Plant Ecology

, Volume 152, Issue 1, pp 93–100 | Cite as

Determinants of C3 forb growth and production in a C4 dominated grassland

  • John M. Briggs
  • Alan K. Knapp
Article

Abstract

Forbs are the most abundant species within the vascular flora of tallgrass prairie and they make the greatest contribution to biodiversity of all growth forms. However, little is known about the factors that determine their productivity and growth rates. The objective of this study was to assess the controls of forb growth (absolute and relative) and production in tallgrass prairie from a long-term burning experiment at the Konza Prairie in NE Kansas. Over the 14-year study, forbs comprised 9% of the total biomass production on sites with a high fire frequency vs. 29% on the low fire frequency site, with gramminoids accounting for the remainder. Although interannual variations in peak biomass of the grasses was strongly correlated with environmental variables related to water availability, there were no similar relationships for forbs, suggesting that production of forbs and grasses responded to interannual variations in climate in different ways. Multivariate analysis of climatic controls on growth rates of grasses and forbs yielded similar results. Although forbs had low biomass and absolute growth per unit ground area in frequently burned prairie, their relative growth rates were highest in such sites. Thus, it appears that reduced growth rates of individual forbs per se do not limit forb success in annually burned prairie. Instead, direct negative effects of fire on forbs (increased mortality) may be responsible. Determinants of forb growth and productivity in unburned prairie remain unresolved.

