Landscape Ecology

, Volume 16, Issue 3, pp 267–277

Dispersion of kangaroo rat mounds at multiple scales in New Mexico, USA

  • Robert L. Schooley
  • John A. Wiens


Burrowing mammals create disturbances that increase the ecological heterogeneity of landscapes. In desert systems, banner-tailed kangaroo rats (Dipodomys spectabilis) construct large mounds that greatly influence the spatial patterning of soils, plants, and animals. The overall effects of the patches generated by D. spectabilis depend on the dispersion patterns of the mounds; these patterns may be sensitive to scale and landscape position. We examined the distribution of D. spectabilis mounds across multiple scales in four 40-ha grassland plots in New Mexico, USA. We used Ripley's K-function for our point-pattern analysis. The dispersion patterns of mounds were generally scale-sensitive but depended somewhat on plot-level densities, which were related to topographic position and grazing history. Mound spacing was either regular or random at small scales (0–50 m), random or aggregated at intermediate scales (50–300 m), and aggregated at large scales (300–3000 m). This scale-dependency of pattern reflected spatial domains in which different biotic (territoriality, dispersal, grazing) and abiotic (soil texture and drainage) factors exerted strong influences. How other organisms perceive the spatial patterning of mounds will depend on the extent of their movements. Patches may appear regular to one species but aggregated to another. The dispersion of D. spectabilis mounds also has implications for the spatial structuring of desert rodent communities. D. spectabilis excludes smaller species of kangaroo rats from areas around their mounds; they create spatial heterogeneity in behavioral dominance that may influence the distribution of subordinate species at multiple scales.

