Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy

, Volume 4, Issue 2, pp 193–200

Ethical decision making in neonatal units — The normative significance of vitality

  • Berit Støre Brinchmann
  • Per Nortvedt


This article will be concerned with the phenomenon of vitality, which emerged as one of the main findings in a larger grounded theory study about life and death decisions in hospitals' neonatal units. Definite signs showing the new-born infant's energy and vigour contributed to the clinician's judgements about life expectancy and the continuation or termination of medical treatment. In this paper we will discuss the normative importance of vitality as a diagnostic cue and will argue that vitality, as a sign perceived by doctors and nurses, has moral significance and represents a legitimate contribution to clinical decision-making in difficult cases where the child's life is at stake. We will argue that these clinical intuitions can be justified on a moral basis but only with certain qualifications that accounts for a certain objectivity and intersubjective reliability in the therapeutic judgements.

clinical decision-making end-of-life decision ethics moral realism premature infants preterm vitality 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Als, H. et al.: 1982, 'Manual for the Assessment of Preterm Infants' Behavior', in: H.E. Fitzgerald, B.M. Lester and M.W. Yogman (eds.), Theory and Research in Behavioral Pediatrics, Vol. 1. New York: Plenum Press, pp. 64–133.Google Scholar
  2. Anspach, R.R.: 1993, Deciding Who Lives. Fateful Choices in the Intensive Care Nursery. Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  3. Brinchmann, B.S.: 1998a, 'We Did What We Could; He Was Such a 'Nice' Baby. How Do Nurses and Doctors Make Ethical Decisions in The Neonatal Unit?' (in Norwegian), Vård i Norden (Nursing Science and Research in the Nordic Countries) 18 (2), 16–21.Google Scholar
  4. Brinchmann, B.S.: 1998b, 'The 'Inquisitive One' with the Green Book – Field Researcher and 'Grounded Theorist' on a Neonatal Unit' (in Norwegian), Vård i Norden (Nursing Science and Research in the Nordic Countries) 18 (3), 20–25.Google Scholar
  5. Brinchmann, B.S.: 1999a, 'Ethical Decisions About Neonates in Norway' [abstract]. Image. Journal of Nursing Scholarship 31 (3), 276–277.Google Scholar
  6. Brinchmann B.S.: 1999b, 'Vitality as a Criterion of the Prognosis of Premature Infants?' (in Norwegian). Tidsskrift for Den norske læeforening (The Journal of the Norwegian Medical Association) 119, 2993–2995.Google Scholar
  7. Brinchmann, B.S.: 2000, 'They Have to Show that They Can Make It: Vitality as a Criterion for the Prognosis of Premature Infants', Nursing Ethics 7 (2), 141–147.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Catlin, A.J.: 1999, 'Physicians' Neonatal Resuscitation of Extremely Low–Birth–Weight Preterm Infants', Image. Journal of Nursing Scholarship 31 (3), 269–275.Google Scholar
  9. Cuttini, M., M. Rebagliato, P. Bortoli, G. Hansen, R. de Leeuw, S. Lenoir, J. Persson, M. Reid, M. Schroell, U. de Vonderweid, M. Kaminski, H. Lenard, M. Orzalesi and R. Saracci: 1999, 'Parental Visiting, Vommunication, and Participation in Ethical Decisions: A Comparison of Neonatal Practice in Europe', Archives of Disease in Childhood Fetal & Neonatal Edition 81 (2): F84–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Ethical Council, Contribution to the Debate. Extremely Early Born. Ethical Aspects (in Danish), Copenhagen: Thorup, 1994.Google Scholar
  11. Glaser, B.G. and A.L. Strauss: 1967, The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. New York: A de Gruyter.Google Scholar
  12. Glaser, B.G.: 1978, Theoretical Sensitivity. Advances in the Methodology of Grounded Theory. Mill Valley: The Sociology Press.Google Scholar
  13. Glaser, B.G.: 1998, Doing Grounded Theory: Issues and Discussions. Mill Valley: Sociology Press.Google Scholar
