Autonomy, authenticity, or best interest: Everyday decision-making and persons with dementia
- 1.2k Downloads
The question of when we have justification for overriding ordinary, everyday decisions of persons with dementia is considered. It is argued that no single criterion for competent decision-making is able to distinguish reliably between decisions we can legitimately override and decisions we cannot legitimately override.
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Dunn, B., A. Owen and B. Sahakian: 2000, 'Neuropsychological Assessment of Dementia', In: J. O'Brien, D. Ames and A. Burns (eds.), Dementia, 2nd edn. London: Arnold.Google Scholar
- Dworkin, R.: 1993, Life's Dominion. New York: Alfred A. Knopf Publishers.Google Scholar
- Kahneman, D., P. Slovic and A. Tversky (eds.): 1982, Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Kamboh, M.I.: 1995, 'Apolipoprotein E Polymorphism and Susceptibility to Alzheimer's Disease', Human Biology 67 (2), 195–215.Google Scholar
- Parfit, D.: 1984, Reasons and Persons. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Post, S.G. and P.J. Whitehouse (eds.): 1998, Genetic Testing for Alzheimer Disease – Ethical and Clinical Issues. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar