Minds and Machines

, Volume 11, Issue 4, pp 483–502

The Compatibility of Complex Systems and Reduction: A Case Analysis of Memory Research

  • William Bechtel
Article

Abstract

Some theorists who emphasize the complexity of biological and cognitive systems and who advocate the employment of the tools of dynamical systems theory in explaining them construe complexity and reduction as exclusive alternatives. This paper argues that reduction, an approach to explanation that decomposes complex activities and localizes the components within the complex system, is not only compatible with an emphasis on complexity, but provides the foundation for dynamical analysis. Explanation via decomposition and localization is nonetheless extremely challenging, and an analysis of recent cognitive neuroscience research on memory is used to illustrate what is involved. Memory researchers split between advocating memory systems and advocating memory processes, and I argue that it is the latter approach that provides the critical sort of decomposition and localization for explaining memory. The challenges of linking distinguishable functions with brain processes is illustrated by two examples: competing hypotheses about the contribution of the hippocampus and competing attempts to link areas in frontal cortex with memory processing.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Atkinson, R.C. and Shiffrin, R.M. (1968), 'Human memory: A proposed system and its control processes', in K.W. Spence and J.T. Spence, eds., The Psychology of Learning and Motivation: Advances in Research and Theory, Vol. 2, pp. 89–195, New York: Academic.Google Scholar
  2. Bechtel, W. (2001), 'Decomposing and localizing vision: An exemplar for cognitive neuroscience', in W. Bechtel, P. Mandik, J. Mundale and R.S. Stufflebeam, eds., Philosophy and the neurosciences: A reader, Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
  3. Bechtel, W. and Abrahamsen, A. (in press), Connectionism and the mind: Parallel processing, dynamics, and evolution in networks, Second Edition, Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
  4. Bechtel, W. and Richardson, R.C. (1993), Discovering complexity: Decomposition and localization as scientific research strategies, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Beer, R.D. (2000), 'Dynamical approaches to cognitive science', Trends in Cognitive Sciences 4, pp. 91–99.Google Scholar
  6. Blaxton, T.A. (1989), 'Investigating dissociations among memory measures: Support for a transfer appropriate processing framework', Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 15, pp. 657–668.Google Scholar
  7. Bransford, J.D., Franks, J.J., Morris, C.D. and Stein, B.S. (1979), 'Some general constraints on learning and memory research', in L.S. Cermak & F.I.M. Craik, eds., Levels of processing in human memory, Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, pp. 331–354.Google Scholar
  8. Brewer, J.B., Zhao, Z., Desmond, J.E., Glover, G.H. and Gabrieli, J.D.E. (1998), 'Making memories: Brain activity that predicts how well visual experience will be remembered', Science 281, pp. 1185–1187.Google Scholar
  9. Buckner, R.L. (1996), 'Beyond HERA: Contributions of specific prefrontal brain areas to long-term memory retrieval', Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 3(2), pp. 149–158.Google Scholar
  10. Clark, A. (1997), Being there, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  11. Cohen, N.J. and Eichenbaum, H. (1993), Memory, amnesia, and the hippocampal system, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  12. Cohen, N.J. and Squire, L.R. (1980), 'Preserved learning and retention of pattern-analyzing skill in amnesia: Dissociation of knowing how and knowing that', Science 210, pp. 207–210.Google Scholar
  13. Corkin, S. (1968), 'Acquisition of motor skill after bilateral medial temporal-bole excision', Neuropsychologia 6, pp, 255–265.Google Scholar
  14. Corkin, S., Amaral, D., Gonzalez, R. and Johnson, K. et al. (1997), 'H.M.'s medial temporal lesion: Findings from magnetic resonance imaging', The Journal of Neuroscience 17, pp. 3964–3979.Google Scholar
  15. Eichenbaum, H., Otto, T. and Cohen, N.J. (1993). 'Two component functions of the hippocampal memory systems', Behavioral and Brain Sciences 17(3), pp. 449–472.Google Scholar
