Advertisement

Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design

, Volume 15, Issue 5, pp 411–428 | Cite as

DOCK 4.0: Search strategies for automated molecular docking of flexible molecule databases

  • Todd J.A. Ewing
  • Shingo Makino
  • A. Geoffrey Skillman
  • Irwin D. Kuntz
Article

Abstract

In this paper we describe the search strategies developed for docking flexible molecules to macomolecular sites that are incorporated into the widely distributed DOCK software, version 4.0. The search strategies include incremental construction and random conformation search and utilize the existing Coulombic and Lennard-Jones grid-based scoring function. The incremental construction strategy is tested with a panel of 15 crystallographic testcases, created from 12 unique complexes whose ligands vary in size and flexibility. For all testcases, at least one docked position is generated within 2 Å of the crystallographic position. For 7 of 15 testcases, the top scoring position is also within 2 Å of the crystallographic position. The algorithm is fast enough to successfully dock a few testcases within seconds and most within 100 s. The incremental construction and the random search strategy are evaluated as database docking techniques with a database of 51 molecules docked to two of the crystallographic testcases. Incremental construction outperforms random search and is fast enough to reliably rank the database of compounds within 15 s per molecule on an SGI R10000 cpu.

database searching flexible docking incremental construction molecular docking virtual screening 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Morris, G. M., Goodsell, D. S., Huey, R., & Olson A. J., J. Comput. Aid. Mol. Des., 10 (1996) 293.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Judson, R.S., Jaeger, E.P. and Treasurywala, A.M., Theochem-J. Mol. Struct., 114 (1994) 191.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Oshiro, C.M., Kuntz, I.D. and Dixon, J.S., J. Comput. Aid. Mol. Des., 9 (1995) 113.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Clark, K.P. and Ajay, J. Comput. Chem., 16 (1995) 1210. Jones, G., Willett, P. and Glen, R.C., J. Mol. Biol., 254 (1995) 43.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Jones, G., Willett, P., Glen, R. C., Leach, A. R. L. and Taylor, R., J. Mol. Biol., 267 (1997) 727.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Gehlhaar, D.K., Verkhivker, G.M., Rejto, P.A., Sherman, C.J., Fogel, D.B., Fogel, L.J., and Freer, S.T., Chem. Biol., 2 (1995) 317.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Leach, A. R., J. Mol. Biol., 235 (1994) 345.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Westhead, D.R., Clark, D.E., and Murray, C.W., J. Comput. Aid. Mol. Des., 11 (1997) 209.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kuntz, I.D., Blaney, J.M., Oatley, S.J., Langridge, R. and Ferrin, T.E., J. Mol. Biol., 161 (1982) 269.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    DesJarlais, R.L., Sheridan, R.P., Seibel, G.L., Dixon, J.S., Kuntz, I.D. and Venkataraghavan, R., J. Med. Chem., 31 (1988) 722.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Knegtel, R.M.A., Kuntz, I.D. and Oshiro, C.M., J. Mol. Biol., 266 (1997) 424.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Miller, M. D., Kearsley, S. K., Underwood, D. J. and Sheridan, R. P., J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Des., 8 (1994) 153.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Welch, W., Ruppert, J. and Jain, A. N., Chem. Biol. 3 (1996) 449.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Leach, A.R. and Kuntz, I.D., J. Comput. Chem., 13 (1992) 730.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Mizutani, M. Y., Tomioka, N. and Itai, A., J. Mol. Biol., 243 (1994) 310.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Rarey, M., Kramer, B., Lengauer, T. and Klebe, G., J. Mol. Biol., 261 (1996) 470.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Rarey, M., Kramer, B. and Lengauer, T., Bioinformatics, 15 (1999) 243.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Makino, S., & Kuntz, I.D., J. Comput. Chem., 18 (1997), 1812.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Wang, J. and Kollman, P. A., in publication.