Social Indicators Research

, Volume 55, Issue 1, pp 1–96 | Cite as

Quality of Life Indexes for National Policy: Review and Agenda for Research

  • Michael R. Hagerty
  • Robert A. Cummins
  • Abbott L. Ferriss
  • Kenneth Land
  • Alex C. Michalos
  • Mark Peterson
  • Andrew Sharpe
  • Joseph Sirgy
  • Joachim Vogel
Article

Abstract

A number of governments and public policy institutes have developed “Quality of Life Indexes” – statistics that attempt to measure the quality of life for entire states or regions. We develop 14 criteria for determining the validity and usefulness of such QOL indexes to public policy. We then review 22 of the most-used QOL indexes from around the world. We conclude that many of the indexes are successful in that they are reliable, have established time series measures, and can be disaggregated to study subpopulations. However, many fall short in four areas: (1) indexes vary greatly in their coverage and definitions of domains of QOL, (2) none of the indexes distinguish among the concepts of input, throughput, and output that are used by public policy analysts, (3) they fail to show how QOL outputs are sensitive to public policy inputs, and (4) none have examined convergent validity against each other. We conclude that many of these indexes are potentially very useful for public policy and recommend research to further improve them.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

REFERENCES

  1. Allardt, E.: 1978, ‘The relationship between objective and subjective measures in the light of a comparative study’, in R. F. Tomassen (ed.), Comparative Studies in Sociology (Greenwich, CT: JAI Press), p. 1.Google Scholar
  2. Andresen, E. M.: 1999, ‘Population measurement of Health-Related Quality-of-Life (HRQoL)’, Quality of Life Newsletter, Jan. 21.Google Scholar
  3. Andrews, F. M. and McKennell: 1980, ‘Measures of self-reported well-being: Their affective, cognitive, and other components’, Social Indicators Research 8, pp. 127–155.Google Scholar
  4. Andrews, F. M. and S. B. Withey: 1976, Social Indicators of Well-being: American's Perceptions of Life Quality (New York: Plenum Press).Google Scholar
  5. Argyle, M.: 1996, ‘Subjective wellbeing’, in A. Offer (ed.), In Pursuit of the Quality of Life (New York: Oxford University Press), pp. 18–45.Google Scholar
  6. Arroyo, D. M.: 1989a, ‘Crime patterns and public safety’, SocialWeather Bulletin 89-9 (Quezon City: Social Weather Stations, Inc.).Google Scholar
  7. Arroyo, D. M.: 1989b, ‘Self-rated poverty and poverty thresholds,' SocialWeather Bulletin 89-3 (Quezon City: Social Weather Stations, Inc.).Google Scholar
  8. Arroyo, D. M.: 1990a, ‘Monitoring changes in the Filipino's standard of living: Gains and losses, optimism and pessimism among broad groups’, Social Weather Bulletin 90-13 (Quezon City: Social Weather Stations, Inc.).Google Scholar
  9. Arroyo, D. M.: 1990b, ‘Poverty means more than low incomes’, Social Weather Bulletin 90-5 (Quezon City: Social Weather Stations, Inc.).Google Scholar
  10. Bardo, J.W., S. J. Yeager and M. J. Klingsporn: 1982, ‘Preliminary assessment of format-specific central tendency and leniency error in summated rating scales’, Perceptual and Motor Skills 54, pp. 227–234.Google Scholar
  11. Boelhouwer, J. and I. Stoop: 1999, ‘Measuring well-being in the Netherl ands: The SCP index from 1974 to 1997’, Social Indicators Research 48, pp. 51–75.Google Scholar
  12. Bollen, K. A.: 1989, Structural Equations with Latent Variables (New York: John Wiley & Sons).Google Scholar
  13. Boyle, G. J.: 1991, ‘Does item homogeneity indicate internal consistency or item redundancy in psychometric scales?’, Personality and Individual Differences 12, pp. 291–294.Google Scholar