  16. Elman, J.L. (1991), 'Distributed representations, simple recurrent networks, and grammatical structure', Machine Learning 7, pp. 195–224.Google Scholar
  17. Felleman, D.J. and van Essen, D.C. (1991), 'Distributed hierarchical processing in the primate cerebral cortex', Cerebral Cortex 1, pp. 1–47.Google Scholar
  18. Gabrieli, J.D.E., Poldrack, R.A. and Desmond, J.E. (1998), 'The role of left prefrontal cortex in language and memory', Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 95, pp. 906–913.Google Scholar
  19. Hetherington, P.A. and Shapiro, M.L. (1993), 'A simple network model simulates hippocampal place fields: 2. Computing goal directed trajectories and memory fields', Behavioral Neuroscience 107, pp. 434–443.Google Scholar
  20. Hinton, G.E. and Shallice, T. (1991), 'Lesioning a connectionist network: Investigations of acquired dyslexia', Psychological Review 98, pp. 74–95.Google Scholar
  21. Hintzman, D.L. (1990), 'Human learning and memory: connections and dissociations', Annual Review of Psychology 41, pp. 109–139.Google Scholar
  22. Kelley, W.L., Miezin, F.M., McDermott, K., Buckner, R.L., Raichle, M.E., Cohen, N.J. and Petersen, S. E. (1998), 'Hemispheric specialization in human dorsal frontal cortex and medial temporal lobes for verbal and nonverbal memory encoding', Neuron 20, pp. 927–936.Google Scholar
  23. Kelso, J.A.S. (1995), Dynamic patterns: The self organization of brain and behavior, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  24. Kolers, P.A. and Roediger III, H.L. (1984), 'Procedures of Mind', Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 23, pp. 425–449.Google Scholar
  25. Lashley, K.S. (1950), 'In search of an engram', Symposium on Experimental Biology 4, pp. 45–48.Google Scholar
  26. McClelland, J. L., McNaughton, B. L. and O'Reilly, R. C. (1995). 'Why there are complementary learning systems in the hippocampus and neocortex: Insights from the successes and failures of connectionist models of learning and memory', Psychological Review 102(3), pp. 419–457.Google Scholar
  27. McDermott, K.B. and Roediger III, H.L. (1996), 'Exact conceptual repetition dissociate conceptual memory tests: Problems for transfer appropriate processing theories', Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology 50, pp. 57–71.Google Scholar
  28. Miller, G.A. (1956), 'The magical number seven, plus or minus two: some limits on our capacity for processing information', Psychological Review 63, pp. 81–97.Google Scholar
  29. Morris, R.G.M., Garrud, P., Rawlins, J.N.P. and O'Keefe, J. (1982). 'Place navigation impaired in rats with hippocampal lesions', Nature 297, pp. 681–683.Google Scholar
  30. Mundale, J. (1998), 'Brain mapping', in W. Bechtel and G. Graham, eds., A companion to cognitive science, Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
  31. Nadel, L. (1994), 'Hippocampus, space, and relations', Behavioral and Brain Sciences 17, pp. 490–491.Google Scholar
  32. Nyberg, L., Cabeza, R. and Tulving, E. (1998). 'Asymmetric frontal activation during episodic memory: what kind of specificity?' Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2, pp. 419–20.Google Scholar
  33. O'Keefe, J. and Dostrovsky, J. (1971), 'The hippocampus as a spatial map. Preliminary evidence from unit activity in the freely moving rat', Brain Research 34, pp. 171–175.Google Scholar
  34. O'Keefe, J. and Nadel, L. (1978). The hippocampus as a cognitive map, Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  35. Petersen, S.E., Fox, P.J., Posner, M.I., Mintun, M. and Raichle, M.E. (1989), 'Positron emission tomographic studies of the processing single words', Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 1, pp. 153–170.Google Scholar
  36. Plaut, D.C., McClelland, J.L., Seidenberg, M.S. and Patterson, K.E. (1996), 'Understanding normal and impaired word reading: Computational principles in quasi-regular domains', Psychological Review 103, pp. 56–115.Google Scholar
  37. Port, R. and van Gelder, T. (1995), It's about time, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  38. Redish, A. D. (1999). Beyond the cognitive map: From place cells to episodic memory, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  39. Roediger III, H.L., Buckner, R.L. and McDermott, K.B. (1999), 'Components of processing', in J.K. Foster and M. Jelicic eds., Memory: Systems, process, or function. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 32–65.Google Scholar
