Journal of Bioeconomics

, Volume 2, Issue 2, pp 139–152 | Cite as

The Ecology of Trade

  • Brendan Moyle

Abstract

Trading behavior occurs in many species but has a particularly elaborate form in humans. Trade is defined as the mutually beneficial, adaptive transfer of goods and services between organisms. Trade has a competitive element and responds to changes in relative scarcity. Trade is demonstrated to be a biological phenomenon rather than an artefact of human civilisation. Species’ characteristics that increase the likelihood of trade occurring are outlined. The evolution of trading strategies is most likely in humans and social arthropods. A formal model is presented to show that trade can simultaneously increase consumption among populations and reduce pressure on locally scarce resources. This allows a species to increase its density and escape the constraints imposed by local resource limitations. This represents a major ecological benefit to the trading species.

mutualism resources scarcity social arthropods sustainability 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Reference cited

  1. Akerloff, George A. 1970. The market for `lemons': quality uncertainty and the market mechanism. Quarterly Journal of Economics 84: 488-500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alchian, Armen A. 1989. Property rights. Pp. 232-238 in J. Eatwell, M. Milgate & P. Newman (ed.) The Invisible hand. The MacMillan Press, New York and London.Google Scholar
  3. Beattie, Andrew J. 1985. The evolutionary ecology of ant-plant mutualisms. Cambridge University Press, New York.Google Scholar
  4. Chvála, Milan. 1983. The Empidoidae (Diptera) of Fennoscandia and Denmark. II. General Part. The families Hybotidae, Atelestidae and Microphoridae. Fauna Entomologica Scaninavia 12.Google Scholar
  5. Cumming, Jeffery M. 1994. Sexual selection and the evolution of dance fly mating systems (Diptera: Empididae; Empidinae). The Canadian Entomologist 126: 907-920.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Eisner, Thomas. 1957. Comparative morphological study of the proventriculus of ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Bulletin of the Museum of Comparative Zoology, Harvard 116: 439-490.Google Scholar
  7. Fowler, Harold G. & N. Gobbi. 1988. Cooperative prey capture by an orb-web spider. Naturwissenschaften 75: 208-209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Fredlund, Melvin C. 1976. Wolves, chimps and Demsetz. Economic Inquiry 14: 279-90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Ghiselin, Michael T. 1978. The economy of the body. American Economic Review 68: 233-237.Google Scholar
  10. Hayek, Friedrich A. 1978.Newstudies in philosophy, politics, economy and the history of ideas. Routledge & Kegan Paul, London.Google Scholar
  11. Hirshliefer, Jack. 1978. Natural economy versus political economy. Journal of Social and Biological Structures 1: 319-337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hölldobler, Bert. 1981. Foraging and spatiotemporal territories in the honey ant Myrmecocystus mimicus Wheeler (Hymenopetra: Formicidae). Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 9: 301-314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hölldobler, Bert. 1986. Food robbing in ants, a form of interference competition. Oecologia 69: 12-15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hölldobler, Bert & E.O. Wilson. 1990. The ants. Harvard University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  15. Hughes, Ian M. 1977. New Guinea stone age trade. Terras Australis. 3. The Australian National University, Canberra.Google Scholar
  16. Hunt, Colin. 1995. Economics in green party policy-X Roads Ahead! Pp. 395-403. In M. Young (ed.) Ecological Economics Conference: Conference Papers, Coffs Harbour, New South Wales.Google Scholar
  17. Janzen, Daniel H. 1966. Coevolution of mutualism between ants and acacias in Central America. Evolution 20: 249-275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Janzen, Daniel H. 1967. Interaction of the bull's-horn acacia (Acacia cornigera L.) and an ant inhabitant (Pseudomyrmex ferruginea F. Smith) in eastern Mexico. University of Kansas Science Bulletin 47: 315-558.Google Scholar
  19. Janzen, Daniel H. 1969. Allelopathy by myrmecophytes: the ant Azteca as an allelopathic agent of Cecropia. Ecology 50: 147-153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Krafft, Bertrand. 1982. The significance and complexity of communication in spiders. Pp. 67-122 in P.N. Witt & J. S. Rovner (ed.) Spider Communication: Mechanisms and Ecological Significance. Princeton University Press, Princeton.Google Scholar
  21. Levy, David M. 1992. The economic ideas of ordinary people. Routledge, New York.Google Scholar
  22. Maynard Smith, John. 1974. The theory of games and evolution in animal conflicts. Journal of Theoretical Biology 47: 209-221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Moyle, Brendan J. 1998. The bioeconomics of illegal wildlife harvesting: An outline of the issues. Journal of International Wildlife Law & Policy 1: 95-112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Posner, Richard. 1980. A theory of primitive society with special reference to law. The Journal of Law and Economics 23: 1-59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Pryor, Frederic L. 1977. The origins of the economy: a comparative study of distribution in primitive and peasant economies. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
  26. Pryor, Frederic L. 1981. A survey of the economic systems of wild chimpanzees and baboons. Journal of Economic Issues 15: 33-59.Google Scholar
  27. Ryan, Alan. 1989. Property. Pp. 227-231 in J. Eatwell, M. Milgate & P. Newman (ed.) The Invisible Hand. The MacMillan Press, New York.Google Scholar
  28. Seeley, Thomas D. 1985. Honeybee ecology. Princeton University Press, Princeton.Google Scholar
  29. Smith, Adam. 1776.Aninquiry into the nature and causes of the wealth of nations. Chicago University Press, Chicago [Encyclopaedia Britannica, 1952 edition].Google Scholar
  30. Tiger, Lionel & R. Fox. 1972. The imperial animal. Secker & Warburg, London.Google Scholar
  31. Trivers, Robert. 1971. The evolution of reciprocal altruism. Quarterly Review of Biology 46: 35-57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Uetz, George W. & C. S. Hieber. 1997. Colonial web-building spiders: balancing the costs and benefits of group living. Pp. 458-475. In J. C. Choe & B. J. Crespi (ed.) The evolution of social behavior in insects and arachnids. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  33. Yu, Douglas. 1994. Free trade is green, protectionism is not. Conservation biology 8: 989-996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • Brendan Moyle
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of CommerceMassey University (Albany)AucklandNew Zealand

Personalised recommendations