Molecular Biology Reports

, Volume 27, Issue 4, pp 203–208 | Cite as

HAM: A new epitope-tag for in vivo protein labeling

  • Andreas Herbst
  • William P. Tansey
Article

Abstract

The ability to metabolically label proteins with 35S-methionine is critical for the analysis of protein synthesis and turnover. Despite the importance of this approach, however, efficient labeling of proteins in vivo is often limited by a low number of available methionine residues, or by deleterious side-effects associated with protein overexpression. To overcome these limitations, we have created a methionine-rich variant of the widely used HA tag, called HAM, for use with ectopically expressed proteins. Here we describe the development of a series of vectors, and corresponding antisera, for the expression and detection of HAM-tagged proteins in mammalian cells. We show that the HAM tag dramatically improves the sensitivity of 35S-methionine labeling, and permits the analysis of Myc oncoprotein turnover even when HAM-tagged Myc is expressed at levels comparable to that of the endogenous protein. Because of the improved sensitivity provided by the HAM tag, the vectors and antisera described here should be useful for the analysis of protein synthesis and destruction at physiological levels of protein expression.

antibody epitope-tag metabolic labeling protein stability 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    King RW, Deshaies RJ, Peters JM & Kirschmer MW (1996) Science 274: 1652–1659.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Loda M, Cukor B, Tam SW, Lavin P, Fiorentino M, Draetta GF, Jessup JM & Pagano M (1997) Nat. Med. 3: 231–234.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Maxwell PH, Wisener MS, Chang GW, Clifford SC, Vaux EC, Cockman ME, Wykoff CC, Pugh CW, Maher ER & Ratcliffe PJ (1999) Nature 399: 271–275.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Salghetti SE, Kim SY & Tansey WP (1999) Embo J. 18: 717–726.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Yeargin J & Haas M (1995) Curr. Biol. 5: 423–431.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Niman HL, Houghten RA, Walker LE, Reisfeld RA, Wilson IA, Hogle JM & Lerner RA (1983) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 80: 4949–4953.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Tanaka M. & Herr W (1990) Cell 60: 375–386.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Morgenstern JP & Land H (1990) Nucl. Acids Res. 18: 3587–3596.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Rudolf C, Adam G & Simm A (1999) Anal. Biochem. 269: 66–71.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hannon GJ, Sun P, Carnero A, Xie LY, Maestro R, Conklin DS & Beach D (1999) Science 283: 1129–1130.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Tanaka M, Lai JS & Herr W (1992) Cell 68: 755–767.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Wilson IA, Niman HL, Houghten RA, Cherenson AR, Connolly ML & Lerner RA (1984) Cell 37: 767–778.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Henriksson M & Luscher B (1996) Adv. Cancer Res. 68: 109–182.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • Andreas Herbst
    • 1
  • William P. Tansey
    • 1
  1. 1.Cold Spring Harbor LaboratoryCold Spring HarborUSA

Personalised recommendations