  14. Brief, A. P. and L. Roberson: 1989, ‘Job attitude organization: An exploratory study’, Journal of Applied Social Psychology 19, pp. 717–727.Google Scholar
  15. Broe, G. A., A. F. Jorm, H. Creasey, D. Grayson, D. Edelbrock, L. M. Waite, H. Bennett, J.S. Cullen and B. Casey: 1998, ‘Impact of chronic systemic and neurological disorders on disability, depression and life satisfaction’, International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry 13, pp. 667–673.Google Scholar
  16. Bufford, R. K., R. F. Paloutzian and C. W. Ellison: 1991, ‘Norms for the spiritual well-being scale’, Journal of Psychology and Theology 19(1), 56–70.Google Scholar
  17. Campbell, A., P. E. Converse and W. L. Rodgers: 1976, The Quality of American Life: Perceptions, Evaluations and Satisfactions (New York: Russell Sage Foundations).Google Scholar
  18. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention: 1998, Self-reported Frequent Mental Distress Among Adults (United States, 1993-1996) 47, pp. 325–331.Google Scholar
  19. Chapin, F. S.: 1935, The Measurement of Social Status by Use of a Social Status Scale 1933 (Minneapolis: The University of Minnesota Press).Google Scholar
  20. Cobb, C., T. Halstead and J. Rowe: 1995, The Genuine Progress Indicator: Summary of Data andMethodology (San Francisco, CA: Redefining Progress).Google Scholar
  21. Crooker, K. J. and J. P. Near: 1995, ‘Happiness and satisfaction: Measures of affect and cognition?’, in H. L. Meadow, M. J. Sirgy and D. R. Rahtz (eds.), Developments in Quality-of-Life Studies in Marketing (DeKalb, IL: Academy of Marketing Science and the International Society for Quality-of-Life Studies 5), pp. 160–166.Google Scholar
  22. Cummins, R. A.: 1995, ‘On the trail of the gold standard for life satisfaction’, Social Indicators Research 35, pp. 179–200.Google Scholar
  23. Cummins, R. A.: 1996, ‘The domains of life satisfaction: An attempt to order chaos’, Social Indicators Research 38, pp. 303–328.Google Scholar
  24. Cummins, R. A.: 1997a, ‘Comprehensive Quality of Life Scale’, Adult Manual, Fifth Edition. (Melbourne: School of Psychology,Deakin University), pp. 1–51.Google Scholar
  25. Cummins, R. A.: 1997b, ‘Assessing Quality of Life’, in R. Brown (ed.), Quality of Life for People with Disabilities (Cheltenham: Stanley Thornes), pp. 116–150.Google Scholar
  26. Cummins, R. A.: 1998a, ‘The second approximation to an international standard for life satisfaction’, Social Indicators Research 43, pp. 307–334.Google Scholar
  27. Cummins, R. A.: 1998b, Directory of Instruments to Measure Quality of Life and Cognate Areas, Fourth Edition (Melbourne: School of Psychology, Deakin University).Google Scholar
  28. Cummins, R. A.: 1999, ‘A psychometric evaluation of the comprehensive Quality of Life Scale, Fifth Edition’, in L. L. Yuan, B. Yuen and C. Low (eds.), Urban Quality of Life: Critical Issues and Options (Singapore: University Press), pp. 20–33.Google Scholar
  29. Cummins, R. A.: 2000, ‘Objective and subjective quality of life: An interactive model’, Social Indicators Research 52, pp. 55–72.Google Scholar
  30. Cummins, R. A., Ross Andelman, Richard Board, Laura lee Carman, Abbott Ferriss, Phil Friedman, Alex Michalos, Josh Samli, Stan Shapiro, Joe Sirgy, Joar Vitterso and Ruut Veenhoven: 1998, ‘Quality of life definition and terminology: A discussion document from the International Society for Quality of Life Studies’, The International Society for Quality-of-Life Studies (ISQOLS).Google Scholar
  31. Cummins, R. A., M. P. McCabe, Y. Romeo and E. Gullone: 1994, ‘The Comprehensive Quality of Life Scale (ComQol): Instrument development and psychometric evaluation on college staff and students’, Educational and Psychological Measurement 54(2), pp. 372–382.Google Scholar