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Rarey, M., Kramer, B. and Lengauer, T., J. Comput. Aid. Mol. Des., 11 (1997) 369.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Shoichet, B.K. and Kuntz, I.D., Protein Eng., 6 (1993) 723.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Meng, E.C., Shoichet, B.K. and Kuntz, I.D., J. Comput. Chem. 13 (1992) 505.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Gschwend, D. A. and Kuntz, I. D., J. Comput. Aid. Mol. Des., 10 (1996) 123.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Ewing, T.J.A. and Kuntz, I.D., J. Comput. Chem., 18 (1997) 1175.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Ewing, T.J.A., ed., Dock 4.0 User Manual, University of California, San Francisco, 1998, http://www.cmpharm.ucsf.edu/kuntz/dock.html.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Shoichet, B.K. and Kuntz, I.D., Protein Eng., 6 (1993) 723.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    DesJarlais, R.L. and Dixon, J.S., J. Comput. Aid. Mol. Des., 8 (1994) 231.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Pearlman, D. A., Case, D.A., Caldwell, J. W., Ross, W. S., Cheatham, T. E., DeBolt, S., Ferguson, D., Seibel, G. and Kollman, P., Comput. Phys. Commun., 91 (1995), 1.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Nelder, J. A. and Mead, R., Comput. J., 77 (1965) 308.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Press, W. H. and Vetterling, W. T., Numerical Recipes: the Art of Scientific Computing, University Press, New York, NY, 1989.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Allen, M. P. and Tildesley, D. J., Computer Simulation of Liquids, Clarendon Press, New York, NY, 1987.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Krengel, U. (1991). PhD. Thesis. Heidelberg University.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Banner, D. W. and Hadvary, P., J. Biol. Chem., 266 (1991) 20085.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Kim, E. E., Baker, C. T., Dwyer, M. D., Murcko, M. A., Rao, B. G., Tung, R. D. and Navia, M. A., J. Am. Chem. Soc., 117 (1995) 1181.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Bode, W., Turk, D. and Stuerzebecher, J., Eur. J. Biochem., 193 (1990) 175.Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Turk, D., Stuerzebecher, J. and Bode, W., FEBS Lett., 287 (1991) 133.Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Arni, R., Heinemann, U., Maslowska, M., Tokuoka, R. and Saenger, W., Acta Crystallographer, B43 (1987) 549.Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Weber, P. C., Ohlendorf, D. H., Wendoloski, J. J., and Salemme, F.R., Science, 243 (1989) 85.Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Monzingo, A. F. and Matthews, B. W., Biochemistry, 23 (1984) 5724.Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Teplyakov, A., Wilson, K. S., Orioli, P. and Mangani, S., Acta Crystallographica, D49 (1993) 534.Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Christianson, D. W. and Lipscomb, W. N., Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA, 83 (1986) 7568.Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Bolin, J. T., Filman, D. J., Matthews, D. A., Hamlin, R. C. and Kraut, J., J. Biol. Chem., 257 (1982) 13650.Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Ferrin, T. E., Huang, C. C., Jarvis, L. E. and Langridge, R., J. Mol. Graphics, 6 (1988) 13.Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Rusinko, A., Sheridan, R. P., Nilakantan, R., Haraki, K. S., Bauman, N. and Venkataraghavan, R., J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci., 29 (1989) 251.Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    World Wide Web posting of GOLD evaluation results at http://panizzi.shef.ac.uk/cisrg/gareth/gold/gold.htmlGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Bohm, H.J., J. Comput. Aid. Mol. Des., 8 (1994) 243.Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Jain, A.N., J. Comput. Aid. Mol. Des., 10 (1996) 427.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • Todd J.A. Ewing
    • 1
  • Shingo Makino
    • 1
  • A. Geoffrey Skillman
    • 1
  • Irwin D. Kuntz
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, School of PharmacyUniversity of CaliforniaSan FranciscoUSA

Personalised recommendations