Sex Roles

, Volume 43, Issue 11–12, pp 821–841

Childless in the Land of Imperative Motherhood: Stigma and Coping Among Infertile Israeli Women

  • Larissa Remennick
Article

Abstract

Drawing on Goffman's stigma framework, this in-depth study explored the experiences of 26 infertile Jewish women in Israel, the country with a strong pronatalist ideology, both institutional and popular. The findings are in line with the key postulates of the stigma concept: women's coping strategies included selective disclosure, avoidance of exposure of their “hidden disability,” and other information management techniques. Infertility became a “master status” for these women, undermining any other merits and achievements they might have. Most women fully internalized and endorsed the pronatalist discourse by way of pursuing long-term and burdensome infertility treatments, at any personal cost. The paper argues that resistance to stigma of infertility is only possible where women dare question the motherhood imperative, which is clearly not the case with most Israelis. Material and mental resources needed for resisting the stigma of infertility are found among few educated professional women. The paper suggests three theoretical inferences: (a) stigma as a psychological response is graded by the extent of individual's conformity with the dominant norms; (b) the stigma of childlessness is most devastating for the less educated women without career or other nonfamilial aspirations; and (c) in pronatalist societies, the coping and management approach to the study of infertility is more relevant than the resistance approach suggested by some authors.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

REFERENCES

  1. Barraza-Llorens, M. (1998). Effectiveness of assisted conception: A systematic review of the literature. Heslington, UK: York University Health Economics Consortium.Google Scholar
  2. Brosch, I. (1995). Fertility preferences of Israeli couples: A sociological study. Ph.D. thesis, University of Tel-Aviv (Hebrew).Google Scholar
  3. Crabtree, B. F., & Miller, W. L. (1992). A template approach to text analysis: Developing and using codebooks. In B. F. Crabtree, & W. L. Miller (Eds.), Doing qualitative research.Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  4. Eugster, A., & Vingerhoets, A. J. J. M. (1999). Psychological aspects of in vitro fertilization: A review. Social Science and Medicine, 48, 575–589.Google Scholar
  5. Fine, M., & Asch, A. (1988). Disability beyond stigma: Social interaction, discrimination, and activism. Journal of Social Issues, 44, 3–21.Google Scholar
  6. Franklin, S. (1995). Postmodern procreation: A cultural account of assisted reproduction. In F. D., Ginzberg, & R. Rapp, (Eds.), Conceiving the new world order: The global politics of reproduction. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  7. Friedlander, D., & Feldmann, C. (1993). The modern shift to below-replacement fertility: Has Israel's population joined the process? Population Studies, 47, 295–306.Google Scholar
  8. Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory. Chicago: Aldine.Google Scholar
  9. Goffman, E. (1963). Stigma: Notes on the management of spoiled identity. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  10. Greil, A. L. (1991). Not yet pregnant: Infertile couples in contemporary America. NewBrunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Hennmann, T. (1993). Coping with infertility. M.A. thesis,. Bar-Ilan University Ramat-Gan, Israel (Hebrew).Google Scholar
  12. Kirkman, M., & Rosenthal, D. (1999). Representations of reproductive technology in women's narratives of infertility. Women and Health, 29(2), 17–36.Google Scholar
  13. Kohler Riessman, C. (2000). Stigma and everyday resistance practices: Childless women in South India. Gender and Society, 14(1), 111–135.Google Scholar
  14. Lasker, J. N., & Borg, S. (1994). In search of parenthood: Coping with infertility and high-tech conception. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Lev, B. (1999). Assisted reproduction in Israel: An overview. Presentation at the Israeli-British Conference on the Religious and Bioethical Aspects of Assisted Reproduction, The Hebrew University, Jerusalem.Google Scholar
  16. Lorber, J. (1988). IVF and gender politics. Women and Health, 13, 117–133.Google Scholar
  17. May, E. T. (1995). Barren in the promised land: Childless Americans and the pursuit of happiness.New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  18. Miall, C. F. (1986). The stigma of involuntary childlessness. Social Problems, 33, 268–282.Google Scholar
  19. Peritz, E., & Baras, M. (1992). Studies in the fertility of Israel. Jerusalem: The Hebrew University.Google Scholar
  20. Phillips, Z., Barraza-Llorens, M., & Posnett, J. (2000). Evaluation of the relative costeffectiveness of treatments for infertility in the UK. Human Reproduction, 15(1), 95–106.Google Scholar
  21. Portugese, J. (1998) Fertility policy in Israel. The politics of religion, gender, and nation.Westport, CT, and London, UK: Praeger.Google Scholar
  22. Rothman, B. K. (1994). The tentative pregnancy: Amniocentesis and the sexual politics of motherhood. (Rev. ed.) London: Pandora.Google Scholar
  23. Solomon, A. (1991). Anything for a baby: Reproductive technologies in Israel. In B. Swirski & M. P. Safir (Eds.), Calling the equality bluff. New York: Pergamon.Google Scholar
  24. Stanton, A., & Dunkel Schetter, C. (1991). Infertility: Perspectives from stress and coping research.NY & London: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
  25. Stanworth, M. (Ed.). (1987). Reproductive technologies: Gender, motherhood and medicine.Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  26. Whiteford, L. M., & Gonzalez, L. (1995). Stigma: The hidden burden of infertility. Social Science & Medicine, 40(1), 27–36.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • Larissa Remennick
    • 1
  1. 1.Bar-Ilan UniversityIsrael

Personalised recommendations