Advertisement

Hydrobiologia

, Volume 451, Issue 1–3, pp 295–304 | Cite as

Protistan epibionts of the ctenophore Mnemiopsis mccradyi Mayer

  • Anthony G. Moss
  • Anne M. Estes
  • Lisa A. Muellner
  • Darrell D. Morgan
Article

Abstract

Mnemiopsis mccradyi, a common coastal ctenophore, was observed to bear two distinct, exclusive assemblages of protistan epibionts. The mobiline peritrich, Trichodina ctenophorii (Estes et al., 1997), and small Flabellula-like gymnamoebae inhabited only the surface of the comb plates. By contrast, small Vexillifera-like gymnamoebae and large Protoodinium-like dinoflagellates were found on the ectoderm. The relationship of the epimicrobial protists with their host varied from possible mutualism (vexilliferids) to commensalism (trichodinids) to parasitism (flabellulids and protoodinids). Trichodinids may benefit from comb plate attachment by enhanced food capture. Although they did not obviously impair comb plate beating, they did distort the surface and appear to produce fissures in the comb plate surface, which could provide inroads for more severe comb plate damage by amoebae. By contrast, when flabellulid amoebae occurred in very high surface densities (up to ∼5000 mm−2), they clearly damaged comb plates by eroding the surface. Where flabellulid pseudopodia invaded the comb plate, we observed local degradation of comb plate cilia, as evidenced by central pair disorientation and plasma membrane perturbation and overt phagocytosis of comb plate cilia. Ectodermal vexilliferids, which occurred at much lower densities, did not appear to have any degradative impact on the ctenophore. By contrast, clusters of ectodermal protoodinids were found in localized depressions most likely caused by invasive phagocytosis. The impact of the protistan assemblages on ctenophore populations is unclear, but under conditions of severe infestation they might depress ctenophore population density.

