Advertisement

Natural Hazards

, Volume 24, Issue 2, pp 157–169 | Cite as

Community Resilience to Volcanic Hazard Consequences

  • Douglas Paton
  • Marian Millar
  • David Johnston
Article

Abstract

Central to contemporary emergency management is the use of risk management principles to promote community resilience to a range of potential hazard effects. Realising this goal requires that the community and personal characteristics that facilitate the ability to `bounce back' from adversity are identified and modeled. This paper describes the role of self-efficacy, problem-focused coping, sense of community and age in predicting resilience to the social consequences of volcanic hazard activity following the 1995 and 1996 eruptions at Ruapehu volcano, New Zealand. The nature of the relationships observed suggest that resilience should be conceptualised and managed in a contingent rather than a prescriptive manner. The implications of the findings for community risk perception, predicting resilience within an all-hazards management framework, community hazard reduction planning, resilience assessment and evaluation, and risk communication is discussed.

resilience community volcanic hazard Ruapehu risk perception 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bachrach, K. M. and Zautra, A. J.: 1985, Coping with a community stressor: the threat of a hazardous waste facility, J. Health Soc. Behav. 26, 127–141.Google Scholar
  2. Bandura A.: 1997, Self-Efficacy: The Exercise of Control, W.H. Freeman, New York.Google Scholar
  3. Bishop, B., Paton, D., Syme, G., and Nancarrow, B.: forthcoming, Coping with environmental degradation: salination as a community stressor, Network (in press).Google Scholar
  4. Bryan, C., Christenson, B. W., Hodgson, K. A., Houghton, B. F., Johnston, D. M., Jurado-Chichay, Z., Lindsay, J., Manville, V., Nakagawa, M., Nairn, I. A., Otway, P., Sherburn, S., Scott, B. J., Thordarson, T., Wood, C. P., and Wilson, C. J. N.: 1996, Volcanic eruption at a New Zealand ski resort prompts reevaluation of hazards. Eos, Trans, Am. Geophys. Union 77, 189–191.Google Scholar
  5. Chavis, D. M. and Pretty, G. M. H.: 1999, Sense of communty: advances in measurement and application, J. Commun. Psychol. 27, 635–642.Google Scholar
  6. Creamer, M.: 1994, Community recovery from trauma, in R. Watts and D. J. De la Horne (eds.), Coping with Trauma: The Victim and the Helper, Australian Academic Press, Brisbane, pp. 37–52.Google Scholar
  7. Dunning, C.: 1999, Post-intervention strategies to reduce police trauma: a paradigm shift, in J. M. Violanti, J. M., and D. Paton (eds.), Police Trauma: Psychological Aftermath of Civilian Combat, Charles C. Thomas, Springfield, IL, pp. 269–292.Google Scholar
  8. Eränen, L. and Liebkind, K.: 1993, Coping with disaster: the helping behaviour of communities and individuals, in J. P. Wilson and B. Raphael (eds.), International Handbook of Traumatic Stress Syndromes, Plenum Press, New York, pp. 957–964.Google Scholar
  9. Green, D. E., Walkey, F. H., McCormick, I. A., and Taylor, A. J. W.: 1988, Development and evaluation of a 21 item version of the Hopkins Symptom Checklist with New Zealand and United States respondents, Austral. J. Psychol. 40, 61–70.Google Scholar
  10. Houghton, B. F., Latter, J. H., and Hackett, W. R.: 1987, Volcanic hazard assessment for Ruapehu composite volcano, Taupo Volcanic Zone, New Zealand, Bull. Volcanol. 49, 737–751.Google Scholar
  11. Johnston, D. M., Bebbington, M. S., Lai, C.-D., Houghton, B., and Paton, D.: 1999, Volcanic hazard perceptions: Comparative shifts in knowledge and risk, Disaster Prevention and Management 8, 118–126.Google Scholar
  12. Johnston, D. M., Houghton, B. F., Neall, V. E., Ronan, K. R., and Paton, D.: forthcoming, Impacts of the 1945 and 1995–1996 Ruapehu eruptions, New Zealand: An example of increasing societal vulnerability, Geol. Soc. Am. Bull. (in press).Google Scholar
  13. Kaniasty, K. and Norris, F. H.: 1995, In search of altruistic community: patterns of social support mobilization following hurricane Hugo, Am. J. Commun. Psychol. 23, 447–478.Google Scholar
  14. Kaniasty, K. and Norris, F.: 1999, The experience of disaster: Individuals and communities sharing trauma, in R. Gist and B. Lubin (eds.), Response to Disaster, Taylor and Francis Philadelphia, PA, pp. 25–62.Google Scholar
  15. Lindell, M. K. and Whitney, D. J.: 2000, Correlates of household seismic hazard adjustment adoption, Risk Analysis 20, 13–25.Google Scholar
  16. Lyons, J. A.: 1991, Strategies for assessing the potential for positive adjustment following trauma, J. Traumatic Stress 4, 93–111.Google Scholar
  17. Mileti, D. S. and O'Brien, P. W.: 1993, Public Response to Aftershock Warnings, US Geological Survey Professional Paper 1553-B, pp. B31–B42.Google Scholar
  18. Omar, H. and Alon, N.: 1994, The continuity principle: a unified approach to disaster and trauma, Am. J. Commun. Psychol. 22, 273–287.Google Scholar
  19. Paton, D.: 1996, Disaster, communities, and mental health: psychosocial influences on long term impact, Community Mental Health in New Zealand 9, 3–14.Google Scholar
  20. Paton, D. and Smith, L. M.: 1995, Methodological issues in the evaluation of psychological trauma, Austral. Psychol. 30, 200–209.Google Scholar
  21. Sarason, I. G., Levine, H. M., Basham, R. B., and Sarason, B. R.: 1983, Assessing social support: The social support questionnaire, J. Personal. Soc, Psychol. 44, 127–139.Google Scholar
  22. Tobin, G. A.: 1999, Sustainability and community resilience: the holy grail of hazards planning, Environmental Hazards 1, 13–26.Google Scholar
  23. Van den Eyde, J. and Veno, A.: 1999, Coping with disastrous events: an empowerment model of community healing, in R. Gist and B. Lubin (eds.), Response to Disaster, Taylor and Francis Philadelphia, PA., pp. 167–192.Google Scholar
  24. Violanti, J. M., Paton, D., and Dunning, C.: 2000, Posttraumatic Stress Intervention: Challenges, Issues and Perspectives, Charles C. Thomas, Springfield, IL.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • Douglas Paton
    • 1
  • Marian Millar
    • 1
  • David Johnston
    • 2
  1. 1.School of PsychologyMassey UniversityNew Zealand
  2. 2.Institute of Geological and Nuclear SciencesNew Zealand

Personalised recommendations