Advertisement

Social Psychology of Education

, Volume 4, Issue 3–4, pp 311–334 | Cite as

Social Influence Dynamics in Aptitude Tasks

  • Alain Quiamzade
  • Gabriel Mugny
Article

Abstract

Learning and, more generally, the development of cognitive processes in children has been thought to depend on the nature of the conflict induced by confrontation with others (i.e., socio-cognitive conflict). The aim of this article is to extend this notion to social-influence situations involving adolescents and young adults through the presentation of a model that explains social influence in aptitude tasks. This model takes into account the differences or similarities of the competencies of the source and target. It conceptualizes the social versus epistemic regulations of conflict in terms of an identity threat that can be induced by social comparison. To illustrate parts of the model, several experiments are briefly summarized. One demonstrates the conflict regulation dynamics involved in the similarities or differences of the sources' and targets' competencies, while the others show how social-influence dynamics are modified by the presence or absence of a threat to self-competence.

Keywords

Social Comparison Cognitive Capacity Cognitive Tool Friendship Group Epistemic Authority 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Abric, Jean-Claude (1994). Les représentations sociales: Aspects théoriques. In Abric, J.C. (Ed.), Pratiques sociales et représentations. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France; pp. 11–35.Google Scholar
  2. Allen, Vernon L (1965). Situational factors in conformity. In Berkowitz L. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 2). New York: Academic Press; pp. 133–175.Google Scholar
  3. Asch, Solomon E (1956). Studies on independence and conformity: A minority of one against aunanimous majority. Psychological Monographs, 70, 416.Google Scholar
  4. Baldwin, James M (1913). History of psychology. London: Watts.Google Scholar
  5. Brown, Jonathan D (1986). Evaluations of self and others: Self-enhancement biases in social judgement. Social Cognition, 4, 353–376.Google Scholar
  6. Butera, Fabrizio, Gardair, Emmanuelle, Maggi, Jenny, & Mugny, Gabriel (1998). Les paradoxes de l'expertise: influence sociale et (in)compétence de soi et d'autrui. In Py, J., Somat, A., & Baillé, J. (Eds.), Psychologie sociale et formation professionnelle: propositions et regards critiques. Rennes: Presses Universitaires de Rennes; pp. 111–123.Google Scholar
  7. Butera, Fabrizio, Huguet, Pascal, Mugny, Gabriel, & Pérez, Juan-Antonio (1994). Socioepistemic conflict and constructivism. Swiss Journal of Psychology, 53, 229–239.Google Scholar
  8. Butera, Fabrizio & Mugny, Gabriel (1992). Influence minoritaire et falsification. Revue Internationale de Psychologie Sociale, 5(2), 115–132.Google Scholar
  9. Butera, Fabrizio & Mugny, Gabriel (1995). Conflict between incompetencies and influence of a low-expertise source in hypothesis testing. European Journal of Social Psychology, 25, 457–462.Google Scholar
  10. Butera, Fabrizio, Mugny, Gabriel, Legrenzi, Paulo, & Pérez, Juan-Antonio (1996). Majority and minority influence, task representation and inductive reasoning. British Journal of Social Psychology, 35, 123–136.Google Scholar
  11. Butera, Fabrizio, Mugny, Gabriel, & Tomei, Alexander (2000). Incertitudes et enjeux identitaires dans l'influence sociale. In Beauvois, J.L., Joule, R.V., & Monteil, J.M. (Eds.), Perspectives cognitives et conduites sociales (Vol. 7). Rennes: Presses Universitaires de Rennes; pp. 205–229.Google Scholar
  12. Clark, Russell D. & Maass, Anne (1990). The effects of majority size on minority influence. European Journal of Social Psychology, 26(2), 99–117.Google Scholar