Aboveground net primary production Biodiversity Fire Forbs Graminoids Relative growth rates Tallgrass prairie 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Abrams, M. D., Knapp, A. K. & Hulbert, L. C. 1986. A ten-yearrecord of aboveground biomass in a Kansas tallgrass prairie:effects of fire and topographic position. Am. J. Bot. 73: 1509–1515.Google Scholar
  2. Bark, L. D. 1987. Konza prairie research natural area, Kansas.Pp. 45–50. Greenwood D. (ed.), The climate of the Long-termecological research sites. University of Colorado, Institute for Artic and Alpine Research, Boulder, CO, Occasional Paper No. 44.Google Scholar
  3. Briggs, J. M. & Knapp, A. K. 1991. Estimating abovegroundbiomass in tallgrass prairie with the harvest method: determiningproper sample size using jackknifing and Monte Carlosimulations. Southwestern Nat. 36: 1–6.Google Scholar
  4. Briggs, J. M. & Knapp, A. K. 1995. Interannual variability inprimary production in tallgrass prairie: climate, soil moisture,topographic position and fire as determinants of abovegroundbiomass. Am. J. Bot. 82: 1024–1030.Google Scholar
  5. Briggs, J. M., Seastedt T. R. & Gibson, D. J. 1989. Comparativeanalysis of temporal and spatial variability in aboveground productionin a deciduous forest and prairie. Holarctic Ecol. 12:130–136.Google Scholar
  6. Collins, S. L. & Steinauer, E. M. 1998. Disturbance, divversity andspecies interactions in tallgrass prairie. Pp.140–156 In: Knapp, A. K., Briggs, J. M., Hartnett, D. C. & Collins, S. L. (eds),Grassland dynamics: long-term ecological research in tallgrassprairie. Oxford University Press, New York.Google Scholar
  7. Easterling, W. E. 1990. Climate trends and prospects. Pp. 32–55. In:Sampson, R. N. & Hair, D. (eds), Natural recources for the 21stcentury. Island Press, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  8. Easterling, D. R., Horton, B., Jones, P. D., Peterson, T. C., Karl, T. R., Parker, D. E., Salinger, M. J., Razuvayev, V., Plummer, N., Jamason, P., & Folland, C. K. 1997. Maximum and minimumtemperature trends for the globe. Science 277: 364–366.Google Scholar
  9. Freeman, C. C. & Hulbert, L. C. 1985. An annotated list of thevascular flora of Konza Prairie Research Natural Area, Kansas.Transactions of the Kansas Acad. Sci. 88: 84–115.Google Scholar
  10. Freeman, C. C. 1998. The Flora of Konza Prairie: A Historical Reviewand Contemporary Patterns. Pp. 69–80. In: Knapp, A. K., Briggs, J. M., Hartnett, D. D. & Collins, S. L. (eds), Grasslanddynamics: long-term ecological research in tallgrass prairie.Oxford University Press, New York.Google Scholar
  11. Gibson, D. J. 1988. Regeneration and fluctuations of tallgrass prairievegetation in response to burning frequency. Bull. Torrey Bot.Club 115: 1–12.Google Scholar
  12. Gibson, D. J. & Hulbert, L. C. 1987. Effects of fire, topographyand year-to-year climatic variation on species composition intallgrass prairie. Vegetatio 72: 175–185.Google Scholar
  13. Gregory, J. M., Mitchell, J. F. B. & Brady, A. J. 1997. Summerdrought in northern mid-latitudes in a time-dependent CO2 climate experiment. J. Climate 10: 662–686.Google Scholar
  14. Hartnett, D. C. & Keeler, K. H. 1995. Population Processes. Pp. 82–99. In: Joern, A. & Keerler, K. (eds), The changing prairie.Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  15. Hartnett, D. C. & Fay, P. A. 1998. Plant populations: patterns andprocesses. Pp.81–100). In: Knapp, A. K., Briggs, J.M., Hartnett, D. C. & Collins, S. L. (eds), Grassland dynamics: long-termecological research in tallgrass prairie. Oxford University Press, New York.Google Scholar
  16. Hayden, B. P. 1998. Regional climate and the distribution of tallgrassprairie. Pp. 19–34. In: Knapp, A. K., Briggs, J. M., Hartnett, D. C. & Collins, S. L. (eds), Grassland dynamics: longtermecological research in tallgrass prairie. Oxford UniversityPress, New York.Google Scholar
  17. Howe, H. F. 1994. Response of early-and late-flowering plants tofire season in experimental prairies. Ecol. Appl. 4: 121–133.Google Scholar
  18. Hulbert, L. C. 1985. History and use of Konza prairie researchnatural Area. Prairie Scout 5: 63–95.Google Scholar
  19. Hunt, R. 1978. Plant growth analysis. The institute of Biology's,studies in biology no.96. Edward Arnold Limited, London,67 pp.Google Scholar
  20. Knapp, A. K. 1985. Effect of fire and drought on the ecophysiologyof Andropogon gerardii and Panicum virgatum in a tallgrassprairie. Ecology 66: 1309–1320.Google Scholar
  21. Knapp, A. K., Briggs, J. M., Blair, J. M. & Turner, C. L. 1998.Patterns and controls of aboveground net primary production intallgrass prairie. Pp. 193–221. In: Knapp, A. K., Briggs, J. M., Hartnett, D. C. & Collins, S. L. (eds), Grassland dynamics: longtermecological research in tallgrass prairie. Oxford University Press, New York.Google Scholar
  22. Knapp, A. K. & Seastedt, T. R. 1998. Grasslands, Konza prairieand long-term ecological research. Pp. 3–15. In: Knapp, A. K., Briggs, J. M., Hartnett, D. C. & Collins, S. L. (eds), Grasslanddynamics: long-term ecological redearch in tallgras prairie.Oxford University Press, New York.Google Scholar
  23. Martin, C. E., Harris, F. S. & Norman, F. J. 1991. Ecophysiologicalresponses of C3 forbs and C4 grasses to drought and rain on atallgrass prairie in northeastern Kansas. Bot. Gazette 152: 257–262.Google Scholar
  24. McAllister, C. A., Knapp, A. K. & Maragni, L. A. 1998. Is leaf-levelphotosynthesis related to plant success in a highly productivegrassland? Oecologia 117: 40–46.Google Scholar
  25. SAS Institute. 1989. SAS/STAT user's guide, version 6. FourthEdition. SAS Institute, Cary, North Carolina, USA.Google Scholar
  26. Towne, E. G. & A. K. Knapp. 1996. Biomass and density responsesin tallgrass prairie legumes to annual fire and topographic position.Am. J. Bot. 83: 175–179.Google Scholar
  27. Towne, G. & Owensby, C. E. 1984. Long-term effects of annual burning at different rates on ungrazed Kansas tallgrass prairie. J.Range Manag. 37: 392–397.Google Scholar
  28. Turner, C. L. & Knapp, A. K. 1996. Responses of a C4 grassand three C3 forbs to variation in nitrogen and light in tallgrassprairie. Ecology 77: 1738–1749.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • John M. Briggs
    • 1
  • Alan K. Knapp
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Plant BiologyArizona State UniversityTempeUSA
  2. 2.Division of BiologyKansas State UniversityManhattanUSA

Personalised recommendations