burrows desert rodents Dipodomys spectabilis grazing K-function patch disturbances scale semiarid grasslands spatial point patterns 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Adams, E.S. and Tschinkel, W.R. 1995. Spatial dynamics of colony interactions in young populations of the fire ant Solenopsis invicta. Oecologia 102: 156–163.Google Scholar
  2. Addicott, J.F., Aho, J.M., Antolin, M.F., Padilla, D.K., Richardson, J.S and Soluk, D.A. 1987. Ecological neighborhoods: scaling environmental patterns. Oikos 49: 340–346.Google Scholar
  3. Allred, K.W. 1993. A field guide to the grasses of New Mexico. Agricultural Experiment Station, New Mexico State University, Lac Cruces, New Mexico, USA.Google Scholar
  4. Amarasekare, P. 1994. Spatial population structure in the bannertailed kangaroo rat, Dipodomys spectabilis. Oecologia 100: 166–176.Google Scholar
  5. Andersen, A.N. and Patel, A.D. 1994. Meat ants as dominant members of Australian ant communities: an experimental test of their influence on the foraging success and forager abundance of other species. Oecologia 98: 15–24.Google Scholar
  6. Andersen, M. 1992. Spatial analysis of two-species interactions. Oecologia 91: 134–140.Google Scholar
  7. Andersen, M.C. and Kay, F.R. 1999. Banner-tailed kangaroo rat burrow mounds and desert grassland habitats. J. Arid Envir. 41: 147–160.Google Scholar
  8. Bailey, T.C. and Gatrell, A.C. 1995. Interactive Spatial Data Analysis. Longman: Essex, UK.Google Scholar
  9. Best, T.L. 1972. Mound development by a pioneer population of the banner-tailed kangaroo rat, Dipodomys spectabilis baileyi Goldman, in eastern New Mexico. Am. Midl. Nat. 87: 201–206.Google Scholar
  10. Best, T.L. 1988. Dipodomys spectabilis. Mammal. Spec. 311: 1–10.Google Scholar
  11. Bowers, M.A., Thompson, D.B. and Brown, J.H. 1987. Spatial organization of a desert rodent community: food addition and species removal. Oecologia 72: 77–82.Google Scholar
  12. Bowers, M.A. and Brown, J.H. 1992. Structure in a desert rodent community: use of space around Dipodomys spectabilis mounds. Oecologia 92: 242–249.Google Scholar
  13. Brown, J.H. and Heske, E.J. 1990. Control of a desert-grassland transition by a keystone rodent guild. Science 250: 1705–1707.Google Scholar
  14. Campbell, D.J. 1992. Nearest-neighbor graphical analysis of spatial pattern and a test for competition in populations of singing crickets (Teleogryllus commodus). Oecologia 92: 548–551.Google Scholar
  15. Chew, R.M. and Whitford, W.G. 1992. A long-term positive effect of kangaroo rats (Dipodomys spectabilis) on creosotebushes (Larrea tridentata). J. Arid Envir. 22: 375–386.Google Scholar
  16. Cressie, N.A. 1991. Statistics for Spatial Data. JohnWiley and Sons: New York, NY, USA.Google Scholar
  17. Crist, T.O. and Wiens, J.A. 1996. The distribution of ant colonies in a semiarid landscape: implications for community and ecosystem processes. Oikos 76: 301–311.Google Scholar
  18. Fields, M.J., Coffin, D.P. and Gosz, J.R. 1999. Burrowing activities of kangaroo rats and patterns in plant species dominance at a shortgrass steppe-desert grassland ecotone. J. Vege. Sci. 10: 123–129.Google Scholar
  19. Frye, R.J. 1983. Experimental field evidence of interspecific aggression between two species of kangaroo rat (Dipodomys). Oecologia 59: 74–78.Google Scholar
  20. Getis, A. and Franklin, J. 1987. Second-order neighborhood analysis of mapped point patterns. Ecology 68: 473–477.Google Scholar
  21. Gordon, D.M. and Kulig, A.W. 1996. Founding, foraging, and fighting: colony size and the spatial distribution of harvester ant nests. Ecology 77: 2393–2409.Google Scholar
  22. Gosz, J.R. 1993. Ecotone hierarchies. Ecol. Appl. 3: 369–376.Google Scholar
  23. Guo, Q. 1996. Effects of bannertail kangaroo rat mounds on smallscale plant community structure. Oecologia 106: 247–256.Google Scholar
  24. Haase, P. 1995. Spatial pattern analysis in ecology based on Ripley's K-function: introduction and methods of edge correction. J. Vege. Sci. 6: 575–582.Google Scholar
  25. Hansell, M.H. 1993. The ecological impact of animal nests and burrows. Functional Ecol. 7: 5–12.Google Scholar
  26. Hawkins, L.K. and Nicoletto, P.F. 1992. Kangaroo rat burrows structure the spatial organization of ground-dwelling animals in semiarid grasslands. J. Arid Envir. 23: 199–208.Google Scholar
  27. Heske, E.J., Brown, J.H. and Guo, Q. 1993. Effects of kangaroo rat exclusion on vegetation structure and plant species diversity in the Chihuahuan Desert. Oecologia 95: 520–524.Google Scholar
  28. Huntley, N. and Inouye, R. 1988. Pocket gophers in ecosystems: patterns and mechanisms. BioScience 38: 786–793.Google Scholar
  29. Jones, C.G., Lawton, J.H. and Shachak, M. 1994. Organisms as ecosystem engineers. Oikos 69: 373–386.Google Scholar
  30. Jones, W.T. 1984. Natal philopatry in bannertail kangaroo rats. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 15: 151–155.Google Scholar
  31. Jones, W.T., Waser, P.M., Elliott, L.F., Link, N.E. and Bush, B.B. 1988. Philopatry, dispersal, and habitat saturation in the bannertailed kangaroo rat, Dipodomys spectabilis. Ecology 69: 1466–1473.Google Scholar