  13. Collins, Rebecca L (1996). For better or worse: The impact of upward social comparison on selfevaluation. Psychological Bulletin, 1, 51–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Deutsch, Morton & Gerard, Harold B (1955). A study of normative and informational social influence upon individual judgment. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 51, 629–636.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. De Vries, Nanne K., De Dreu, Carsten K.W., Gordijn, Ernestine, & Schuurman, Mieke (1996). Majority and minority influence: A dual role interpretation. In Stroebe, W. & Hewstone, M. (Eds.), European review of social psychology (Vol. 7). Chichester: Wiley & Sons pp. 145–172.Google Scholar
  16. Doise, Willem & Mugny, Gabriel (1979). Individual and collective conflicts of centration in cognitive development. European Journal of Social Psychology, 9, 105–108.Google Scholar
  17. Doise, Willem & Mugny, Gabriel (1984). The social development of the intellect. Oxford: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
  18. Doise, Willem, Mugny, Gabriel, & Pérez, Juan-Antonio (1998). The social construction of knowledge: Socialmarking and sociocognitive conflict. In Flick, U. (Ed.), The psychology of the social. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; pp. 77–99.Google Scholar
  19. Doise, Willem & Palmorani, Augusto (1984). Social interaction in individual development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Ellis, Schmuel & Kruglanski, Arie (1992). Self as an epistemic authority: Effects of experiential and instructional learning. Social Cognition, 10, 357–375.Google Scholar
  21. Evans, Jonathan St. B.T. (1989). Bias in human reasoning: Causes and consequences. Hove: UK: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  22. Falomir, Juan-Manuel, Mugny, Gabriel, Sanchez-Mazas, Margarita, Pérez, Juan-Antonio, & Carrasco, Feliciano (1998). Influence et conflit d'identité: de la conformité à l'intériorisation. In Beauvois, J.L., Joule, R.V. & Monteil J.M. (Eds.), Perspectives cognitives et conduites socials (Vol. 6), Neuchâtel: Delachaux et Niestlé pp. 313–336.Google Scholar
  23. Festinger, Leon (1954). A theory of social comparison processes. Human Relations, 7, 117–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Flament, Claude (1982). Du biais d'équilibre à la représentation du groupe. In Codol, J.P & Leyens, J.P (Eds.), Cognitive analysis of social behavior. La Haye, Boston, Londres: Martinus Nijhoff; pp. 151–169.Google Scholar
  25. French, John R. & Raven, Bertram H. (1959). The bases of social power. In Cartwright, D. (Ed.), Studies in social power.Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press, pp. 118–149.Google Scholar
  26. Goethals, George R. & Darley, John M. (1977). Social comparison theory: An attributional approach. In Suls, J. & Miller, R. (Eds.), Social comparison processes: Theoretical and empirical perspectives. Washington, DC: Hemisphere, pp. 259–278.Google Scholar
  27. Gorman, Michael & Carlson, Bernard (1989). Can experiments be used to study science? Social Epistemology, 3, 89–106.Google Scholar
  28. Hass, R. Glen (1981). Effects of source characteristics on cognitive responses and persuasion. In Petty, R.E., Ostrom, T.M. & Brock, T.C. (Eds.), Cognitive responses in persuasion. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum; pp. 141–172.Google Scholar
  29. Hovland, Carl I., Janis, Irving L., & Kelley, Harold H. (1953). Communication and persuasion. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  30. Insko, Chester A., Drenan, Sarah, Solomon, Michael R., Smith, Richard, & Wade, Terry J. (1983). Conformity as a function of consistency of positive self-evaluation with being liked and being right. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 19, 342–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Johnson, David W. & Johnson, Frank P. (1991). Joining together: Group theory and group skills. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  32. Kruglanski, Arie W. (1989). Lay epistemics and human knowledge: Cognitive and motivational bases. New York, London: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
  33. Kruglanski, Arie W. & Mayseless, Ofra (1987). Motivational effects in the social comparison of opinions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 834–842.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Legrenzi, Paolo, Butera, Fabrizio, Mugny, Gabriel, & Pérez, Juan-Antonio (1991). Majority and minority influence in inductive reasoning: A preliminary study. European Journal of Social Psychology, 21, 359–363.Google Scholar
