Advertisement

Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW)

, Volume 10, Issue 2, pp 211–246 | Cite as

Bridging Work Practice and System Design: Integrating Systemic Analysis, Appreciative Intervention and Practitioner Participation

  • Helena Karasti
Article

Abstract

This article discusses the integration of work practice and system design. By scrutinising the unfolding discourse of workshop participants the co-construction of work practice issues as relevant design considerations is described. Through a mutual exploration of ethnography and participatory design the contributing constituents to the co-construction process are identified and put forward as elements in the integration of `systemic analysis' and `appreciative intervention'. The systemic analysis proposes collaboratively grounding the emergent understandings on an inductive and iterative analysis of actual technologically mediated work practice. The appreciative intervention, in turn, calls for envisioning images of future system and context through a recognition of presence and change intertwined in the existing ways of working. The identified elements are joined into three dimensions of interplay, namely the analytic distance, the horizon of work practice transformations and the situated generalisations, which reformulate new conceptualisations of what the integration of work practice and participatory system design is all about. It is suggested that these dimensions together with practitioner participation call into question some of the taken-for-granted assumptions and commonly forwarded intractable disciplinary dichotomies and contribute more generally to bridging work practice and participatory design.

analysis ethnography image interpretation integration interdisciplinarity intervention participatory design practitioner participation radiology system design work practice 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Anderson, B. (1997): Work, Ethnography and System Design. In A. Kent and J.G. Williams (eds.): The Encyclopedia of Microcomputing. New York: Marcel Dekker, pp. 159–183.Google Scholar
  2. Anderson, R.J. (1994): Representations and Requirements: The Value of Ethnography in System Design. Human-Computer Interaction, vol. 9, pp. 151–182.Google Scholar
  3. Bader, G. and J.M. Nyce (1998): When Only the Self Is Real: Theory and Practice in the Development Community. Journal of Computer Documentation, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 5–10.Google Scholar
  4. Bardram, J.E. (1997): Plans as Situated Action: An Activity Theory Approach toWorkflow Systems. In J. Hughes, W. Prinz and T. Rodden (eds.): ECSCW97 Proceedings of the Fifth European Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, Lancaster, UK, September 7-11, 1997. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 17–32.Google Scholar
  5. Barley, S.R. (1990): Images of Imaging: Notes on Doing Longitudinal Field Work. Organization Science, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 220–247.Google Scholar
  6. Bentley, R., J.A. Hughes, D. Randall, T. Rodden, P. Sawyer, D. Shapiro and I. Sommerville (1992): Ethnographically-Informed Systems Design for Air Traffic Control. In L. Turner and R. Kraut (eds.): CSCW'92 Proceedings of the Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work, Toronto, Canada, October 31 to November 4, 1992. New York: ACM Press. pp. 123–129.Google Scholar
  7. Bjerknes, G. and T. Bratteteig (1989): Florence in Wonderland - Systems Development with Nurses. In G. Bjerknes, P. Ehn and M. Kyng (eds.): Computers and Democracy - A Scandinavian Challenge. Aldershot: Avebury, pp. 279–295.Google Scholar
  8. Blomberg, J. (1987): Social Interaction and Office Communication: Effects on User Evaluation of New Technologies. In R.E. Kraut (ed.): Technology and the Transformation ofWhite-collarWork. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, pp. 195–210.Google Scholar
  9. Blomberg, J. (1988): The Variable Impact of Computer Technologies on the Organization of Work Activities. In I. Greif (ed.): Computer-supported Cooperative Work: A Book of Readings. San Mateo: Morgan Kaufman, pp. 771–782.Google Scholar
  10. Blomberg, J. (1995): Ethnography: Aligning Field Studies ofWork and SystemDesign. In A.F. Monk and N. Gilbert (eds.): Perspectives on HCI: Diverse Approaches. London: Academic Press Ltd., Harcourt Brace & Company Publishers, pp. 175–197.Google Scholar
