Ethical Theory and Moral Practice

, Volume 4, Issue 2, pp 171–189 | Cite as

On the Emotional Character of Trust

  • Bernd Lahno

Abstract

Trustful interaction serves the interests of those involved. Thus, one could reason that trust itself may be analyzed as part of rational, goal‐oriented action. In contrast, common sense tells us that trust is an emotion and is, therefore, independent of rational deliberation to some extent. I will argue that we are right in “trusting” our common sense. My argument is conceptual in nature, referring to the common distinction between trust and pure reliance. An emotional attitude may be understood as some general pattern in the way the world or some part of the world is perceived by an individual. Trust may be characterized by such a pattern. I shall focus on two central features of a trusting attitude. First, trust involves a participant attitude (Strawson) toward the person being trusted. Second, a situation of trust is perceived by a trusting person as one in which shared values or norms motivate both his own actions as well as those of the person being trusted. As an emotional attitude, trust is, to some extent, independent of objective information. It determines what a trusting person will believe and how various outcomes are evaluated. Hence, trust is quite different from rational belief and the problem with trust is not adequately met in minimizing risk by supplying extensive information or some mechanism of sanctioning. Trust is an attitude that enables us to cope with risk in a certain way. If we want to promote trustful interaction, we must form our institutions in ways that allow individuals to experience their interest and values as shared and, thus, to develop a trusting attitude.

cooperation emotion faith rational choice trust 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

REFERENCES

  1. Aristotle, “Rhetoric”, in Jonathan Barnes (ed.) The Complete Works of Aristotle, Vol. 2. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1984, pp. 2152–2269.Google Scholar
  2. Baier, Annette, Trust and Antitrust, Ethics 96 (1986), pp. 231–260.Google Scholar
  3. Bollnow, Otto Friedrich, Existenzphilosophie und Pädagogik. Stuttgart: W. Kohlhammer, 1959.Google Scholar
  4. Coleman, James S., Foundations of Social Theory, Cambridge, MA/London: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 1990.Google Scholar
  5. Calhoun, Cheshire, Cognitive Emotions?, in C. Calhoun and R.C. Solomon (eds) What is an Emotion? Classical Readings in Philosophical Psychology. New York/Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1984, pp. 327–342.Google Scholar
  6. Calhoun, Cheshire and Solomon, Robert C., (eds), What is an Emotion? Classical Readings in Philosophical Psychology. New York/Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1984.Google Scholar
  7. Dasgupta, Partha, Trust as a Commodity, in D. Gambetta (ed.), Trust: Making and Breaking Cooperative Relations. Oxford/New York: Basil Blackwell, 1988, pp. 49–72.Google Scholar
  8. Dennet, Daniel C., Intentional Systems, Journal of Philosophy 8 (1987), pp. 87–106.Google Scholar
  9. de Sousa, Ronald, The Rationality of Emotion, Cambridge, MA/London: MIT Press, 1987.Google Scholar
  10. Deutsch, Morton, Trust and Suspicion, Journal of Conflict Resolution, 4 (1958), pp. 265–279.Google Scholar
  11. Elster, Jon, Alchemies of The Mind. Rationality and the Emotions. New York/Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999.Google Scholar
  12. Flew, Antony and Macintyre, A., New Essays in Philosophical Theology. London, 1955.Google Scholar
  13. Gambetta, Diego, Can We Trust Trust, in D. Gambetta (ed.), Trust: Making and Breaking Cooperative Relations. Oxford/New York: Basil Blackwell, 1988, pp. 213–238.Google Scholar
  14. Govier, Trudy, An Epistemology of Trust, International Journal of Moral and Social Studies, 8(2) (1993), pp. 155–174.Google Scholar
  15. Govier, Trudy, Social Trust and Human Communities. Montreal/Kingston/London/Buffalo: McGill-Queen's University Press, 1997.Google Scholar
  16. Hardin, Russell, Trusting Persons, Trusting Institutions, in R. Zeckhauser (ed.), Strategy and Choice. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 1991, pp. 183–209.Google Scholar
  17. Hartmann, Nicolai, Ethik. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 1962.Google Scholar
  18. Hollis, Martin, Trust within Reason. Cambridge, UK/New York: Cambridge University Press, 1998.Google Scholar
  19. Holton, Richard, Deciding to Trust, Coming to Believe, Australian Journal of Philosophy, 72(1) (1994), pp. 63–76.Google Scholar
  20. Horsburgh, H.J.N., The Ethics of Trust, Philosophical Quarterly 10, (1960), pp. 343–354.Google Scholar
  21. Kollock, Peter, The Emergence of Exchange Structures: An Experimental Study of Uncertainty, Commitment and Trust”, The American Journal of Sociology, 100(2) (1994), pp. 313–345.Google Scholar
  22. Makarenko, A.S., Der Weg ins Leben. Berlin/Weimar: Aufbau-Verlag, 1974.Google Scholar
  23. Mayer, Roger C., Davis, James H. and Schoorman, F. David, An Integrative Model of Organizional Trust, Academy of Management Review, 20(3) (1995), pp. 709–734.Google Scholar
  24. Morgan, Robert M. and Hunt, Shelby D., The Commitment-Trust Theory of Relationship Marketing, Journal of Marketing, 58 (1994), 20–38.Google Scholar
  25. Pettit, Philip, The Cunning of Trust, Philosophy and Public Affairs, 24(3) (1995), pp. 202–225.Google Scholar
  26. Shapiro, Susan P., The Social Control of Impersonal Trust, American Journal of Sociology 93 (1987), pp. 623–658.Google Scholar
  27. Sitkin, Sim B. and Roth, Nancy L., Explaining the Limited Effectiveness of Legalistic, Remedies' for Trust/Distrust, Organization Science, 4(3) (1993), pp. 367–392.Google Scholar
  28. Solomon, Leonard, The Influence of Some Types of Power Relationships and Game Strategies upon the Development of Interpersonal Trust, Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 61(2) (1960), pp. 223–230.Google Scholar
  29. Solomon, Robert, The Passions. Emotions and The Meaning of Life. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Company, 1993.Google Scholar
  30. Strawson, Peter F., Freedom and Resentment. London: Methuen, 1974.Google Scholar
  31. Tyler, Tom R. and Degoey, Peter, Trust in Organizational Authorities: The Influence of Motive Attributions on Willingness to Accept Decisions, in R.M. Kramer and T.R. Tyler (eds), Trust in Organizations. Frontiers of Theory and Research. Thousand Oaks/London/ New Delhi: SAGE, 1996.Google Scholar
  32. Williamson, Oliver E., Calculativeness, Trust, and Economic Organization, Journal of Law and Economics 36(1) (1993), pp. 453–486.Google Scholar
  33. Wisdom, John, Gods, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 45 (1944–45), pp. 185–206.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • Bernd Lahno
    • 1
  1. 1.Sozialwissenschaftliches Institut, Soziologie IHeinrich‐Heine‐Universität DüsseldorfDüsseldorfGermany

Personalised recommendations