Patient decision making competence: Outlines of a conceptual analysis
- 259 Downloads
In order to protect patients against medical paternalism, patients have been granted the right to respect of their autonomy. This right is operationalized first and foremost through the phenomenon of informed consent. If the patient withholds consent, medical treatment, including life-saving treatment, may not be provided. However, there is one proviso: The patient must be competent to realize his autonomy and reach a decision about his own care that reflects that autonomy. Since one of the most important patient rights hinges on the patient's competence, it is crucially important that patient decision making incompetence is clearly defined and can be diagnosed with the greatest possible degree of sensitivity and, even more important, specificity. Unfortunately, the reality is quite different. There is little consensus in the scientific literature and even less among clinicians and in the law as to what competence exactly means, let alone how it can be diagnosed reliably. And yet, patients are deemed incompetent on a daily basis, losing the right to respect of their autonomy. In this article, we set out to fill that hiatus by beginning at the very beginning, the literal meaning of the term competence. We suggest a generic definition of competence and derive four necessary conditions of competence. We then transpose this definition to the health care context and discuss patient decision making competence.
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Beauchamp, T.L.: 1991, ‘Competence’, in: M.A.G. Cutter and E.E. Shelp (eds.), Competency: A Study of Informal Competency Determinations in Primary Care (Kluwer Academic, Boston), pp. 49–77.Google Scholar
- Buchanan, A. and D. Brock: 1990, Deciding for Others. The Ethics of Surrogate Decision Making. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Faden, R.R. and T.L. Beauchamp: 1986, A History and Theory of Informed Consent. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Gert, B. at al.: 1997, Bioethics: A Return to Fundamentals. New York/Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Klippe, H.v.d.: 1990, ‘Wilsonbekwaamheid in de psychiatrie: zes benaderingen’, Maandblad Geestelijke Volksgezondheid 45, 123–138.Google Scholar
- Legemaate, J.: 1992, ‘Criteria voor wilsonbekwaamheid’, NJB 76 (6), 190–193.Google Scholar
- Maas, P.J.v.d. at al.: 1991, Medische beslissingen rond het levenseinde. Amsterdam: Sdu Uitgeverij.Google Scholar
- Pellegrino, E.D. and D.C. Thomasma: 1988, For the Patient's Good: The Restoration of Beneficence in Health Care. New York/Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Welie, J.V.M.: 1998, In the Face of Suffering. The Philosophical–Anthropological Foundations of Clinical Ethics. Omaha: Creighton University Press.Google Scholar