Experimental Economics

, Volume 4, Issue 1, pp 55–85

Marketmaking in the Laboratory: Does Competition Matter?

  • Jan Pieter Krahnen
  • Martin Weber


This paper is the first experimental study of the effects of competition and adverse selection on the performance of market maker (MM-) markets. Information distribution may is either symmetric or heterogeneous. MM-markets are either monopolistic (the specialist markets), or competitive (the multi MM-market). Welfare comparisons are with respect to a continuous double auction (DA-) market. Informed subjects receive an imperfect signal of the true state of the world. We find three main results. First, competition among market makers significantly reduces the bid-ask spread, and increases transaction volume. Second, competition among market makers induces competitive undercutting, yielding net trading losses for market makers as a group in most periods. Third, from the perspective of uninformed traders, a competing MM-regime is optimal, since it minimizes their expected trading losses.

market microstructure dealer market bid-ask spread competition 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Admati, A. and Pfleiderer, P. (1989). “Divide and Conquer: A Theory of Intraday and Day-of-the-week Mean Effects.” Review of Financial Studies. 2, 189–224.Google Scholar
  2. Amihud, Y. and Mendelson, H. (1986). “Asset Pricing and the Bid-Ask Spread.” Journal of Financial Economics. 17, 223–249.Google Scholar
  3. Bloomfield, R. (1996). “Quotes, Prices and Estimates in a Laboratory Market.” Journal of Finance. 51, 1791–1808.Google Scholar
  4. Bloomfield, R. and O'Hara, M. (1999). “Market Transparency: WhoWins and Who Loses?” Review of Financial Studies. 12, 5–35.Google Scholar
  5. Bloomfield, R. and O'Hara, M. (2000). “Can Transparent Markets Survive?” Journal of Financial Economics. 55, 425–459.Google Scholar
  6. Börsenzeitung, (1995). Zur führenden Börsenorganisation in der europäischen Zeitzone werden, No. 63, March 30, 8.Google Scholar
  7. Christie, W. and Schultz, P. (1994). “Why Do NASDAQ Market Makers Avoid Odd-Eighth Quotes?” Journal of Finance. 49, 1813–1840.Google Scholar
  8. Christie, W., Harris, J., and Schultz, P. (1994). “Why Did NASDAQ Market Makers Stop Avoiding Odd-Eighth Quotes?” Journal of Finance. 49, 1841–1860.Google Scholar
  9. Financial Economists Roundtable (1996). “Statement on the Structure of the NASDAQ Stock Market.” Journal of Financial Services Research. 10, 105–107.Google Scholar
  10. Financial Times. (1997). Derivatives: Fierce battle rages for market share (author: Samer Iskander), June 27.Google Scholar
  11. Freihube, T., Kehr, C., and Krahnen, J.P. (1999). “Was leisten die Kursmakler: Eine empirische Untersuchung der Frankfurter Wertpapierbörse.” Kredit und Kapital. 32, 426–460.Google Scholar
  12. Friedman, D. (1984). “On the Efficiency of Experimental Double Auction Markets.” American Economic Review. 74, 60–72.Google Scholar
  13. Friedman, D. (1991). “A Simple Testable Model of Double Auction Markets.” Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization. 15, 47–70.Google Scholar
  14. Friedman, D. (1993). “Privileged Traders and Asset Market Efficiency: A Laboratory Study.” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis. 28, 515–534.Google Scholar
  15. Garman, M. (1976). “Market Microstructure.” Journal of Financial Economics. 3, 257–275.Google Scholar
  16. Glosten, L.R. (1989). “Insider Trading, Liquidity, and the Role of the Monopolist Specialist.” Journal of Business. 62, 211–235.Google Scholar
  17. Glosten, L.R. and Harris, L.E. (1988). “Estimating the Components of the Bid/Ask Spread.” Journal of Financial Economics. 21, 123–142.Google Scholar
  18. Glosten, L.R. and Milgrom, P. (1985). “Bid, Ask, and Transaction Prices in an Specialist Market with Heterogeneously Informed Traders.” Journal of Financial Economics. 13, 71–100.Google Scholar
  19. Hasbrouck, J. (1988). “Trades, Quotes, Inventory, and Information.” Journal of Financial Economics. 22, 229–252.Google Scholar
