Applied Intelligence

, Volume 15, Issue 2, pp 117–130 | Cite as

An Endosymbiotic Evolutionary Algorithm for Optimization

  • Jae Yun Kim
  • Yeongho Kim
  • Yeo Keun Kim
Article

Abstract

This paper proposes a new symbiotic evolutionary algorithm to solve complex optimization problems. This algorithm imitates the natural evolution process of endosymbionts, which is called endosymbiotic evolutionary algorithm. Existing symbiotic algorithms take the strategy that the evolution of symbionts is separated from the host. In the natural world, prokaryotic cells that are originally independent organisms are combined into an eukaryotic cell. The basic idea of the proposed algorithm is the incorporation of the evolution of the eukaryotic cells into the existing symbiotic algorithms. In the proposed algorithm, the formation and evolution of the endosymbionts is based on fitness, as it can increase the adaptability of the individuals and the search efficiency. In addition, a localized coevolutionary strategy is employed to maintain the population diversity. Experimental results demonstrate that the proposed algorithm is a promising approach to solving complex problems that are composed of multiple sub- problems interrelated with each other.

coevolutionary algorithm endosymbiosis optimization localized coevolution 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    D.E. Goldberg, Genetic Algorithms in Search, Optimization, and Machine Learning, Addison-Wesley: Massachusetts, 1989.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    M.A. Potter, “The design and analysis of a computational model of cooperative coevolution,” Ph.D. dissertation, George Mason University, 1997.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    D.E. Moriarty and R. Miikkulainen, “Forming neural networks through efficient and adaptive coevolution,” Evolutionary Computation, vol. 5, pp. 373-399, 1997.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    L. Bull and T.C. Fogarty, “Artificial symbiogenesis,” Artificial Life, vol. 2, pp. 269-292, 1995.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    W.D. Hillis, “Co-evolving parasites improve simulated evolution as an optimization procedure,” Physica D, vol. 42, pp. 228-234, 1990.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    C.D. Rosin and R.K. Belew, “New methods for competitive coevolution,” Evolutionary Computation, vol. 5, pp. 1-29, 1997.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    S. Nolfi and D. Floreano, “Coevolving predator and prey robots: Do arms races arise in artificial evolution,” Artificial Life, vol. 4, pp. 311-335, 1998.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    M.L. Maher and J. Poon, “Modelling design exploration as co-evolution,” Microcomputers in Civil Engineering, vol. 11, pp. 195-210, 1996.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    L. Bull, “Evolutionary computing in multi-agent environments: Partners,” Proc. 7th International on Conference Genetic Algorithms, East Lansing, MI, pp. 370-377, 1997.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    L. Margulis, Symbiosis in Cell Evolution, W.H. Freeman, San Francisco, 1981.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    J. Lovelock and L. Margulis, “Dr. Lynn Margulis: Microbiological collaboration of Gaia,” http://www.magan.com.au/ ~prfbrown/gaia lyn.html, Mountain Man Graphics, Australia, 1996.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    N.A. Campbell, L.G. Mitchell, and J.B. Reece, Biology: Concepts & Connections, 2nd ed., Benjamin/Cummings Publishing Company Inc., Redwood City, CA, 1996.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Y.K. Kim, J.Y. Kim, and Y. Kim, “Analysis of partnering strategies in symbiotic evolutionary algorithms,” Working Paper, Department of Industrial Engineering, Chonnam National University, Korea, 1999.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    G. Syswerda, “A study of reproduction in generational and steady-state genetic algorithms,” Foundations of Genetic Algorithms, edited by Gregory J.E. Rawlins, San Mateo, CA, pp. 94-101, 1991.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    S.A. Kauffman and S. Johnsen, “Co-evolution to the edge of chaos: Coupled fitness landscapes, poised states and coevolutionary avalanches,” Artificial Life II: Proc. of an Interdisciplinary Workshop on the Synthesis and Simulation of Living Systems, Redwood City, CA, pp. 325-370, 1989.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    S.A. Kauffman, The Origins of Order: Self-Organization and Selection in Evolution, Oxford University Press, New York, Oxford, 1993.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Y.K. Kim, J.Y. Kim, and Y. Kim, “A coevolutionary algorithm for balancing and sequencing in mixed model assembly lines,” Applied Intelligence, vol. 13, pp. 247-258, 2000.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Y. Davidor, “A naturally occurring niche and species phenomenon: The model and first results,” Proc. 4th International on Conference Genetic Algorithms, San Mateo, CA, pp. 257-263, 1991.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    H.J.C. Barbosa, “A coevolutionary genetic algorithm for a game approach to structural optimization,” Proc. 7th International on Conference Genetic Algorithms, East Lansing, MI, pp. 545-552, 1997.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jae Yun Kim
    • 1
  • Yeongho Kim
    • 2
  • Yeo Keun Kim
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Industrial EngineeringChonnam National UniversityKwangjuRepublic of Korea
  2. 2.Department of Industrial EngineeringSeoul National UniversitySeoulRepublic of Korea

Personalised recommendations