenophores of the Southern Atlantic. J. Parasit. 82: 352–353.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  85. Martorelli, S. R., 2001. Digenea parasites of jellyfish and ctenophores of the Southern Atlantic. Hydrobiologia 451 (Dev. Hydrobiol. 155): 305–310.Google Scholar
  86. Martorelli, S. R. & F. Cremonte, 1998. A proposed three-host life history of Monascus filiformis (Rudolphi, 1819) (Digenea: Fellodistomidae) in the south west Atlantic Ocean. Can. J. Zool. 76: 1198–1203.Google Scholar
  87. Matsakis, S. & R. J. Conover, 1991. Abundance and feeding of medusae and their potential impact as predators on other zooplankton in Bedford Basin (Nova Scotia, Canada) during spring. Can. J. Fish. aquat. Sci. 48: 1419–1430.Google Scholar
  88. Matthews, J. E. & H. H. Shoemaker, 1952. Fishes using ctenophores for shelter. Copeia 4: 270.Google Scholar
  89. McFarlane, G. A., R. J. Beamish, M. W. Saunders, M. S. Smith & T. Butler, 1984. Data for the biology and diet studies of spiny dogfish (Squalus acanthias) in Hecate Strait, B. C., August 1977 and June 1978. Can. Data Rep. Fish. aquat. Sci. No. 443: 1–410.Google Scholar
  90. Mianzan, H. W., N. Mari, B. Prenski & F. Sanchez, 1996. Fish predation on neritic ctenophores from the Argentine continental shelf: a neglected food resource? Fish. Res. 27: 69–79.Google Scholar
  91. Mianzan, H., P. M. Pájaro, A. Colombo & A. Madirolas, 2001. Feeding on survival-food: gelatinous plankton as a source of food for anchovies. Hydrobiologia, this volume.Google Scholar
  92. Mianzan, H. W., M. Pajaro, L. Machinandiarena & F. Cremonte, 1997. Salps: possible vectors of toxic dinoflagellates? Fish. Res. 29: 193–197.Google Scholar
  93. Mills, C. E., 1995. Medusae, siphonophores and ctenophores as planktivorous predators in changing global ecosystems. ICES J. mar. Sci. 52: 575–581.Google Scholar
  94. Möller, H., 1980. Scyphomedusa as predators and food competitors of larval fish. Meeresforschung 28: 90–100.Google Scholar
  95. Möller, H., 1984. Reduction of a larval herring population by jellyfish predator. Science 224: 621–622.Google Scholar
  96. Monteleone, D. M. & L. E. Duguay, 1988. Laboratory studies of predation by the ctenophore Mnemiopsis leidyi on the early stages in the life history of the bay anchovy, Anchoa mitchilli. J. Plankton Res. 10: 359–372.Google Scholar
  97. Mutlu, E., 1999. Distribution and abundance of ctenophores and their zooplankton food in the Black Sea. II. Mnemiopsis leidyi. Mar. Biol. 135: 603–613.Google Scholar
  98. Mutlu, E. & F. Bingel, 1999. Distribution and abundance of ctenophores and their zooplankton food in the Black Sea. I. Pleurobrachia pileus. Mar. Biol. 135: 589–601.Google Scholar
  99. O'Connor, B. & D. McGrath, 1978. On the occurrence of the scyphozoan Rhizostoma octopus (L.) around the Irish Coast in 1976. Ir. Nat. J. 19: 261–263.Google Scholar
  100. Olesen, N. J., K. Frandsen & H. U. Riisgård, 1994. Population dynamics, growth and energetics of jellyfish Aurelia aurita in a shallow fjord. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 105: 9–18.Google Scholar
  101. Oviatt, C. A. & P. M. Kremer, 1977. Predation on the ctenophore, Mnemiopsis leidyi, by butterfish, Peprilus triacanthus, in Narragansett Bay, Rhode Island. Chesapeake Sci. 18: 236–240.Google Scholar
  102. Pagès, F., M. G. White & P. G. Rodhouse, 1996. Abundance of gelatinous carnivores in the nekton community of the Antarctic Polar Frontal Zone in summer 1994. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 141: 139–147.Google Scholar
  103. Paradis, A. R., P. Pépin & J. A. Brown, 1996. Vulnerability of fish eggs and larvae to predation: review of the influence of the relative size of prey and predator. Can. J. Fish. aquat. Sci. 53: 1226-1235.Google Scholar