  32. Diener, E.: 1994, ‘Assessing subjective well-being: Progress and opportunities’, Social Indicators Research 31, pp. 103–157.Google Scholar
  33. Diener, E.: 1995, ‘A value based index for measuring national quality of life’, Social Indicators Research 36, pp. 107–127.Google Scholar
  34. Diener, E. and C. Diener: 1995, ‘Income and the quality of life of nations’, Social Indicators Research 36, pp. 275–286.Google Scholar
  35. Diener, E. D., R. A. Emmons, R. J. Larsen and S. Griffin: 1985, ‘The satisfaction with life scale’, Journal of Personality Assessment 49, pp. 71–75.Google Scholar
  36. Diener, E., J. Horwitz and R. A. Emmons: 1985a, ‘Happiness of the verywealthy’, Social Indicators Research 16, pp. 263–274.Google Scholar
  37. Diener, E., R. J. Larsen, S. Levine and R. A. Emmons: 1985b, ‘Intensity and frequency: Dimensions underlying positive and negative affect’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 48, pp. 1253–1265.Google Scholar
  38. Diener, E., E. Sandvik, L. Seidlitz and M. Diener: 1993, ‘The relationship between income and subjective well-being: Relative or absolute?' Social Indicators Research, 28, pp. 195–223.Google Scholar
  39. D'Iribarne, P.: 1974, ‘The relationship between subjective and objective well being’, in B. Strumpel (ed.), Subjective Elements ofWell Being (Paris: OECD).Google Scholar
  40. Eckersley, R.: 1999, ‘Rising youth suicide in Western nations: An indicator of social decline, or improvement?' (submitted for publication).Google Scholar
  41. Estes, R. J.: 1984, The Social Progress of Nations (New York: Praeger).Google Scholar
  42. Estes, R. J.: 1988, Trends in World Social Development (New York: Praeger).Google Scholar
  43. Estes, R. J.: 1995, ‘Social development trends in Africa’, Social Development Issues 17(1), pp. 18–47.Google Scholar
  44. Estes, R. J.: 1996a, ‘Social development trends in Asia’, Social Indicators Research 37(2), pp. 119–148.Google Scholar
  45. Estes, R. J.: 1996b, ‘Social development trends in central and South America’, Social Development Issues 18(1), pp. 25–52.Google Scholar
  46. Estes, R. J.: 1997, ‘Social development trends in Europe, 1970-1994: Development prospects for the new Europe’, Social Indicators Research 42(1), pp. 1–19.Google Scholar
  47. Estes, R. J.: 1998, ‘Social development trends in transitional economies, 1970-1995’, in Ronald Hope Kempe, Sr. (ed.), Challenges of Transformation and Transition from Centrally Planned to Market Economies (United Nations: United Nations Centre for Regional Development), pp. 13–30.Google Scholar
  48. Estes, R. J.: 1988, Trends in World Social Development: The Social Progress of Nations, 1970-1987 (New York: Praeger Publishers).Google Scholar
  49. Euro-barometer: 1998, ‘EuroBarometer’, Brussels: Commission of the European Communities, Online access: http://europa.eu.int/en/comm/dg10/infcom/epo/ eb.html.Google Scholar
  50. Evans, D. R.: 1994, ‘Enhancing quality of life in the population at large’, Social Indicators Research 33, pp. 47–88.Google Scholar
  51. Ferriss, A.: 2000, ‘A brief history of social indicator developments' (unpublished manuscript).Google Scholar
  52. Firat, A. F. and Karafakioglu: 1990, ‘Quality of life issues and marketing as a social change agent’, in H. L. Meadow and M. J. Sirgy (eds.), Quality-of-Life Studies in Marketing and Management (Blacksburg, VA: Virginia Tech, International Society for Quality-of-Life Studies), pp. 623–632.Google Scholar
  53. Fishbein, M. and I. Ajzen: 1975, Belief, Attitude, Intention and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research (Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley).Google Scholar
  54. Fordham Institute for Innovation in Social Policy: 1999, 1998, Index of Social Health (Tarrytown, NY: Fordham Graduate Center).Google Scholar
