Molecular Breeding

, Volume 7, Issue 4, pp 341–350

Prevention of flower formation in dicotyledons

  • Juha Lemmetyinen
  • Tuija Pennanen
  • Mika Lännenpää
  • Tuomas Sopanen
Article
  • 72 Downloads

Abstract

Prevention of flower formation is important, for example for preventing the spread of transgenes from genetically modified plants or the spread of non-native species, for increasing vegetative growth or preventing the formation of allergenic pollen. The aim of this study was to determine whether flowering of dicotyledonous plants can be prevented by genetic manipulation without harmful effects on vegetative growth. Here we describe isolation of the BpMADS1 gene (similar to SEP3, formerly AGL9) from birch and show that it is expressed only in the inflorescences. In tobacco and Arabidopsis, the expression of BpMADS1::GUS was also virtually inflorescence-specific. Transgenic tobacco and Arabidopsis containing a BpMADS1::BARNASE construct grew well. In one tobacco line the formation of the inflorescence was completely prevented; in several other lines the flowers lacked stamens and carpels and therefore were sterile. The final dry weights of the shoots of the sterile tobacco lines were 140–200% of those of controls. In Arabidopsis, some of the transgenic lines containing the BpMADS1::BARNASE construct formed inflorescences. Some of these lines formed never flowers and some others formed occasionally single fertile flowers. Some other lines did not form inflorescences, but formed up to about one hundred leaves, even in long-day conditions. These results suggest that formation of flowers or inflorescences in widely different dicotyledonous plants could be prevented using the BpMADS1::BARNASE construct and that prevention of flowering may lead to increased vegetative mass.