  14. Holm, S.: 1997, Ethical Problems in Clinical Practice – A Study of the Ethical Reasoning of Health Care Professionals. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Jonas, H.: 1984, The Imperative of Responsibility. In Search of an Ethics for the Technological Age. London: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  16. Kvestad, E., K. Lunde, T.J. Markestad and R. Førde: 1999, 'Norwegian Obstetric Paediatric Hospitals' Attitudes Towards Treatment of Extremely Premature Babies' (in Norwegian), Tidsskrift for Den norske lægeforening (The Journal of the Norwegian Medical Association) 119, 3015–3018.Google Scholar
  17. Levinas, E.: 1973/1995, The Theory of Intuition in Husserl's Phenomenology. Illinois: North Western University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Limits for the Treatment of Prematurely Born Infants (in Norwegian). Consensus Conference 24–25 November 1998. Report No. 13 from the Committee for the Consensus Conference Programme. Oslo: The Norwegian Research Council, 1998.Google Scholar
  19. Lindseth, A., G. Udén, A. Norberg and V. Marhaug: 1994, 'Registered Nurses' and Physicians' Reflections on Their Narratives About Ethically Difficult Care Episodes', Journal of Advanced Nursing 20, 245–250.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. McHaffie, H.E. and P.W. Fowlie: 1996, Life, Death and Decisions. Doctors and Nurses Reflect on Neonatal Practice. Hale: Hochland & Hochland Limited.Google Scholar
  21. McNaugthon, D.: 1988, Moral Vision. An Introduction to Ethics. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.Google Scholar
  22. Miller, M.Q. and M. Quinn–Hurst: 1994, 'Neurobehavioral Assessment of High–Risk Infants in Neonatal Intensive Care Unit', The American Journal of Occupational Therapy 48 (6), 506–512.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Pinch, W.J. and M.L. Spielman: 1990, 'The Parents' Perspective: Ethical Decision–Making in Neonatal Intensive Care', Journal of Advanced Nursing 15, 712–719.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Pinch, W.J. and M.L. Spielman: 1993, 'Parental Perceptions of Ethical Post–NICU Discharge', Western Journal of Nursing Research 15 (4), 422–440.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Pinch, W.J. and M.L. Spielman: 1996, 'Ethics in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit: Parental Perceptions at Four Years Postdischarge', Advanced Nursing Science 19 (1), 72–85.Google Scholar
  26. Sweitzer, A.: 1919, 'Straßburger Predigten über die Ehrfurcht vor dem Leben,' Erste Predigt, Sonntag, den 16. Februar 1919, Morgenpredigt zu St. Nicolai, in: A. Schweitzer, Gesammelte Werke in fünf Bänden, Band 5. Zürich, Buchclub Ex Libris, p. 124.Google Scholar
  27. Sørlie, V., A. Lindseth, G. Udén and A. Norberg: 2000, 'Women Physician's Narratives About Being in Ethically Difficult Care Situations in Paediatrics', Nursing Ethics 7 (1), 35–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Tribotti, S.J. and M. Stein: 1992, 'From Research to Clinical Practice: Implementing the NIDCAP', Neonatal Network 2, 35–40.Google Scholar
  29. Udén, G., A. Norberg, A. Lindseth and V. Marhaug: 1992, 'Ethical Reasoning in Nurses' and Physicians' Stories About Care Episodes', Journal of Advanced Nursing 17, 1028–1034.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. van der Heide, A., P.J. van der Maas, G. van der Wal, C.L. de Graaff, J.G. Kester, L.a.A. Kollee, R. de Leeuw and R.A. Holl: 1997, 'Medical End–of–Life Decisions Made for Neonates and Infants in the Netherlands', Lancet 350 (9073), 251–255.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. van der Heide, A., P.J. van der Maas, G. van der Wal, L.A.A. Kollee, R. de Leeuw and R.A. Holl: 1998, 'The Role of Parents in End–of–Life Decisions in Neonatology: Physicians' Views and Practices', Pediatrics 101 (3 Pt 1), 413–418.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • Berit Støre Brinchmann
  • Per Nortvedt
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of Nursing Science, The Faculty of MedicineUniversity of OsloNorway

Personalised recommendations