  11. Blomberg, J. and A. Henderson (1990): Reflections on Participatory Design: Lessons from the Trillium Experience. In J. Carrasco Chew and J. Whiteside (eds.): Proceedings of the Human Factors in Computing Systems: Empowering People (CHI'90), Seattle, WA, USA, April 1-5, 1990. New York: ACM, pp. 353–359.Google Scholar
  12. Blomberg, J., J. Giagomi, A. Mosher and P. Swenton-Wall (1993): Ethnographic Field Methods and Their Relation to Design. In D. Schuler and A. Namioka (eds.): Participatory Design: Principles and Practices. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, pp. 123–155.Google Scholar
  13. Blomberg, J., L. Suchman, and R.H. Trigg (1996): Reflections on a Work-Oriented Design Project. Human-Computer Interaction, vol. 11, pp. 237–265.Google Scholar
  14. Blomberg, J., L. Suchman, and R.H. Trigg (1997): Back to Work: Renewing Old Agendas for Cooperative Design. In M. Kyng and L. Mathiassen (eds.): Computers and Design in Context. Cambridge: The MIT Press, pp. 267–288.Google Scholar
  15. Blomberg, J. and R. Trigg (2000): Co-constructing the Relevance of Work Practice for CSCW Design: A Case Study of Translation and Mediation. Occasional Papers from the Work Practice Laboratory, vol. 1, no. 2: 2000, Department of Human Work Science, University of Karlskrona/Ronneby, Ronneby, Sweden, pp. 20.Google Scholar
  16. Bødker, S., E. Christiansen, P. Ehn, R. Markussen, P. Mogensen and R. Trigg (1993): The ATProject - Practical Research in Cooperative Design. Department of Computer Science, PB-454, University of Aarhus, Aarhus, p. 28.Google Scholar
  17. Bødker, S. and K. Grønbaek (1991). Cooperative Prototyping: Users and Designers in Mutual Activity. International Journal of Man Machine Studies, vol. 34, no. 3, pp. 453–478.Google Scholar
  18. Bødker, S. and K. Grønbæk (1996): Users and Designers in Mutual Activity: An Analysis of Cooperative Activities in Systems Design. In Y. Engeström and D. Middleton (eds.): Cognition and Communication at Work. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 130–158.Google Scholar
  19. Bødker, S., K. Grønbæk and M. Kyng (1993): Cooperative Design: Techniques and Experiences From the Scandinavian Scene. In D. Schuler and A. Namioka (eds.): Participatory Design: Principles and Practices. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, pp. 157–175.Google Scholar
  20. Brun-Cottan, F. and P. Wall (1995): Using Video to Re-Present the User. Communications of the ACM, vol. 38, no. 5, pp. 61–71.Google Scholar
  21. Button, G. and P. Dourish (1996): Technomethodology: Paradoxes and Possibilities. In M.J. Tauber, V. Bellotti, R. Jeffries, J. D. Mackinlay and J. Nielsen (eds.): Conference Proceedings on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Vancouver, BC, Canada, April 13-18, 1996. Reading: Addison-Wesley, pp. 19–26.Google Scholar
  22. Button, G. and R. Harper (1996): The Relevance of 'Work-Practice' for Design. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW): An International Journal, vol. 5, pp. 263–280.Google Scholar
  23. Cefkin, M. and B. Jordan (1994): Video-based Interaction Analysis in the Workplace: A Tool for Workers' Appropriation of Their OwnWork. In R. Trigg, S.I. Anderson and E. Dykstra-Erickson (eds.): PDC'94: Proceedings of the Participatory Design Conference, Chapel Hill, NC, USA, October 27-28, 1994. Palo Alto: Computer Professionals for Social Responsibility (CPSR), pp. 149–150.Google Scholar
  24. Chin, G.J., M.B. Rosson and J.M. Carroll (1997): Participatory Analysis: Shared Development of Requirements from Scenarios. In S. Pemberton (ed.): Conference Proceedings on Human Factors in Computing Systems. Atlanta, GA, USA, March 22-27, 1997. Reading: Addison-Wesley, pp. 162–169.Google Scholar
  25. Christensen, M., A. Crabtree, H.D. Damm, K.M. Hansen, O.L. Madsen, P. Marqvardsen, P. Mogensen, E. Sandvad, L. Sloth and M. Thomsen (1998): The M.A.D. Experience: Multiperspective Application Development in Evolutionary Prototyping. In Proceedings of the Twelfth European Conference on Object-Oriented Programming (ECOOP'98), June, 1998. Brussels, Belgium: Springer, pp. 14–41.Google Scholar
  26. Crabtree, A. (1998): Ethnography in Participatory Design. In R. Chatfield, S. Kuhn and M. Muller (eds.): Proceedings of Participatory Design Conference PDC'98. Seattle, WA, USA, November 12-14, 1998. Palo Alto: Computer Professionals for Social Responsibility (CPSR), pp. 93–105.Google Scholar
