Review of Accounting Studies

, Volume 6, Issue 2–3, pp 165–189 | Cite as

Contextual Fundamental Analysis Through the Prediction of Extreme Returns

  • Messod D. Beneish
  • Charles M. C. Lee
  • Robin L. Tarpley


This study examines the usefulness of contextual fundamental analysis for the prediction of extreme stock returns. Specifically, we use a two-stage approach to predict firms that are about to experience an extreme (up or down) price movement in the next quarter. In the first stage, we define the context for analysis by identifying extreme performers; in the second stage we develop a context-specific forecasting model to separate winners from losers. We show that extreme performers share many common market-related attributes, and that the incremental forecasting power of accounting variables with respect to future returns increases after controlling for these attributes. Collectively, these results illustrate the usefulness of conducting fundamental analysis in context.

returns prediction market efficiency financial statement analysis volatility torpedoes rockets value 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Abarbanell, J. S. and B. J. Bushee. (1998). “Abnormal Returns to a Fundamental Analysis Strategy.” The Accounting Review 73, 19-45.Google Scholar
  2. Altman, E. I., R. G. Haldeman and P. Narayanan. (1977). “Zeta Analysis: A New Model to Identify Bankruptcy Risk of Corporations.” Journal of Banking and Finance 1, 29-54.Google Scholar
  3. Asness, C. A. (1997). “The Interaction ofValue and Momentum Strategies.” Financial Analysts Journal 53, 29-36.Google Scholar
  4. BARRA, United States Equity Model Version 3 (E3), Model Handbook, BARRA Corporation: Berkeley, CA.Google Scholar
  5. Barry, C. B. and S. J. Brown. (1984).“Differential Information and the Small Firm Effect.” Journal of Financial Economics 13, 283-294.Google Scholar
  6. Basu, S. (1977). “Investment Performance of Common Stocks in Relation to Their Price Earnings Ratios: A Test of the Efficient Market Hypothesis.” Journal of Finance 32, 663-682.Google Scholar
  7. Beasley, M. S. (1996). “An Empirical Analysis of the Relation Between Board of Director Composition and Financial Statement Fraud.” The Accounting Review 71, 443-465.Google Scholar
  8. Beaver, W., P. Kettler and M. Scholes. (1970). “The Association Between Market Determined and Accounting Determined Risk Measures.” The Accounting Review 45, 654-682.Google Scholar
  9. Beneish, M. D. (1997). “Detecting GAAP Violation: Implications for Assessing Earnings Management Among Firms with Extreme Financial Performance.” Journal of Accounting and Public Policy 16, 271-309.Google Scholar
  10. —, (1999a). “The Detection of Earnings Manipulation.” Financial Analysts Journal 55, 24-36.Google Scholar
  11. —, (1999b). “Incentives and Penalties Related to Earnings Overstatements that Violate GAAP.” The Accounting Review 74, 425-457.Google Scholar
  12. Beneish, M. D. and C. R. Harvey. (1998). “Measurement Error and Nonlinearity in the Earnings-Returns Relation.” Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting 3, 219-247.Google Scholar
  13. Bernard, V. and J. Thomas. (1989). “Post-Earnings-Announcement Drift: Delayed Price Response or Risk Premium?” Journal of Accounting Research 27, 1-48.Google Scholar
  14. Bernard, V. and J. Thomas. (1990). “Evidence that Stock Prices do not Fully Reflect the Implications of Current Earnings for Future Earnings.” Journal of Accounting & Economics 13, 305-340Google Scholar
  15. Chan, Louis K. C., Y. Hamao and J. Lakonishok. (1991). “Fundamentals and Stock Returns in Japan.” Journal of Finance 46, 1739-1764.Google Scholar
  16. Chan, L. K., J. Lakonishok and T. Sougiannis. (1999). “The Stock Market Valuation of Research and Development Expenditures.” Working Paper, University of Illinois.Google Scholar
  17. Christie, A. A. (1982). “The Stochastic Behavior of Common Stock Variances: Value, Leverage and Interest Rate Effects.” Journal of Financial Economics 10, 407-432.Google Scholar