  55. Gertner, J. and R. Kirwan: 1999, ‘The best places to live’, Money (November), pp. 130–138.Google Scholar
  56. Green, P.: 1984, ‘Hybrid models for conjoint analysis: An exploratory review’, Journal of Marketing Research 21, pp. 155–169.Google Scholar
  57. Guterbock, T. M.: 1997, ‘Why Money Magazine's “best places” keep changing’, Public Opinion Quarterly 61, pp. 339–355.Google Scholar
  58. Hagerty, M. R.: 1999a, ‘Unifying livability and comparison theory: Crossnational time-series analysis of life-satisfaction,' Social Indicators Research 46 (June).Google Scholar
  59. Hagerty, M. R.: 1999b, ‘Comment on the construction of the fordham index of social health’, Social Indicators Network News 57, p. 10.Google Scholar
  60. Hagerty, M. R.: 2000, ‘Social comparisons of income in one's community: Evidence from national surveys of income and happiness’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (April) 78(4), pp. 764–771.Google Scholar
  61. Hagerty, M. R., P. Naik and C. L. Tsai: 2000, ‘The effects of quality of life on national elections: A multicountry analysis’, Social Indicators Research (Feb.) 49(2).Google Scholar
  62. Hair, J. F. Jr., R. E. Anderson, R. L. Tatham and W. C. Black: 1998, Multivariate Data Analysis, Fifth Edition (Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall).Google Scholar
  63. Henderson, H., J. Lickerman and P. Flynn: 2000, Calvert-Henderson Quality of Life Indicators: A New Tool for Assessing National Trends (Bethesda, MD: Calvert Group).Google Scholar
  64. Hennessy, C. H., D. G. Moriarty, M.M. Zack, P.A. S cherr and R. Brackbill: 1994, ‘Measuring health-related quality of life for public health surveillance’, Public Health Reports 109, pp. 665–672.Google Scholar
  65. Hoos, I. R.: 1972, Systems Analysis in Public Policy; a Critique (Berkeley, University of California Press).Google Scholar
  66. Johnston, D. F.: 1988, ‘Toward a comprehensive “quality of life” index’, Social Indicators Research 20, pp. 473–496.Google Scholar
  67. Joreskog, K. and D. Sorbom: 1988, LISREL 7: A Guide to the Program and Applications, Second Edition (Chicago, IL: SPSS Inc.).Google Scholar
  68. Kacapyr, E.: 1996, ‘Economic Forecasting, M. E. Sharpe'.Google Scholar
  69. Kacapyr, E.: 1997, ‘Are we having fun yet?' American Demographics (October), pp. 28–29.Google Scholar
  70. Kotler, P., D. Haider and I. Rein: 1993, Marketing Places (New York: The Free Press).Google Scholar
  71. Kuhfeld, W. F., R. D. Tobias and M. Garratt: 1994., ‘Efficient experimental designs with marketing research applications’, Journal of Marketing Research 31, pp. 547–557.Google Scholar
  72. Kuyken, W., J. Orley, P. Hudelson and N. Sartorius: 1994, ‘Quality of life assessment across cultures’, International Journal of Mental Health 23, pp. 5–28.Google Scholar
  73. Land, K.: 2000, ‘Social indicators’, in Edgar F. Borgatta and Rhonda V. Montgomery (eds.), Encyclopedia of Sociology, Revised Edition (New York: Macmillan, forthcoming).Google Scholar
  74. Lane, R. E.: 1991, The Market Experience (Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
  75. Luchters, G. and L. Menkhoff: 1994, ‘The fourth premiere of the Human Development Index,' Intereconomics, January/February.Google Scholar
  76. Malhotra, N. K., M. Peterson and S. B. Kleiser: 1998, ‘Assessing the reliability and validity of international secondary data used to design competitive strategies for global marketing’, in Manrai A and L. Manrai (eds.), Research in Marketing: Designing Competitive Strategies for Global Marketing (Stamford, CT: JAI Press) 14, pp. 185–228.Google Scholar
  77. Mangahas, M.: 1976, Measuring Philippine Development (ed.) (Manila: Development Academy of the Philippines).Google Scholar
