Advertisement

Information Systems Frontiers

, Volume 3, Issue 1, pp 49–62 | Cite as

An Assessment of the Singerian Inquiring Organizational Model: Cases from Academia and the Utility Industry

  • Sandra M. Richardson
  • James F. Courtney
  • David B. Paradice
Article

Abstract

The Singerian model of inquiring organizations is reviewed (Proceedings of the Americas Conference on Information Systems, Phoenix, Arizona Aug. 16–18,1996:443–445; Australian Journal of Information Systems, 1998;6(1):3–15, reprinted in Foundations of Information Systems: Towards a Philosophy of Informative Technology, http://www.cba.uh.edu/~parks/fis/fisart.htm.) and two cases of organizations representing the Singerian approach are analyzed. The Singerian organization, based on Churchman's (The Design of Inquiring Systems: Basic Concepts of Systems and Organizations, New York, NY: Basic Books Inc., 1971.) Singerian inquiring system, has ethical purposes, treats employees, customers and other stakeholders with trust and respect, and pursues socially responsible goals, including a respect for the environment. Decision making in Singerian organizations is holistic and systemic, and includes diverse stakeholders, thus requiring an open, cooperative culture, wherein debate is encouraged. Authority is diffuse. Measurement is fundamental. A system of measures is continuously monitored, refined, compared and revised to assess progress. Cooperation and communication are supported with various types of groupware, including e-mail, electronic meeting systems, group support systems, negotiation support systems, discussion forums, knowledge bases, knowledge management systems and the like. The Internet and World Wide Web may serve as resource and dissemination agents for “exoteric” knowledge created by the organization. Two organizations, an Energy Service Company and an academic Center for the Management of Information Systems, are analyzed for their conformance to and success with the Singerian approach. The organizations tended to prosper when the model was followed, but ran into difficulties when it was not.

inquiring systems inquiring organizations learning organizations organizational learning systems theory 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Argyris C, Schön D. Organizational Learning II. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley, 1996.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Churchman CW. The Design of Inquiring Systems: Basic Concepts of Systems and Organization. NewYork, NY: Basic Books, Inc., 1971.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Courtney JF. Decision Making and Knowledge Management in Inquiring Organizations: Toward a New Decision-Making Paradigm for DSS. Decision Support Systems, forthcoming.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Courtney JF, Croasdell DT, Paradice DB. Inquiring Organizations. 3 page abstract. Proceedings of the Americas Conference on Information Systems, Phoenix, Arizona, Aug. 16–18,1996: 443–445.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Courtney JF, Croasdell DT, Paradice DB. Inquiring Organizations. Australian Journal of Information Systems, 1998; 6(1):3–15, and reprinted in Foundations of Information Systems: Towards a Philosophy of Information Technology, Available: http://www.cba.uh.edu/~parks/fis/fisart.htm.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Croasdell DT, Courtney JF, Paradice DB. Singerian Inquiring Organizations: Guiding Principles and Design Guidelines for Learning Organizations. Proceedings of the Americans Conference on Information Systems, Baltimore, Maryland, August 14–16, 1998.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    DiBella AJ. Developing Learning Organizations: A Matter of Perspective. Academy of Management Journal, Iss. Best Paper Proceeding 1995;287–290.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Huber G. Organizational Learning: The Contributing Processes and Literature. Organization Science 1991;2:88–115.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kienholz A. Systems ReThinking: An Inquiring Systems Approach to the Art and Practice of the Learning Organization. Foundations of Information Systems: Towards a Philosophy of Information Technology. Available: http://www.cba.uh.edu/~parks/fis/fis.htm, 1998.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Malhotra YB. Knowledge Management in Inquiring Organizations. Proceedings of 3rd Americas Conference on Information Systems, Indianapolis, IN, August 15–17, 1997;293–295.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Mason RO. A Dialectical Approach to Strategic Planning. Management Science 1969;15(8):B403-B414.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Mitroff I. A Communication Model of Dialectical Inquiring Systems-A Strategy for Strategic Planning. Management Science 1971;17(10):B634-B648.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Mitroff I, Betz F, Mason RO. A Mathematical Model of Churchmanian Inquiring Systems with Special Reference to Popper's Measures for ‘The Severity of Tests’. Theory and Decision, 1970;1:155–178.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Mitroff II, Linstone HA. The Unbounded Mind: Breaking the Chains of Traditional Business Thinking. New York: Oxford University Press, 1993.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    National Association of Energy Service Companies, Available: http://www. naesco.org.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Nevis EC, DiBella AJ, Gould JM. Understanding Organizations as Leaning Systems. Sloan Management Review1995;36:73–85.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Senge P. The Leader's NewWork: Building Learning Organizations. Sloan Management Review 1990;Fall:7–22.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sandra M. Richardson
    • 1
  • James F. Courtney
    • 2
  • David B. Paradice
    • 3
  1. 1.Information Systems and Quantitative Sciences, College of Business AdministrationTexas Tech UniversityLubbockUSA
  2. 2.Management Information Systems Department, College of Business AdministrationUniversity of Central FloridaOrlandoUSA
  3. 3.Information and Management Sciences DepartmentFlorida State UniversityTallahasseeUSA

Personalised recommendations