  27. Crabtree, A. (2000): Talking Work: Language-games, Organisations and Computer Supported Cooperative Work. Computer Supported Collaborative Work (CSCW). An International Journal, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 215–237.Google Scholar
  28. Crabtree, A., D.M. Nichols, J. O'Brien, M. Rouncefield and M.B. Twidale (2000): Ethnomethodologically Informed Ethnography and Information System Design. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, vol. 51, no. 7, pp. 666–682.Google Scholar
  29. Dourish, P. and G. Button (1998): On “Technomethodology”: Foundational Relationships between Ethnomethodology and System Design. Human-Computer Interaction, vol. 13, pp. 395–432.Google Scholar
  30. Ehn, P. (1988): Work-Oriented Design of Computer Artifacts. Stockholm, Sweden: Arbetslivscentrum.Google Scholar
  31. Engeström, Y. (1995): Kehittävä työntutkimus: Perusteita, tuloksia ja haasteita (Developmental Work Research: Foundations, Findings, and Challenges, in Finnish). Helsinki: Painatuskeskus.Google Scholar
  32. Engeström, Y. (1996): Developmental Work Research as Educational Research: Looking Ten Years Back and into the Zone of Proximal Development. Nordisk Pedagogik - Journal of Nordic Educational Research, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 131–143.Google Scholar
  33. Engeström, Y. (1999): Expansive Visibilization of Work: An Activity-Theoretical Perspective. Computer Supported Collaborative Work (CSCW). An International Journal, vol. 8, nos. 1-2, pp. 63–93.Google Scholar
  34. Engeström, Y., J. Virkkunen, M. Helle, J. Pihlaja and R. Poikela (1996): Change Laboratory as a Tool for Transforming Work. Lifelong Learning in Europe, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 10–17.Google Scholar
  35. Floyd, C. (1993): STEPS - A Methodical Approach to PD. Communications of the ACM, vol. 36, no. 4, p. 83.Google Scholar
  36. Floyd, C.,W.-M. Mehl, F-M. Reisin, G. Schmidt and G. Wolf (1989): Out of Scandinavia: Alternative Approaches to Software Design and System Development. Human-Computer Interaction, vol. 4, pp. 253–350.Google Scholar
  37. Forsythe, D.E. (1999): “It is just a Matter of Common Sense”: Ethnography as Invisible Work. Computer Supported Collaborative Work (CSCW). An International Journal, vol. 8, no. 1-2, pp. 127–145.Google Scholar
  38. Goodwin, C. and M.H. Goodwin (1997): Seeing as a Situated Activity: Formulating Planes. In Y. Engeström and D. Middleton (eds.): Cognition and Communication at Work. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 61–95.Google Scholar
  39. Graves, W. and J. Nyce (1992): Normative Models and Situated Practice in Medicine: Towards More Adequate System Design and Development. Information and Decision Technologies, vol. 18, pp. 143–149.Google Scholar
  40. Greenbaum, J. and M. Kyng (eds.) (1991): Design at Work. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  41. Grudin, J. and R.E. Grinter (1995): Ethnography and Design. Computer Supported Collaborative Work (CSCW). An International Journal, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 55–59.Google Scholar
  42. Hastrup, K. (1995): Passage to Anthropology: Between Experience and Theory. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  43. Hughes, J.A., V. King, T. Rodden and H. Anderson (1994): Moving out from the Control Room: Ethnography in System Design. In R. Furuta and C. Neuwirth (eds.): Proceedings of the Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work, Chapel Hill, NC, USA, October 22-26, 1994. ACM Press, pp. 429–439.Google Scholar
  44. Hughes, J.A., J. O'Brien, D. Randall, T. Rodden, M. Rouncefield and P. Tolmie (1999): Getting to Know the 'Customer in the Machine'. In Proceedings of the International ACM SIGGROUP Conference on Supporting Group Work, Phoenix, AZ, USA, November 14-17, 1999. ACMPress, pp. 30–39.Google Scholar
  45. Hughes, J.A., J. O'Brien, T. Rodden, M. Rouncefield and S. Blythin (1997): Designing with Ethnography:A Presentation Framework for Design. In G. van der Veer, A. Henderson and S. Coles (eds.): Proceedings of Designing Interactive Systems Conference: Processes, Practices,Methods, and Techniques (DIS'97), Amsterdam, The Netherlands, August 18-20, 1997. New York: ACM Press, pp. 147–158.Google Scholar
  46. Hughes, J.A., D. Randall and D. Shapiro (1991): CSCW: Discipline or Paradigm? A Sociological Perspective. In L. Bannon, M. Robinson and K. Schmidt (eds.): Proceedings of the Second European Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work. Amsterdam, The Netherlands, September 25-27. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 309–323.Google Scholar