  78. Mangahas, M.: 1986, ‘Dimensions of poverty’, SWS Occasional Paper (Quezon City: Social Weather Stations, Inc.).Google Scholar
  79. Mangahas, M.: 1987, ‘Rural poverty, social surveillance and democratic development’, SWS Occasional Paper (Quezon City: Social Weather Stations, Inc.).Google Scholar
  80. Mangahas, M.: 1995, ‘Self-rated poverty in the Philippines, 1984-1992’, International Journal of Public Opinion Research 7/1, pp. 40–55.Google Scholar
  81. Mangahas, M.: 1996, ‘Review of surveys on crime’, Social Weather Bulletin 96-11/12 (June) (Quezon City: Social Weather Stations, Inc.).Google Scholar
  82. Mangahas, M. and L. L. Guerrero: 1998, ‘Self-sustained quality of life monitoring: The Philippine social weather reports’, SWS Occasional Paper (Quezon City: Social Weather Stations, Inc.).Google Scholar
  83. Maslow, A: 1970, Motivation and Personality (Second Edition) (New York: Harper).Google Scholar
  84. McKennell, A. C.: 1978, ‘Cognition and affect in perceptions of well being’, Social Indicators Research 5, pp. 389–426.Google Scholar
  85. McKennel, A. C. and F. M. Andrews: 1980, ‘Models of cognition and affect in perceptions of well being’, Social Indicators Research 8, pp. 257–298.Google Scholar
  86. Michalos, A. C.: 1980-82, North American Social Report 1-5, D. Reidel.Google Scholar
  87. Michalos, A. C.: 1985, ‘Multiple Discrepancies Theory (MDT)’, Social Indicators Research 6(1), pp. 347–413.Google Scholar
  88. Michalos, A. C.: 1997, ‘Combining social, economic and environmental indicators to measure sustainable human well-being’, Social Indicators Research 40, pp. 221–258.Google Scholar
  89. Michalos, A. C.: 1991, Global Report on Student Well-being 1-4 (New York: Springer-Verlag).Google Scholar
  90. Michalos, A. C.: 1995, A Pragmatic Approach to Business Ethics (Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks).Google Scholar
  91. Miringoff, M. L. and M. L. Miringoff: 1999, The Social Health of the Nation: How America is Really Doing (New York: Oxford Univ. Press).Google Scholar
  92. Miringoff, M. L.,M. L.Miringoff and S. Opdycke: 1996, ‘Monitoring the nation's social performance: The Index of Social Health’, in E. F. Zigler, S. L. Kagan and Nancy W. Hall (eds.), Children, Families, and Government (New York: Cambridge Univ. Press), pp. 10–30.Google Scholar
  93. Moffitt, R.: 1998, Current Population Surveys: March Individual-Level Extracts, 1968-1992 (2nd ICPSR version) [Computer file]. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin, Institute for Research on Poverty [Producer]. Ann Arbor,MI: Interuniversity Consortium for Political and Social Research [Distributor].Google Scholar
  94. Moller, V.: 1997, Quality of Life in South Africa (Kluwer).Google Scholar
  95. Morrow, R. S. and S. Morrow: 1973, ‘The measurement of intelligence’, in Benjamin Wolman (ed.), Handbook of General Psychology (Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, Inc.).Google Scholar
  96. Murray, C. J. L.: 1991, ‘Rational approaches to priority setting in international health’, Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 93.Google Scholar
  97. Noll, H. H. and W. Zapf: 1994, ‘Social indicators research: Societal monitoring and social reporting’, in I. Borg and P. Mohler (eds.), Trends and Perspectives in Empirical Social Research. (Walter de Gruyter, Berlin/New York), pp. 1–16.Google Scholar
  98. Noll, H. H. and E. Wiegand: 1993, ‘System Sozialer Indikatoren für die Bundesrepublik Deutschland-Zeitreihen 1950-1991’, Tabellenband. ZUMA (Mannheim).Google Scholar
  99. Nubler, I.: 1995, ‘The Human Development Index revisited’, Intereconomics (July/August), pp. 171–176.Google Scholar
  100. O'Boyle, C. A.: 1994, ‘The Schedule for the Evaluation of Individual Quality of Life (SEIQoL)’, International Journal of Mental Health 23, pp. 3–23.Google Scholar
