Linguistics and Philosophy

, Volume 24, Issue 3, pp 271–330

Complex Demonstratives

  • J. Dever


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Almog, J., J. Perry, and H. Wettstein: 1989, Themes from Kaplan, Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  2. Barwise, J. and R. Cooper: 1981, 'Generalized Quantifiers and Natural Language', Linguistics and Philosophy 4, 159–219.Google Scholar
  3. Blackburn, S.: 1975, Meaning, Reference, and Necessity, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  4. Braun, D.: 1994, 'Structured Characters and Complex Demonstratives', Philosophical Studies 74, 193–219.Google Scholar
  5. Burge, T.: 1973, 'Reference and Proper Names', in Ludlow (1997), pp. 593–608.Google Scholar
  6. Chomsky, N.: 1995, The Minimalist Program, The MIT Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  7. Davidson, D.: 1979, 'Moods and Performatives', in Davidson (1984), pp. 109–122.Google Scholar
  8. Davidson, D.: 1984, Inquiries into Truth and Interpretation, Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  9. Davies, M.: 1982, 'Individuation and the Semantics of Demonstratives', Journal of Philosophical Logic 11, 287–310.Google Scholar
  10. Dever, J.: 1998, Variables, Doctoral dissertation, University of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar
  11. Donnellan, K.: 1966, 'Reference and Definite Descriptions', The Philosophical Review 77, 281–304.Google Scholar
  12. Evans, G.: 1973, 'The Causal Theory of Names', in Evans (1985), pp. 1–24.Google Scholar
  13. Evans, G.: 1977, 'Pronouns, Quantifiers, and Relative Clauses (I)', Canadian Journal of Philosophy 7, 467–536.Google Scholar
  14. Evans, G.: 1977a, 'Pronouns, Quantifiers, and Relative Clauses (II)', Canadian Journal of Philosophy 7, 777–797.Google Scholar
  15. Evans, G.: 1982, Varieties of Reference, Clarendon Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  16. Evans, G.: 1985, The Collected Papers, Clarendon Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  17. Føllesdal, D.: 1986, 'Essentialism and Reference', in L. Hahn and P. Schlipp (1986), pp. 97–113.Google Scholar
  18. Frege, G.: 1879, 'Begriffsschrift', in Van Heijenoort (1967), pp. 1–82.Google Scholar
  19. Frege, G.: 1892, 'On Sense and Reference', in Ludlow (1997), pp. 563–584.Google Scholar
  20. Groenendijk, J. and M. Stokhof: 1991, 'Dynamic Predicate Logic', Linguistics and Philosophy 14, 39–100.Google Scholar
  21. Hahn, L. and P. Schlipp: 1986), The Philosophy of W. V. Quine, Open Court, La Salle.Google Scholar
  22. Higginbotham, J. and R. May: 1981, 'Questions, Quantifiers and Crossing', The Linguistic Review 1, 41–79.Google Scholar
  23. Kaplan, D.: 1977, 'Demonstratives', in Almog et al. (1989), pp. 481–563.Google Scholar
  24. Kaplan, D.: 1989, 'Afterthoughts', in Almog et al. (1989), pp. 564–614.Google Scholar
  25. King, J.: 1999, 'Are Complex “That” Phrases Devices of Direct Reference?', Nous 33, 155–182.Google Scholar
  26. Kripke, S.: 1979, 'A Puzzle about Belief', in N. Salmon and S. Soames (1988), pp. 102–148.Google Scholar
  27. Kripke, S.: 1980, Naming and Necessity, Harvard University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  28. Lappin, S. and N. Francez: 1993, 'E-Type Anaphora, I-Sums, and Donkey Anaphora', Linguistics and Philosophy 17(4), 391–428.Google Scholar
  29. Larson, R. and P. Ludlow: 1993, 'Interpreted Logical Forms', Synthese 95, 305–355.Google Scholar
  30. Larson, R. and G. Segal: 1995, Knowledge of Meaning, MIT Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  31. Lindstrom, P.: 1966, 'First-Order Predicate Logic with Generalized Quantifiers', Theoria 32, 186–195.Google Scholar
  32. Longobardi, G.: 1994, 'Reference and Proper Names', Linguistic Inquiry 25, 609–666.Google Scholar
  33. Ludlow, P.: 1997, Readings in the Philosophy of Language, The MIT Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  34. Ludwig, K. and Lepore, E. (2000). 'Semantics and Pragmatics of Complex Demonstratives', Mind, forthcoming.Google Scholar
  35. McCawley, J.: 1982, 'Parentheticals and Discontinuous Constituents', Linguistic Inquiry 13, 91–106.Google Scholar
  36. McDowell, J.: 1977, 'On the Sense and Reference of a Proper Name', Mind, 86, 159–185.Google Scholar
  37. Mostowski, A.: 1957, 'On a Generalization of Quantifiers', Fundemanta Mathematicae 44, 12–36.Google Scholar
  38. Neale, S.: 1990, Descriptions, The MIT Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  39. Neale, S.: 1993, 'Term Limits', in J. Tomberlin (eds.), Language and Logic, Vol. 7.Google Scholar
  40. Neale, S.: 1998, 'Coloring and Composition', in R. Stainton (ed.), Philosophy and Linguistics.Google Scholar
  41. Peacocke, C.: 1975, 'Proper Names, Reference, and Rigid Designation', in Blackburn (1975), pp. 109–132.Google Scholar
  42. Richard, M.: 1993, 'Articulated Terms', in J. Tomberlin (eds.), Language and Logic, Vol. 7.Google Scholar
  43. Russell, B.: 1905, 'On Denoting', Mind 14, 479–493.Google Scholar
  44. Safir, K.: 1986, 'Relative Clauses in a Theory of Binding and Levels', Linguistic Inquiry 17, 663–689.Google Scholar
  45. Salmon, N.: 1982, 'Assertion and Incomplete Definite Descriptions', Philosophical Studies 42, 37–45.Google Scholar
  46. Salmon, N.: 1991, 'The Pragmatic Fallacy', Philosophical Studies 63, 83–97.Google Scholar
  47. Salmon, N. and S. Soames: 1988, Propositions and Attitudes, Oxford University Press, New York.Google Scholar
  48. Sher, G.: 1990, 'Ways of Branching Quantifiers', Linguistics and Philosophy 13, 393–422.Google Scholar
  49. Strawson, P.: 1959, Individuals, Methuen, London.Google Scholar
  50. Strawson, P.: 1974, Subject and Predicate in Logic and Grammar, Methuen, London.Google Scholar
  51. Van Heijenoort, J.: 1967, From Frege to Gödel: A Sourcebook in Mathematical Logic, 1879-1931, Harvard University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. Dever
    • 1
  1. 1.University of Texas at AustinAustinUSA

Personalised recommendations