  47. Hughes, J.A., D. Randall and D. Shapiro (1993): From Ethnographic Record to System Design - Some Experiences from the Field. Computer Supported Collaborative Work (CSCW). An International Journal, vol. 1, pp. 123–141.Google Scholar
  48. Hughes, J.A., I. Sommerville, R. Bentley and D. Randall (1993): Designing with Ethnography: Making Work Visible. Interacting with Computers: the Interdisciplinary Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 239–253.Google Scholar
  49. Jordan, B. (1994): A Learning Organization in the Making: Report of the Work Practice and Design Project at the Xerox CAC in Dallas. SPL-94-030, P94-0014, Palo Alto, Xerox PARC.Google Scholar
  50. Jordan, B. (1996): Ethnographic Workplace Studies and CSCW. In D. Shapiro, M. Tauber and R. Traunmuller (eds.): The Design of Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Groupware Systems. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science B.V. pp. 17–42.Google Scholar
  51. Karasti, H. (1997a): Using Video to Join Analysis of Work Practice and System Design: A Study of an Experimental Teleradiology System and Its Redesign. In K. Braa and E. Monteiro (eds.): Proceeding on the 20th Information Systems Research Seminar in Scandinavia, IRIS'20, Social Informatics, Hankø Fjordhotel, Norway, August 9-12, 1997. Department of Informatics, University of Oslo, Norway, pp. 237–254.Google Scholar
  52. Karasti, H. (1997b): Bridging the Analysis of Work Practice and System Redesign in Cooperative Workshops. In G. van der Veer, A. Henderson and S. Coles (eds.): Proceedings of Designing Interactive Systems Conference: Processes, Practices, Methods, and Techniques (DIS'97), Amsterdam, The Netherlands, August 18-20, 1997. New York: ACM Press, pp. 185–195.Google Scholar
  53. Karasti, H. (2000): Co-constructing Shared Understandings of Work Practices for System Design: The Interplay of Views. Occasional Papers from the Work Practice Laboratory, vol. 1, no. 1: 2000, Department of Human Work Science, University of Karlskrona/Ronneby, Ronneby, Sweden, pp. 32.Google Scholar
  54. Karasti, H., J. Reponen, O. Tervonen and K. Kuutti (1998): The Teleradiology System and Changes in Work Practices. Computer Methods And Programs in Biomedicine, vol. 57, pp. 69–78.Google Scholar
  55. Kensing, F. and J. Blomberg (1998): Participatory Design: Issues and Concerns. Computer Supported Collaborative Work (CSCW). An International Journal, vol. 7, pp. 167–185.Google Scholar
  56. Kensing, F., J. Simonsen and K. Bødker (1996): MUST - a Method for Participatory Design. In J. Blomberg, F. Kensing and E.A. Dykstra-Erickson (eds.): Proceedings of the Participatory Design Conference (PDC'96), Cambridge, MA, USA, November 13-15, 1996. ACM, pp. 129–140.Google Scholar
  57. Kensing, F., J. Simonsen and K. Bødker (1998): Participatory Design at a Radio Station. Computer Supported Cooperative Work - An International Journal, vol. 7, no. 2-3, pp. 243–271.Google Scholar
  58. Kjær, A. and K. Halskov Madsen (1994): Participatory Analysis of Flexibility: Some Experiences. In R. Trigg, S.I. Anderson and E. Dykstra-Erickson (eds.): Proceedings of the Participatory Design Conference (PDC'94), Chapel Hill, NC, USA, October 27-28, 1994. Palo Alto: Computer Professionals for Social Responsibility (CPSR), pp. 21–31.Google Scholar
  59. Mogensen, P. (1994): Challenging Practice: An Approach to Cooperative Analysis. Ph.D. dissertation, DAIMI PB 465, Computer Science Department, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.Google Scholar
  60. Mogensen, P. and R. Trigg (1992): Artifacts as Triggers for Participatory Analysis. In S. Kuhn, M. Muller and J.A. Meskill (eds.): Proceedings of the Participatory Design Conference (PDC'92), Cambridge, MA, USA, November 6-7, 1992. Palo Alto: Computer Professional for Social Responsibility, pp. 55–62.Google Scholar
  61. Muller, M.J. (1991): PICTIVE - An Exploration in Participatory Design. In S.P. Robertson, G. M. Olson and J. S. Olson (eds.): Human Factors in Computing Systems Conference Proceedings on Reaching through Technology, New Orleans, LA, USA, April 27-May 2, 1991. ACM Press, pp. 225–231.Google Scholar
  62. Muller, M.J. and S. Kuhn (1993): Participatory Design - Introduction. Communications of the ACM, vol. 36, no. 4, pp. 24–28.Google Scholar
