Autonomous Robots

, Volume 11, Issue 1, pp 87–95 | Cite as

Social Tele-Embodiment: Understanding Presence

  • Eric Paulos
  • John Canny


Humans live and interact within the real world but our current online world neglects this. This paper explores research into Personal Roving Presence (PRoP) devices that provide a physical mobile proxy, controllable over the Internet to provide tele-embodiment. Leveraging off of its physical presence in the remote space, PRoPs provide important human verbal and non-verbal communication cues. The ultimate goal is a computer mediated communication (CMC) tool for rich natural human interaction beyond currently available systems. This paper examines PRoP design choices, system architecture, social issues, and evaluations of several user studies.

tele-embodiment tele-presence tele-robotics tele-actor 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Ontario Telepresence Group.Google Scholar
  2. Brave, S. and Dahley, A. 1997. in Touch: A Medium for Haptic Interpersonal Communication. ACM SIGCHI.Google Scholar
  3. Clark, H.H. and Brennan, S.E. 1991. Grounding in Communication. Perspectives on Socially Shared Cognition, American Psychological Association: Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  4. Crisman, J.D., Cleary, M.E., and Rojas. 1998. The dieictically controlled wheelchair. Image and Vision Computing, 16(4):235–249.Google Scholar
  5. Daft, R.L. and Lengel, R.H. 1991. Organizational information requirements, media richness, and structural design. In Management Science, 32:554–571.Google Scholar
  6. Dourish, P. 1998. Using metalevel techniques in a flexible toolkit for CSCW applications. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 5(2):109–155.Google Scholar
  7. Dourish, P., Adler, A., Bellotti, V., and Henderson, A. 1996. Your place or mine? Learning from long-term use of audio-video communication. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW), 5(1):33–62.Google Scholar
  8. Dourish, P. and Bellotti, V. 1992. Awareness and coordination in shared workspaces. In Proc. ACM Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work CSCW'92 (Toronto, Ontario). New York: ACM.Google Scholar
  9. Fischer, C.S. 1992. America Calling: A Social History of the Telephone to 1940. University of California Press: Berkeley.Google Scholar
  10. Goertz, R. and Thompson, R. 1954. Electronically Controlled Manipulator. Nucleonics. Google Scholar
  11. Goldberg, K., Mascha, M., Gentner, S., Rothenberg, N., Sutter, C., and Wiegley, J. 1995. Desktop teleoperation via the World Wide Web.Google Scholar
  12. Goldberg, K. and Wallace, R. 1993. Data Dentata. ACM SIGGRAPH: Anaheim, CA.Google Scholar
  13. Grange, S., Fong, T., et al. 2000. Effective vehicle teleoperation on the World Wide Web. IEEE ICRA, San Francisco, CA.Google Scholar
  14. Hall, E.T. 1966. The Hidden Dimension, Doubleday: Garden City, NY.Google Scholar
  15. Ishii, H., Kobayashi, M., et al. 1993. Integration of interpersonal space and shared workspace: ClearBoard design and experiments. ACM Transactions on Information Systems, 11:349.Google Scholar
  16. Kiesler, S.B. 1978. Interpersonal Processes in Groups and Organizations, AHM Pub. Corp.: Arlington Heights, I1.Google Scholar
  17. Kuzuoka, H. and Ishimoda, G. 1995. Supporting position expressions for spatial workspace collaboration. Transactions of the Information Processing Society of Japan, 36(6):1379–1386.Google Scholar
  18. Marvin, C. 1988. When old Technologies were new: Thinking About Electric Communication in the Late Nineteenth Century, Oxford University Press: New York.Google Scholar
  19. Milgram, S. 1974. Obedience to Authority; an Experimental View, Harper & Row: New York.Google Scholar
  20. Murray, R.M., Li, Z., et al. 1994. A Mathematical Introduction to Robotic Manipulation, CRC Press: Boca Raton.Google Scholar
  21. Paulos, E. and Canny, J. 1997. Ubiquitous tele-embodiment: Applications and implication. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 46(6):861–877.Google Scholar
  22. Paulos, E. and Canny, J. 1998. PRoP: Personal Roving Presence, ACM SIGCHI: Los Angeles, CA.Google Scholar
  23. Reeves, B. and Nass, C.I. 1996. The Media Equation: How People Treat Computers, Television, and new Media like Real People and Places. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  24. Richardson, A.E., Montello, D.R., et al. 1999. Spatial knowledge acquisition from maps and from navigation in real and virtual environments. Memory & Cognition, 27(4):741–750.Google Scholar
  25. Rocco, E. 1998. Trust breaks down in electronic contexts but can be repaired by some initial face-to-face contact.Google Scholar
  26. Sellen, A., Buxton, B., et al. 1992. Using spatial cues to improve videoconferencing.Google Scholar
  27. Sheridan, T.B. 1992. Telerobotics, Automation, and Human Supervisory Control, MIT Press: Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  28. Siegwart, R., Wannaz, C., et al. 1998. Guiding Mobile Robots through the Web. IEEE/RSJ Workshop, Victoria, Canada.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • Eric Paulos
    • 1
  • John Canny
    • 1
  1. 1.Computer Science DepartmentUniversity of CaliforniaBerkeley

Personalised recommendations