  32. Klaas, B.A., Maloney, K.A. and Danielson, B.J. 2000. The tempo and mode of gopher mound production in a tallgrass prairie remnant. Ecography 23: 246–256.Google Scholar
  33. Kotliar, N.B. and Wiens, J.A. 1990. Multiple scales of patchiness and patch structure: a hierarchical framework for the study of heterogeneity. Oikos 59: 253–260.Google Scholar
  34. Lawton, J.H. 1994. What do species do in ecosystems? Oikos 71: 367–374.Google Scholar
  35. Lehman, C.L. and Tilman, D. 1997. Competition in spatial habitats. In Spatial Ecology: the Role of Space in Population Dynamics and Interspecific Interactions, pp. 185–203. Edited by D. Tilman and P. Kareiva. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey, USA.Google Scholar
  36. Levin, S.A. 1992. The problem of pattern and scale in ecology. Ecology 73: 1943–1967.Google Scholar
  37. Lima, S.L. and Zollner, P.A. 1996. Towards a behavioral ecology of ecological landscapes. Trends Ecol. Evol. 11: 131–135.Google Scholar
  38. MathSoft. 1997. S-Plus User's Guide. Data Analysis Products Division, MathSoft: Seattle, WA, USA.Google Scholar
  39. Moeur, M. 1993. Characterizing spatial patterns of trees using stemmapped data. Forest Sci. 39: 756–775.Google Scholar
  40. Moorhead, D.L., Fisher, F.M. and Whitford, W.G. 1988. Cover of spring annuals on nitrogen-rich kangaroo rat mounds in a Chihuahuan Desert grassland. Am. Midl. Nat. 120: 443–447.Google Scholar
  41. Moroka, N., Beck, R.F. and Pieper, R.D. 1982. Impact of burrowing activity of the banner-tail kangaroo rat on southern New Mexico desert rangelands. J. Range Manag. 35: 707–710.Google Scholar
  42. Mun, H.-T. and Whitford, W.G. 1990. Factors affecting annual plants assemblages on banner-tailed kangaroo rat mounds. J. Arid Envir. 18: 165–173.Google Scholar
  43. Parmenter, R.P. and Van Devender, T.R. 1995. Diversity, spatial variability, and functional roles of vertebrates in the desert grassland. In The Desert Grassland, pp. 196–229. Edited by M.P. McClaran and T.R. Van Devender. University of Arizona Press, Tucson, Arizona, USA.Google Scholar
  44. Peterson, D.L. and Parker, V.T. (eds.). 1998. Ecological Scale: Theory and Applications. Columbia University Press, New York, NY, USA.Google Scholar
  45. Randall, J.A. 1984. Territorial defense and advertisement by footdrumming in bannertail kangaroo rats (Dipodomys spectabilis) at high and low population densities. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 16: 11–20.Google Scholar
  46. Reich, R.M. and Davis, R. 1998. Quantitative Spatial Analysis. Colorado State University: Fort Collins, Colorado, USA.Google Scholar
  47. Ripley, B.D. 1976. The second-order analysis of stationary point processes. J. Appl. Probab. 13: 255–266.Google Scholar
  48. Schooley, R.L., Bestelmeyer, B.T. and Kelly, J.F. 2000. Influence of small-scale disturbances by kangaroo rats on Chihuahuan Desert ants. Oecologia 125: 142–149.Google Scholar
  49. Schroder, G.D. 1979. Foraging behavior and home range utilization of the bannertail kangaroo rat (Dipodomys spectabilis). Ecology 60: 657–665.Google Scholar
  50. Schroder, G.D. and Geluso, K.N. 1975. Spatial distribution of Dipodomys spectabilis mounds. J. Mammal. 56: 363–368.Google Scholar
  51. Tilman, D., Lehman, C.L. and Kareiva, P. 1997. Population dynamics in spatial habitats. In Spatial Ecology: the Role of Space in Population Dynamics and Interspecific Interactions, pp. 3–20. Edited by D. Tilman and P. Kareiva. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey, USA.Google Scholar
  52. United States Department of Agriculture. 1988. Soil Survey of Socorro County Area, New Mexico. Soil Conservation Service, Washington D.C., USA.Google Scholar
  53. Valone, T.J., Brown, J.H. and Jacobi, C.L. 1995. Catastrophic decline of a desert rodent, Dipodomys spectabilis: insights from a long-term study. J. Mammal. 76: 428–436.Google Scholar
  54. Waser, P.M. and Jones, W.T. 1991. Survival and reproductive effort in banner-tailed kangaroo rats. Ecology 72: 771–777.Google Scholar
  55. Whicker, A.D. and Detling, J.K. 1988. Ecological consequences of prairie dog disturbances. BioScience 38: 778–785.Google Scholar
  56. Whitford, W.G. and Kay, F.R. 1999. Biopedturbation by mammals in deserts: a review. J. Arid Envir. 41: 203–230.Google Scholar
  57. Wiens, J.A. 1985. Vertebrate responses to environmental patchiness in arid and semiarid ecosystems. In The Ecology of Natural Disturbances and Patch Dynamics, pp. 169–193. Edited by S.T.A. Pickett and P.S. White. Academic Press, Orlando, Florida, USA.Google Scholar
  58. Wiens, J.A. 1989. Spatial scaling in ecology. Functional Ecol. 3: 385–397.Google Scholar
  59. Wiens, J.A. and Milne, B.T. 1989. Scaling of ‘landscapes’ in landscape ecology, or, landscape ecology from a beetle's perspective. Landscape Ecol. 3: 87–96.Google Scholar
  60. With, K.A. 1994. Using fractal analysis to assess how species perceive landscape structure. Landscape Ecol. 9: 25–36.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • Robert L. Schooley
    • 1
  • John A. Wiens
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Biology and Graduate Degree Program in EcologyColorado State UniversityFort CollinsUSA

Personalised recommendations