Advertisement

European Journal of Political Research

, Volume 40, Issue 1, pp 31–56 | Cite as

Determinants of public support for EU membership: Data from the Baltic countries

  • Piret Ehin
Article

Abstract

Focusing on individual-level determinants of public support for EU membership, this paper brings the literature on Western European integration to bear on the Eastern and Central European accession. Existing theories have focused on utilitarian expectations, political values, and domestic politics as determinants of public attitudes toward European integration. The paper discusses the applicability of the proposed theories and measures in the Eastern European context and develops a model that identifies micro-level economicexpectations, support for democratic norms, trust in the national government, and perceptions of ethnic tension as possible determinants of public support for EU membership. These propositions are tested with survey data from Estonia, Latvia, and Lithuania, using logistic regression. The results lend strong support to the expected gains and domestic politics hypotheses but suggest that individual competitiveness, a frequently used proxy for economic expectations, may be a poor predictor of attitudes toward the EU in the CEE context. Perceptions of increased ethnic tensions were found to decrease minority supportfor EU membership in Latvia, the Baltic country that has pursued particularly stringent citizenship and minority policies. Identification with democratic norms did not influence opinions in Latvia and Estonia, while having an unexpected negative effect on the attitudes of the Lithuanian public.

Keywords

Strong Support National Government European Integration Public Support Public Attitude 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Anderson, C. & Reichert, S. (1996). Economic benefits and support for membership in the E.U.: A cross-national analysis, Journal of Public Policy 15(3): 231–249.Google Scholar
  2. Anderson, C. & Kaltenhaler, K. (1996). The dynamics of public opinion toward European integration, 1973–1993, European Journal of International Relations 2(2): 175–199.Google Scholar
  3. Ardy, B. (1999). Agricultural, structural policy, the budget and Eastern enlargement of the European Union, in K. Henderson (ed.), Back to Europe: Central and Eastern Europe and the European Union (pp. 107–128). London: UCL Press.Google Scholar
  4. Bell, J. & Mickiewicz, T. (1999). EU accession and labor markets in the Visegrad countries, in K. Henderson (ed.), Back to Europe: Central and Eastern Europe and the European Union (pp. 129–150). London: UCL Press.Google Scholar
  5. Bollerup, S. & Christensen, C. (1997). Nationalism in Eastern Europe: Causes and Consequences of the National Revivals and Conflicts in Late-Twentieth-Century Eastern Europe. New York: St Martin's Press.Google Scholar
  6. Dehousse, R. (1995). Constitutional reform in the European Community: Are there alternatives to the majoritarian avenue?, West European Politics 18(3):118–136.Google Scholar
  7. Eichenberg, R. & Dalton, R. (1993). Europeans and the European Community: The dynamics of public support for European integration, International Organization 47(4): 507–534.Google Scholar
  8. European Commission (1997). Central and Eastern Eurobarometer, No 7. Brussels: European Commission.Google Scholar
  9. European Commission (1998). Central and Eastern Eurobarometer, No 8. Brussels: European Commission.Google Scholar
  10. Franklin, M., Marsh, M. & McLaren, L. (1994). Uncorking the bottle: Popular opposition to European unification in the wake of Maastricht, Journal of Common Market Studies 32: 455–472.Google Scholar
  11. Franklin, M., van der Eijk, C. & and Michael Marsh (1995). Referendum outcomes and trust in government: Public support for Europe in the wake of Maastricht. In J. Hayward (ed.), The Crisis of Representation in Europe (pp. 101–117). London: Frank Cass.Google Scholar
  12. Gabel, M. (1998a). Interests and Integration: Market Liberalization, Public Opinion, and European Union. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
  13. Gabel, M. (1998b). Economic integration and mass politics: Market liberalization and public attitudes in the European Union, American Journal of Political Science 42(3): 936–953.Google Scholar
  14. Gabel, M. & Palmer, H. (1995). Understanding variation in public support for European integration, European Journal of Political Research 27(1): 3–19.Google Scholar
  15. Gallagher, M. (1996). Ireland: The referendum as a conservative device. In M. Gallagher & P. Uleri (eds.), The Referendum Experience in Europe (pp. 86–105). London: MacMillan Press.Google Scholar
  16. Grabbe, H. & Hughes, K. (1999). Central and East European views on EU enlargement: Political debates and public opinion. In K. Henderson (ed.), Back to Europe: Central and Eastern Europe and the European Union (pp. 185–202). London: UCL Press.Google Scholar
  17. Hug, S. & Sciarini, P. (2000). Referendums on European integration: Do institutions matter in the voter's decision?, Comparative Political Studies 33(1): 3–36.Google Scholar
  18. Inglehart, R. (1977). The Silent Revolution. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Inglehart, R., Rabier, J.-R. & Reif, K. (1991). The evolution of public attitudes toward European integration: 1970–86. In K. Reif & R. Inglehart (eds.), Eurobarometer: The Dynamics of European Public Opinion. London: McMillan.Google Scholar
  20. Janssen, J. (1991). Postmaterialism, cognitive mobilization and support for European integration, British Journal of Political Science 21: 443–468.Google Scholar
  21. Latawski, P. (1995). Contemporary nationalism in East Central Europe: Unfinished Business. New York: St. Martin's Press.Google Scholar
  22. Millard, F. (1999). Polish domestic politics and accession to the European Union. In K. Henderson (ed.), Back to Europe: Central and Eastern Europe and the European Union (pp. 203–220). London: UCL Press.Google Scholar
  23. Midtbø, T. & Hines, K. (1998). The referendum-election nexus: An aggregate analysis of Norwegian voting behavior, Electoral Studies 17(1): 77–94.Google Scholar
  24. Nello, S. & Smith, K. (1998). The European Union and Central and Eastern Europe: The Implications of Enlargement in Stages. Aldershot, UK: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  25. Norgaard, O., Johannsen, L. et al. (1999). The Baltic States after Independence. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  26. Pierce, R., Valen, H. & Listhaug, O. (1983). Referendum voting behavior: The Norwegian and British referenda on membership in the European Community, American Journal of Political Science 27(1): 43–63.Google Scholar
  27. Rose, R. (1997). New Baltic Barometer III: A Survey Study. Glasgow, UK: Centre for the Study of Public Policy, University of Strathclyde.Google Scholar
  28. Schimmelfennig, F. (1998). Liberal norms and the Eastern enlargement of the European Union: A Case for sociological institutionalism, Österreichische Zeitschrift für Politikwissenschaft 27(4): 459–472.Google Scholar
  29. Shepherd, R. (1975). Public Opinion and European Integration. Westmead, UK: Saxon House.Google Scholar
  30. Smith, G. (1996).When nations challenge and nations rule: Estonia and Latvia as ethnic democracies, International Politics 33(1): 27–43.Google Scholar
  31. Svensson, P. (1984) Class, party and ideology: A Danish case study of electoral behavior in referendums, Scandinavian Political Studies 17(1): 69–82.Google Scholar
  32. Van Everdingen, Y. & Van Raaij, W. (1998). The Dutch people and the Euro: A structural analysis relating national identity and economic expectations to attitude towards the Euro, Journal of Economic Psychology 19(6): 721–740.Google Scholar
  33. Weiler, J., Haltern, U. & Mayer, F. (1995). European democracy and its critique. West European Politics 18(3):4–39.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • Piret Ehin
    • 1
  1. 1.University of ArizonaTucsonUSA

Personalised recommendations