Advertisement

The Logic of Organizational Markets: Thinking Through Resource Partitioning Theory

  • Ivar Vermeulen
  • Jeroen Bruggeman
Article

Abstract

Resource partitioning theory claims that “Increasing concentration enhances the life chances of specialist organizations.” We systematically think through this theory, specify implicit background assumptions, sharpen concepts, and rigorously check the theory's logic. As a result, we increase the theory's explanatory power, and claim—contrary to received opinion'that under certain general conditions, “resource partitioning” and the proliferation of specialists can take place independently of organizational mass and relative size effects, size localized competition, diversifying consumer tastes, increasing number of dimensions of the resource space, and changing niche widths. Our analysis makes furthermore clear that specialist and generalist strategies are asymmetric, and shows that not concentration enhances the life chances of specialists but economies of scale instead. Under the conditions explicated, we argue that if scale economies come to dominate, the number of organizations in the population increases, regardless of the incumbents' sizes.

theory reconstruction resource partitioning competition market concentration economies of scale niche specialization organizational ecology logical formalization applied logic 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Barnett, W. (1997), “The Dynamics of Competitive Intensity, ” Administrative Science Quarterly, 42, 128–160.Google Scholar
  2. Barnett, W. and G. Carroll (1987), “Competition and Mutualism Among Early Telephone Companies, ” Administrative Science Quarterly, 30, 400–421.Google Scholar
  3. Barney, J.B. and W.G. Ouchi (1986), Organizational Economics. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco.Google Scholar
  4. Barron, D.N. (1999), The Structuring of Organizational Populations, ” American Sociological Review, 64, 421–445.Google Scholar
  5. Barwise, J. and J. Etchemendy (1999), Language, Proof and Logic. CSLI, Stanford.Google Scholar
  6. Baum, J.A.C. and H.A. Haveman (1997), “Love Thy Neighbor? Differentiation and Agglomeration in the Manhattan Hotel Industry, 1898–1990, ” Administrative Science Quarterly, 42, 304–338.Google Scholar
  7. Baum, J.A.C. and S.J. Mezias (1992), “Localized Competition and Organizational Failure in the Manhattan Hotel Industry, 1898–1990, ” Administrative Science Quarterly, 37, 580–604.Google Scholar
  8. Boone, C., V. Bröcheler and G.R. Carroll (2000), “Custom Service: Application and Test of Resource Partitioning Theory Among Dutch Auditing Firms from 1896 to 1992, ” Organization Studies, 21(2), 355–381.Google Scholar
  9. Bruggeman, J. (1997a), “Formalizing Organizational Ecology, ” Ph.D. Thesis, Amsterdam, ILLC DS-1996-4.Google Scholar
  10. Bruggeman, J. (1997b), “Niche Width Theory Reappraised, ” Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 22, 201–220.Google Scholar
  11. Bruggeman, J. and I. Vermeulen (2000), “A Logical Toolkit for Theory (re)Construction, ” Technical Report, T&M Research Report 2000W-005 CM&M-009, Universiteit Twente.Google Scholar
  12. Carley, K. and M. Prietula (Eds.) (1994), Computational Organization Theory. N.J. Erlbaum, Hillsdale.Google Scholar
  13. Carroll, G.R. (1985), “Concentration and Specialization: Dynamics of Niche Width in Populations of Organizations, ” American Journal of Sociology, 90, 1262–1283.Google Scholar
  14. Carroll, G.R. and M.T. Hannan (Eds.) (1995), Organizations in Industry. Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  15. Carroll, G.R. and M.T. Hannan (2000), The Demography of Corporations and Industries. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar
  16. Chang, C. and H.J. Keisler (1990), Model Theory (3rd ed.). North-Holland, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
