Photosynthesis Research

, Volume 66, Issue 1–2, pp 45–56

Airborne test of laser pump-and-probe technique for assessment of phytoplankton photochemical characteristics

  • Alexander M. Chekalyuk
  • Frank E. Hoge
  • Charles W. Wright
  • Robert N. Swift
  • James K. Yungel
Article

Abstract

Initial results of the airborne LIDAR measurement of photochemical quantum yield, ΦPo, and functional absorption cross-section, σPS II, of Photosystem II (PS II) are reported. NASA's AOL3 LIDAR was modified to implement short-pulse pump-and-probe (SP-P&P) LIDAR measurement protocol. The prototype system is capable of measuring a pump-induced increase in probe-stimulated chlorophyll fluorescence, ΔF/Fsat, along with the acquisition of `conventional' LIDAR-fluorosensor products from an operational altitude of 150 m. The use of a PS II sub-saturating probe pulse increases the response signal but also results in excessive energy quenching (EEQ) affecting the ΔF/Fsat magnitude. The airborne data indicated up to a 3-fold EEQ-caused decline in ΔF/Fsat, and 2-fold variability in the EEQ rate constant over a spatial scale a few hundred kilometers. Therefore, continuous monitoring of EEQ parameters must be incorporated in the operational SP-P&P protocol to provide data correction for the EEQ effect. Simultaneous airborne LIDAR measurements of ΦPo and σPS II with EEQ correction were shown to be feasible and optimal laser excitation parameters were determined. Strong daytime ΔF/Fsat decline under ambient light was found in the near-surface water layer over large aquatic areas. An example of SP-P&P LIDAR measurement of phytoplankton photochemical and fluorescent characteristics in the Chesapeake Bay mouth is presented. Prospects for future SP-P&P development and related problems are discussed.

