Sex Roles

, Volume 44, Issue 5–6, pp 321–337 | Cite as

Gender and Regional Differences in Spatial Referents Used in Direction Giving

Abstract

This study examined gender and regional differences in spatial referents used in giving route directions. In response to an Internet survey, participants (primarily white and highly educated) provided samples of route directions to a target destination in their home area. Only directions from those living in the United States were analyzed. Women referred more often than men to buildings as landmarks, whereas men referred more often than women to cardinal directions. Both women and men referred more often to cardinal directions if they reported that they lived in the Midwest/West than in the Northeast/South, or if they lived in areas where the roads were arranged in a gridlike pattern. The findings suggest that women and men differ in the type of spatial referents they use in giving directions, but that direction giving in both genders is affected by the environment in which they live.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

REFERENCES

  1. Astur, R. S., Ortiz, M. L., & Sutherland, R. J. (1998). A characterization of performance by men and women in a virtual Morris water task: A large and reliable sex difference. Behavioural Brain Research, 93, 185–190.Google Scholar
  2. Baenninger, M. (1997). Sex-related differences in the development of spatial ability: The efficacy of training. Paper presented at the meeting of the Society for Research in Child Development, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  3. Baenninger, M., & Newcombe, N. (1989). The role of experience in spatial test performance: A meta-analysis. Sex Roles, 20, 327–344.Google Scholar
  4. Barnett, M. A., Vitaglione, G. D., Harper, K. K. G., Quackenbush, S. W., Steadman, L. A., & Valdez, B. S. (1997). Late adolescents' experiences with and attitudes toward videogames. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 27, 1316–1334.Google Scholar
  5. Brown, L.N., Lahar, C. J., & Mosley, J. L. (1998). Age and gender-related differences in strategy use for route information: A map-present direction-giving paradigm. Environment and Behavior, 30, 123–143.Google Scholar
  6. Buchanan, T., & Smith, J. L. (1999). Using the Internet for psychological research: Personality testing on the World Wide Web. British Journal of Psychology, 99, 124–144.Google Scholar
  7. Burns, P. C. (1998). Wayfinding errors while driving. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 18, 209–217.Google Scholar
  8. Campbell, J. (2001). Map use & analysis (4th ed.). Boston, MA: WCB/McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  9. Dabbs, J. M., Chang, E.-L., Strong, R. A., & Milun, R. (1998). Spatial ability, navigation strategy, and geographic knowledge among men and women. Evolution and Human Behavior, 19, 89–98.Google Scholar
  10. De Lisi, R., & Cammarano, D. M. (1996). Computer experience and gender differences in undergraduate mental rotation performance. Computers in Human Behavior, 12, 351–361.Google Scholar
  11. Denis, M. (1997). The description of routes: A cognitive approach to the production of spatial discourse. Cahiers de Psychologie Cognitive/Current Psychology of Cognition, 16, 409–458.Google Scholar
  12. Denis, M., Pazzaglia, F., Cornoldi, C., & Bertolo, L. (1999). Spatial discourse and navigation: An analysis of route directions in the city of Venice. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 13, 145–174.Google Scholar
  13. Dorval, M., & Pépin, M. (1986). Effect of playing a video game on a measure of spatial visualization. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 62, 159–162.Google Scholar
  14. Eals, M., & Silverman, I. (1994). The hunter-gatherer theory of spatial sex differences: Proximate factors mediating the female advantage in recall of object arrays. Ethology and Sociobiology, 15, 95–105.Google Scholar
  15. Evans, G.W. (1980). Environmental cognition. Psychological Bulletin, 88, 259–287.Google Scholar
  16. Galea, L. A. M., & Kimura, D. (1993). Sex differences in route-learning. Personality and Individual Differences, 14, 53–65.Google Scholar
  17. Gärling, T., Lindberg, E., Carreiras, M., & Bö ök, A. (1986). Reference systems in cognitive maps. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 6, 1–8.Google Scholar
  18. Golledge, R. G. (1987). Environmental cognition. In D. Stokols & I. Altman (Eds.), Handbook of environmental psychology (pp. 131–174). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  19. Golledge, R. G., Dougherty, V., & Bell, S. (1995). Acquiring spatial knowledge: Survey versus route-based knowledge in unfamiliar environments. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 85, 134–158.Google Scholar
