A Taxonomy of Business Process Modeling and Information Systems Modeling Techniques

  • George M. Giaglis
Article

Abstract

Modeling always has been at the core of both organizational design and information systems (IS) development. Models enable decision makers to filter out the irrelevant complexities of the real world, so that efforts can be directed toward the most important parts of the system under study. However, both business analysts and IS professionals may find it difficult to navigate through a maze of theoretical paradigms, methodological approaches, and representational formalisms that have been proposed for both business process modeling (BPM) and information systems modeling (ISM). This paper sets out to put an order to this chaos by proposing an evaluation framework and a novel taxonomy of BPM and ISM techniques. These findings, coupled with a detailed review of BPM and ISM techniques, can assist decision makers in comparatively evaluating and selecting suitable modeling techniques, depending on the characteristics and requirements of individual projects.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. van der Aalst, W. M. P. and van Hee, K. M., “Business Process Redesign: A Petri-Net-Based Approach, ” Computers in Industry, Vol. 29, pp. 15–26 (1996).Google Scholar
  2. Avison, D. E., The Information Systems Development Life Cycle: A First Course in Information Systems, McGraw-Hill, London (1997).Google Scholar
  3. Ba, S., Lang, K. R., and Whinston, A. B., “Enterprise Decision Support Using Intranet Technology, ” Decision Support Systems, Vol. 20, pp. 99–134 (1997).Google Scholar
  4. Bhaskar, R., Lee, H. S., Levas, A., Petrakian, R., Tsai, F., and Tulskie, B., “Analysing and Re-engineering Business Processes Using Simulation. in: Proceedings of the 1994 Winter Simulation Conference, J. D. Tew, S. Manivannan, D. A. Sadowski, and A. F. Seila (Eds.), Lake Buena Vista, FL, pp. 1206–1213 (December, 1994).Google Scholar
  5. Blyth, A., “Modeling the Business Process to Derive Organisational Requirements for Information Technology, ” SIGOIS Bulletin, Vol. 16, No. 1, pp. 25–33 (1995).Google Scholar
  6. Booch, G., Rumbaugh, J., and Jacobson, I., Unified Modeling Language User Guide, Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA (1999).Google Scholar
  7. Compatangelo, E. and Rumolo, G., “Automated Reasoning About Enterprise Concepts, ” SIGGROUP Bulletin, Vol. 18, No. 2, pp. 56–58 (1997).Google Scholar
  8. Curtis, W., Kellner, M. I., and Over, J., “Process Modeling, ” Communications of the ACM, Vol. 35, No. 9, pp. 75–90 (1992).Google Scholar
  9. Davenport, T. H. and Short, J. E., “The New Industrial Engineering: Information Technology and Business Process Redesign, ” Sloan Management Review, Vol. 31, No. 4 (Summer 1990), pp. 11–27.Google Scholar
  10. Davenport, T. H. and Stoddard, D. B., “Reengineering: Business Change of Mythic Proportions?” MIS Quarterly, Vol. 18, No. 2, pp. 121–127 (1994).Google Scholar
  11. Doran, J. and Gilbert, N., “Simulating Societies: An Introduction, ” in: Simulating, Societies: The Computer Simulation of Social Phenomena N. Gilbert, and J. Doran (Eds.), UCL Press, London (1994).Google Scholar
  12. Earl, M. J., “The New and the Old of Business Process Redesign, ” Journal of Strategic Information Systems, Vol. 3, No. 1, pp. 5–22 (1994).Google Scholar
  13. Forrester, J. W., Industrial Dynamics, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA (1961).Google Scholar
  14. Gladwin, B. and Tumay, K., “Modeling Business Processes with Simulation Tools, ” in: Proceedings of the 1994 Winter Simulation Conference, J. D. Tew, S. Manivannan, D. A. Sadowski, and A. F. Seila (Eds.), Lake Buena Vista, FL, pp. 114–121 (December 1994).Google Scholar
  15. Grover, V., Fielder, K. D., and Teng, J. T. C., “Exploring the Success of Information Technology Enabled Business Process Reengineering, ” IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, Vol. 41, No. 3, pp. 276–284 (1994).Google Scholar
  16. Hansen, G. A., Automating Business Process Reengineering: Breaking the TQM Barrier, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ (1994).Google Scholar
  17. Hedberg, S. R., “AI Tools for Business Process Modeling, ” IEEE Expert, pp. 13–15 (1996).Google Scholar
  18. HPS, iThink Analyst Technical Documentation, High Performance Systems Inc., Hanover (1997).Google Scholar
  19. Huber G. P. and McDaniel, R. R., “The Decision Making Paradigm of Organisation Design, ” Management Science, Vol. 32, No. 5, pp. 576–589 (1986).Google Scholar
  20. Huckvale, T. and Ould, M., “Process Modeling—Who, What and How: Role Activity Diagramming, ” in: Business Process Change: Concepts, Methods and Technologies, V. Grover and W. J. Kettinger (Eds.), Idea Group Publishing, Harrisburg, PA, pp. 330–349 (1995).Google Scholar
  21. Jensen, K., Coloured Petri Nets: Basic Concepts, Analysis Methods and Practical Use, Springer-Verlag, Berlin (1996).Google Scholar
  22. Jones, J. L., Structured Programming Logic: A Flowcharting Approach, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ (1986).Google Scholar