  104. Paradis, A. R., M. Pépin & P. Pepin, 1999. Disentangling the effects of size-dependent encounter and susceptibility to predation with an individual-based model for fish larvae. Can. J. Fish. aquat. Sci. 56: 1562–1575.Google Scholar
  105. Parsons, T. R., 1992. The removal of marine predators by fisheries and the impact of trophic structure. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 25: 51–53.Google Scholar
  106. Parsons, T. R., 1995. The impact of industrial fisheries on the trophic structure of marine ecosystems. In Polis, G. A. & K. O. Winemiller (eds), Food Webs: Integration of Patterns and Dynamics. Chapman & Hall, New York: 352–357.Google Scholar
  107. Pauly, D., R. Froese & V. Christensen, 1998a. How pervasive is “Fishing down marine food webs”? Response. Science 282: 1383a.Google Scholar
  108. Pauly, D., V. Christensen, J. Dalsgaard, R. Froese & R. Torres, Jr., 1998b. Fishing down marine food webs. Science 279: 860–863.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  109. Phillips, P. J., W. D. Burke & E. J. Keener, 1969. Observations on the trophic significance of jellyfishes in Mississippi Sound with quantitative data on the associative behavior of small fishes with medusae. Trans. am. Fish. Soc. 98: 703–712.Google Scholar
  110. Purcell, J. E., 1981a. Dietary composition and diel feeding patterns of epipelagic siphonophores. Mar. Biol. 65: 83–90.Google Scholar
  111. Purcell, J. E., 1981b. Feeding ecology of Rhizophysa eysenhardti, a siphonophore predator of fish larvae. Limnol. Oceanogr. 26: 424–432.Google Scholar
  112. Purcell, J. E., 1984a. The functions of nematocysts in prey capture by epipelagic siphonophores (Coelenterata, Hydrozoa). Biol. Bull. 166: 310–327.Google Scholar
  113. Purcell, J. E., 1984b. Predation on fish larvae by Physalia physalis, the Portuguese man of war. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 19: 189–191.Google Scholar
  114. Purcell, J. E., 1985. Predation on fish eggs and larvae by pelagic cnidarians and ctenophores. Bull. mar. Sci. 37: 739–755.Google Scholar
  115. Purcell, J. E., 1989. Predation by the hydromedusa Aequorea victoria on fish larvae and eggs at a herring spawning ground in British Columbia. Can. J. Fish. aquat. Sci. 46: 1415–1427.Google Scholar
  116. Purcell, J. E., 1990. Soft-bodied zooplankton predators and competitors of larval herring (Clupea harengus pallasi) at herring spawning grounds in British Columbia. Can. J. Fish. aquat. Sci. 47: 505–515.Google Scholar
  117. Purcell, J. E., 1992. Effects of predation by the scyphomedusan Chrysaora quinquecirrha on zooplankton populations in Chesapeake Bay. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 87: 65–76.Google Scholar
  118. Purcell, J. E., 1997. Pelagic cnidarians and ctenophores as predators: Selective predation, feeding rates and effects on prey populations. Ann. Inst. Oceanogr. Paris 73: 125–137.Google Scholar
  119. Purcell, J. E. & P. A. V. Anderson, 1995. Electrical responses to water-soluble components of fish mucus recorded from the cnidocytes of a fish predator, Physalia physalis. Mar. Fresh. Behav. Physiol. 26: 149–162.Google Scholar
  120. Purcell, J. E. & J. J. Grover, 1990. Predation and food limitation as causes of mortality in larval herring at a spawning ground in British Columbia. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 59: 55–67.Google Scholar
  121. Purcell, J. E. & C. E. Mills, 1988. The correlation of nematocyst types to diets in pelagic Hydrozoa. In Hessinger, D. A. & H. M. Lenhoff (eds), The Biology of Nematocysts. Academic Press, San Diego: 463–485.Google Scholar
  122. Purcell, J. E. & M. V. Sturdevant, 2001. Prey selection and dietary overlap among zooplanktivorous jellyfish and juvenile fishes in PrinceWilliam Sound, Alaska. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 210: 67–83.Google Scholar