  17. Coleman, J.S. (1990), Foundations of Social Theory. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  18. Enderton, H.B. (1972). A Mathematical Introduction to Logic. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
  19. Fisher, A. (1988), The Logic of Real Arguments. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  20. Freeman, J. and M.T. Hannan (1983), “NicheWidth and the Dynamics of Organizational Populations, ” American Journal of Sociology, 88, 1116–1145.Google Scholar
  21. Freeman, J. and A. Lomi (1994), “Resource Partitioning and Foundings of Banking Cooperatives in Italy, ” in J.A. Baum and J.V. Singh (Eds.) Evolutionary Dynamics of Organizations. Oxford University Press, New York. pp. 269–293.Google Scholar
  22. Gamut, L. (1991), Logic, Language and Meaning. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
  23. Gilbert, N. and K.G. Troitzsch (1999), Simulation for the Social Scientist. Open University PressGoogle Scholar
  24. Hall, R.I. (1976), “A System Pathology of an Organization: The Rise and Fall of the Old Saturday Evening Post, ” Administrative Science Quarterly, 21, 185–211.Google Scholar
  25. Hannan, M., J. Ranger-Moore and J. Banaszak-Holl (1990), “Competition and the Evolution of Organizational Size Distributions, ” in J.V. Singh (Ed.) Organizational Evolution: New Directions. Sage, Newbury Park. pp. 246–268.Google Scholar
  26. Hannan, M.T. (1997), “On Logical Formalization of Theories from Organizational Ecology, ” in A.E. Raftery (Ed.), Sociological Methodology. Blackwell, Oxford. pp. 145–149.Google Scholar
  27. Hannan, M.T. (1998), “Rethinking Age Dependence in Organizational Mortality: Logical Formalizations, ” American Journal of Sociology, 104, 126–164.Google Scholar
  28. Hannan, M.T. and G.R. Carroll (1992), Dynamics of Organizational Populations. Oxford University Press, New York.Google Scholar
  29. Hannan, M.T., G.R. Carroll, E.A. Dundon and J.C. Torres (1995), “Organizational Evolution in a Multinational Context: Entries of Automobile Manufacturers in Belgium, Britain, France, Germany, and Italy, ” American Sociological Review, 60, 509–528.Google Scholar
  30. Hannan, M.T. and J. Freeman (1977), “The Population Ecology of Organizations, ” American Journal of Sociology, 82, 929–964.Google Scholar
  31. Hannan, M.T. and J. Freeman (1984), “Structural Inertia and Organizational Change, American Sociological Review, 49, 149–164.Google Scholar
  32. Hannan, M.T. and J. Freeman (1989), Organizational Ecology. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  33. Hodges, W. (1983), “Elementary Predicate Logic, ” in D. Gabbay and F. Guenthner (Eds.) Handbook of Philosophical Logic. Vol. 1. Reidel, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
  34. Kamps, J. (1999), “On Criteria for Formal Theory Building: Applying Logic and Automated Reasoning Tools to the Social Sciences, ” in J. Hendler and D. Subramanian (Eds.) Proceedings of the Sixteenth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI-99), AAAI Press/The MIT Press, Menlo Park CA, pp. 285–290.Google Scholar
  35. Kamps, J. and M. Masuch (1997), “Partial Deductive Closure: Logical Simulation and Management Science, ” Management Science, 43(9), 1229–1245.Google Scholar
  36. Kamps, J. and L. Pólos (1999), “Reducing Uncertainty: A Formal Theory of Organizations in Action, ” American Journal of Sociology, 104, 1776–1812.Google Scholar
  37. Kyburg, Jr., H.E. (1968), Philosophy of Science: A Formal Approach. Macmillan, New York.Google Scholar
  38. Lakatos, I. (1976), Proofs and Refutations. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  39. Levinthal, D.A. and J.G. March (1981), “A Model of Adaptive Organizational Search, ” Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 2, 307–333.Google Scholar
