Advertisement

Biaxial Mechanical Evaluation of Planar Biological Materials

  • Michael S. Sacks
Article

Abstract

A fundamental goal in constitutive modeling is to predict the mechanical behavior of a material under a generalized loading state. To achieve this goal, rigorous experimentation involving all relevant deformations is necessary to obtain both the form and material constants of a strain-energy density function. For both natural biological tissues and tissue-derived soft biomaterials, there exist many physiological, surgical, and medical device applications where rigorous constitutive models are required. Since biological tissues are generally considered incompressible, planar biaxial testing allows for a two-dimensional stress-state that can be used to characterize fully their mechanical properties. Application of biaxial testing to biological tissues initially developed as an extension of the techniques developed for the investigation of rubber elasticity [43, 57]. However, whereas for rubber-like materials the continuum scale is that of large polymer molecules, it is at the fiber-level (∼1 μm) for soft biological tissues. This is underscored by the fact that the fibers that comprise biological tissues exhibit finite nonlinear stress-strain responses and undergo large strains and rotations, which together induce complex mechanical behaviors not easily accounted for in classic constitutive models. Accounting for these behaviors by careful experimental evaluation and formulation of a constitutive model continues to be a challenging area in biomechanics. The focus of this paper is to describe a history of the application of biaxial testing techniques to soft planar tissues, their relation to relevant modern biomechanical constitutive theories, and important future trends.

biaxial mechanical testing constitutive modeling of planar biomaterials homogeneity mechanical properties of collagenous tissues 

