Plant Ecology

, Volume 152, Issue 1, pp 67–78 | Cite as

Field experiments on seed dispersal by wind in ten umbelliferous species (Apiaceae)

  • Eelke Jongejans
  • Anders Telenius


This report presents data from experiments on seed dispersal by wind for ten species of the family Apiaceae. Seed shadows were obtained in the field under natural conditions, using wind speeds between four and ten m/s. The flight of individual seeds was followed by eye, and seed shadows were acquired, with median distances varying from 0.7 to 3.1 m between species. Multiple regression models of wind speed and seed weight on dispersal distance were significant for six out of ten species; wind speed had significant effects in seven cases, but seed weight only once. A good correlation between mean terminal falling velocity of the seeds of a species and median dispersal distance, indicates the promising explanatory power that individual terminal velocity data might have on dispersal distance, together with wind speed and turbulence. The theory that seeds that seem to be adapted to wind dispersal travel much longer distances than seeds that have no adaptation was tested. Flattened and winged seeds were indeed found to be transported further by wind, but not much further. Moreover, the species with wind-adapted seeds were also taller, being an alternative explanation since their seeds experienced higher wind speeds at these greater heights. Furthermore, flattened and winged seeds were disseminated from ripe umbels at lower wind speeds in the laboratory. This means that the observed difference in dispersal distance would have been smaller when species specific thresholds for wind speed were incorporated in the field experiments. We argue therefore, that seed morphology is not always the best predictor in classifying species in groups with distinctly different dispersal ability.

Anemochory Dissemination Seed morphology Seed weight Terminal velocity Wind-adaptation Wind speed 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Anonymous 1994. STATISTICA for the Macintosh (Volume I). Statsoft, Tulsa.Google Scholar
  2. Andersen, M. C. 1991. Mechanistic models for the seed shadows of wind-dispersed plants. The Am. Nat. 137: 476–497.Google Scholar
  3. Augspurger, C. K. & Franson, S. E. 1987. Wind dispersal of artificial fruits varying in mass, area, and morphology. Ecology 68: 27–42.Google Scholar
  4. Cain, M. L., Damman, H. & Muir, A. 1998. Seed dispersal and the holocene migration of woodland herbs. Ecol. Monog. 68: 325–347.Google Scholar
  5. Casper, B. B. 1987. Spatial patterns of seed dispersal and postdispersal seed predation of Cryptantha flava (Boraginaceae). Am. J. Bot. 74: 1646–1655.Google Scholar
  6. Eriksson, O. 1999. Seed size variation and its effect on germination and seedling performance in the clonal herb Convallaria majalis. Acta Oecologica 20: 61–66.Google Scholar
  7. Goudriaan, J. 1977. Crop micrometeorology: a simulation study. Centre for Agricultural Publishing and Documentation, Wageningen.Google Scholar
  8. Greene, D. F. & Johnson, E. A. 1993. Seed mass and dispersal capacity in wind-dispersed diaspores. Oikos 67: 69–74.Google Scholar
  9. Grift, T. E., Walker, J. T. & Hofstee, J. W. 1997. Aerodynamic properties of individual fertilizer particles. Trans. ASAE 40: 13–20.Google Scholar
  10. Hendrix, S. D., Nielsen, E., Nielsen, T., & Schutt, M. 1991. Are seedlings from small seeds always inferior to seedlings from large seeds? Effects of seed biomass on seedling growth in Pastinaca sativa L. New Phytologist 119: 299–305.Google Scholar
  11. Hensen, I. & Müller, C. 1997. Experimental and structural investigations of anemochorous dispersal. Plant Ecol. 133: 169–180.Google Scholar
  12. Hofstee, J. W. 1992. Handling and spreading of fertilizers: part 2, physical properties of fertilizer, measuring methods and data. J. Agric. Eng. Res. 53: 141–162.Google Scholar
  13. Hovestadt, T., Yao, P. & Linsenmair, E. 1999. Seed dispersal mechanisms and the vegetation of forest islands in a West African forest-savanna mosaic (Comoé National Park, Ivory Coast). Plant Ecol. 144: 1–25.Google Scholar
  14. Hughes, L., Dunlop, M., French, K., Leishman, M. R., Rice, B., Rodgerson, L. & Westoby, M. 1994. Predicting dispersal spectra: a minimal set of hypotheses based on plant attributes. J. Ecol. 82: 933–950.Google Scholar
  15. Jongejans, E. & Schippers, P. 1999. Modeling seed dispersal by wind in herbaceous species. Oikos 87: 362–372.Google Scholar
  16. Kiviniemi, K. 1996. A study of adhesive seed dispersal of three species under natural conditions. Acta Bot. Neerl. 45: 73–83.Google Scholar
  17. Kiviniemi, K. & Telenius, A. 1998. Experiments on adhesive dispersal by wood mouse: seed shadows and dispersal distances of 13 plant species from cultivated areas in southern Sweden. Ecography 21: 108–116.Google Scholar
  18. Lacey, E. P. 1982. Timing of seed dispersal in Daucus carota. Oikos 39: 83–91.Google Scholar
  19. Lid, J. & Lid, D. T. 1994. Norsk Flora. Det Norske Samlaget, Oslo.Google Scholar
  20. Maier, A., Emig, W. & Leins, P. 1999. Dispersal patterns of some Phyteuma species (Campanulaceae). Plant Biol. 1: 408–417.Google Scholar
  21. Matlack, G. R. 1994. Plant species migration in a mixed-history forest landscape in eastern North America. Ecology 75: 1491–1502.Google Scholar
  22. Monteith, J. L. & Unsworth, M. H. 1990. Principles of environmental physics. Edward Arnold, London.Google Scholar
  23. Morse, D. H. & Schmitt, J. 1985. Propagule size, dispersal ability, and seedling performance in Asclepias syriaca. Oecologia 67: 372–379.Google Scholar
  24. Okubo, A. 1980. Diffusion and ecological problems: mathematical models. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.Google Scholar
  25. Quinn, R. M., Lawton, J. H., Eversham, B. C. & Wood, S. N. 1994. The biogeography of scarce vascular plants in Britain with respect to habitat preference, dispersal ability and reproductive biology. Biol. Cons. 70: 149–157.Google Scholar
  26. Redbo-Torstensson, P. & Telenius, A. 1995. Primary and secondary seed dispersal by wind and water in Spergularia salina. Ecography 18: 230–237.Google Scholar
  27. Strykstra, R. J., Pegtel, D. M. & Bergsma, A. 1998. Dispersal distance and achene quality of the rare anemochorous species Arnica montana L.: implications for conservation. Acta Bot. Neerl. 47: 45–56.Google Scholar
  28. Telenius, A. & Torstensson, P. 1989. The seed dimorphism of Spergularia marina in relation to dispersal by wind and water. Oecologia 80: 206–210.Google Scholar
  29. Van Dorp, D., Hoek, W.P. & Daleboudt, C. 1996. Seed dispersal capacity of six perennial grassland species measured in a wind tunnel at varying wind speed and height. Canadian J. Bot. 74: 1956–1963.Google Scholar
  30. Westhoff, V. & Van der Maarel, E. 1973. The Braun-Blanquet approach. Pp. 619–726. In: Whittaker, R. H. (ed.), Ordination and classification of communities. Dr W. Junk, The Hague, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
  31. Willson, M. F. 1993. Dispersal mode, seed shadows, and colonization patterns. Vegetatio 107/108: 261–280.Google Scholar
  32. Willson, M. F., Rice, B. L. & Westoby, M. 1990. Seed dispersal spectra: a comparison of temperate plant communities. J. Veg. Sci. 1: 547–562.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • Eelke Jongejans
    • 1
  • Anders Telenius
    • 2
  1. 1.Laboratory of Theoretical Production EcologyWageningen UniversityWageningenThe Netherlands
  2. 2.Department of Biology and Chemical EngineeringMälardalen UniversitySweden

Personalised recommendations