The Review of Austrian Economics

, Volume 14, Issue 2–3, pp 181–191 | Cite as

Alfred Schütz and George Shackle: Two Views of Choice

  • Roger Koppl
Article

Abstract

Within the Austrian school of economics, Ludwig Lachmann identified Alfred Schütz and George Shackle as master “subjectivists.” Subjectivists trace aggregate economic phenomena back to the subjective thoughts and expectations of individuals. Schütz was a member of the “Mises Circle” of Austrian economists. Shackle was a student of the Austrian economist F.A. Hayek, but a follower of Hayek's great rival, John Maynard Keynes. Austrians respect both figures as important subjectivists who offered valuable accounts of the role of uncertainty in human action. The paper serves two purposes. First, it is a useful primer on the distinct theories of Schuts and Shackle. Second, it draws attention to the problem of change and novelty in the work of Schütz and Shackle. Schütz underemphasized the role of novelty in society. Shackle, by contrast, exaggerated the role of novelty in choice. A middle ground position is defended.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ayers, A. J. [1952 (1946)] Language, Truth and Logic, 2nd ed. New York: Dover Publications, Inc.Google Scholar
  2. Butos, W., and Koppl, R. (1993) “Hayekian Expectations: Theory and Empirical Applications.” Constitutional Political Economy, 4(3): 303–329.Google Scholar
  3. Butos, W., and Koppl, R. (1997) “The Varieties of Subjectivism: Keynes and Hayek on Expectations.” History of Political Economy, 29(2): 327–359.Google Scholar
  4. Butos, W., and Koppl, R. (1999) “Hayek and Kirzner at the Keynesian Beauty Contest.” Journal des Economistes et des Etudes Humaines, 9 (2/3): 257–275.Google Scholar
  5. Garrison, R. (1982) “Austrian Economics as the Middle Ground: Comment on Loasby.” In Kirzner, I.M. (Ed.) Method, Process and Austrian Economics: Essays in Honor of Ludwig von Mises. Lexington, MA: D. C. Heath.Google Scholar
  6. Koppl, R. (1994) “Lachmann on Schütz and Shackle.” Advances in Austrian Economics, 1: 289–301.Google Scholar
  7. Koppl, R. (1997) “Mises and Schütz on Ideal Types.” Cultural Dynamics, 9(1): 63––76.Google Scholar
  8. Koppl, R. (1998) “Apriorism and Dualism.” Advances in Austrian Economics, 5: 159–179.Google Scholar
  9. Littlechild, S. C. (1979) “Comment: Radical Subjectivism or Radical Subversion?” In Rizzo, M. (Ed.) Time, Uncertainty and Disequilibrium Lexington, MA: D. C. Heath.Google Scholar
  10. O'Driscoll, G., and Rizzo, M. (1985) The Economics of Time and Ignorance. New York and Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
  11. Prendergast, C. (1986) “Alfred Schütz and the Austrian School of Economics.” American Journal of Sociology, 92(1): 1–26.Google Scholar
  12. Schütz, A. [1967 (1932)] The Phenomenology of the Social World, translated by George Walsh and Frederick Lehnert. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Schütz, A. [1967 (1951)] “Choosing Among Projects of Action.” In Collected Papers vol. 1. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.Google Scholar
  14. Schütz, A. [1967 (1954)] “Common-Sense and Scientific Interpretation of Human Action.” In Collected Papers vol. 1. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.Google Scholar
  15. Schütz, A. [1971 (1943)] “The Problem of Rationality in the SocialWorld.” In Collected Papers vol. 2. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.Google Scholar
  16. Schütz, A. [1971 (1959)] “Tiresias, or our Knowledge of Future Events.” In Collected Papers vol. 2. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.Google Scholar
  17. Schütz, A., and Luckmann, T. (1973) The Structures of the Life-World. Translated by Zaner, R.M., and Engelhardt, H. T. Jr. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Shackle, G. L. S. (1949) Expectation in Economics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Shackle, G. L. S. (1961) Decision, Order and Time in Human Affairs. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Shackle, G. L. S. (1972) Epistemics and Economics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Shackle, G. L. S. (1979) “Imagination, Formalism and Choice.” In Rizzo, M. (Ed.) Time, Uncertainty and Disequilibrium. Lexington, MA: D. C. Heath.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • Roger Koppl
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Economics and FinanceFairleigh Dickinson UniversityMadison

Personalised recommendations