  101. OECD: 1982, ‘The OECD list of social indicators’, The OECD Social Indicator Development Programme (Paris).Google Scholar
  102. Organ, D. W. and J. P. Near: 1985, ‘Cognition vs. affect in measures of job satisfaction’, International Journal of Psychology 20, pp. 241–253.Google Scholar
  103. Osberg, L. and A. Sharpe: 1998, ‘An index of economic well-being for Canada’, Research Paper R-99-3E, Applied Research Branch, Human Resources Development Canada, Ottawa, Ontario.Google Scholar
  104. Osberg, L. and A. Sharpe: 1999, ‘An index of economic well-being for Canada and the United States’, paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Economic Association, New York, New York, January.Google Scholar
  105. Osberg, L. and A. Sharpe: 2000, ‘International comparisons of trends in economic well-being’, paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Economic Association, Boston, Mass., January.Google Scholar
  106. Paloutzian, R. F. and C.W. Ellison: 1982, ‘Loneliness, spiritual well-being and the quality of life’, In L. A. Peplau and D. Perlman (eds.), Loneliness: A Sourcebook of Current Theory, Research and Therapy (New York: John Wiley and Sons) pp. 224–237.Google Scholar
  107. Peterson, M. and N. K. Malhotra: 1997, ‘Comparative marketing measures of societal quality of life: Substantive dimensions in 186 countries’, Journal of Macromarketing 17(1), pp. 25–38.Google Scholar
  108. Peterson, M., N. K. Malhotra and J. Wagner: 1999, ‘Country quality of life and foreign direct investment decisions’, Global Outlook 11, pp. 1, 51–62.Google Scholar
  109. Pirfo, E., C. Albera, Il. Arizio, S. Catapano, M. Cortese and C. Romano: 1994, ‘Job preparation and improvement of the quality of life of schizophrenic patients in today's metropolis’, International Journal of Mental Health 23, pp. 11–22.Google Scholar
  110. Rosencranz, H. A. and C. T. Pihlblad: 1970, ‘Measuring the health of the elderly’, Journal of Gerontology 25, pp. 129–133.Google Scholar
  111. Ryff, C. D.: 1995, ‘Psychological well-being in adult life’, American Psychological Society 4, pp. 99–104.Google Scholar
  112. Samli, A. C.: 1995, ‘QOL research and measurement: some parameters and dimensions’, in H. L. Meadow, M. J. Sirgy and D. Rahtz (eds.), Developments in quality-of-life studies in marketing (DeKalb, IL: Academy of Marketing Science and the International Society for Quality-of-Life Studies) 5, pp. 173–180.Google Scholar
  113. Sandoval, G. A. and P. R. L aylo: 1993, Crime Victimization in the Philippines: Demographic Patterns and Attitudinal Correlates (Quezon City: SocialWeather Stations, Inc.).Google Scholar
  114. Schaefer, M. T. and D. H. Olson: 1981, ‘Assessing intimacy: The PAIR inventory’, Journal of Marital and Family Therapy 24, pp. 47–60.Google Scholar
  115. Schwartz, S. H.: 1992, ‘Universals in the content and structure of values: Theoretical advances and empirical tests in 20 countries’, in M. Zanna (ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology 20 (Orlando, Florida: Academic).Google Scholar
  116. Sewell, W. H.: 1940, ‘The constructin and standardization of a scale for the measurement of the socio-economic status of Oklahoma farm families’, Technical Bulletin No. 9 (Stillwater, OK: Oklahoma Agricultural Experiment Station).Google Scholar
  117. Sirgy, M. J., A. C. Samli and H. L. Meadow: 1982, ‘The interface between quality of life and marketing: a theoretical framework’, Journal of Public Policy and Marketing 1, pp. 69–84.Google Scholar
  118. Skevington, S. M., J. Bradshaw and S. Saxena: 1999, ‘Selecting national items for the WHOQOL: conceptual and psychometric considerations’, Social Science and Medicine 48, pp. 473–487.Google Scholar
