Sex Roles

, Volume 44, Issue 3–4, pp 177–188 | Cite as

Is Female Body Esteem Shaped by Benevolent Sexism?

Article

Abstract

The present investigation sought to determine whether women's body attitudes could be understood as a manifestation of benevolent sexism. Results indicated that women who held many benevolent sexist beliefs not only used more cosmetics when preparing for a romantic date than women who endorsed few such beliefs, but they also expressed more positive attitudes toward an aspect of female body esteem, sexual attractiveness, that can be altered using cosmetic products.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

REFERENCES

  1. Berry, D. S., & McArthur (Zebrowitz), L. Z. (1986). Perceiving character in faces: The impact of age-related craniofacial changes in social perception. Psychological Bulletin, 100, 3–18.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Cecil, H., & Stanley, M. A. (1997). Reliability and validity of adolescents' scores on the Body Esteem Scale. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 57, 340–356.Google Scholar
  3. Chrisler, J. C. (1994). Reframing women's weight: Does thin equal healthy? In A. Dan (Ed.), Reframing women's health: Multidisciplinary research and practice. Newbury Park, NJ: Sage.Google Scholar
  4. Cox, C. L., & Glick, W. H. (1986). Resume evaluations and cosmetics sue: When more is not better. Sex Roles, 14, 51–58.Google Scholar
  5. Cunningham, M. R. (1986). Measuring the physical in physical attractiveness: Quasiexperiments on the sociobiology of female facial beauty. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 925–935.Google Scholar
  6. Cunningham, M. R., Barbee, A. P., & Pike, C. L. (1990). What do women want: Facialmetric assessment of multiple motives in the perception of male physical attractiveness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 61–72.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Davis, S. (1990). Men as success objects and women as sex objects: A study of personal advertisements. Sex Roles, 23, 43–50.Google Scholar
  8. Dion, K. K., Berscheid, E., & Walster (Hatfield), E. (1972). What is beautiful is good. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 24, 285–290.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Dion, K. L., Dion, K. K., & Keelan, J. P. (1990). Appearance anxiety as a dimension of socialevaluative anxiety: Exploring the ugly duckling syndrome. Contemporary Social Psychology, 14, 220–224.Google Scholar
  10. Dion, K. K., & Stein, S. (1978). Physical attractiveness and interpersonal influence. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 14, 97–108.Google Scholar
  11. Franzoi, S. L. (1994). Further evidence of the reliability and validity of the body esteem scale. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 50,237–239.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Franzoi, S. L. (1995). The body as object versus the body as process: Gender differences and gender considerations. Sex Roles, 33, 417–437.Google Scholar
  13. Franzoi, S. L., & Chang, Z. (2000). The sociocultural dynamics of the physical self: How does gender shape body esteem? In J. A. Holstein & G. Miller (Eds.), Perspectives on social problems (Vol. 12). Stamford, CT: JAI Press.Google Scholar
  14. Franzoi, S. L., & Herzog, M. E. (1986). The Body Esteem Scale:Aconvergent and discriminant validity study. Journal of Personality Assessment, 50, 24–31.Google Scholar
  15. Franzoi, S. L., & Shields, S. A. (1984). The body esteem scale: Multidimensional structure and sex differences in a college population. Journal of Personality Assessment, 48(2), 173–178.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Fredrickson, B. L., Roberts, T. (1997). Objectification theory: Toward understanding women's lived experiences and mental health risks. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 21, 173–206.Google Scholar
  17. Fredrickson, B. L., Roberts, T., Noll, S. M., Quinn, D. M., & Twenge, J.M. (1998). That swimsuit becomes you. Sex differences in self-objectification, restrained eating, and math performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 269–284.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Freedman, R. (1986). Beauty bound. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
  19. Glick, P., Diebold, J., Bailey-Werner, B., & Zhu, L. (1997). The two faces of Adam: Ambivalent sexism and polarized attitudes toward women. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23, 1323–1334.Google Scholar
  20. Glick, P., & Fiske, S. T. (1996). The ambivalent sexism inventory: Differentiating hostile and benevolent sexism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 491–512.Google Scholar