  63. Nyce, J.M. and J. Löwgren (1995): Toward Foundational Analysis in Human-computer Interaction. In P.J. Thomas (ed.): The Social and Interactional Dimensions of Human-Computer Interfaces. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 37–47.Google Scholar
  64. Orr, J.E. (1990): Sharing Knowledge, Celebrating Identity: War Stories and Community Memory in a Service Culture. In D. Middleton and D. Edwards (eds.): Collective Remembering: Memory in Society. Newbury Park: Sage, pp. 169–189.Google Scholar
  65. Plowman, L., Y. Rogers and M. Ramage (1995): What Are Workplace Studies For? In H. Marmolin, Y. Sundblad and K. Schmidt (eds.): Proceedings of the Fourth European Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work, Stockholm, Sweden, September 10-14, 1995. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 309–324.Google Scholar
  66. Reponen, J., S. Lähde, O. Tervonen, E. Ilkko, T. Rissanen and I. Suramo (1995): Low-cost Digital Teleradiology. European Journal of Radiology, vol. 19, pp. 226–231.Google Scholar
  67. Salter, L. and A. Hearn (eds.) (1996): Outside the Lines.Montreal: McGill-Queen's University Press.Google Scholar
  68. Schuler, D. and A. Namioka (eds.) (1993): Participatory Design. Principles and Practices. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  69. Shapiro, D. (1994): The Limits of Ethnography: Combining Social Sciences for CSCW. In R. Furuta and C. Neuwirth (eds.): Proceedings of the Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW'94), Chapel Hill, NC, USA, October 22-26, 1994. New York: ACMPress, pp. 417–428.Google Scholar
  70. Simonsen, J. and F. Kensing (1994): Take Users Seriously, but Take a Closer Look: Organizational and Technical Effects from Designing with an Ethnographically Inspired Approach. In R. Trigg, S.I. Anderson and E. Dykstra-Erickson (eds.): Proceedings of Participatory Design Conference (PDC'94), Chapel Hill, NC, USA, October 27-28, 1994. Palo Alto: Computer Professional for Social Responsibility (CPSR), pp. 47–58.Google Scholar
  71. Simonsen, J. and F. Kensing (1998): Make Room for Ethnography in Design! Journal of Computer Documentation, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 20–30.Google Scholar
  72. Suchman, L. (1983): Office Procedure as Practical Action: Models of Work and System Design. Transactions on Office Information Systems, vol. 1, no. 4, pp. 320–328.Google Scholar
  73. Suchman, L. (1987): Plans and Situated Actions. The Problem of Human-machine Communication. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  74. Suchman, L. (1994): Do Categories Have Politics? The Language/Action Perspective Reconsidered. Computer Supported Collaborative Work (CSCW). An International Journal, vol. 2, pp. 177–190.Google Scholar
  75. Suchman, L. (1997): Centers for Coordination: A Case and some Themes. In L. Resnick, B.R. Säljö, C. Pontecorvo and B. Burge (eds.): Discourse, Tools, and Reasoning: Essays on Situated Cognition. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, pp. 41–62.Google Scholar
  76. Suchman, L., J. Blomberg, J. Orr and R. Trigg (1999): Reconstructing Technologies as Social Practice. American Behavioral Scientist, vol. 43, no. 3, pp. 392–408.Google Scholar
  77. Suchman, L. and R.H. Trigg (1991): Understanding Practice: Video as a Medium for Reflection and Design. In J. Greenbaum and M. Kyng (eds.): Design at Work: Cooperative Design of Computer Systems. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum, pp. 65–89.Google Scholar
  78. Trigg, R., S. Bødker and K. Grønbæk (1991): Open-Ended Interaction in Cooperative Prototyping: A Video-based Analysis. Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems, vol. 3, pp. 63–86.Google Scholar
  79. Twidale, M., T. Rodden and I. Sommerville (1993): The Designers' Notepad: Supporting and Understanding Cooperative Design. In G. de Michelis, C. Simone and K. Schmidt (eds.): Proceedings of the Third European Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work, Milan, Italy, September 13-17, 1993. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 93–108.Google Scholar
  80. Viller, S. and I. Sommerville (1999): Coherence: An Approach to Representing Ethnographic Analyses in Systems Design. Human-Computer Interaction, vol. 14, nos. 1-2, pp. 9–41.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • Helena Karasti
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Information Processing Science, University of OuluOulu UniversityFinland

Personalised recommendations