  123. Purcell, J. E., A. Malej & A. Benović, 1999a. Potential links of jelly-fish to eutrophication and fisheries. In Malone, T. C., A. Malej, L. W. Harding, Jr., N. Smodlaka & R. E. Turner (eds), Ecosystems at the Land–sea Margin: Drainage Basin to Coastal Sea. American Geophysical Union, Coastal and Estuarine Studies 55: 241–263.Google Scholar
  124. Purcell, J. E., T. D. Siferd & J. B. Marliave, 1987. Vulnerability of larval herring (Clupea harengus pallasi) to capture by the jellyfish Aequorea victoria. Mar. Biol. 94: 157–162.Google Scholar
  125. Purcell, J. E., J. R. White & M. R. Roman, 1994a. Predation by gelatinous zooplankton and resource limitation as potential controls of Acartia tonsa copepod populations in Chesapeake Bay. Limnol. Oceanogr. 39: 263–278Google Scholar
  126. Purcell, J. E., T. Shiganova, M. B. Decker & E. D. Houde, 2001. The ctenophore Mnemiopsis in native and exotic habitats: U.S. estuaries versus the Black Sea basin. Hydrobiologia 451 (Dev. Hydrobiol. 155): 145–175.Google Scholar
  127. Purcell, J. E., J. R. White, D. A. Nemazie & D. A. Wright, 1999b. Temperature, salinity and food effects on asexual reproduction and abundance of the scyphozoan Chrysaora quinquecirrha. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 180: 187–196.Google Scholar
  128. Purcell, J. E., E. D. Brown, K. D. E. Stokesbury, L. J. Haldorson & T. C. Shirley, 2000. Aggregations of the jellyfish Aurelia labiata: abundance, distribution, association with age-0 walleye pollock, and behaviors promoting aggregation in Prince William Sound, Alaska, U.S.A. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 195: 145–158.Google Scholar
  129. Purcell, J. E., D. A. Nemazie, S. E. Dorsey, E. D. Houde & J. C. Gamble, 1994b. Predation mortality of bay anchovy (Anchoa mitchilli) eggs and larvae due to scyphomedusae and ctenophores in Chesapeake Bay. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 114: 47–58.Google Scholar
  130. Robison, B. H., 1983. Midwater biological research with the WASP ADS. Mar. Tech. Soc. J. 17: 21–27.Google Scholar
  131. Runge, J. A., P. Pepin & W. Silvert, 1987. Feeding behavior of the Atlantic mackerel Scomber scombrus on the hydromedusa Aglantha digitale. Mar. Biol. 94: 329–333.Google Scholar
  132. Schneider, G. & G. Behrends, 1998. Top-down conrol in a neritic plankton system by Aurelia aurita medusae – a summary. Ophelia 48: 71–82.Google Scholar
  133. Scott, A., 1914. The mackerel fishery off Walney in 1913. Proc. Trans. Liverpool Biol. Soc. 28: 109–115.Google Scholar
  134. Scott, A., 1924. Food of the Irish Sea herring in 1923. Proc. Trans. Liverpool Biol. Soc. 38: 115–119.Google Scholar
  135. Shanks, A. L. & W. M. Graham, 1988. Chemical defense in a scyphomedusa. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 45: 81–86.Google Scholar
  136. Shiganova, T. A., 1998. Invasion of the Black Sea by the ctenophore Mnemiopsis leidyi and recent changes in pelagic community structure. Fish. Oceanogr. 7: 305–310.Google Scholar
  137. Southcott, R. V. & C. J. M. Glover, 1987. Tthe occurrence of Desmonema gaudichaudi (Lesson) (Scyphozoa, Semaeostomeae) in South Australian waters with records of fish–jellyfish symbioses. Trans. r. Soc. S. Australia 111: 131–132.Google Scholar
  138. Spanier, E. & B. S. Galil, 1991. Lessepsian migration: a continuous biogeographical process. Endeavour (Oxf.) 15: 102–106.Google Scholar
  139. Stachowicz, J. J. & N. Lindquist, 1997. Chemical defense among hydroids on pelagic Sargassum: predator deterrence and absorption of solar UV radiation by secondary metabolites. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 155: 115–126.Google Scholar