chlorophyll energy quenching fluorescence LIDAR photochemistry photosynthesis Photosystem II phytoplankton pump and probe remote sensing 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Chekalyuk AM and Gorbunov MYu (1994a) Pump-and-probe LIDAR fluorosensor and its applications for estimates of phytoplankton photosynthetic activity. In: Second Thematic Conference on Remote Sensing for Marine and Coastal Environments, pp 389–400. New Orleans, USA, 31 January–2 February 1994 ERIM Publ., Ann Arbor, MichiganGoogle Scholar
  2. Chekalyuk AM and Gorbunov MYu (1994b) Diel variability of in vivo chlorophyll fluorescence in near-surface water layer. SPIE 2258: 140–151Google Scholar
  3. Chekalyuk AM, Olson RJ and Sosik HM (1996) Pump-during-probe fluorometry of phytoplankton: Group-specific photosynthetic characteristics from individual cell analysis. SPIE 2963: 840–845Google Scholar
  4. Chekalyuk AM, Hoge FE, Wright CW and Swift RN (2000) Short-pulse pump-and-probe technique for airborne laser assessment of Photosystem II photochemical characteristics. Photosynth Res 66: 33–44 (this issue)PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Falkowski PG and Kolber Z (1995) Variations in chlorophyll fluorescence yields in phytoplankton in the world oceans. Aust J Plant Physiol 22: 341–355CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Falkowski PG and Raven JA (1997) Aquatic Photosynthesis. Black-well Science, MaldenGoogle Scholar
  7. Falkowski PG, Fujita Y, Ley A and Mauzerall D (1986) Evidence for cyclic electron flow around Photosystem II in Chlorella pyrenoidosa. Plant Physiol 81: 310–312PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Falkowski PG, Kolber Z and Fujita Y (1988) Effect of redox state on the dynamics Photosystem II during steady-state photosynthesis in eucaryotic algae. Biochim Biophys Acta 933: 432–443CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Falkowski PG, Ziemann D, Kolber Z and Bienfang PK (1991) Role of eddy pumping in enhancing primary production in the ocean. Nature 352: 55–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Field C, Behrenfeld MJ, Randerson JT and Falkowski PG (1998) Primary production of the biosphere: Integrating terrestrial and oceanic components. Science 281: 237–240PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Geider R, Greene R, Kolber Z, MacIntyre HL and Falkowski PG (1993) Fluorescence assessment of the maximum quantum efficiency of photosynthesis in the western North Atlantic. Deep-Sea Res 40: 1205–1224CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Genty B, Briantis J-M and Baker N (1989) The relationship between the quantum yield of photosynthetic electron transport and quenching of chlorophyll fluorescence. Biochim Biophys Acta 990: 87–92Google Scholar
  13. Govindjee (1995) Sixty-three years since Kautsky: Chlorophyll a fluorescence. Aust J Plant Physiol 22: 131–160Google Scholar
  14. Hoge FE and Swift RN (1981) Airborne simultaneous spectroscopic detection of laser-induced water Raman backscatter and fluorescence from chlorophyll a and other naturally occurring pigments. Appl Opt 20: 3197–3205PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Hoge FE, Berry RE and Swift RN (1986a) Active-passive airborne ocean color measurements. 1: Instrumentation. Appl Opt 25: 39–47PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Hoge FE, Swift RN and Yungel JK (1986b) Active-passive airborne ocean color measurement. 2: Applications. Appl Opt 25: 48–57PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hoge FE, Wright CW, Kana TM, Swift RN and Yungel JK (1998) Spatial variability of oceanic phycoerythrin spectral types derived from airborne laser-induced fluorescence emissions. Appl Opt 21: 4744–4749CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Johnson B, Higgs C, Primmerman C, Mandra R, Jeys T, DeFeo W, Grey P and Rowe G (1995) Airborne LIDAR measurements of phytoplankton abundance and productivity in New England coastal waters. In: Third Thematic Conference on Remote Sensing for Marine and Coastal Environments, pp 819–832Google Scholar
  19. Kirk JTO (1994) Light and Photosynthesis in Aquatic Ecosystems. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  20. Kolber Z and Falkowski PG (1993) Use of active fluorescence to estimate phytoplankton photosynthesis in situ. Limnol Oceanogr 38: 1646–1665CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kolber Z, Wyman KD and Falkowski PG (1990) Natural variability in photosynthetic energy conversion efficiency: A field study in the Gulf of Maine. Limnol Oceanogr 35: 72–79CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kolber Z, Barber RT, Coale KH, Fitzwater SE, Greene RM, Johnson KS, Linley S and Falkowski PG (1994) Iron limitation of phytoplankton photosynthesis in the equatorial Pacific Ocean. Nature 371: 145–149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kolber Z, Prazil O and Falkowski PG (1998) Measurements of variable chlorophyll fluorescence using fast repetition rate techniques: Defining methodology and experimental protocols. Biochim Biophys Acta 1367: 88–106PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kramer DM, Robinson HR and Crofts AR (1990) A portable multiflash kinetic fluorimeter for measurement of donor and acceptor reactions of Photosystem II in leaves of intact plants under field conditions. Photosynth Res 26: 181–193CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Krause GH and Weis E (1991) Chlorophyll fluorescence and photosynthesis: The basics. Ann Rev Plant Physiol 42: 313–349CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Mauzerall D (1972) Light-induced fluorescence changes in Chlorella, and the primary photoreactions for production of oxygen. Proc Nat Acad Sci 69: 1358–1362PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Mauzerall D (1976) Multiple excitations in photosynthetic systems. Biophys J 16: 87–91PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Olson RJ, Chekalyuk AM and Sosik HM (1996) Phytoplankton photosynthetic characteristics from fluorescence induction assays of individual cells. Limnol Oceanogr 41: 1253–1263CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Olson RJ, Sosik HM and Chekalyuk AM (1999) Photosynthetic characteristics of marine phytoplankton from pump-during-probe fluorometry of individual cells at sea. Cytometry 37: 1–13PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Schreiber U, Groberman L and Vidaver W (1975) Protable, solid-state fluorometer for measurement of chlorophyll fluorescence induction in plants. Rev Sci Instrum 46: 538–542CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Schreiber U, Neubauer C and Schliwa U (1993) PAM fluorometer based on medium-frequency pulsed Xe-flash measuring light: A highly sensitive new tool in basic and applied photosynthesis research. Photosynth Res 36: 65–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. van Kooten O and Snel JFH (1990) The use of chlorophyll fluorescence nomenclature in plant stress physiology. Photosynth Res 25: 147–150CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • Alexander M. Chekalyuk
    • 1
  • Frank E. Hoge
    • 2
  • Charles W. Wright
    • 2
  • Robert N. Swift
    • 3
  • James K. Yungel
    • 3
  1. 1.National Research CouncilUSA
  2. 2.Goddard Space Flight CenterUSA
  3. 3.NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Wallops Flight FacilityEG & G, Inc.Wallops IslandUSA

Personalised recommendations