Water Resources Management

, Volume 14, Issue 6, pp 435–456

Multicriterion Analysis for Sustainable Water Resources Planning: A Case Study in Spain

  • K. Srinivasa Raju
  • Lucien Duckstein
  • Cecile Arondel


The present article demonstrates the implementation of Multicriterion Decision Making (MCDM) analysis for a case study of Flumen Monegros irrigation area in the Huesca province of Spain. The criteria used to rank alternativesconsist of (1) economic factors including initial cost ofirrigation system, maintenance cost, profitability of crops,extent of European subsidies; (2) environmental factors whichcomprise water volume, water quality after irrigation, efficiency of the use of water, resistance to floods or droughts; (3) Social factors including employment of rurallabour, area non-cultivated. Alternative policies areformulated by mixing factors such as irrigation system, waterpricing, water allocation, crop distribution, fertiliser use,subsidies received. Multicriterion Sorting Technique (MCST)ELECTRE-TRI is employed to reduce the large size payoff matrixto predefined categories for further usage of MCDM techniques.Five MCDM techniques, namely, PROMETHEE-2, EXPROM-2, ELECTRE-3, ELECTRE-4, and Compromise Programming (CP) are employed torank the alternatives. Spearman rank correlation coefficientis employed to assess the correlation coefficient between theranking patterns obtained by the above MCDM techniques.Additive ranking principle is used for group decision makinganalysis. Results indicate that five MCDM techniques choosethe same alternative strategy as the preferred one.

ELECTRE-TRI group decision making irrigation planning multicriterion decision making Spain Spearman rank correlation 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Arondel, C. and Giradin, P.: 2000, 'Sorting cropping systems on the basis of their impact on ground water quality', European Journal of Operational Research 127(3), 467–482.Google Scholar
  2. Bender, M. J. and Simonovic, S. P.: 2000, 'A fuzzy compromise approach to water resource systems planning under uncertainty', Fuzzy Sets and Systems 115, 35–44.Google Scholar
  3. Bogardi, J. J. and Nachtnebel, H. P. (eds): 1994, Multicriteria Decision Analysis in Water Resources Management, International Hydrological Programme, UNESCO, Paris.Google Scholar
  4. Brans, J. P., Vincke, Ph. and Mareschal, B.: 1986, 'How to select and how to rank projects: The PROMETHEE method', European Journal of Operational Research 24, 228–238.Google Scholar
  5. Breuil, L., Cadilhon, J. J., Maurel, F. and Duckstein, L.: 2000, 'Multiobjective management of an irrigated area in the Ebro basin Spain', 17th European Conference on Operational Research, Budapest, Hungary.Google Scholar
  6. Bui, T. X.: 1987, Coop: A Group Decision Support System for Cooperative Multiple Criteria Group Decision Making, Springler-Verlag, Berlin.Google Scholar
  7. Connell, E. O., Bathurst, J., Kilsby, C., Parkin, G., Quinn, P., Younger, P., Anderton, S. and Riley, M.: 2000, Integrating mesoscale catchment experiments with modelling: The potential for sustainable water resources management, Fifth IHP/IAHS George Kovacs Colloquium, HELP, International Hydrological Programme, UNESCO, Paris.Google Scholar
  8. Diakoulaki, D. and Koumoutsos, N.: 1991, 'Cardinal ranking of alternative actions: extension of PROMETHEE method', European Journal of Operational Research 53, 337–347.Google Scholar
  9. Duckstein, L., Treichel, W. and Magnouni, S. E.: 1994, 'Ranking ground-water management alternatives by multicriterion analysis', Journal of Water Resources Planning Management, ASCE 120, 546–565.Google Scholar
  10. Gibbons, J. D.: 1971 Nonparametric Statistical Inference, McGraw-Hill, New York.Google Scholar
  11. Goicoechea, A., Hansen, D. and Duckstein, L.: 1982, Introduction to Multiobjective Analysis with Engineering and Business Applications, John Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
  12. Loucks, D. P., Stedinger, J. R. and Haith, D. A.: 1981, Water Resource Systems Planning and Analysis, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey.Google Scholar
  13. Mousseau, V., Slowinski, R. and Zielniewicz, P.: 1999, 'ELECTRE-TRI 2.0a: Methodological guide and user's manual', Cahier du LAMSADE, No. 111, Universite de Paris Dauphine, France.Google Scholar
  14. Pomerol, J. Ch. and Romero, S. B.: 2000, Multicriterion Decision in Management: Principles and Practice, Kluwer Academic Publishers, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
  15. Raju, K. S. and Duckstein, L.: 2000, 'MULTICRIT: Multicriterion decision support system', Technical Report No. 4/2000, GRESE, ENGREF, Paris, France.Google Scholar
  16. Rogers, M., Bruen, M. and Maystre, L. Y.: 2000, ELECTRE and decision support methods and applications in engineering and infrastructure investment, Kluwer Academic Publishers, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
  17. Szidarovszky, F., Gershon, M. and Duckstein, L.: 1986, Techniques for Multiobjective Decision Making in Systems Management, Elsevier, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
  18. Wymore, A. W.: 1987, Model Based Systems Engineering, CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida.Google Scholar
  19. Zeleny, M.: 1982, Multiple Criteria Decision Making, McGraw-Hill, New York.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • K. Srinivasa Raju
    • 1
  • Lucien Duckstein
    • 2
  • Cecile Arondel
    • 3
  1. 1.ENGREFParis, Cedex 15France
  2. 2.ENGREFParis, Cedex 15France (author for correspondence, e-mail
  3. 3.LAMSADE, Universite Paris-DauphineFrance

Personalised recommendations