  20. Golledge, R. G., Ruggles, A. J., Pellegrino, J. W., & Gale, N. D. (1993). Integrating route knowledge in an unfamiliar neighborhood: Along and across route experiments. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 13, 293–307.Google Scholar
  21. Greenfield, P. M., Brannon, C., & Lohr, D. (1994). Two-dimensional representation of movement through three-dimensional space: The role of video game expertise. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 15, 87–103.Google Scholar
  22. Greenfield, P. M., Camaioni, L., Ercolani, P., Weiss, L., Lauber, B. A., & Perrucchini, P. (1994). Cognitive socialization by computer games in two cultures: Inductive discovery or mastery of an iconic code? Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 15, 59–85.Google Scholar
  23. Gron, G., Wunderlich, A. P., Spitzer, M., Tomczak, R., & Riepe, M.W. (2000). Brain activation during human navigation: Gender-different neural networks as substrate of performance. Nature Neuroscience, 3, 404–408.Google Scholar
  24. Halpern, D. F. (2000). Sex differences in cognitive abilities (3rd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  25. Harrell, W. A., Bowlby, J.W., & Hall-Hoffarth, D. (2000). Directing wayfinders with maps: The effects of gender, age, route complexity, and familiarity with the environment. The Journal of Social Psychology, 140, 169–178.Google Scholar
  26. Hart, R. (1978). Children's experience of place. New York: Irvington Press.Google Scholar
  27. Hart, R. A., & Moore, G. T. (1973). The development of spatial cognition: A review. In R. M. Downs & D. Stea (Eds.), Image and environment (pp. 246–288). Chicago: Aldine.Google Scholar
  28. Holding, C. S. (1992). Clusters and reference points in cognitive representations of the environment. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 12, 45–55.Google Scholar
  29. Holding, C. S., & Holding, D. H. (1989). Acquistion of route network knowledge by males and females. The Journal of General Psychology, 116, 29–41.Google Scholar
  30. Hunt, E. B., Pellegrino, J. W., Frick, R. W., Farr, S. A., & Alderton, D. L. (1988). The ability to reason about movement in the visual field. Intelligence, 12, 77–100.Google Scholar
  31. James, T. W., & Kimura, D. (1997). Sex differences in remembering the locations of objects in an array: Location-shifts versus location-exchanges. Evolution and Human Behavior, 18, 155–163.Google Scholar
  32. Krantz, J. H., Ballard, J., & Scher, J. (1997). Comparing the results of laboratory and worldwide web sample on the determinants of female attractiveness. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 29, 264–269.Google Scholar
  33. Law, D. J., Pellegrino, J.W., & Hunt, E. B. (1993). Comparing the tortoise and the hare: Gender differences and experience in dynamic spatial reasoning tasks. Psychological Science, 4, 35–40.Google Scholar
  34. Lawton, C. A. (1994). Gender differences in way-finding strategies: Relationship to spatial ability and spatial anxiety. Sex Roles, 30, 765–779.Google Scholar
  35. Lawton, C. A. (1996). Strategies for indoor wayfinding: The role of orientation. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 16, 137–145.Google Scholar
  36. Lawton, C. A., Charleston, S. I., & Zieles, A. S. (1996). Individual-and gender-related differences in indoor wayfinding. Environment and Behavior, 28, 204–219.Google Scholar
  37. Lawton, C. A., & Morrin, K. A. (1999). Gender differences in pointing accuracy in computersimulated 3D mazes. Sex Roles, 40, 73–92.Google Scholar
  38. Levinson, S. C. (1996). Frames of reference and Molyneux's question: Crosslinguistic evidence. In P. Bloom, M. A. Peterson, L. Nadel, & M. F. Garret (Eds.), Language and space (pp. 110–169). Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  39. Linn, M. C., & Petersen, A. C. (1985). Emergence and characterization of sex differences in spatial ability: A meta-analysis. Child Development, 56, 1479–1498.Google Scholar
  40. Linn, M. C., & Petersen, A. C. (1986). A meta-analysis of gender differences in spatial ability: Implications for mathematics and science achievement. In J. S. Hyde & M. C. Linn (Eds.), The psychology of gender: Advances through meta-analysis (pp. 67–101). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  41. Matthews, M.H. (1986a). Gender, graphicacy and geography. Educational Review, 38, 259–271.Google Scholar
  42. Matthews, M. H. (1986b). The influence of gender on the environmental cognition of young boys and girls. The Journal of Genetic Psychology, 147, 295–302.Google Scholar
