, Volume 1, Issue 1, pp 1–9 | Cite as

Applying game theory to automated negotiation

  • Ken Binmore
  • Nir Vulkan


With existing technology, it is already possible for personal agents to schedule meetings for their users, to write the small print of an agreement, and for agents to search the Internet for the cheapest price. But serious negotiation cranks the difficulty of the problem up several notches. In this paper, we review what game theory has to offer in the light of experience gained in programming automated agents within the ADEPT (Advance Decision Environment for Process Tasks) project, which is currently being used by British Telecom for some purposes.


Game Theory Business Process Management Bargaining Model Nash Bargaining Solution Game Theoretic Model 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. [1]
    A.R. Admati and M. Perry, Strategic delay in bargaining, Rev. Econom. Stud. 54 (1987) 345–364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. [2]
    K. Binmore, Bargaining and coalitions, in: Game Theoretic Models of Bargaining, ed. A.E. Roth (Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 1985) pp. 269–304.Google Scholar
  3. [3]
    K. Binmore, Modeling rational players, Parts I and II, Economics and Philosophy 3 (1987) 179–214; 4 (1985) 9–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. [4]
    K. Chatterjee and C.C. Lee, Bargaining and search with incomplete information about outside options, mimeo (1996).Google Scholar
  5. [5]
    K. Chatterjee and L. Samuleson, Bargaining with two-sided incomplete information: An infinite horizon model with alternating offers, Rev. Econom. Stud. 54 (1987) 175–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. [6]
    K. Chatterjee and L. Samuleson, Bargaining under two-sided incomplete information: The unrestricted case, Oper. Res. 36 (1988) 605–618.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. [7]
    S.J. Grossman and M. Perry, Sequential bargaining under asymmetric information, J. Econom. Theory 39 (1986) 120–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. [8]
    F. Gul and H. Sonnenschein, On delay in bargaining with one-sided uncertainty, Econometrica 56 (1988) 601–611.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. [9]
    S. Hurkens and N. Vulkan, Information acquisition and entry, Discussion paper 96–23, University College London (1996).Google Scholar
  10. [10]
    N.R. Jennings, P. Farain, M.J. Johnson, T.J. Norman, P. O'Brein and M.E. Wiegand, Agent-based business process management, Internat. J. Cooperative Inform. Systems 5(2–3) (1996) 105–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. [11]
    S. Matthews, Information acquisition in discriminatory auctions, in: Bayesian Models in Economic Theory, eds. M. Boyer and R.E. Kihlstrom (Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1984).Google Scholar
  12. [12]
    A.J. Rodríguez, P. Noriega, C. Sierra and J. Padget, FM96.5 – A Java-based electronic auction house, in: 2nd Internat. Conf. on the Practical Application of Intelligent Agents and Multi-Agent Technology: PAAM '97 (1997).Google Scholar
  13. [13]
    J. Rosenschein and G. Zlotkin, Rules of Encounter (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1994).Google Scholar
  14. [14]
    A. Rubinstein, Perfect equilibrium in a bargaining model, Econometrica 50 (1982) 207–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. [15]
    A. Rubinstein, A bargaining model with incomplete information about time preference, Econometrica 53 (1985) 1151–1172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. [16]
    A. Rubinstein, Choice of conjectures in a bargaining game with incomplete information, in: Game Theoretic Models of Bargaining, ed. A.E. Roth (Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 1985) pp. 99–114.Google Scholar
  17. [17]
    C. Sierra, P. Faratin and N.R. Jennings, A service-oriented negotiation model between autonomous agents, in: Proc. of Modeling Autonomous Agents in a Multi-Agent World (MAAMAW) (1997).Google Scholar
  18. [18]
    R.H. Varian, Economic mechanism design for computerised agents, in: USENIX Workshop on Electronic Commerce, New York (July 1995).Google Scholar
  19. [19]
    N. Vulkan, Uncertainty, information acquisition and economic equilibria, Ph.D. thesis, University College London (1996).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ken Binmore
    • 1
  • Nir Vulkan
    • 1
  1. 1.The ESRC Centre for Economic Learning and Social EvolutionUniversity College LondonLondonUK

Personalised recommendations