  35. Levine, John M., Resnick, Lauren B., & Higgins, E. Tory (1993). Social foundations of cognition. Annual Review of Psychology, 44, 585–612.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Maggi, Jenny, Butera, Fabrizio, & Mugny, Gabriel (1996). Conflict of incompetencies: Direct and indirect influences on representation of the centimeter. International Review of Social Psychology, 9, 91–105.Google Scholar
  37. Mead, George H (1934). Mind, self, and society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  38. Moliner, Pascal (1989). Validation expérimentale de l'hypothèse du noyau central des representations socials. Bulletin de Psychologie, 42, 759–762.Google Scholar
  39. Moliner, Pascal & Tafani, Eric (1997). Attitudes and social représentations: A theoretical and experimental approach. European Journal of Social Psychology, 27, 687–702.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Monteil, Jean-Marc & Huguet, Pascal (1999). Social context and cognitive performance: Towards a social psychology of cognition. Hove, East Sussex: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
  41. Moscovici, Serge (1980). Toward a theory of conversion behaviour. In Berkowitz, L. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 13). New York: Academic Press; pp. 209–239.Google Scholar
  42. Moscovici, Serge, Lage, Elisabeth, & Naffrechoux, Martine (1969). Influence of a consistent minority on the responses of a majority in a color perception task. Sociometry, 32, 365–380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Moscovici, Serge, Mucchi Faina, Angelica, & Maass, Anne (1994). Social influence. Chicago: Nelson-Hall.Google Scholar
  44. Moscovici, Serge, Mugny, Gabriel, & Van Avermaet, Eddy (1985). Perspectives on minority influence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Paris: Editions de la Maison des Sciences de l'Homme.Google Scholar
  45. Mugny, Gabriel, Butera, Fabrizio, Quiamzade, Alain, Dragulescu, Agatta, & Tomei, Alexander (in press). Comparaison sociale des compétences et influence sociale. In Brangier, E., Dubois, N., & Tarquinio, C. (Eds.), L'analyse psychosociale des compétences.Google Scholar
  46. Mugny, Gabriel, Butera, Fabrizio, Sanchez-Mazas, Margarita, & Pérez, Juan-Antonio (1995). Judgments in conflict: The conflict elaboration theory of social influence. In Boothe, B., Hirsig, R., Helminger, A., Meier, B., & Volkart, R. (Eds.), Perception, evaluation, interpretation. Berne: Huber, pp. 160–168.Google Scholar
  47. Mugny, Gabriel, De Paolis, Paola, & Carugati, Felice (1984). Social regulation in cognitive development. In Doise, W. & Palmonari, A. (Eds.), Social interaction in individual development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; pp. 127–146.Google Scholar
  48. Mugny, Gabriel & Doise, Willem (1978). Socio-cognitive conflict and structuration of individual and collective performances. European Journal of Social Psychology, 8, 181–192.Google Scholar
  49. Mugny, Gabriel, Doise, Willem, & Perret-Clermont, Anne-Nelly (1975-1976). Conflit de centrations et progrès cognitive. Bulletin de Psychologie, XXIX(321), 4–7.Google Scholar
  50. Mugny, Gabriel, Lévy, May, & Doise, Willem (1978). Conflit sociocognitif et développement cognitif: l'effet de la présentation par un adulte de modèles ‘progressifs’ et de modèles ‘régressifs,’ dans une épreuve de représentation spatiale. Revue Suisse de Psychologie, 19, 1–30.Google Scholar
  51. Mugny, Gabriel, Moliner, Pascal, & Flament, Claude (1997). De la pertinence des processus d'influence sociale dans la dynamique des représentations socials. Revue Internationale de Psychologie Sociale, 10, 31–49.Google Scholar
  52. Mugny, Gabriel, Tafani, Eric, Butera, Fabrizio, & Pigière, Dominique (1998). Contrainte et dépendance informationnelles: Influence sociale sur la représentation du groupe d'amis ideal. Connexions, 72, 55–72.Google Scholar