  21. Glick, P., & Fiske, S. T. (1997). Hostile and benevolent sexism: Measuring ambivalent sexist attitudes toward women. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 21, 119–135.Google Scholar
  22. Glick, P., & Fiske, S. T. (in press). Ambivalent sexism. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology. San Diego: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  23. Glick, P., Fiske, S. T., Mladinic, A., Saiz, J. L., Abrams, D., Masser, B., Adetoun, B., Johnstone, E. O., Akande, A., Alao, A., Brunner, A., Willemsen, T. M., Chipeta, K., Dardenne, B., Dijksterhuis, A., Wigboldus, D., Eckes, T., Six-Materna, I., Exposito, F., Moya, M., Foddy, M., Kim, H.-J., Lameiras, M., Sotelo, M. J., Mucchi-Faina, A., Romani, M., Sakalli, N., Udegbe, B., Yamamoto, M., Maria, M. U., Ferreira, M. C., & Lopez, W. L. (2000). Beyond prejudice as simple antipathy: Hostile and benevolent sexism across cultures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 763–775.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Goldberg, P. A., Gottesdiener, M., Abramson, P. R. (1975). Another put-down of women? Perceived attractiveness as a function of support for the feminist movement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 32, 113–115.Google Scholar
  25. Hart, E. A., Leary, M. R., & Rejeski, W. J. (1989). The measurement of social physique anxiety. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 11, 94–104.Google Scholar
  26. Jackman, M. R. (1994). The velvet glove: Paternalism and conflict in gender, class, and race relations. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  27. Keating, C. F. (1985). Gender and the physiognomy of dominance and attractiveness. Social Psychology Quarterly, 48, 61–70.Google Scholar
  28. Kilianski, S., & Rudman, L. A. (1998).Wanting it both ways: Do women approve of benevolent sexism? Sex Roles, 39, 333–352.Google Scholar
  29. Kyle, D. J., & Mahler, H. I.M. (1996). The effects of hair color and cosmetic use on perceptions of a female's ability. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 20, 447–455.Google Scholar
  30. Martz, D. M., Handley, K. B., & Eisler, R.M. (1995). The relationship between feminine gender role stress, body image, and eating disorders. Psychology ofWomen Quarterly, 19, 493–508.Google Scholar
  31. Masser, B., & Abrams, D. (1999). Contemporary sexism: Relationships among hostile sexism, benevolent sexism, and neosexism. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 23, 503–517.Google Scholar
  32. McArthur (Zebrowitz), L. Z., & Apatow, K. (1983/1984). Impressions of baby-faced adults. Social Cognition, 2, 315–342.Google Scholar
  33. Miller, L. C., & Cox, C. L. (1982). For appearances' sake: Public self-consciousness and makeup use. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 8, 748–751.Google Scholar
  34. Osborn, D. R. (1996). Beauty is as beauty does? Makeup and posture effects on physical attractiveness judgments. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 26, 31–51.Google Scholar
  35. Peplau, L. A., Hill, C. T., & Rubin, Z. (1993). Sex-role attitudes in dating and marriage: A 15-year followup of the Boston Couples Study. Journal of Social Issues, 49, 31–52.Google Scholar
  36. Rudd, N. A. (in press). Cosmetics comparison and use among women: Ritualized activities that construct and transform the self. Journal of Ritual Studies.Google Scholar
  37. Rudd, N. A., & Lennon, S. J. (1999). Social power and appearance management among women. In K. K. P. Johnson & S. J. Lennon (Eds.), Appearance and power. Oxford: Berg.Google Scholar
  38. Silberstein, L. R., Striegel-Moore, R. H., Timko, C., & Rodin, J. (1988). Behavioral and psychological implications of body dissatisfaction: Do men and women differ? Sex Roles, 19, 219–232.Google Scholar
  39. Thomas, C., & Freeman, R. (1990). The body esteem scale: Construct validity of the female subscales. Journal of Personality Assessment, 54, 204–212.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Wolf, N. (1991). The beauty myth: How images of beauty are used against women. New York: Double Day.Google Scholar
  41. Wood, W., Christensen, P. N., Hebl, M. R., & Rothgerber, H. (1997). Conformity to sex-typed norms, affect, and the self-concept. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 523–535.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Zebrowitz, L. A., Tenenbaum, D. R., & Goldstein, L. H. (1991). The impact of job applicants' facial maturity, sex, and academic achievement on hiring recommendations. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 21, 525–548.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Marquette UniversityMilwaukee

Personalised recommendations