References

  1. 1.
    R. Abeyaratne, C. Chu and R.D. James, Kinetics of materials with wiggly energies: theory and application to the evolution of twinning microstructures in a Cu-Al-Ni shape memory alloy. Philos. Mag. A 73(2) (1996) 457–497.ADSGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    K.J. Bathe, Finite Elements Proceedures in Engineering Analysis. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ (1982).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    K.L. Billiar and M.S. Sacks, A method to quantify the fiber kinematics of planar tissues under biaxial stretch. J. Biomech. 30(7) (1997) 753–756.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    K.L. Billiar and M.S. Sacks, Biaxial mechanical properties of fresh and glutaraldehyde treated porcine aortic valve cusps: Part II-A structurally guided constitutive model. J. Biomech. Engrg. 122(4) (2000) 327–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    K.L. Billiar and M.S. Sacks, Biaxial mechanical properties of the natural and glutaraldehyde treated aortic valve cusp-Part I: Experimental results. J. Biomech. Engrg. 122(1) (2000) 23–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    M.M. Black, I.C. Howard, X.C. Huang and E.A. Patterson, A three-dimensional analysis of a bioprosthetic heart valve. J. Biomech. 24 (1991) 793–801.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    L.J. Brossollet and R.P. Vito, A new approach to mechanical testing and modeling of biological tissues, with application to blood vessels. J. Biomech. Engrg. 118(November) (1996) 433–439.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    P.H. Chew, F.C. Yin and S.L. Zeger, Biaxial stress-strain properties of canine pericardium. J. Mol. Cell Cardiol. 18(6) (1986) 567–578.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    H.S. Choi and R.P. Vito, Two-dimensional stress-strain relationship for canine pericardium. J. Biomech. Engrg. 112(2) (1990) 153–159.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    C. Chu and R.D. James, Biaxial loading experiments on Cu-Al-Ni single crystals. In: K.S. Kim (ed.), Experiments in Smart Materials and Structures, ASME-AMD (1993) pp. 61–69.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    J.C. Criscione, J.D. Humphrey, A.D. Douglas and W.C. Hunter, An invariant basis for natural strain which yields orthogonal stress response terms in isotropic hyperelasticity. J. Mech. Phys. Solids 48 (2000) 2445–2465.zbMATHCrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    L.L. Demer and F.C.P. Yin, Passive biaxial mechanical properties of isolated canine myocardium. J. Physiology 339 (1983) 615–630.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    H. Demiray, A note on the elasticity of soft biological tissues. J. Biomech. 5 (1972) 308–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    J. Downs, H. Halperin, J. Humphrey and F. Yin, An improved video-based computer tracking system for soft biomaterials testing. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Engrg. 37 (1990) 903–907.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    D. Flynn, G. Peura, P. Grigg and A. Hoffman, A finite element based method to determine the properties of planar soft tissue. J. Biomech. Engrg. 120 (1998) 202–210.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Y.C. Fung, Biomechanics: Mechanical Properties of Living Tissues, 2nd ed. Springer, New York (1993).Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    M.S. Hamid, H.N. Sabbah and P.D. Stein, Influence of stent height upon stresses on the cusps of closed bioprosthetic valves. J. Biomech. 19 (1986) 759–769.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    A.H. Hoffman and P. Grigg, A method for measuring strains in soft tissue. J. Biomech. 10 (1984) 795–800.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    J. Humphrey, D. Vawter and R. Vito, Quantification of strains in biaxially tested soft tissues. J. Biomech. 20(1) (1987) 59–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    J.D. Humphrey, R.K. Strumpf and F.C. Yin, Determination of a constitutive relation for passive myocardium: I. A new functional form. J. Biomech. Engrg. 112(3) (1990) 333–339.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    J.D. Humphrey, R.K. Strumpf and F.C. Yin, Determination of a constitutive relation for passive myocardium: II. Parameter estimation. J. Biomech. Engrg. 112(3) (1990) 340–346.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    J.D. Humphrey, R.K. Strumpf and F.C.P. Yin, A constitutive theory for biomembranes: application to epicardial mechanics. J. Biomech. Engrg. 114 (1992) 461–466.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    J.D. Humphrey, D.L. Vawter and R.P. Vito, Mechanical behavior of excised canine visceral pleura. Ann. Biomed. Engrg. 14 (1986) 451–466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    J.D. Humphrey, D.L. Vawter and R.P. Vito, Quantification of strains in biaxially tested soft tissues. J. Biomech. 20 (1987) 59–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    J.D. Humphrey and F.C. Yin, Biaxial mechanical behavior of excised epicardium (published erratum appears in J. Biomech. Engrg. 111(3) (1989) 227). J. Biomech. Engrg. 110(4) (1988) 349–351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    P. Khalsa, A. Hoffman and P. Grigg, Mechanical states encoded by stretch-sensitive neurons in feline joint capsule. J. Neurophysiology 76(1) (1996) 175–187.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    S. Krucinski, I. Vesely, M.A. Dokainish and G. Campbell, Numerical simulation of leaflet flexure in bioprosthetic valves mounted on rigid and expansile stents. J. Biomech. 26 (1993) 929–943.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Y. Lanir, A structural theory for the homogeneous biaxial stress-strain relationships in flat collageneous tissues. J. Biomech. 12 (1979) 423–436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Y. Lanir, Constitutive equations for fibrous connective tissues. J. Biomech. 16 (1983) 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Y. Lanir and Y.C. Fung, Two-dimensional mechanical properties of rabbit skin. I. Experimental system. J. Biomech. 7(1) (1974) 29–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Y. Lanir and Y.C. Fung, Two-dimensional mechanical properties of rabbit skin. II. Experimental results. J. Biomech. 7(2) (1974) 171–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Y. Lanir, O. Lichtenstein and O. Imanuel, Optimal design of biaxial tests for structural material characterization of flat tissues. J. Biomech. Engrg. 118 (1996) 41–47.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    J.M. Lee, D.W. Courtman and D.R. Boughner, The glutaraldehyde-stablized porcine aortic valve xenograft. I. Tensile viscoelastic properties of the fresh leaflet material. J. Biomedical Mater. Res. 18 (1984) 61–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    J.M. Lee, M.C. LeWinter, G. Freeman, R. Shabetai and Y.C. Fung, Biaxial mechanical properties of the pericardium in normal and volume overload dogs. Amer. J. Physiology 249 (1985) H222-H230.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    D.H. Lin and F.C. Yin, A multiaxial constitutive law for mammalian left ventricular myocardium in steady-state barium contracture or tetanus. J. Biomech. Engrg. 120(4) (1998) 504–517.Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    K. May-Newman and F.C. Yin, Biaxial mechanical behavior of excised porcine mitral valve leaflets. Amer. J. Physiology 269(4 Pt 2) (1995) H1319-H1327.Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    K. May-Newman and F.C. Yin, A constitutive law for mitral valve tissue. J. Biomech. Engrg. 120(1) (1998) 38–47.Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    P.M.F. Nielsen, P.J. Hunter and B.H. Smaill, Biaxial testing of membrane biomaterials: Testing equipment and procedures. J. Biomech. Engrg. 113 (1991) 295–300.Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    V.P. Novak, F.C. Yin and J.D. Humphrey, Regional mechanical properties of passive myocardium. J. Biomech. 27(4) (1994) 403–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    J. Orberg, E. Baer and A. Hiltner, Organization of collagen fibers in the intestine. Connective Tissue Res. 11 (1983) 285–297.Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    J.W. Orberg, L. Klein and A. Hiltner, Scanning electron microscopy of collagen fibers in intestine. Connective Tissue Res. 9 (1982) 187–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    R.S. Rivlin, Large elastic deformations of isotropic materials IV. Further developments of the general theory. Philos. Trans. Roy. Soc. London Ser. A 241 (1948) 379–397.zbMATHMathSciNetADSGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    R.S. Rivlin and D.W. Saunders, Large elastic deformations of isotropic materials, VII. Experiments on the deformation of rubber. Philos. Trans. Roy. Soc. London Ser. A 243 (1951) 251–288.zbMATHADSGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    M.S. Sacks, A method for planar biaxial testing that includes in-plane shear. J. Biomech. Engrg. 121 (1999) 551–555.Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    M.S. Sacks, A structural constitutive model for chemically treated planar connective tissues under biaxial loading. Comput. Mech. 26(3) (2000) 243–249.zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    M.S. Sacks and C.J. Chuong, Biaxial mechanical properties of passive right ventricular free wall myocardium. J. Biomech. Engrg. 115 (May 1993) 202–205.Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    M.S. Sacks and C.J. Chuong, A constitutive relation for passive right-ventricular free wall myocardium. J. Biomech. 26(11) (1993) 1341–1345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    M.S. Sacks and C.J. Chuong, Orthotropic mechanical properties of chemically treated bovine pericardium. Ann. Biomed. Engrg. 26(5) (1998) 892–902.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    M.S. Sacks and D.C. Gloeckner, Quantification of the fiber architecture and biaxial mechanical behavior of porcine intestinal submucosa. J. Biomedical Mater. Res. 46 (1999) 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    M.S. Sacks, D.B. Smith and E.D. Hiester, A small angle light scattering device for planar connective tissue microstructural analysis. Ann. Biomed. Engrg. 25(4) (1997) 678–689.Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    M.S. Sacks, D.B. Smith and E.D. Hiester, The aortic valve microstructure: Effects of transvalvular pressure. J. Biomedical Mater. Res. 41 (1998) 131–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    F. Schoen and R. Levy, Tissue heart valves: Current challenges and future research perspectives. J. Biomedical Mater. Res. 47 (1999) 439–465.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    A. Shacklock, Biaxial testing of cardiac tissue. In: M.S. University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand (1987).Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    R.K. Strumpf, L. Demer and F.C.P. Yin, Quantification of passive biaxial myocardial stress-strain properties. Circulation 68 (1983) 372.Google Scholar
  55. 55.
    R.K. Strumpf, J.D. Humphrey and F.C. Yin, Biaxial mechanical properties of passive and tetanized canine diaphragm. Amer. J. Physiology 265(2 Pt 2) (1993) H469-H475.Google Scholar
  56. 56.
    P. Tong and Y.C. Fung, The stress-strain relationship for the skin. J. Biomech. 9(10) (1976) 649–657.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    L.R.G. Treloar, The Physics of Rubber Elasticity. Oxford Univ. Press, London (1975).Google Scholar
  58. 58.
    R.P. Vito, The mechanical properties of soft tissues-I. A mechanical system for biaxial testing. J. Biomech. 13 (1980) 947–950.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    S.D. Waldman and J.M. Lee, Boundary conditions during biaxial testing of planar connective tissues: Part 1: Dynamic behavior. J. Biomech. (2000) submitted.Google Scholar
  60. 60.
    S.D. Waldman, M.S. Sacks and J.M. Lee, Imposed state of deformation determines local collagen fibre orientation but not apparent mechanical properties. Biomed. Sci. Instrum. 35 (1999) 51–56.Google Scholar
  61. 61.
    A.S. Wineman, Large axisymmetric inflation of a nonlinear viscoelastic membrane by laterial pressure. Trans. Soc. Rheology 20(2) (1976) 203–225.zbMATHMathSciNetCrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    W.H. Yang and C.H. Lu, General deformations of neo-hookean membranes. J. Appl. Mech. (1973 March) 1–12.Google Scholar
  63. 63.
    F.C. Yin, R.K. Strumpf, P.H. Chew and S.L. Zeger, Quantification of the mechanical properties of noncontracting canine myocardium under simultaneous biaxial loading. J. Biomech. 20(6) (1987) 577–589.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    F.C. Yin, W.R. Tompkins, K.L. Peterson and M. Intaglietta, A video-dimension analyzer. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Engrg. 19(5) (1972) 376–381.Google Scholar
  65. 65.
    F.C.P. Yin, P.H. Chew and S.L. Zeger, An approach to quantification of biaxial tissue stress-strain data. J. Biomech. 19 (1986) 27–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    P. Zioupos and J.C. Barbenel, Mechanics of native bovine pericardium: I. The multiangular behavior of strength and stiffness of the tissue. Biomaterials 15 (1994) 366–373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • Michael S. Sacks
    • 1
  1. 1.Tissue Mechanics Laboratory, Department of BioengineeringUniversity of PittsburghU.S.A.

Personalised recommendations