  43. McBurney, D. H., Gaulin, S. J. C., Devineni, T., & Adams, C. (1997). Superior spatial memory of women: Stronger evidence for the gathering hypothesis. Evolution and Human Behavior, 18, 165–174.Google Scholar
  44. McClurg, P. A., & Chaillé, C. (1987). Computer games: Environments for developing spatial cognition? Journal of Educational Computing Research, 3, 95–111.Google Scholar
  45. McGuinness, D., & Sparks, J. (1983). Cognitive style and cognitive maps: Sex differences in representations of a familiar terrain. Journal of Mental Imagery, 7, 91–100.Google Scholar
  46. Miller, L. K., & Santoni, V. (1986). Sex differences in spatial abilities: Strategic and experiential correlates. Acta Psychologica, 62, 225–235.Google Scholar
  47. Montello, D. R., Lovelace, K. L., Golledge, R. G., & Self, C. M. (1999). Sex-related differences and similarities in geographic and environmental spatial abilities. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 89, 515–534.Google Scholar
  48. Montello, D. R., & Pick, H. L. (1993). Integrating knowledge of vertically aligned large-scale spaces. Environment and Behavior, 25, 457–484.Google Scholar
  49. Okagaki, L., & French, P. A. (1994). Effects of video game playing on measures of spatial performance: Gender effects in late adolescence. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 15, 33–58.Google Scholar
  50. O'Laughlin, E. M., & Brubaker, B. S. (1998). Use of landmarks in cognitive mapping: Gender differences in self report versus performance. Personality and Individual Differences, 24, 595–601.Google Scholar
  51. Phillips, C. A., Rolls, S., Rouse, A., & Griffiths, M. D. (1995). Home video game playing in schoolchildren: A study of incidence and patterns of play. Journal of Adolescence, 18, 687–691.Google Scholar
  52. Russell, J. A., & Ward, L. M. (1982). Environmental psychology. Annual Review of Psychology, 33, 651–688.Google Scholar
  53. Sadalla, E. K., & Montello, D. R. (1989). Remembering changes in direction. Environment and Behavior, 21, 346–363.Google Scholar
  54. Sandstorm, N. J., Kaufman, S. A., & Huettel, S. A. (1998). Males and females use different distal cues in virtual environment navigation task. Cognitive Brain Research, 6, 351–360.Google Scholar
  55. Schiff, W., & Oldak, R. (1990). Accuracy of judging time to arrival: Effects of modality, trajectory, and gender. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 16, 303–316.Google Scholar
  56. Schmitz, S. (1997). Gender-related strategies in environmental development: Effects of anxiety on wayfinding in and representation of a three-dimensionalmaze. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 17, 215–228.Google Scholar
  57. Self, C. M., Gopal, S., Golledge, R. G., & Fenstermaker, S. (1992). Gender-related differences in spatial abilities. Progress in Human Geography, 16, 315–342.Google Scholar
  58. Siegel, A.W., & White, S. H. (1975). The development of spatial representations of large-scale environments. In H.W. Reese (Ed.), Advances in child development (Vol. 10). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  59. Silverman, I., & Eals, M. (1992). Sex differences in spatial abilities: Evolutionary theory and data. In J. Barkow, L. Cosmides, & J. Tooby (Eds.), The adapted mind: Evolutionary psychology and the generation of culture (pp. 487–503). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  60. Smith, M. A., & Leigh, B. (1997). Virtual subjects: Using the internet as an alternative source of subjects and research environment. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 29, 496–505.Google Scholar
  61. Subrahmanyam, K., & Greenfield, P. M. (1994). Effect of video game practice on spatial skills in girls and boys. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 15, 13–32.Google Scholar
  62. Taylor, H. A., & Tversky, B. (1996). Perspective in spatial descriptions. Journal of Memory and Language, 35, 371–391.Google Scholar
  63. Tversky, B. (1996). Spatial perspective in descriptions. In P. Bloom, M. A. Peterson, L. Nadel, & M. F. Garrett (Eds.), Language and space (pp. 463–491). Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  64. Ward, S. L., Newcombe, N., & Overton, W. F. (1986). Turn left at the church, or three miles north. Environment and Behavior, 18, 192–213.Google Scholar
  65. Webley, P. (1981). Sex differences in home range and cognitive maps in eight-year old children. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 1, 293–302.Google Scholar
  66. Webley, P., & Whalley, A. (1987). Sex differences in children's environmental cognition. Journal of Social Psychology, 127, 223–225.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Indiana–Purdue University Fort WayneIndiana;

Personalised recommendations