  119. Szabo, S.: 1996, ‘The World Health Organization Quality of Life (WHOQOL) assessment instrument’, in B. Spilker (ed.), Quality of life and pharmacoeconomics in clinical trials, Second Edition (Philadelphia: Lippincox-Raven Publishers), pp. 355–362.Google Scholar
  120. Trabold-Nubler, H.: 1991, ‘The human development index: A new development indicator?’, Intereconomics (Sept./Oct.), pp. 236–243.Google Scholar
  121. United Nations Human Development Program (UNHDP): 1990, Human Development Report (N.Y. and Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
  122. United Nations Human Development Program: 1993, ‘Human Development Index: Survey of recent reviews’, Human Development Report (N.Y. and Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
  123. United Nations Human Development Program: 1996, ‘Human Development Index: Survey of recent reviews’, Human Development Report (N.Y. and Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
  124. University of Virginia Center for Public Service: 1996a, Virginia's Local Economies: Statistical Update, 1996 (Charlottesville, VA: University of Virginia Center for Public Service, University of Virginia).Google Scholar
  125. University of Virginia Center for Public Service: 1996b, Virginia Statistical Abstract, 1996-1997 (Charlottesville, VA: University of Virginia Center for Public Service, University of Virginia).Google Scholar
  126. Van Dam, F. S. A. M., R. Somers and A. L. Van Beek-Couzijn: 1981, ‘Quality of life: Some theoretical issues’, Journal of Clinical Pharmacology 21, pp. 166–168.Google Scholar
  127. Veenhoven, R.: 1984, Conditions of Happiness (Dordrecht: Reidel).Google Scholar
  128. Veenhoven, R.: 1993, Happiness in Nations, Rotterdam: Risbo. Data available from web-site: http://www.eur.nl/fsw/research/happiness.Google Scholar
  129. Veenhoven, R.: 1994, ‘Is happiness a trait?’, Tests of the theory that a better society does not make people any happier, Social Indicators Research 32, pp. 101–160.Google Scholar
  130. Veenhoven, R.: 1995, ‘The cross national pattern of happiness. Tests of predictions implied in three theories of happiness’, Social Indicators Research 34, pp. 33–68.Google Scholar
  131. Veenhoven, R.: 1996, ‘Happy life expectancy: A comprehensive measure of quality of life in nations’, Social Indicators Research 39, pp. 1–58.Google Scholar
  132. Veenhoven, R.: 1998, ‘Quality-of-life and happiness: Not quite the same’, in G. DeGirolamo, et al. (eds.), Health and Quality-of-Life (Il Pensierro Scientifico, Rome).Google Scholar
  133. Veenhoven, R. and P. Ouweneel: 1995, ‘Livability of the welfare-state. Appreciation-of-life and length-of-life in nations varying in state-welfareeffort’, Social Indicators Research 36, pp. 1–49.Google Scholar
  134. Viney, L. L., B.M. Walker, T. Robertson, B. Lilley and C. Ewans: 1994, ‘Dying in palliative care units in hospital: A comparison of the quality of life of terminal cancer patients’, Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 62, pp. 157–160.Google Scholar
  135. Virginia Tech Center for Survey Research: 1998, Quality of Life in Virginia: 1998 (Blacksburg, VA: Center for Survey Research, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University).Google Scholar
  136. Vogel, J.: 1991, ‘Social report for the nordic countries’, Living Conditions and Inequality in the late 1980s (Copenhagen).Google Scholar
  137. Vogel, J.: 1993, ‘Wohlfahrtssurveys und Sozialberichterstattung in Nordeuropa, Systematische Dauerbeobachtung der objektiven Lebensverhältnisse’, in W. Glatzer (ed.), Einstellungen und Lebensbedingungen in Europa. Campus.Google Scholar
  138. Vogel, J.: 1995a, The Social Indicator Tradition (Luxembourg: Eurostat, Doc E2/IS/2/95).Google Scholar