comb jellies comb plate marine parasites amoebae ciliates dinoflagellates coastal health 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Afzelius, B., 1961. The fine structure of the cilia from ctenophore swimming plates. J. Biophys. Biochem. Cytol. 9: 383–394.Google Scholar
  2. Arthur, J. R. & J. Lom, 1984. Trichodinid Protozoa (Ciliophora: Peritrichida) from freshwater fishes of Rybinsk Reservior, USSR. Protozoology 31: 82–91.Google Scholar
  3. Arthur, J. R. & L. Margolis, 1984. Trichodina truttae Müller, 1937 (Ciliophora: Peritrichida), a common pathogenic ectoparasite of cultured juvenile salmonid fishes in British Columbia: Redescription and examination by scanning electron microscopy. Can J. Zool. 62: 1842–1848.Google Scholar
  4. Barlow, D., M. A. Sleigh & R. J. White, 1993. Water flows around the comb plates of the ctenophore Pleurobrachia plotted by computer: a model system for studying propulsion by antiplectic metachronism. J. exp. Biol. 177: 113–128.Google Scholar
  5. Bovee, E. C. & T. K. Sawyer, 1979. Marine flora and fauna of the Northeastern United States. Protozoa: Sarcodina: Amoebae. NOAA Technical Report. National Marine Fisheries Service Circular 419. 1–56.Google Scholar
  6. Butler, H. & A. Rogerson, 1995. Temporal and spacial abundance of naked amoebae (Gymnamoebae) in marine benthic sediment of the Clyde Sea area, Scotland. J. Euk. Microbiol. 42: 724–730.Google Scholar
  7. Butler, H. & A. Rogerson, 1997. Consumption rates of six species of marine benthic naked amoebae (Gymnamoebia) from sediments in the Clyde Sea area. J. mar. biol. Assoc. U. K. 77: 989–997.Google Scholar
  8. Cachon, J. & M. Cachon, 1971. Protoodinium chattoni Hovasse. Manifestations ultrastructurales des repports entre le Péridinien et la Médusa-hôte: fixation, phagocytos. Arch. Protistenk. 113: 293–305.Google Scholar
  9. Crowell, S., 1976. An edwardsiid larva parasitic in Mnemiopsis. In Mackie, G. O. (ed.), Coelenterate Ecology and Behaviour, Plenum Publishing Corp., New York: 247–250.Google Scholar
  10. Estes, A. M., B. S. Reynolds & A. G. Moss, 1997. Trichodina ctenophorii n. sp., a novel symbiont of ctenophores of the northern coast of the Gulf of Mexico. J. Euk. Microbiol. 44: 420–426.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Edmiston, L., 1979. The Zooplankton of the Apalachicola Bay System. Dissertation, Florida State University, Tallahassee, Florida: 104 pp.Google Scholar
  12. Fensome, R. A., F. J. R. Taylor, G. Norris, W. A. S. Sarjeant, D. I. Wharton & G. L. Williams, 1993. A classification of living and fossil dinoflagellates. Micropaleontol. Press spec. Publ. No. 7: 351 pp.Google Scholar
  13. Finenko, G. A., B. E. Anninsky, A. A. Romanova, G. I. Abolmasova & A. E. Kideys, 2001. Chemical composition, respiration and feeding rates of the new alien ctenophore, Beroe ovata, in the Black Sea. Hydrobiologia 451 (Dev. Hydrobiol. 155): 177–186.Google Scholar
  14. Harbison G. R. & L. P. Madin, 1979. Diving – A new view of plankton biology. Oceanus 22: 21–27.Google Scholar
  15. Harbison, G. R., D. C. Biggs & L. P. Madin, 1977. The associations of Amphipoda Hyperiidea with gelatinous zooplankton – II. Associations with cnidarians, ctenophora and radiolaria. Deep Sea Res. 24: 465–485.Google Scholar
  16. Hovasse, R., 1935. Deux Péridiniens parasites convergents: Oodinium poucheti (Lemm.), Protoodiium chattoni. Gen. Nov. sp. Nov. Bull. Biol. Fr. Belg. 69: 59–86.Google Scholar
  17. James-Clark, H., 1866. On the anatomy and physiology of the vorticellidan parasite (Trichodina pediculus, Ehr) of Hydra. Ann. Mag. N. Hist. 17: 401–425.Google Scholar
  18. Khan, R. A., 1990. Parasitism in marine fish after chronic exposure to petroleum hydrocarbons in the laboratory and to the Exxon Valdez oil spill. Bull. envir. Contam. Toxicol. 44: 759–763.Google Scholar
  19. Khan, R. A., D. E. Barker, K. Williams-Ryan & R. G. Hooper, 1993. Influence of crude oil and pulp and paper mill effluent on mixed infections of Trichodina cottidarium and T. saintjohnsi (Ciliophora) parasitizing Myoxiocephalus octodecemspinosus and M. scorpius. Can. J. Zool. 72: 247–251.Google Scholar
  20. Kinne, 0., 1990. Diseases of Marine Animals. Vol. III, Biologische Anstalt Helgoland, Hamburg, Germany: 450 pp.Google Scholar
  21. Koie, M., 1991. Aspects of the morphology and life cycle of Lecithocladium excisum (Digenia: Hemiuridae) – a parasite of Scomber. Int. J. Parasitol. 21: 597–602.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Kreps, T. A., J. E. Purcell & K. B. Heidelberg, 1997. Escape of the ctenophore Mnemiopsis leidyi from the scyphomedusa predator Chrysaora quinquecirrha. Mar. Biol. 128: 441–446.Google Scholar
  23. Lom, J., 1958. A contribution to the systematics and morphology of endoparasitic trichodinids from amphibians, with a proposal of uniform specific characteristics. J. Protozool. 5: 251–263.Google Scholar
  24. Lom, J., 1970. Observations on trichodinid ciliates from freshwater fishes. Arch. Protistenk. Bd. 112: 153–177.Google Scholar
  25. Lom, J. & D. P. Haldar, 1976. Observations on trichodinids endocommensal in fishes. Trans. am. Micro. Soc. 95: 527–541.Google Scholar
  26. Lom, J. & G. L. Hoffman, 1964. Geographic distribution of some species of trichodinids (Ciliata: Peritricha) parasitic on fishes. J. Parasitol. 50: 30–35.Google Scholar
  27. Martorelli, S. R., 2001. Digenea parasites of jellyfishes and ctenophores of the southern Atlantic. Hydrobiologia, this volume.Google Scholar
  28. Mills, C. E. & N. McLean, 1991. Ectoparasitism by a dinoflagellate (Dinoflagellata: Oodinidae) on 5 ctenophores and a hydromedusae (Cnidaria). Dis. aquat. Org. 10: 211–216.Google Scholar
  29. Page, F. C., 1976. An illustrated key to freshwater and soil amoebae. Freshwater Biological Association, Ambleside, Cumbria: 155 pp.Google Scholar
  30. Page, F. C., 1986. The genera and possible relationships of the family amoebidae, with special attention to comparative ultrastructure. Protistologica 22: 301–316.Google Scholar
  31. Page, F. C., 1987. The classification of 'naked' amoebae (Phylum Rhizopoda). Arch. Protistenk. 133: 199–217.Google Scholar
  32. Page, F. C., 1988. A New Key to Freshwater and Soil Gymnamoebae. Freshwater Biological Association, Ambleside, Cumbria, U.K.: 122 pp.Google Scholar
  33. Page, F. C. & S. M. Blakely, 1979. Cell surface structures: a taxonomic character in the Thecamoebae (Protozoa: Gymnamoebia). Zool. J. linn. Soc. 66: 113–135.Google Scholar
  34. Poynton, S. L. & J. Lom, 1989. Some ectoparastic trichodinids from Atlantic cod, Gadus morhua L., with a description of Trichodina cooperi n. sp. Can. J. Zool. 67: 1793–1800.Google Scholar
  35. Purcell, J. E. & M. N. Arai, 2001. Interactions of pelagic cnidarians and ctenophores with fish: a review. Hydrobiologia 451 (Dev. Hydrobiol. 155): 27–44.Google Scholar
  36. Purcell, J. E., T. A. Shiganova, M. B. Decker & E. D. Houde, 2001. The ctenophore Mnemiopsis in native and exotic habitats: U.S. estuaries versus the Black Sea basin. Hydrobiologia 451 (Dev. Hydrobiol. 155): 145–175.Google Scholar
  37. Reeve, M. R., M. A. Walter & T. Ikeda, 1978. Laboratory studies of ingestion and food utilization in lobate and tentaculate ctenophores. Limnol. Oceanogr. 23: 740–751.Google Scholar
  38. Shushkina, E. A. & E. I. Musayeva, 1990. Structure of planktonic community of the Black Sea epipelagic zone and its variation caused by invasion of a new ctenophore species. Oceanology 30: 225–228.Google Scholar
  39. Shiganova, T. A., Yu. V. Bulgakova, S. P. Volovik, Z. A. Mirzoyan & S. I Dudkin, 2001. The new invader Beroe ovata Mayer, 1912 and its effect on the ecosystem in the northeastern Black Sea. Hydrobiologia 451 (Dev. Hydrobiol. 155): 187–197.Google Scholar
  40. Sieburth, J. M., 1984. Protozoan bacterivory in pelagic marine waters. In Hobbie, J. E. & P. J. le B. Williams (eds), Heterotrophic Activity in the Sea, Plenum Publishing Corp., N.Y.: 569 pp.Google Scholar
  41. Stunkard, H. W., 1980. The morphology, life cycle, and taxonomic relations Lepocreadium areolatum (Trematoda: Digenea). Biol. Bull. 158: 154–163.Google Scholar
  42. Swanberg, N., 1974. The feeding behaviour of Beroë ovata. Mar. Biol. 24: 69–76.Google Scholar
  43. Tamm, S. L., 1982. Ctenophores. In Shelton, G. A. B. (ed.), Electrical Conduction and Behaviour in 'simple' Invertebrates. Oxford University Press, London: 261–358.Google Scholar
  44. Tamm, S. L. & S. Tamm, 1981. Ciliary reversal without rotation of axonemal structures in ctenophore comb plates. J. Cell Biol. 89: 495–509.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Urawa, S. & T. Awakura, 1994. Protozoan diseases of freshwater fishes in Hokkaido. Sci. Rep. Hokkaido Fish Hatchery 48: 47–58.Google Scholar
  46. Uzmann, J. R. & A. P. Stickney, 1954. Trichodina myicola n. sp., a peritrichous ciliate from the marine bivalve Mya arenaria L. J. Protozool. 1: 149–155.Google Scholar
  47. Van As, J. G. & L. Basson, 1996. An endosymbiotic trichodinid, Trichodina rhinobatae sp. n. (Ciliophora: Peritrichia) found in the lesser guitarfish, Rhinobatos annulatus Smith, 1841 (Rajiformes: Rhinobatidae) from the South African Coast. Acta Protozool. 35: 61–67.Google Scholar
  48. Wellborn, T. L., 1967. Trichodina (Ciliata: Urceolariidae) of freshwater fishes of the southeastern United States. J. Protozool. 14: 399–412.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Yip, S. Y., 1984. Parasites of Pleurobrachia pileus Müller (Ctenophora) from Galway Bay, Western Ireland. J. Plankton Res. 6: 107–122.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • Anthony G. Moss
    • 1
  • Anne M. Estes
    • 2
  • Lisa A. Muellner
    • 2
  • Darrell D. Morgan
    • 2
  1. 1.Biological SciencesAuburn UniversityAuburnU.S.A.
  2. 2.Biological SciencesAuburn UniversityAuburnU.S.A.

Personalised recommendations