Ablation Arabidopsis BARNASE Birch Flowering Tobacco 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Angenent G.C., Busscher M., Franken J., Mol J.N.M. and van Tunen A.J. 1992. Differential expression of two MADS box genes in wild-type and mutant petunia flowers. Plant Cell 4: 983–993.Google Scholar
  2. Beals T.P. and Goldberg R.B. 1997. A novel cell ablation strategy blocks tobacco anther dehiscence. Plant Cell 9: 1527–1545.Google Scholar
  3. Bechtold N., Ellis J. and Pelletier G. 1993. In planta Agrobacterium mediated gene transfer by infiltration of adult Arabidopsis thaliana plants. C.R. Acad. Sci. Paris, Sci. Vie/Life Sci. 316: 1194–1199.Google Scholar
  4. Blázquez M.A., Soowal L.N., Lee I. and Weigel D. 1997. LEAFY expression and flower initiation in Arabidopsis. Development 124: 3835–3844.Google Scholar
  5. Bonhomme F., Sommer H., Bernier G. and Jacqmard A. 1997. Characterization of SaMADS D from Sinapis alba suggests a dual function of the gene: in inflorescence development and floral organogenesis. Plant Mol. Biol. 34: 573–582.Google Scholar
  6. Day C.D., Galgoci B.F.C. and Irish V.F. 1995. Genetic ablation of petal and stamen primordia to elucidate cell interactions during floral development. Development 121: 2887–2895.Google Scholar
  7. Elo A., Lemmetyinen J., Turunen M.-L., Tikka L. and Sopanen T. 2001. Three MADS-box genes similar to APETALA1 and FRUITFULL from silver birch (Betula pendula). Physiol. Plant. 112: 95–103.Google Scholar
  8. Goldman M.H.S., Goldberg R.B. and Mariani C. 1994. Female sterile tobacco plants are produced by stigma-specific cell ablation. EMBO J. 13: 2976–2984.Google Scholar
  9. Hartley R.W. 1988. Barnase and barstar. Expression of its cloned inhibitor permits expression of a cloned ribonuclease. J. Mol. Biol. 202: 913–915.Google Scholar
  10. Horsch R.B., Fry J.E., Hoffmann N.L., Eichholtz D., Rogers S.G. and Fraley R.T. 1985. A simple and general method for transferring genes into plants. Science 227: 1229–1231.Google Scholar
  11. Jefferson R.A., Kavanagh T.A. and Bevan M.W. 1987. GUS fusions: β-glucuronidase as a sensitive and versatile gene fusion marker in higher plants. EMBO J. 6: 3901–3907.Google Scholar
  12. Jofuku K.D. and Goldberg R.B. 1988. Analysis of plant gene structure. In: Shaw C.H. (Ed.), Plant Molecular Biology: A Practical Approach. IRL Press, Oxford, pp. 37–66.Google Scholar
  13. Kelly A.J., Bonnlander M.B. and Meeks-Wagner D.R. 2995. NFL, the tobacco homolog of FLORICAULA and LEAFY, is transcriptionally expressed in both vegetative and floral meristems. Plant Cell 7: 225–234.Google Scholar
  14. Levy Y.Y. and Dean C. 1998. The transition to flowering. Plant Cell 10: 1973–1989.Google Scholar
  15. Magallón S., Crane P.R. and Herendeen P.S. 1999. Phylogenetic pattern, diversity, and diversification of eudicots. Ann. MO Bot. Gard. 86: 297–372.Google Scholar
  16. Mandel M.A. and Yanofsky M.F. 1998. The Arabidopsis AGL9 MADS box gene is expressed in young flower primordia. Sex. Plant Reprod. 11: 22–28.Google Scholar
  17. Mariani C., De Beuckeleer M., Truettner J., Leemans J. and Goldberg R.B. 1990. Induction of male sterility in plants by a chimaeric ribonuclease gene. Nature 347: 737–741.Google Scholar
  18. McDaniel C.N. 1996. Developmental physiology of floral initiation in Nicotiana tabacum L. J. Exp. Bot. 47: 465–475.Google Scholar
  19. Nilsson O., Wu E., Wolfe D.S. and Weigel D. 1998. Genetic ablation of flowers in transgenic Arabidopsis. Plant J. 15: 799–804.Google Scholar
  20. Pappenheimer A.M. Jr. 1977. Diphtheria toxin. Ann. Rev. Biochem. 46: 69–94.Google Scholar
  21. Paul W., Hodge R., Smartt S., Draper J. and Scott R. 1992. The isolation and characterisation of the tapetum-specific Arabidopsis thaliana A9 gene. Plant Mol. Biol. 19: 611–622.Google Scholar
  22. Pelaz S., Ditta G.S., Baumann E., Wisman E. and Yanofsky M.F. 2000. B and C floral organ identity functions require SEPALLATA MADS-box genes. Nature 405: 200–203.Google Scholar
  23. Pnueli L., Abu-Abeid M., Zamir D., Nacken W., Schwarz-Sommer Z. and Lifschitz E. 1991. TheMADS box gene family in tomato: temporal expression during floral development, conserved secondary structures and homology with homeotic genes from Antirrhinum and Arabidopsis. Plant J. 1: 255–266.Google Scholar
  24. Strauss S.H., Rottmann W.H., Brunner A.M. and Sheppard L.A. 1995. Genetic engineering of reproductive sterility in forest trees. Mol. Breed. 1: 5–26.Google Scholar
  25. Theissen G., Becker A., Di Rosa A., Kanno A., Kim J.T., Münster T., Winter K.-U. and Saedler H. 2000. A short history of MADSbox genes in plants. Plant Mol. Biol. 42: 115–149.Google Scholar
  26. Tzfira T., Zuker A. and Altman A. 1998. Forest-tree biotechnology: genetic transformation and its application to future forests. Trends Biotechnol. 16: 439–446.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • Juha Lemmetyinen
    • 1
  • Tuija Pennanen
    • 1
  • Mika Lännenpää
    • 1
  • Tuomas Sopanen
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of BiologyUniversity of JoensuuJoensuuFinland

Personalised recommendations