Linguistics and Philosophy

, Volume 24, Issue 3, pp 383–403 | Cite as

Singular Donkey Pronouns Are Semantically Singular

  • Makoto Kanazawa

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

REFERENCES

  1. Barker, Chris: 1993, 'A Presuppositional Account of Proportional Ambiguity', in Proceedings from Semantics and Linguistic Theory III, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY.Google Scholar
  2. Dalrymple, Mary, Makoto Kanazawa, Yookyung Kim, Sam Mchombo, and Stanley Peters: 1998, 'Reciprocal Expressions and the Concept of Reciprocity', Linguistics and Philosophy 21, 159–210.Google Scholar
  3. Davies, Martin: 1981, Meaning, Quantification, Necessity, Routledge & Kegan Paul, London.Google Scholar
  4. Heim, Irene: 1982, The Semantics of Definite and Indefinite Noun Phrases, Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Linguistics, University of Massachusetts at Amherst, Amherst, MA. (Published 1988 by Garland, New York.)Google Scholar
  5. Jackson, Eric G.: 1994, Negative Polarity, Definites under Quantification and General Statements, Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Philosophy, Stanford University, Stanford, CA.Google Scholar
  6. Kadmon, Nirit: 1987, On Unique and Non-Unique Reference and Asymmetric Quantification, Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Linguistics, University of Massachusetts at Amherst, Amherst, MA.Google Scholar
  7. Kamp, Hans: 1991, 'Uniqueness Presuppositions and Plural Anaphora in DTT and DRT', in M. Stokhof, J. Groenendijk, and D. Beaver (eds.), Quantification and Anaphora I, Edinburgh (DYANA deliverable R2.2A).Google Scholar
  8. Kanazawa, Makoto: 1994, 'Weak vs. Strong Readings of Donkey Sentences and Monotonicity Inference in a Dynamic Setting', Linguistics and Philosophy 17, 109–158.Google Scholar
  9. Kang, Young Eun Yoon: 1994, Weak and Strong Interpretations of Quantifiers and Definite NPs in English and Korean, Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Linguistics, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX. (This is referred to as Yoon 1994 in the text.)Google Scholar
  10. Krifka, Manfred: 1996a, 'Pragmatic Strengthening in Plural Predications and Donkey Sentences', in Teresa Galloway and Justin Spence (eds.), Proceedings from Semantics and Linguistic Theory VI, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY.Google Scholar
  11. Krifka, Manfred: 1996b, 'Parametric Sum Individuals for Plural Anaphora', Linguistics and Philosophy 19, 555–598.Google Scholar
  12. Lappin, Shalom: 1989, 'Donkey Pronouns Unbound', Theoretical Linguistics 15, 263–286.Google Scholar
  13. Lappin, Shalom, and Nissim Francez: 1994, 'E-type Pronouns, I-sums, and Donkey Anaphora', Linguistics and Philosophy 17, 391–428.Google Scholar
  14. Larson, Richard and Gabriel Segal: 1995, Knowledge of Meaning, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  15. Link, Godehard: 1983, 'The Logical Analysis of Plurals and Mass Terms: A Lattice-Theoretical Approach', in R. Bäuerle et al. (eds.), Meaning, Use, and Interpretation of Language, de Gruyter, Berlin. (Reprinted in Godehard Link, 1998, Algebraic Semantics in Language and Philosophy, CSLI Publications, Stanford, CA.)Google Scholar
  16. Neale, Stephen: 1990, Descriptions, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  17. Scha, Remko J. H.: 1984, 'Distributive, Collective and Cumulative Quantification', in Jeroen Groenendijk, Theo M. V. Janssen and Martin Stokhof (eds.), Truth, Interpretation and Information, Foris Publications, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
  18. Tancredi, Christopher: ms., 'Dynamic Situations', Yokohama National University. (The author is now at the University of Tokyo.)Google Scholar
  19. Yoon, Youngeun: 1996, 'Total and Partial Predicates and the Weak and Strong Interpretations', Natural Language Semantics 4, 217–236.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • Makoto Kanazawa
    • 1
  1. 1.Interfaculty Initiative in Information StudiesUniversity of TokyoHongo, Bunkyo-ku, TokyoJapan

Personalised recommendations