Minds and Machines

, Volume 11, Issue 1, pp 77–93

The Status and Future of the Turing Test

  • James H. Moor

DOI: 10.1023/A:1011218925467

Cite this article as:
Moor, J.H. Minds and Machines (2001) 11: 77. doi:10.1023/A:1011218925467


The standard interpretation of the imitation game is defended over the rival gender interpretation though it is noted that Turing himself proposed several variations of his imitation game. The Turing test is then justified as an inductive test not as an operational definition as commonly suggested. Turing's famous prediction about his test being passed at the 70% level is disconfirmed by the results of the Loebner 2000 contest and the absence of any serious Turing test competitors from AI on the horizon. But, reports of the death of the Turing test and AI are premature. AI continues to flourish and the test continues to play an important philosophical role in AI. Intelligence attribution, methodological, and visionary arguments are given in defense of a continuing role for the Turing test. With regard to Turing's predictions one is disconfirmed, one is confirmed, but another is still outstanding.

imitation game Loebner prize Turing test 

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • James H. Moor
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PhilosophyDartmouth CollegeHanoverUSA

Personalised recommendations