Plant Foods for Human Nutrition

, Volume 56, Issue 4, pp 335–348 | Cite as

Value of a tomato byproduct as a source of dietary fiber in rats

  • Angela Alvarado
  • Emperatriz Pacheco-Delahaye
  • Patricio Hevia
Article

Abstract

A residue consisting of tomato peel and seeds is a byproduct of thetomato paste industry. This product had, after drying and grinding,101.4 g water, 175.6 g protein, 95.9 g lipids, 36.4 g ash and590.7 g total carbohydrates per kilogram of residue. The carbohydratesin the residue were mainly dietary fiber (495.3 g) from which 405.4 gwere insoluble fiber. Additionally, the residue had ascorbic acid 0.25 g, P 3 g, Ca 1.7 g, K 13.1 g, Mg 2.4 g, Cu 0.013 g, Fe0.248 g, Mn 0.018 g and Zn 0.174 g per kilogram of residue. Theresidue fed to rats at increasing concentrations in the diet (0, 134, 263and 387 g/kg diet) over 18 days had no effect on body weight gain;caused an increase in food intake and slightly reduced feed efficiency.Incorporation of the residue in the diet caused a substantialincrease in fecal mass, which was proportional to the dietary fiber providedby the residue (r = 0.89); apparent absorption of protein, energy,Ca, Mg, Fe, Zn and Cu present in the diets was reduced. These reductions were proportional to the amount of dietary fiber provided by the residueand became substantial when the residue was included at 263 or 387g/kg. However, when the residue was included at 134 g/kg, little effect onthe apparent absorption of the dietary nutrients was noted. Because thisconcentration provided the rats with approximately 10 times more fiberthan that recommended for humans, one can expect that if this tomatoresidue were consumed at concentrations recommended for humans, itshould have no effect on nutrient availability. These results indicate that thistomato residue represents an attractive source of fiber, which in rats had alow apparent absorption (52–56%). In addition, it was very effective inincreasing fecal mass with no negative effects on growth performance.