  20. Ho, T. and Stoll, H. (1981). “Optimal Market Maker Pricing under Transactions and Return Uncertainty.” Journal of Financial Economics. 9, 47–73.Google Scholar
  21. Ho, T. and Macris, R.G. (1985). “Market Making and the Changing Structure of the Securities Industries.” In Y. Amihud, T.S.Y. Ho, and R.A. Schwartz (eds.), Market Making and the Changing Structure of the Securities Industry, Lexington: MA, 41–66.Google Scholar
  22. Huang, R. and Stoll, H. (1996). “Dealer versus Auction Markets: A Paired Comparison of Execution Costs on NASDAQ and the NYSE.” Journal of Financial Economics. 41, 313–357.Google Scholar
  23. Krahnen, J.P. (1993). “Market Makers and Traders in an Experimental Stock Market.” Working Paper, University of Giessen.Google Scholar
  24. Krahnen, J.P., Rieck, C., and Theissen, E. (1999). “Designing an Experimental Asset Market.” In W. Bühler, H. Hax, and R. Schmidt (eds.), Empirical Research on the German Capital Market, Heidelberg: Springer, 27–54.Google Scholar
  25. Krahnen, J.P. and Weber, M. (1999). “Does Information Aggregation Depend on Market Structure? Market Makers versus Double Auction.” Zeitschrift f¨ur Wirtschafts-und Sozialwissenschaften. 119, 1–21.Google Scholar
  26. Kyle, A. (1985). “Continuous Auctions and Insider Trading.” Econometrica. 53, 1315–1336Google Scholar
  27. Kyle, A.S. (1989). “Informed Speculation with Imperfect Competition.” Review of Economic Studies. 56, 317–355.Google Scholar
  28. Lamoureux, C.G. and Schnitzlein, C.R. (1997). “When it's not the only Game in Town.” Journal of Finance. 52, 683–712.Google Scholar
  29. Leach, J.C. and Madhavan, A.N. (1993). “Price Experimentation and Security Market Structure.” Review of Financial Studies. 6, 375–404.Google Scholar
  30. LeRoy, S.F. (1989). “Efficient Capital Markets and Martingales.” Journal of Economic Literature. 27, 1583–1621.Google Scholar
  31. Milgrom, P. and Stokey, N. (1982). “Information, Trade and Common Knowledge.” Journal of Economic Theory. 26, 17–27.Google Scholar
  32. Madhavan, A. (1992). “Trading Mechanisms in Securities Markets.” Journal of Finance. 47, 607–642.Google Scholar
  33. Madhavan, A. and Sofianos, G. (1994). “Auction and Market Maker Markets: An Empirical Analysis of NYSE Specialist Trading.” NYSE Working Paper #94–01.Google Scholar
  34. O'Hara, M. (1995). Market Microstructure Theory. Cambridge, Mass.: Blackwell Publishers.Google Scholar
  35. Pagano, M. and Roell, A. (1996). “Transparency and Liquidity: A Comparison of Auction and Market Maker Makets with Informed Trading.” Journal of Finance. 51, 579–612.Google Scholar
  36. Plott, Charles R. and Sunder, S. (1982). “Efficiency of Experimental Security Markets with Insider Information: An Application of Rational-Expectations Models.” Journal of Political Economy. 90(4), 663–698.Google Scholar
  37. Plott, Charles R. and Sunder, S. (1988). “Rational Expectations and the Aggregation of Diverse Information in Laboratory Security Markets.” Econometrica. 56, 1085–1118.Google Scholar
  38. Plott, C.R. and Gray, P. (1990). “The Multiple Unit Double Auction.” Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization. 13, 245–258.Google Scholar
  39. Seppi, D.J. (1997). “Liquidity Provision with Limit Orders and a Strategic Specialist.” Review of Financial Studies. 10, 103–150.Google Scholar
  40. Spulber, D.F. (1996). “Marketmicrostructure and Intermediation.” Journal of Economic Perspectives. 10(3), 135–152.Google Scholar
  41. Theissen, E. (1996). “Market Structure and the Aggregation of Information: An Experimental Investigation.” Working paper, University of Frankfurt.Google Scholar
  42. Wahal, S. (1997). “Entry, Exit, Market Makers, and the Bid-Ask-Spread.” Review of Financial Studies. 10, 871–901.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jan Pieter Krahnen
    • 1
    • 2
  • Martin Weber
    • 3
  1. 1.Finance DepartmentGoethe Universitaet FrankfurtGermany
  2. 2.CFS Center for Financial StudiesCEPRGermany
  3. 3.Lehrstúhl Bankbetiiebs LehreUniversitaet MannheimGermany)

Personalised recommendations