  40. Rolls, E.T. and Treves, A. (1998), Neural networks and brain function, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  41. Schacter, D.L., Eich, J.E. and Tulving, E. (1878), 'Richard Semon's theory of memory', Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 17, pp. 721–743.Google Scholar
  42. Schacter, D.L. and Tulving, E. (1994), 'What are the memory systems of 1994?' in D. L. Schacter and E. Tulving, eds., Memory systems 1994, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 1–38.Google Scholar
  43. Scoville, W.B. and Milner, B. (1957), 'Loss of recent memory after bilateral hippocampal lesions', Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry 20, pp. 11–21.Google Scholar
  44. Skarda, C.A. and Freeman, W.J. (1987), 'How brains make chaos to make sense of the world', Behavioral and Brain Sciences 10, pp. 161–195.Google Scholar
  45. Sperling, G. (1960), 'The information available in brief visual presentations', Psychological Monographs 74.Google Scholar
  46. Touretzky, D.S. and Redish, A.D. (1996), 'A theory of rodent navigation based on interacting representations of space', Hippocampus 6, pp. 247–270.Google Scholar
  47. Tulving, E. (1972), 'Episodic and semantic memory', in E. Tulving and W. Donaldson, eds., Organization of memory, New York: Academic, pp. 381–403.Google Scholar
  48. Tulving, E. (1984), 'Multiple learning and memory systems', in K.M.J. Lagerspetz and P. Niemi, eds., Psychology in the 1990s, Elsevier, pp. 163–184.Google Scholar
  49. Tulving, E. (1985), 'How many memory systems are there?', American Psychologist 40, pp. 385–398.Google Scholar
  50. Tulving, E. (1989). 'Memory: Performance, knowledge, and experience', European Journal of Cognitive Psychology 1, pp. 3–26.Google Scholar
  51. Tulving, E. (1999), 'Study of memory: Processes and systems', in J.K. Foster and M. Jelicic, eds., Memory: Systems, process, or function, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 11–30.Google Scholar
  52. Tulving, E., Heyman, C.A.G. and MacDonald, C.A. (1991), 'Long-lasting perceptual priming and semantic learning in amnesia. A case experiment, Journal of Experimental Psychology 17, pp. 595–617.Google Scholar
  53. Tulving, E., Kapur, S., Craik, F.I., M., Moscovitch, M. and Houle, S. (1994), 'Hemispheric encoding/retrieval asymmetry in episodic memory: Positron emission tomography findings', Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (USA) 91, pp. 2016–2020.Google Scholar
  54. Tulving, E. and Schacter, D.L. (1990), 'Priming and human memory systems', Science 247, pp. 301–306.Google Scholar
  55. van Essen, D.C. and Gallant, J.L. (1994), 'Neural mechanisms of form and motion processing in the primate visual system, Neuron 13, pp. 1–10.Google Scholar
  56. van Gelder, T. (1995), 'What might cognition be, if not computation', The Journal of Philosophy 92, pp. 345–381.Google Scholar
  57. van Gelder, T. (1998), 'The dynamical hypothesis in cognitive science', Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21, pp. 615–628.Google Scholar
  58. van Orden, G. C. and Paap, K.R. (1997), 'Functional neural images fail to discover the pieces of the mind in the parts of the brain', Philosophy of Science 64, pp. S85–S94.Google Scholar
  59. van Orden, G.C., Pennington, B.F. and Stone, G.O. (in preparation), 'What do double dissociations prove? Inductive methods and isolable systems'.Google Scholar
  60. Wagner, A.D., Schacter, D.L., Rotte, M., Koutstaal, W., Maril, A., Dale, A.M., Rosen, B.R. and Buckner, R.L. (1998) 'Building memories: Remembering and forgetting of verbal materials as predicted by brain activity', Science 281, pp. 1188–1191.Google Scholar
  61. Waugh, N.C. and Norman, D.A. (1965), 'Primary memory', Psychological Review 72, pp. 89–104.Google Scholar
  62. Wheeler, M. (in press), 'Explaining the evolved: Homunculi, modules, and internal representation', Robotics and Autonomous Systems.Google Scholar
  63. Wimsatt, W. C. (1986) 'Forms of aggregativity', in A Donagan, A.N. Perovich, Jr., and M.V. Wedin, eds, Human nature and natural knowledge, Dordrecht: Reidel, pp. 259–291.Google Scholar
  64. Zipser, D. (1985). 'A computational model of hippocampal place fields', Behavioral Neuroscience 99, pp. 1006–1018.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • William Bechtel
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PhilosophyWashington UniversitySt. LouisUSA

Personalised recommendations