Apparent absorption Dietary fiber Fecal mass Macronutrients Micronutriets Tomato residue 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Burkitt DP, Trowell HL (1975) Refined carbohydrates and disease. In: Some Implications of Dietary Fiber. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Mendeloff AI (1987) Dietary fiber and gastrointestinal disease. Am J Clin Nutr 45: 1267S-1270S.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Anderson JW, Smith BM, Gustafson NJ (1994) Health benefits and practical aspects of high-fiber diets. Am J Clin Nutr 59(suppl): 1242S-1247S.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Gallaher DD, Schneeman BO (1996) Dietary fiber. In: Ziegler EE, Filer LJ (eds), Present Knowledge in Nutrition. Washington DC: ILSI Press, pp 87-97.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Sels JPJE, Postmes BH, Wolffenbuttel R, Kruseman ACN (1991) Dietary fiber in the management of diabetes mellitus: A review. Neth J Med 38: 265-277.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Humphreys MM (1997) Are the nutritional guidelines for diabetics achievable? Proc Nutr Soc 56: 899-902.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Anderson JW, Deakins DA, Floore TL (1990) Dietary fiber and coronary heart disease. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr 29: 95-147.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Lim BO, Yaamada K, Nonaka M, Kuramoto Y, Hung P, Sugano M (1997) Dietary fiber modulate indices of intestinal immune function in rats. J Nutr 127: 663-667.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Erhardt JG, Lim SS, Bode C, Bode C (1997) A diet rich in fat and poor in dietary fiber increases the in vitro formation of reactive oxygen species in human feces. J Nutr 127: 706-709.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Muller-Lissner SA (1988) Effect of wheat bran on weight of stool and gastrointestinal transit time: a meta analysis. Brit J Nutr 296: 615-617.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Cummings JH, Englyst HN (1995) Gastrointestinal effects of food carbohydrates. Am J Clin Nutr 61: (Suppl) 938S-945S.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Cilli V, Hevia P (1989) Wheat bran and whole wheat flour as sources of fiber and calories for the rat. Nutr Rep Int 39: 917-930.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Drouliscos NJ (1976) Nutritional evaluation of the protein of dried tomato pomace in the rat. Brit J Nutr 36: 449-456.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Ibrahim HM, Alwash AH (1983) The effect of different ratios of tomato pomace and alfalfa hay in the ration of the digestion and performance of Awassi lambs. World Rev Anim Prod 19: 31-35.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Zhao XO, Jorgensen H, Eggum BO (1995) The influence of dietary fiber on body composition, visceral organ weight, digestibility and energy balance in rats house in different thermal environments. Brit J Nutr 73: 687-699.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Baer DJ, Rumpler WW, Miles CW, Fahey G (1997) Dietary fiber decreases the metabolizable energy content and nutrient digestibility of mixed diets fed to humans. J Nutr 127: 579-586.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Wisker E, Bach Knudsen EK, Daniel M, Feldheim W, Eggum BO (1996) Digestibilities of energy, protein, fat and nonstarch polysaccharides in low fiber diet and diets containing coarse or fine whole meal rye are comparable in rats and humans. J Nutr 126: 481-488.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Leterme P, Théwis A, Van Leeuwen P, Monmart T, Huisman J (1996) Chemical composition of pea fibre isolates and their effect on the endogenous amino acid flow at the ileum of the pig. J Sci Food Agric 72: 127-134.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Gralak MA, Leontowicz M, Morawiec M, Bartnikowska E, Kulasek GW (1996) Comparison of the influence of dietary fibre sources with different proportions of soluble and insoluble fibre on Ca, Mg, Fe, Zn, Mn, and Cu apparent absorption in rats. Arch Tierernahr 49: 293-299.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Kochetov V, Moisseva J, Lutsenko I (1981) By-products from vegetable canning in diets for finishing pigs. Zhivotnovodstro 8: 41-42.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Carlson BL, Knorr D, Watkins TR (1981) Influence of tomato seed addition on the quality of wheat flour breads. J Food Sci 46: 1029-1031.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    AOAC (1990) Official Methods of Analysis, 15th edn. Washington, DC: Association of Official Analytical Chemists.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Asp NG, Johansson CG, Hallmer H, Siljestrom M (1983) Rapid enzymatic assay of insoluble and soluble dietary fiber. J Agric Food Chem 31: 476-482.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Dubois M, Gilles KH (1956) Colorimetric method for determination of sugar and related substances. Am Chem 28: 350-360.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Somogy M (1945) A new reagent for the determination of sugars. J Biol Chem 160: 61-73.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Nelson N (1944) A photometric adaptation of the Somogyi method for the determination of glucose. J Biol Chem 153: 375-380.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Shinnick FL, Ink SL, Marlett JA (1990) Dose response to a dietary oat bran fraction in cholesterol-fed rats. J Nutr 120: 561-568.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    National Research Council NRC (1996) Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals. Washington DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Hevia P, Cioccia A (1988) Application of a colorimetric method to the determination of nitrogen in nutritional studies with rats and humans. Nutr Rep Int 38: 1129-1136.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Steel RGD, Torrie JH (1988) Bioestadística Principios y procedimientos. Mexico: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Pennington JAT (1994) Bowes & Church's Food Values of Portions Commonly Used. Philadelphia: JB Lippincott Company, 131 pp.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Illman RJ, Storer GB, Topping DL (1993) White wheat flour lowers plasma cholesterol and increases cecal steroids relative to whole wheat flour, wheat brand and wheat pollard in rats. J Nutr 123: 1094-1100.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    De Schrijver R, Fremaut D, Verheyen A (1992) Cholesterol lowering effects and utilisation of protein, lipid, fiber and energy in rats fed unprocessed and baked oat bran. J Nutr 122: 1318-1324.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Peterson AD, Baumgardt BR (1971) Influence of level of energy demand on the ability of rats to compensate for diet dilution. J Nutr 101: 1069-1074.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Larsen T, Ostergard K, Hansen I, Bach Knudsen KE, Eggum BO (1991) Daily food intake and digestibility in rats. Brit J Nutr 65: 29-35.Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Lopez-Guisa JM, Harned MC, Dibielzig R, Rao SC Marlett JA (1988) Processed oat hulls as potential dietary fiber sources in rat. J Nutr 118: 953-962.Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Hansen I, Bach Knudsen KE, Eggum BO (1992) Gastrointestinal implications in the rat of wheat bran, oat bran and pea fibre. Brit J Nutr 68: 451-462.Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Cummings JH, Bingham SA, Heaton KW, Easwood MA (1992) Faecal weight, colon cancer risk and dietary intake of nonstarch polysaccharides (dietary fiber). Gastroenterology 103: 1783-1789.Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Cummings JH (1993) The effect of dietary fibre on fecal weight and composition. In: Spiller GA (ed), Dietary Fibre in Human Nutrition. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, pp 263-349.Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Southgate DAT, Durnin JVGH (1970) Calorie conversion factors. An experimental reassessment of the factors used in the calculation of the energy value of human diets. Brit J Nutr 24: 517-535.Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Kelsay JL, Goering HK, Behall KM, Pratter ES (1981) Effect of fiber from fruits and vegetables on metabolic responses of human subjects: Fiber intakes, fecal excretions and apparent digestibilities. Am J Clin Nutr 34: 1849-1852.Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    American Institute of Nutrition AIN (1977) Report of the American Institute of Nutrition ‘ad hoc’ committee on standards for nutritional studies. J Nutr 107: 1340-1348.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • Angela Alvarado
    • 1
  • Emperatriz Pacheco-Delahaye
    • 2
  • Patricio Hevia
    • 3
  1. 1.Departamento of Fisiología y Bioquímica, Facultad de Ciencias de la SaludUniversidad de CaraboboMaracayVenezuela
  2. 2.Instituto de Química y Tecnología, Facultad de AgronomíaUniversidad Central de VenezuelaMaracayVenezuela
  3. 3.Laboratorio de NutriciónUniversidad Simón BolívarCaracasVenezuela

Personalised recommendations