  40. Lomi, A. (1995), “The Population and Community Ecology of Organizational Founding: Italian Cooperative Banks, ” European Sociological Review, 11, 75–98.Google Scholar
  41. McPherson, M. (1983), “An Ecology of Affiliation, ” American Sociological Review, 48, 519–532.Google Scholar
  42. Mezias, J.M. and S.J. Mezias (2000), “Resource Partitioning, the Founding of Specialist Firms, and Innovation: The American Feature Film Industry, 1912–1929, ” Organization Science, 11(3), 306–322.Google Scholar
  43. Mitchell, W. (1995), “Medical Diagnostic Imaging Manufacturers, ” in G.R. Carroll and M.T. Hannan (Eds.) Organizations in Industry. Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  44. Péli, G. (1997), “The Niche Hiker's Guide to Population Ecology: A Logical Reconstruction of Organizational Ecology's Niche Theory, ” in A.E. Raftery (Ed.) Sociological Methodology. Blackwell, Oxford. pp. 1–46.Google Scholar
  45. Péli, G., J. Bruggeman, M. Masuch and B. Ó Nualláin (1994), “A Logical Approach to Formalizing Organizational Ecology, ” American Sociological Review, 59, 571–593.Google Scholar
  46. Péli, G. and M. Masuch (1997), “The Logic of Propagation Strategies: Axiomatizing a Fragment of Organizational Ecology in First-order Logic, ” Organization Science, 8, 310–331.Google Scholar
  47. Péli, G. and B. Nooteboom (1999), “Market Partitioning and the Geometry of the Resource Space, ” American Journal of Sociology, 104, 1132–1153.Google Scholar
  48. Podolny, J.M., T.E. Suart and M.T. Hannan (1996), “Networks, Knowledge, and Niches: Competition in the Worldwide Semiconductor Industry, 1984–1991. American Journal of Sociology, 104, 1132–1153.Google Scholar
  49. Popper, K. (1959), The Logic of Scientific Discovery. Hutchinson, London.Google Scholar
  50. Sastry, M.A. (1997), “Problems and Paradoxes in a Model of Punctuated Organizational Change. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42, 237–275.Google Scholar
  51. Shepherd, W. (1987), “Concentration, ” in J. Eatwell et al. (Eds.), The New Palgrave. Macmillan, London. pp. 563–564.Google Scholar
  52. Sørensen, A.B. (1978), “Mathematical Models in Sociology, ” Annual Review of Sociology, 4, 345–371.Google Scholar
  53. Suppes, P. (1968), “The Desirability of Formalization in Science. ” Journal of Philosophy, 65, 651–664.Google Scholar
  54. Sutton, R.I. and B.M. Staw (1995), “What Theory Is Not, ” Administrative Science Quarterly, 40, 371–384.Google Scholar
  55. Swaminathan, A. (1995), “The Proliferation of Specialist Organizations in the American Wine Industry, 1941–1990, ” Administrative Science Quarterly, 40, 653–680.Google Scholar
  56. Swaminathan, A. and G.R. Carroll (1995), “Beer Brewers, ” in G.R. Carroll and M.T. Hannan (Eds.) Organizations in Industry. Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  57. Thornton, P.H. (1999), “Concentrated Markets in Cultural Industries: The Decline of New Firms in the Higher Education Publishing Industry, ” Paper presented at the American Sociological Association.Google Scholar
  58. Van Dalen, D. (1994), Logic and Structure (3rd Ed.). Springer-Verlag, Berlin.Google Scholar
  59. Varian, H.R. (1999), Intermediate Microeconomics (5th Ed.). Norton, New York.Google Scholar
  60. Wade, J. (1996), “A Community-Level Analysis of Sources and Rates of Technological Variation in the Microprocessor Market, ” Academy of Management Journal, 39, 1218–1244.Google Scholar
  61. Wos, L., R. Overbeek, E. Lusk and J. Boyle (1991), Automated Reasoning (2nd Ed.). McGraw-Hill, New York.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ivar Vermeulen
    • 1
  • Jeroen Bruggeman
    • 2
  1. 1.Institute for Logic, Language and ComputationUniversiteit van AmsterdamAmsterdamThe Netherlands
  2. 2.Faculty of Technology and ManagementTwente University, PO BoxEnschedeThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations