Photonic Network Communications

, Volume 3, Issue 3, pp 307–319

Ethernet PON (ePON): Design and Analysis of an Optical Access Network

  • Glen Kramer
  • Biswanath Mukherjee
  • Gerry Pesavento
Article

Abstract

With the expansion of services offered over the Internet, the “last mile” bottleneck problems continue to exacerbate. A passive optical network (PON) is a technology viewed by many as an attractive solution to this problem. In this study, we propose the design and analysis of a PON architecture which has an excellent performance-to-cost ratio. This architecture uses the time-division multiplexing (TDM) approach to deliver data encapsulated in Ethernet packets from a collection of optical network units (ONUs) to a central optical line terminal (OLT) over the PON access network. The OLT, in turn, is connected to the rest of the Internet. A simulation model is used to analyze the system’s performance such as bounds on packets delay and queue occupancy. Then, we discuss the possibility of improving the bandwidth utilization by means of timeslot size adjustment, and by packet scheduling.

access network local loop passive optical network PON time-division multiple access TDMA self-similar traffic 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [1]
    G. Pesavento, M. Kelsey, PONs for the broadband local loop, Lightwave, PennWell, vol. 16,no. 10, (September 1999), pp. 68-74.Google Scholar
  2. [2]
    B. Lung, PON architecture “futureproofs” FTTH, Lightwave, PennWell, vol. 16,no. 10, (September 1999), pp. 104-107.Google Scholar
  3. [3]
    W. Leland, M. Taqqu, W. Willinger, D. V. Wilson, On the self-similar nature of ethernet traffic (extended version), IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking, vol. 2,no. 1, (February 1994), pp. 1-15.Google Scholar
  4. [4]
    L. Kleinrock, On flow control in computer networks, Proc. of ICC'78, vol. 2, (Toronto, Ontario, June 1978), pp. 27.2.1-27.2.5.Google Scholar
  5. [5]
    B. Mukherjee, Optical Communication Networks, (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1997).Google Scholar
  6. [6]
    W. Willinger, M. Taqqu, A. Erramilli, A bibliographical guide to self-similar traffic and performance modeling for modern high speed networks, in Stochastic Networks: Theory and Applications in Telecommunication Networks (F. P Kelly, S. Zachary, and I. Ziedins, eds.), vol. 4 of the Royal Statistical Society Lecture Notes Series, (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1996).Google Scholar
  7. [7]
    J. Hammond, P. O'Reilly, Performance Analysis of Local Computer Networks, (Addison-Wesley Publishing Co., Reading, MA, 1986).Google Scholar
  8. [8]
    P. M. Fiorini, On modeling concurrent heavy-tailed network traffic sources and its impact upon QOS, Proc. of ICC'99, vol. 2, (Vancouver, June 1999), pp. 716-720.Google Scholar
  9. [9]
    W. Willinger, V. Paxson, M. Taqqu, Self-similarity and heavy tails: Structural modeling of network traffic, A Practical Guide to Heavy Tails: Statistical Techniques and Applications, R. Adler, R. Feldman, M. S. Taqqu, eds. (Birkhauser, Boston, 1998).Google Scholar
  10. [10]
    K. Park, W. Willinger, Self-similar traffic: An overview, (Preprint.) To appear in Self-Similar Network Traffic and Performance Evaluation, (Wiley-Interscience, 2000).Google Scholar
  11. [11]
    W. R. Stevens, TCP/IP Illustrated, Volume 1, (Addison-Wesley Publishing Co., Reading, MA, 1994).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • Glen Kramer
    • 1
  • Biswanath Mukherjee
    • 1
  • Gerry Pesavento
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Computer ScienceUniversity of CaliforniaDavisUSA
  2. 2.Advanced Technology Lab.Alloptic, Inc.LivermoreUSA

Personalised recommendations