  139. Vogel, J.: 1995b, Towards an Integrated Household Survey Programme. The Swedish Experience (Luxembourg: Eurostat, Doc E2/IS/2/95).Google Scholar
  140. Vogel, J.: 1997a, ‘Living conditions and inequality in the European Union’, Eurostat: Population and Social Conditions (Luxembourg: E/1997-3).Google Scholar
  141. Vogel, J.: 1997b, ‘The European welfare mix: institutional configuration and distributive outcome in Sweden and the European Union. A longitudinal and comparative perspective’, paper presented at the 1997 conference of the International Society for Quality of Life studies (Charlotte, NC, USA, 20-23. 11. 1997).Google Scholar
  142. Vogel, J.: 1998a, ‘Welfare surveys and social reporting in the nordic countries’, I Statistik im Dienste der Öffentlichkeit. Bundesamt fuer Statistik (Bern, Schweiz).Google Scholar
  143. Vogel, J.: 1998b, ‘Coping with the European welfare mix. Welfare delivery systems, family formation and material inequality between types of families in the European Union’, paper presented at the 1998 Siena Group Meeting on Families at the end of the Twentieth Century (Sidney, Australia, 7-9. 12.1998).Google Scholar
  144. Vogel, J. and L. Häll: 1997, ‘Välfärd och ojämlikhet i 20-årsperspektiv 1975-95 living conditions and inequality 1975-95’, Report 91, series Living Conditions, Statistics (Sweden).Google Scholar
  145. Vogel, J., H. Sauli and A. Andersen: 1993,Welfare Surveys and Social Reporting in the Nordic Countries. Experiences and Potential (Eurostat: doc E3/IS/5/93).Google Scholar
  146. The WHOQOL Group: 1993, WHOQOL Study Protocol (Geneva: WHO, Division of Mental Health).Google Scholar
  147. The WHOQOL Group: 1995a, WHOQOL-100: Domains and Facets questionnaire (Geneva:WHO, Division of Mental Health).Google Scholar
  148. TheWHOQOL Group: 1995b,WHOQOL-100: The 100 questions with response scales (Geneva:WHO, Division of Mental Health).Google Scholar
  149. The WHOQOL Group: 1995c, WHOQOL-100: Facet definitions and questions (Geneva:WHO, Division of Mental Health).Google Scholar
  150. The WHOQOL Group: 1995d, WHOQOL-100: Australian version (Geneva: WHO, Division of Mental Health).Google Scholar
  151. The WHOQOL Group: 1995e, ‘The World Health Organization quality of life assessment (WHOQOL): Position paper from the World Health Organization’, Social Science and Medicine 41, pp. 1403–1409.Google Scholar
  152. The WHOQOL Group: 1996a, WHOQOL-BREF: Field trial version, Questionnaire (Geneva:WHO, Division of Mental Health).Google Scholar
  153. The WHOQOL Group: 1996b, WHOQOL-BREF: Field trial version: Introduction, administration, scoring and general version of the assessment (Geneva: WHO, Division of Mental Health).Google Scholar
  154. The WHOQOL Group: 1998a, ‘The World Health Organization quality of life assessment (WHOQOL): Development and general psychometric properties’, Social Science and Medicine 46, pp. 1569–1585.Google Scholar
  155. The WHOQOL Group: 1998b, ‘Development of the World Health Organization WHOQOL-BREF quality of life assessment’, Psychological Medicine 28, pp. 551–558.Google Scholar
  156. Zagorski, K. and J. S. McDonnell: 1995, ‘Consumer confidence' Indexes as Social Indicators’, Social Indicators Research 36, pp. 227–246.Google Scholar
  157. Zapf, W.: 1977, ‘Soziale Indikatoren-eine Zwischenbilanz’, in H.-J. Krupp and W. Zapf (eds.), Sozialpolitik und Sozialberichterstattung (Campus Verlag, Frankfurt a.M./New York), pp. 231–246.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • Michael R. Hagerty
    • 1
  • Robert A. Cummins
    • 1
  • Abbott L. Ferriss
    • 1
  • Kenneth Land
    • 1
  • Alex C. Michalos
    • 1
  • Mark Peterson
    • 1
  • Andrew Sharpe
    • 1
  • Joseph Sirgy
    • 1
  • Joachim Vogel
    • 1
  1. 1.Graduate School of ManagementUniversity of CaliforniaDavisUSA

Personalised recommendations