Advertisement

Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders

, Volume 31, Issue 2, pp 207–217 | Cite as

The Development of a Stress Survey Schedule for Persons with Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities

  • June Groden
  • Amy Diller
  • Margaret Bausman
  • Wayne Velicer
  • Gregory Norman
  • Joseph Cautela
Article

Abstract

The Stress Survey Schedule is an instrument for measuring stress in the lives of persons with autism and other developmental disabilities. Development of the survey and analysis of the underlying measurement structure of the instrument is reported in three studies. Through the use of exploratory and confirmatory analysis procedures, eight dimensions of stress were identified: Anticipation/Uncertainty, Changes and Threats, Unpleasant Events, Pleasant Events, Sensory/Personal Contact, Food Related Activity, Social/Environmental Interactions, and Ritual Related Stress. These stress dimensions are highly relevant to the problems of autism and have not been addressed by other stress surveys. The information obtained from the Stress Survey can be used to plan for strategies to reduce the stress before it occurs or results in maladaptive behavior.

Autism stress survey 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

REFERENCES

  1. Bentler, P. M. (1989). EQS structural equations program manual. Los Angeles: BMDP Statistical Software.Google Scholar
  2. Bentler, P. M. (1990). Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 256-259.Google Scholar
  3. Bollen, K. A., & Long, J. S. (1993). Introduction. In K. A. Bollen, & J. S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 1-9). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  4. Bramston, P., & Bostock, J. (1994). Measuring perceived stress in people with intellectual disabilities: The development of a new scale. Australia and New Zealand Journal of Developmental Disabilities, 19, 149-157.Google Scholar
  5. Bramston, P., & Fogarty, G. J. (1995). Measuring stress in the mildly intellectually handicapped: The factorial structure of the Subjective Stress Scale. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 16, 117-131.Google Scholar
  6. Byrne, B. M. (1994). Structural Equation Modeling with EQS and EQS/Windows. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  7. Cautela, J. R., & Groden, J. (1978). Relaxation: A comprehensive manual for adults, children, and children with special needs. Champaign, IL: Research Press.Google Scholar
  8. Celiberti, D. A., Bobo, H. E., Kelly, K. S., Harris, S. L., & Handleman, J. S. (1997). The differential and temporal effects of antecedent exercise on the self-stimulatory behavior of a child with autism. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 18, 139-150.Google Scholar
  9. Cohen, D. J., & Volkmar, F. R. (1997). Handbook of autism and pervasive developmental disorders (2nd ed.). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  10. Fogarty, G. J., Bramston, P., & Cummins, R. A. (1997). Validation of the Lifestress Inventory for people with a mild intellectual disability. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 18, 435-456.Google Scholar
  11. Grandin, T., & Scariano, M. M. (1986). Emergence: Labeled autistic. Novato, CA: Arena Press.Google Scholar
  12. Groden, G., Stevenson, S., & Groden, J. (1997). Understanding challenging behavior: A step-by-step behavior analysis guide. Worthington, OH: IDS.Google Scholar
  13. Groden, J., & Cautela, J. (1984). Use of imagery procedures with students labeled “Trainable Retarded.” Psychological Reports, 54, 595-605.Google Scholar
  14. Groden, J., & Cautela, J. (1988). Procedures to increase social interaction among adolescents with autism: A multiple baseline analysis. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 19, 87-93.Google Scholar
  15. Groden, J., Cautela, J., Prince, S., & Berryman, J. (1994). The impact of stress and anxiety on individuals with autism and developmental disabilities. In E. Schopler & G. B. Mesibov (Eds.), Behavioral issues in autism (pp. 177-194). New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
  16. Groden, J., & LeVasseur, P. (1999). Stress reduction: A positive behavioral support. Presentation at a web conference, Autism 99 [On-line]. Available: www.autism.org.Google Scholar
  17. Guadagnoli, E., & Velicer, W. F. (1988). Relations of sample size to the stability of components patterns. Psychological Bulletin, 103, 265-275.Google Scholar
  18. Horn, J. L. (1965). A rationale and test for the number of factors in factor analysis. Psychometrika, 30, 179-185.Google Scholar
  19. Johnston, S. S., & Reichle, J. (1993). Designing and implementing interventions to decrease challenging behavior. Language, Speech and Hearing Services in Schools, 24, 225-235.Google Scholar
  20. King, N. J., Molloy, G. N., Heyne, D., Murphy, G. C., Ollendick, T. H. (1998). Emotive imagery treatment for childhood phobias: A credible and empirically validated intervention? Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy, 26, 103-113.Google Scholar
  21. Marsh, H. W., Balla, J. R., & McDonald, R. P. (1988). Goodness-of-fit indexes in confirmatory factor analysis: The effect of sample size. Psychological Bulletin, 103, 391-410.Google Scholar
  22. Mullis, R. L., Youngs, G. A., Jr., Mullis, A. K., & Rathge, R. W. (1993). Adolescent stress: Issues of measurement. Adolescence, 28, 267-279.Google Scholar
  23. Selye, H. (1974). Stress without distress. Philadelphia: Lipincott.Google Scholar
  24. Setterlind, S, & Larsson, G. (1995). The Stress Profile: A psychological approach to measuring stress. Stress Medicine, 11, 85-92.Google Scholar
  25. Silverman, W. K., La Greca, A. M., & Wasserstein, S. (1995). What do children worry about? Worries and their relation to anxiety. Child Development, 66, 671-686.Google Scholar
  26. Smith, D. (1989). [Review of the book Autism: Strategies for change]. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 10, 327-330.Google Scholar
  27. Velicer, W. F. (1976). Determining the number of components from the matrix of partial correlations. Psychometrika, 41, 321-327.Google Scholar
  28. Velicer, W. F., & Fava, J. L. (1998). The effects of variable and subject sampling on factor patter recovery. Psychological Methods, 3, 231-251.Google Scholar
  29. Williams, D. (1992). Nobody nowhere. New York: Times Books.Google Scholar
  30. Zwick, W. R., & Velicer, V. F. (1986). Comparison of five rules for determining the number of components to retain. Psychological Bulletin, 99, 432-442.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • June Groden
    • 1
  • Amy Diller
    • 1
  • Margaret Bausman
    • 1
  • Wayne Velicer
    • 2
  • Gregory Norman
    • 3
  • Joseph Cautela
    • 4
  1. 1.The Groden CenterProvidence
  2. 2.University of Rhode IslandKingston
  3. 3.Stanford Center for Research in Disease PreventionPalo Alto
  4. 4.Behavior Therapy InstituteSudbury

Personalised recommendations