  18. Davis, J. L. (1994). “The Cross-Section of Realized Stock Returns: The Pre-Compustat Evidence.” Journal of Finance 49, 1579-1593.Google Scholar
  19. Dietrich, R. J. and R. S. Kaplan. (1982). “Empirical Analysis of the Commercial Loan Classification Decision.” The Accounting Review 57, 18-38.Google Scholar
  20. Dopuch, N., R. W. Holthausen and R. W. Leftwich. (1987). “Predicting Audit Qualifications with Financial and Market Variables.” The Accounting Review 62, 431-454.Google Scholar
  21. Fama, E. F. and K. R. French. (1992). “The Cross-Section of Expected Stock Returns.” Journal of Finance 47, 427-465.Google Scholar
  22. Fridson, M. S. (1996). “Financial Statement Analysis: A Practitioner's Guide.” New York: John Wiley.Google Scholar
  23. Harvey, C. R. and A. Siddique. (2000). “Conditional Skewness in Asset Pricing Tests.” Journal of Finance 55, 1263-1295.Google Scholar
  24. Haugen, R. A. and N. L. Baker. (1996). “Commonality in the Determinants of Expected Stock Returns.” Journal of Financial Economics 41, 401-439.Google Scholar
  25. Hayn, C. (1995). “The Information Content of Losses.” Journal of Accounting and Economics 20, 125-153.Google Scholar
  26. Holthausen, R. W. and D. F. Larcker. (1992). “The Prediction of Stock Returns Using Financial Statement Information.” Journal of Accounting and Economics 15, 373-411.Google Scholar
  27. Jegadeesh, N. and S. Titman. (1993). “Returns to Buying Winners and Selling Losers: Implications for Stock Market Efficiency.” Journal of Finance 48, 65-91.Google Scholar
  28. Lakonishok, J., A. Shleifer and R. W. Vishny. (1994). “Contrarian Investment, Extrapolation, and Risk.” Journal of Finance 49, 1541-1578.Google Scholar
  29. LaPorta, R. (1996). “Expectations and the Cross-Section of Stock Returns.” Journal of Finance 51, 1715-1742.Google Scholar
  30. Lee, C. M. C. and B. Swaminathan. (2000). “Price Momentum and Trading Volume.” Journal of Finance 55, 2017-2070.Google Scholar
  31. Lev, B. and R. Thiagarajan. (1993). “Fundamental Information Analysis.” Journal of Accounting Research 31, 190-202.Google Scholar
  32. National Commission on Fraudulent Financial Reporting, (1987). Report of National Commission on Fraudulent Financial Reporting. New York: AICPA.Google Scholar
  33. O'Shaughnessy, J. P. (1998). What Works on Wall Street, Revised Edition, McGraw-Hill, New York.Google Scholar
  34. Ou, J. A. and S. H. Penman. (1989). “Financial Statement Analysis and the Prediction of Stock Returns.” Journal of Accounting and Economics 11, 295-329.Google Scholar
  35. Palepu, K. G. (1986). “Predicting Takeover Targets: A Methodological and Empirical Analysis.” Journal of Accounting and Economics 27, 3-36.Google Scholar
  36. Piotroski, J. (2000). “Value Investing: The Use of Historical Financial Statement Information to SeparateWinners from Losers.” Journal of Accounting Research (forthcoming).Google Scholar
  37. Reinganum, M. R. (1998). “The Anatomy of a Stock Market Winner.” Financial Analysts Journal, March/April, 16-28.Google Scholar
  38. Seyhun, H. N. and M. Bradley. (1997). “Corporate Bankruptcy and Insider Trading.” Journal of Business 70, 189-216.Google Scholar
  39. Skinner, D. J. and R. G. Sloan. (1998). “Earnings Surprises, Growth Expectations and Stock Returns, or, don't let a Torpedo Stock Sink Your Portfolio.” Working Paper, University of Michigan July.Google Scholar
  40. Sloan, R. G. (1996). “Do Stock Prices Fully Reflect Information in Accruals and Cash Flows About Future Earnings?” The Accounting Review 71, 289-315.Google Scholar
  41. Zmijewski, M. E. (1984). “Methodological Issues Related to the Estimation of Financial Distress Prediction Models.” Journal of Accounting Research 22, 59-82.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • Messod D. Beneish
    • 1
  • Charles M. C. Lee
    • 2
  • Robin L. Tarpley
    • 3
  1. 1.Indiana UniversityUSA
  2. 2.Cornell UniversityUSA
  3. 3.Georgetown UniversityUSA

Personalised recommendations