  53. Mugny, Gabriel, Tafani, Eric, Falomir, Juan-Manuel, & Layat, Carine (2000). Crédibilité de la source, comparaison sociale et influence sociale. International Review of Social Psychology, 13, 151–175.Google Scholar
  54. Nemeth, Charlan J (1986). Differential contributions of majority and minority influence. Psychological Review, 93, 23–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Nemeth, Charlan J., Mosier, Kathleen, & Chiles, Cynthia (1992). When convergent thought improves performance: Majority versus minority influence. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 18, 139–144.Google Scholar
  56. Nemeth, Charlan J. & Wachtler, Joel (1983). Creative problem solving as a result of majority versus minority influence. European Journal of Social Psychology, 13, 45–55.Google Scholar
  57. Pérez, Juan-Antonio & Mugny, Gabriel (1987). Paradoxical effects of categorization in minority influence: When being an outgroup is an advantage. European Journal of Social Psychology, 17, 157–169.Google Scholar
  58. Pérez, Juan-Antonio & Mugny, Gabriel (1996). The conflict elaboration theory of social influence. In Witte, E.H. & Davis, J.H. (Eds.), Understanding group behavior, (Vol. 2). Small group processes and interpersonal relations. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; pp. 191–210.Google Scholar
  59. Perret-Clermont, Anne-Nelly (1980). Social interaction and cognitive development in children. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  60. Piaget, Jean (1965). Etudes sociologiques. Genève: Librairie Droz.Google Scholar
  61. Piaget, Jean & Inhelder, Bärbel (1948). La représentation de l'espace chez l'enfant. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
  62. Popper, Karl R (1955). The logic of scientific discovery. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  63. Quiamzade, Alain, Falomir, Juan-Manuel, Mugny, Gabriel, & Butera, Fabrizio (1999). Gestion identitaire versus épistémique des competences. In Hansen, H., Sigrist, B., Goorhuis, H. & Landolt, H. (Eds.), Bildung und Arbeit: Das Ende einer Differenz? Aarau, Sauerländer; pp. 267–276.Google Scholar
  64. Quiamzade, Alain, Tomei, Alexander, & Butera, Fabrizio (2000). Informational dependence and informational constraint: Social comparison and social influences in anagram resolution task. International Review of Social Psychology, 13, 123–150.Google Scholar
  65. Tafani, Eric, Mugny, Gabriel, & Bellon, Sébastien (1999). Irréversibilité du changement et enjeux identitaires dans l'influence sociale sur une représentation sociale. Psychologie et société, 1, 73–104.Google Scholar
  66. Vygotsky, Lev S (1962). Thought and language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  67. Wason, Peter C (1960). On the failure to eliminate hypotheses in a conceptual task. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 12, 129–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Wheeler, Ladd, Martin, René, & Suls, Jerry (1997). The proxy model of social comparison for selfassessment of ability. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 1, 54–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Wicklund, Robert A. (1989). The appropriation of ideas. In Paulus, P.B. (Ed.), Psychology of group influence. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum; pp. 393–423.Google Scholar
  70. Wicklund, Robert A. & Brehm, Jack W (1968). Attitude change as a function of felt competence and threat to attitudinal freedom. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 4, 64–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Wills, Thomas A (1981). Downward comparison principles in social psychology. Psychological Bulletin, 90, 245–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Winnykamen, Fayda (1990). Apprendre en imitant? Paris: Presses Universitaires de FranceGoogle Scholar
  73. Wood, Joanne V. & Taylor Kathryn L (1991). Serving self-relevant goals through social comparison. In Suls, J. & Wills, T.A. (Eds.), Social comparison: Contemporary theory and research. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; pp. 23–49.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of GenevaSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations