Advertisement

Precision Agriculture

, Volume 2, Issue 3, pp 265–279 | Cite as

The “Null Hypothesis” of Precision Agriculture Management

  • B. M. Whelan
  • A. B. McBratney
Article

Abstract

As precision agriculture strives to improve the management of agricultural industries, the importance of scientific validation must not be forgotten. Eventually, the improvement that is imparted by precision agriculture management must be considered in terms of profitability and environmental impact (both short and long term). As one form of precision agriculture, we consider site-specific crop management to be defined as: “Matching resource application and agronomic practices with soil and crop requirements as they vary in space and time within a field.” While the technological tools associated with precision agriculture may be most obvious, the fundamental concept will stand or fall on the basis of scientific experimentation and assessment. Crucial then to scientifically validating the concept of site-specific crop management is the proposal and testing of the null hypothesis of precision agriculture, i.e. “Given the large temporal variation evident in crop yield relative to the scale of a single field, then the optimal risk aversion strategy is uniform management.” The spatial and temporal variability of important crop and soil parameters is considered and their quantification for a crop field is shown to be important to subsequent experimentation and agronomic management. The philosophy of precision agriculture is explored and experimental designs for Precision agriculture are presented that can be employed in attempts to refute the proposed null hypothesis.

experimentation spatial variability management zone 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. R. J. Barnes, Bounding the required sample size for geologic site characterisation. Mathematical Geology 20, 477–490(1988).Google Scholar
  2. R.A. Fisher, Statistical Methods and Scientific Inference, (Oliver and Boyd, Edinburgh, UK, 1959), 175pp.Google Scholar
  3. R.A. Fisher, (1970) Statistical Methods for Research Workers, 14th ed. Edinburgh, UK: Oliver and Boyd, 362pp.Google Scholar
  4. R.A. Fisher and F. Yates, Statistical Tables for Biological, Agricultural and Medical Research, 6th ed. (Hafner Publishing Company, New York, USA, 1963), 146pp.Google Scholar
  5. S.N. Goodman, p-values, hypothesis tests, and likelihood: implications for epidemiology of a neglected historical debate, American Journal of Epidemiology 137, 485–496(1993).Google Scholar
  6. R.G. Kachanoski and G. L. Fairchild, Field scale fertiliser recommendations: the spatial scaling problem, Canadian Journal of Soil Science 76, 1–6(1996).Google Scholar
  7. R.M. Lark and J. V. Stafford, Classification as a first step in the interpretation of temporal and spatial variation of crop yield, Annals of Applied Biology 130, 111–121(1997).Google Scholar
  8. A.B. McBratney and M. J. Pringle, Spatial variability in soil-implications for precision agriculture. In: Precision Agriculture '97: Proceedings of the 1st European Conference on Precision Agriculture, edited by J. V. Stafford (BIOS, Oxford, UK, 1997), pp. 3–32.Google Scholar
  9. A.B. McBratney and B. M. Whelan, The Potential for Site-Specific Management of Cotton Farming Systems (CRC for Sustainable Cotton Production, Narrabri, Australia, 1995), 46pp.Google Scholar
  10. P.B. Medawar, Advice to a Young Scientist (Harper & Row, New York, USA, 1979), 109pp.Google Scholar
  11. K.R. Popper, Conjectures and Refutations: The Growth of Scientific Knowledge (Routledge, London, 1963), 431 pp.Google Scholar
  12. M.J. Pringle, A. B. McBratney, and S. E. Cook, Some methods of estimating yield response to a spatially variable input. In: Precision Agriculture '99: Proceedings of the 2nd European Conference on Precision Agriculture, edited by J. V. Stafford (Sheffield Academic Press, Sheffield, UK, 1999), pp. 309–318.Google Scholar
  13. B.M. Whelan, Reconciling Continuous Soil Variation and Crop Yield-a study of some implications of within-field variability for site-specific crop management. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, (University of Sydney, Australia, 1998).Google Scholar
  14. B.M. Whelan, A. B. McBratney, and R. A. Viscarra Rossel,Spatial prediction for precision agriculture. In: Precision Agriculture: Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Precision Agriculture, edited by P. C. Robert, R. H. Rust, and W. E. Larson (ASA-CSSA-SSSA, Madison, WI, 1996), pp. 331–342.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • B. M. Whelan
    • 1
  • A. B. McBratney
    • 1
  1. 1.Australian Centre for Precision AgricultureUniversity of SydneyAustralia

Personalised recommendations