  140. Stewart, S. E., 1996. Field behaviour of Tripedalia cystophora (Class Cubozoa). Mar. Fresh. Behav. Physiol. 27: 175–188.Google Scholar
  141. Suyehiro, Y., 1942. A study on the digestive system and feeding habits of fish. Jpn. J. Zool. 10: 1–299.Google Scholar
  142. Svendsen, Y. S., 1990. Hosts of third stage larvae of Hysterothylacium sp. (Nematoda, Anisakidae) in zooplankton from outer Oslofjord, Norway. Sarsia 75: 161–167.Google Scholar
  143. Tadokoro, K., Y. Ishida, N. D. Davis, S. Ueyanagi & T. Sugimoto, 1996. Change in chum salmon (Oncorhynchus keta) stomach contents associated with fluctuations of pink salmon (O. gorbuscha) abundance in the central subarctic Pacific and Bering Sea. Fish. Oceanogr. 5: 89–99.Google Scholar
  144. Thiel, M. E., 1970. Das Zusammenleben von Jung-und Klein-fischen mit Rhizostomeen (Scyphomedusae). Ber. Dtsch. Wiss. Komm. Meeresforsch. 21: 444–473.Google Scholar
  145. Thiel, M. E., 1978. Das Zusammenleben von Jung-und Kleinfischen mit Semaeostomen (Scyphomedusae). Mitt. Hamb. Zool. Mus. Inst. 75: 19–47.Google Scholar
  146. Thiel, H., 1979. Assoziationen von Quallen und Fischen. Nat. Mus. 109: 353–360.Google Scholar
  147. Tolley, S. G., 1987. Association of young Chloroscombrus chrysurus (Pisces: Caragidae) with the jellyfish Aurelia aurita. Copeia 1987: 216–219.Google Scholar
  148. Toonen, R. H. & F.-S. Chia, 1993. Limitations of laboratory assessments of coelenterate predation: container effects on the prey selection of the limnomedusa, Proboscidactyla flavicirrata (Brandt). J. exp. mar. Biol. Ecol. 167: 215–235.Google Scholar
  149. Tsuruta, A., 1963. Distribution of plankton and its characteristics in the oceanic fishing grounds with special reference to their relation to fishery. J. Shimonoseki Univ. Fish. 12: 13–214.Google Scholar
  150. Van Der Veer, H. W., 1985. Impact of coelenterate predation on larval plaice Pleuronectes platessa and flounder Platichthys flesus stock in the Western Wadden Sea. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 25: 229–238.Google Scholar
  151. Vinogradov, M. E., E. A. Shushkina & Yu. V. Bulgakova, 1996. Consumption of zooplankton by the comb jelly Mnemiopsis leidyi and pelagic fishes in the Black Sea. Oceanology 35: 523–527.Google Scholar
  152. Vućetić, T. & V. Alegria-Hernandez, 1988. Trands of annual catches or stock densities of some pelagic fishes in recent 'Pelagia years' in the Adriatic. FAO Fish Rep. 394: 133–136.Google Scholar
  153. Welch, D. W., 1997. Anatomical specialization in the gut of Pacific salmon (Oncorhynchus): evidence for oceanic limits to salmon production? Can. J. Zool. 75: 936–942.Google Scholar
  154. Widder, E. A., S. A. Bernstein, D. F. Bracher, J. F. Case, K. R. Reisenbichler & J. J. Torres, 1989. Bioluminescence in the Monterey submarine canyon: image analysis of video recordings from a midwater submersible. Mar. Biol. 100: 541–551.Google Scholar
  155. Yip, S. Y., 1984. Parasites of Pleurobrachia pileus Müller, 1776 (Ctenophora), from Galway Bay, Western Ireland. J. Plankton Res. 6: 107–121.Google Scholar
  156. Zaitsev, Yu. P., 1992. Recent changes in the trophic structure of the Black Sea. Fish. Oceanogr. 1: 180–189.Google Scholar
  157. Zaitsev, Yu. P. & L. N. Polischuk, 1984. An increase in the number of Aurelia aurita (L.) in the Black Sea. Ekol. Morya 17: 35–46.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jennifer E. Purcell
    • 1
  • Mary N. Arai
    • 2
    • 3
  1. 1.Horn Point LaboratoryUniversity of Maryland Center for Environmental ScienceCambridgeU.S.A.
  2. 2.Pacific Biological StationNanaimoCanada
  3. 3.Department of Biological SciencesUniversity of CalgaryCanada
  4. 4.Shannon Point Marine CenterAnacortesU.S.A.

Personalised recommendations