Electronic Commerce Research

, Volume 1, Issue 3, pp 301–314 | Cite as

Designing Electronic Auctions: An Internet-Based Hybrid Procedure Combining Aspects of Negotiations and Auctions

  • Jeffrey E. Teich
  • Hannele Wallenius
  • Jyrki Wallenius
  • Alexander Zaitsev
Article

Abstract

We discuss design issues pertaining to multiple issue auctions in the WWW environment. Based on a critical evaluation of existing auctions, we propose NegotiAuctiontm, an algorithmic Internet-based auction procedure, which combines certain elements of negotiations and auctions. It can be used either in reverse or forward auctions. When defining a multiple issue (multiple attribute) auction, the auction owner has more control over the bidding process than is possible in traditional auctions, signaling bid requirements to the bidders individually. This will result in a preferred set of auction winners. It is believed to reduce the total transaction time and eliminate the necessity of holding subsequent negotiations with the set of winners.

multi-attribute auctions electronic markets hybrid combination markets e-negotiation 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bakos, Y. (1998). “The Emerging Role of Electronic Marketplaces on the Internet.” Communications of the ACM 41, 35–42.Google Scholar
  2. Bichler, M. (2000). “An Experimental Analysis of Multi-Attribute Auctions.” Decision Support Systems 29, 249–268.Google Scholar
  3. Bichler, M., M. Kaukal, and A. Segev. (1999). “Multi-Attribute Auctions for Electronic Procurement.” In Proceedings of the First IBM IAC Workshop on Internet Based Negotiation Technologies, Yorktown Heights, NY.Google Scholar
  4. Bichler, M., and H.Werthner. (2000). “A Classification Framework of Multidimensional, Multi-Unit Procurement Negotiations.” In Proceedings of the DEXA 2000 Conference, Greenwich, UK.Google Scholar
  5. Branco, F. (1997). “The Design of Multi-Dimensional Auctions.” Rand Journal of Economics 28, 63–81.Google Scholar
  6. Che, Y.K. (1992). “Design Competition through Multi-Dimensional Auctions.” Rand Journal of Economics 24, 668–679.Google Scholar
  7. Choudhury, V., K. Hartzel, and B. Konsynski. (1998). “Uses and Consequences of Electronic Markets: An Empirical Investigation in the Aircraft Parts Industry.” MIS Quarterly, December, 471–507.Google Scholar
  8. Dalton, G. (1999). “Going, Going, Gone.” Information Week 4, 45–50.Google Scholar
  9. Dasgupta, S., and D.F. Spulber. (1989). “Managing Procurement Auctions.” Information Economics and Policy 4, 5–29.Google Scholar
  10. Hapgood, F. (1999). The Corporate Flea Market, Inc. Magazine, Technology 3(90). http://www.inc.com/ incmagazine/archives/17990901.html.Google Scholar
  11. Jones, J., and G. Koehler. (2000). “Multiple Criteria Combinatorial Auction: A B2B Allocation Mechanism for Substitute Goods.” In Proceedings of the AMCIS (Long Beach).Google Scholar
  12. Kumar, M., and S. Feldman. (1999). “Internet Auctions.” Unpublished Manuscript, IBM Research Division, T. J. Watson Research Center.Google Scholar
  13. Maes, P., R.H. Guttman, and A. Moukas. (1999). “Agents that Buy and Sell.” Communications of the ACM 42, 81–91.Google Scholar
  14. Sandholm, T. (1999). “eMediator: A Next Generation Electronic Commerce Server.” In AAAI Workshop on AI in Electronic Commerce, Orlando, FL. AAAI Workshop Technical Report WS–99–01, 46–55.Google Scholar
  15. Strobel, M. (2000). “On Auctions as the Negotiation Paradigm of Electronic Markets: Success Factors, Limitations and Research Directions.” EM Journal of Electronic Markets 10.Google Scholar
  16. Teich, J., H. Wallenius, and J. Wallenius. (1999). “Multiple Issue Auction and Market Algorithms for the World Wide Web.” Decision Support Systems 26, 49–66.Google Scholar
  17. Teich, J., H. Wallenius, J. Wallenius, and A. Zaitsev. (1999). “A Multiple Unit Auction Algorithm: Some Theory and a Web Implementation.” Electronic Markets: International Journal of Electronic Commerce and Business Media 9, 1–7.Google Scholar
  18. Vigoroso, M. (1999). “Are Internet Auctions Ready to Gear Up?” Purchasing 11.Google Scholar
  19. Wurman, P.R., W.W. Walsh, and M.P. Wellman. (1998). “A Flexible Double Auctions for Electronic Commerce: Theory and Implementation.” Decision Support Systems 24, 17–27.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jeffrey E. Teich
    • 1
  • Hannele Wallenius
    • 2
  • Jyrki Wallenius
    • 3
  • Alexander Zaitsev
    • 4
  1. 1.Management DepartmentNew Mexico State UniversityLas CrucesUSA
  2. 2.Department of Industrial Engineering and ManagementHelsinki University of TechnologyFinland
  3. 3.Helsinki School of Economics and Business AdministrationHelsinkiFinland
  4. 4.Moscow State UniversityMoscowRussia

Personalised recommendations