Comparative housing and welfare: Theorising the relationship

  • Jim Kemeny

Abstract

Housing accounts for a high proportion of the capital investment component of welfare, and is the largest single item in household budgets. It also plays a major part in defining life styles and structuring the urban environment. It is argued that in the light of this, housing must cease to be treated as the poor relative of the four pillars of welfare and the vital role it plays must be recognised, especially in terms of synergy with other dimensions of welfare – notably pensions – that sets limits to the way welfare states are organised. Differences in how housing is organised between countries therefore need to be given much closer and more theoretically informed attention by welfare researchers than has been the case hitherto. In this article a first step is made toward this end.

housing pensions urban form welfare regimes welfare state welfare theory 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Balchin, P. (Ed.) (1996) Housing Policy in Europe, Routledge, London.Google Scholar
  2. Barlow, J. and Duncan, S. (1994) Success and Failure in Housing Provision: European Systems Compared, Pergamon, Oxford.Google Scholar
  3. Bonoli, G. (1997) Classifying welfare states: A two-dimensional approach, Journal of Social Policy, 26, 351-372.Google Scholar
  4. Castells, M. (1977) The Urban Question, Edward Arnold, London.Google Scholar
  5. Castles, F.G. and Ferrera, M. (1996) Home ownership and the welfare state: Is Southern Europe different?, South European Society and Politics, 1, 163-185.Google Scholar
  6. Castles, F.G. and Mitchell, D. (1990) ThreeWorlds ofWelfare Capitalism or Four?, Australian National University, Graduate Programme in Public Policy Discussion Paper No. 21, Canberra.Google Scholar
  7. Dickens, P., Duncan, S., Goodwin, M. and Gray, F. (1985) State, Housing and Localities, Methuen, London.Google Scholar
  8. Donnison, D. (1969) The Government of Housing, Penguin, London.Google Scholar
  9. Donnison, D. and Ungerson, C. (1982) Housing Policy, Penguin, Harmondsworth.Google Scholar
  10. Esping-Andersen, G. (1985) Politics Against Markets: The Social Democratic Road to Power, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar
  11. Esping-Andersen, G. (1990) The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism, Polity Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  12. Kangas, O. (1994) The merging of welfare state models? Past and present trends on Finnish and Swedish social policy, Journal of European Social Policy, 4, 79-94.Google Scholar
  13. Kemeny, J. (1977) A political sociology of home ownership in Australia, Australian and New Zealand Journal of Sociology, 13, 47-52.Google Scholar
  14. Kemeny, J. (1981) The Myth of Home Ownership: Public Versus Private Choices in Housing Tenure, Routledge, London.Google Scholar
  15. Kemeny, J. (1992a) Housing and Social Theory, Routledge, London.Google Scholar
  16. Kemeny, J. (1992b) Swedish rent-setting policy: Labour-led corporatism in a strategic policy area, International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 16, 555-570.Google Scholar
  17. Kemeny, J. (1995a) From Public Housing to the Social Market: Rental Policy Strategies in Comparative Perspective, Routledge, London.Google Scholar
  18. Kemeny, J. (1995b) Theories of power in ‘The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism', Journal of European Social Policy, 5, 87-96.Google Scholar
  19. Kemeny, J. and Lowe, S. (1998) Schools of comparative housing research: From convergence to divergence, Housing Studies, 13, 161-176.Google Scholar
  20. Kleinman, M.P. (1993) Large-scale transfers of council housing to new landlords: Is British social housing becoming more ‘European?’, Housing Studies, 8, 163-178.Google Scholar
  21. Langan, M. and Ostner, I. (1991) Gender and welfare: Towards a comparative framework, In: Towards a European Welfare State (Ed., G. Room), School for Advanced Urban Studies, University of Bristol, Bristol.Google Scholar
  22. Leibfried, S. (1991) Towards a EuropeanWelfare State: On Integrating Poverty Regimes in the European Community, Working Paper 2/91, Bremen University, Centre for Social Policy Research.Google Scholar
  23. Lewis, J. (1992) Gender and the development of welfare regimes, Journal of European Social Policy, 2, 159-173.Google Scholar
  24. Lijphart, A. and Crepaz, M.M.L. (1991) Corporatism and consensus democracy in eighteen countries: Conceptual and empirical linkages, British Journal of Political Science, 21, 235-246.Google Scholar
  25. Lowe, S. (1994) Towards a social theory of housing in Eastern Europe, In: Transitional Housing Systems (Eds, Tanninen, T., Ambrose, I. and Siksiö, O.), Bauhaus, Dresden/Dessau.Google Scholar
  26. Malpass, P. (1999) Housing associations and housing policy in Britain since 1989, Housing Studies, 14, 881-893.Google Scholar
  27. O'Connor, J. (1993) Gender, class and citizenship in the comparative analysis of welfare states: Theoretical and methodological issues, British Journal of Sociology, 44, 501-519.Google Scholar
  28. Oxley, M. (2001) Meaning, science, context and confusion in comparative housing research, Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 16, 89-106.Google Scholar
  29. Pickvance, C. (2001) Four varieties of comparative analysis, Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 16, 7-28.Google Scholar
  30. Popenoe, D. (1977) The Suburban Environment: Sweden and the United States, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.Google Scholar
  31. Popenoe, D. and Michelson, W. (2001) Macro environments and people: Cities, suburbs, and metropolitan areas, In: Handbook of Environmental Sociology (Eds, Dunlap, R. and Michelson, W.), Greenwood Publishing Group, forthcoming.Google Scholar
  32. Power, A. (1993) Hovels to High-rise: State Housing in Europe Since 1850, Routledge, London.Google Scholar
  33. Saunders, P. (1990) A Nation of Home Owners, Hyman Unwin, London.Google Scholar
  34. Schmidt, S. (1989) Convergence theory, labour movements, and corporatism: The case of housing, Scandinavian Housing and Planning Research, 6, 83-101.Google Scholar
  35. Skifter Andersen, H. and Munk, A. (1994) The welfare state versus the social marketcomparisons and evaluation of housing policies in Denmark and West Germany with special importance attached to social housing and rent control, Scandinavian Housing and Planning Research, 11, 1-25.Google Scholar
  36. Smith, J. and Oxley, M. (1997) Housing investment and social housing: European comparisons, Housing Studies, 12, 489-507.Google Scholar
  37. Szalai, A. (Ed.) (1973) The Use of Time; Daily Activities of Urban and Suburban Populations in Twelve Countries, Mouton, The Hague.Google Scholar
  38. Torgersen, U. (1987) Housing: The wobbly pillar under the welfare state, In: Between State andMarket: Housing in the Post-industrial Era (Eds, Turner, B., Kemeny, J. and Lundqvist, L.), Almqvist and Wicksell International, Stockholm, pp. 116-126.Google Scholar
  39. Wilensky, H.L. and Lebeaux, C.N. (1958) Industrial Society and SocialWelfare, Russell Sage Foundation, New York, NY.Google Scholar
  40. Wilensky, H.L. (1975) The Welfare State and Equality: Structural and Ideological Roots of Public Expenditure, University of California Press, Berkeley, CA.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jim Kemeny
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute for Housing and Urban Research and Department of SociologyUppsala UniversityGävleSweden

Personalised recommendations