  23. Kettinger, W. J., Teng, J. T. C., and Guha, S., “Business Process Change: A Study of Methodologies, Techniques, and Tools, ” MIS Quarterly, Vol. 21, No. 1, pp. 55–80 (1997).Google Scholar
  24. Leymann, F. and Altenhuber, W., “Managing Business Processes as an Information Resource, ” IBM Systems Journal, Vol. 33, No. 2, pp. 326–348 (1994).Google Scholar
  25. Liles, D. H. and Presley, A. R., “Enterprise Modelling within an Enterprise Engineering Framework, ” in: Proceedings of the 1996 Winter Simulation Conference, J. M. Charnes, D. J. Morrice, D. T. Brunner, and J. J. Swain (Eds.), San Diego, CA, pp. 993–999 (December 1996).Google Scholar
  26. MacArthur, P. J., Crosslin, R. L., and Warren, J. R., “A Strategy for Evaluating Alternative Information System Designs for Business Process Reengineering, ” International Journal of Information Management, Vol. 14, No. 4, pp. 237–251 (1994).Google Scholar
  27. Marsan, M. A., Balbo, G., Conte, G., Donatelli, S., and Franceschinis, G., Modeling with Generalised Stochastic Petri Nets, Wiley, Chichester, U.K. (1995).Google Scholar
  28. Mayer, R. J., Benjamin, P. C., Caraway, B. E., and Painter, M. K., “A Framework and a Suite of Methods for Business Process Reengineering, ” in: Business Process Change: Concepts, Methods and Technologies, V. Grover and W. J. Kettinger (Eds.), Idea Group Publishing, Harrisburg, PA, pp. 245–290 (1995).Google Scholar
  29. van Meel, J.W., Bots, P.W. G., and Sol, H. G., “Towards a Research Framework for Business Engineering, ” IFIP Transactions A: Computer Science and Technology, Vol. 54, pp. 581–592 (1994).Google Scholar
  30. Moore, T. C. and Whinston, A. B., “A Model of Decision Making with Sequential Information Acquisition, ” Decision Support Systems, Vol. 2, No. 4, pp. 289–308 (1986).Google Scholar
  31. Nissen, M. E., “Qualitative Simulation of Organizational Microprocesses, ” in: J. F. Nunamaker and R. H. Sprague (Eds.), Proceedings of the 27th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Vol. 4, IEEE Press, Los Alamitos, CA, pp. 635–644 (1994).Google Scholar
  32. Nissen, M. E., “Designing Qualitative Simulation Systems for Business, ” Simulation and Gaming, Vol. 27, No. 4, pp. 462–483 (1996).Google Scholar
  33. Orman, L. V., “A Model Management Approach to Business Process Reengineering, ” in: Proceedings of the American Conference on Information Systems, Pittsburgh (August 1995).Google Scholar
  34. Paul, R. J. and Doukidis, G. I., “Artificial Intelligence Aids in Discrete-Event Digital Simulation Modeling, ” IEE Proceedings, Vol. 134, No. 4, pp. 278–286 (1987).Google Scholar
  35. Paul, R. J., Giaglis, G. M., and Hlupic, V., “Simulation of Business Processes, ” American Behavioral Scientist, Vol. 42, No. 10, pp. 1551–1576 (1999).Google Scholar
  36. Peterson, J. L., Petri Net Theory and the Modeling of Systems, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ (1981).Google Scholar
  37. Reising, W., Muchnick, S. S., and Schnupp, P. (Eds.), A Primer in Petri Net Design, Springer-Verlag, Berlin (1992).Google Scholar
  38. Scholz-Reiter, B. and Stickel, E., (eds.), Business Process Modelling. Springer-Verlag, Berlin (1996).Google Scholar
  39. Schriber, T. J., Fundamentals of Flowcharting, Wiley, New York (1969).Google Scholar
  40. Shannon, R. E., Systems Simulation: The Art and the Science, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ (1975).Google Scholar
  41. Sol, H. G. and Crosslin, R. L. (eds.), Dynamic Modeling of Information Systems, II, North-Holland, Amsterdam (1992).Google Scholar
  42. Streng, R. J., “BPR Needs BIR and BTR: The PIT-Framework for Business Re-engineering, ” in: Proceedings of the Second SISNET Conference, Barcelona, Spain (September 1994).Google Scholar
  43. Teufel, S. and Teufel, B., “Bridging Information Technology and Business: Some Modelling Aspects, ” SIGOIS Bulletin, Vol. 16, No. 1, pp. 13–17 (1995).Google Scholar
  44. Tsalgatidou, A. and Junginger, S., “Modeling in the Re-engineering Process, ” SIGOIS Bulletin, Vol. 16, No. 1, pp. 17–24 (1995).Google Scholar
  45. Tushman, M. L. and Nadler, D. A., “Information Processing as an Integrating Concept in Organisation Design, ” Academy of Management Review, Vol. 3, No. 3, pp. 613–624 (1978).Google Scholar
  46. UML, UML Proposal to the Object Management Group, available online at: http://www.rational.com/uml (1997).Google Scholar
  47. Warren, J. R., Stott, J. W., and Norcio, A. F., “Stochastic Simulation of Information Systems Designs from Data Flow Diagrams, ” Journal of Systems and Software, Vol. 18, No. 2, pp. 191–199 (1992).Google Scholar
  48. Wolstenholme, E. F., Henderson, S., and Gavine, A., The Evaluation of Management Information Systems: A Dynamic and Holistic Approach, John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, U.K. (1993).Google Scholar
  49. Yourdon, E., Modern Structured Analysis, Prentice-Hall International, Englewood Cliffs, NJ (1989).Google Scholar
  50. Yu, E. S. K., Mylopoulos, J., and Lesperance, Y., “AI Models for Business Process Reengineering, ” IEEE Expert, pp. 16–23 (1996).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • George M. Giaglis
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Information Systems and ComputingBrunel University, UxbridgeMiddlesexU.K.

Personalised recommendations