Advertisement

The Connections between Family Formation and First-time Home Ownership in the Context of West Germany and the Netherlands

  • Clara H. Mulder
  • Michael Wagner
Article

Abstract

Using data from retrospective life course surveys held in West Germany and the Netherlands in the 1980s and early 1990s, we investigate the interconnections between first partnership, first marriage, and first childbirth, on the one hand, and first-time home ownership, on the other. We consider the temporal connection between events in the family life course and home ownership from various angles, proceeding from survival analyses to analyses of the timing and ordering of the distinct events and a multivariate analysis of the transition to home ownership. We find marked differences between countries and cohorts in this temporal connection.

cohabitation home ownership marriage parenthood 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Blossfeld, H.-P. and Rohwer, G., 1995. Techniques of Event History Modeling. New Approaches to Causal Analysis. Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah.Google Scholar
  2. Börsch-Supan, A., 1986. 'Household formation, housing prices, and public policy impacts', Journal of Public Economics 30: 145–164.Google Scholar
  3. Brückner, E., 1993. Lebensverläufe und gesellschaftlicherWandel: Konzeption, Design und Methodik der Erhebung von Lebensverläufen der Geburtsjahrgänge 1919–1921. Max-Planck-Institut für Bildungsforschung (Materialien aus der Bildungsforschung Nr. 44), Berlin.Google Scholar
  4. Brückner, H. and Mayer, K.U., 1995. Lebensverläufe und gesellschaftlicher Wandel: Konzeption, Design und Methodik der Erhebung von Lebensverläufen der Geburtsjahrgänge 1954–1956 und 1959–1961. Max-Planck-Institut für Bildungsforschung (Materialien aus der Bildungsforschung Nr. 48), Berlin.Google Scholar
  5. Buck, N. and Scott, J., 1993. 'She's leaving home: but why? An analysis of young people leaving the parental home', Journal of Marriage and the Family 55: 863–874.Google Scholar
  6. Castiglioni, M. and Dalla Zuanna, G., 1994. 'Innovation and tradition: reproductive and marital behaviour in Italy in the 1970s and 1980s', European Journal of Population 10: 107–142.Google Scholar
  7. Chevan, A., 1989. 'The growth of home ownership: 1940–1980', Demography 26: 249–266.Google Scholar
  8. Clark, W.A.V., Deurloo, M.C. and Dieleman, F.M., 1994. 'Tenure changes in the context of micro level family and macro level economic shifts', Urban Studies 31: 137–154.Google Scholar
  9. Courgeau, D. and Lelièvre, E., 1988. 'Estimation of transition rates in dynamic household models', in N. Keilman, A. Kuijsten and A. Vossen (eds), Modelling Household Formation and Dissolution. Clarendon Press, Oxford, 160–175.Google Scholar
  10. Davies Withers, S., 1998. 'Linking household transitions and housing transitions: a longitudinal analysis of renters', Environment and Planning A 30: 615–630.Google Scholar
  11. De Jong, A. and De Graaf, A., 1999. 'Marriage: From cornerstone to outdated institution?', in J. Garssen, J. De Beer, L. Hoeksma, K. Prins and R. Verhoef (eds), Vital Events. Past, Present and Future of the Dutch Population. Statistics Netherlands, Voorburg, 37–50.Google Scholar
  12. Deurloo, M.C., Clark, W.A.V. and Dieleman, F.M., 1994. 'The move to housing ownership in temporal and regional contexts', Environment and Planning A 26: 1659–1670.Google Scholar
  13. Dieleman, F.M. and Everaers, P.C.J., 1994. 'From renting to owning: life course and housing market circumstances', Housing Studies 9: 11–25.Google Scholar
  14. Easterlin, R.A., 1980. Birth and Fortune; the Impact of Numbers on Personal Welfare. Basic Books, New York.Google Scholar
  15. Ermisch, J., 1999. 'Prices, parents, and young people's household formation', Journal of Urban Economics 45: 47–71.Google Scholar
  16. ESR/STP, 1992. ESR/STP (formerly SSCW-Telepanel) data file. Owner: Stichting Economische, Sociaal-culturele en Ruimtelijke Wetenschappen (ESR) of the Netherlands Organisation for the Advancement of Scientific Research (NWO), The Hague. Data collection: Stichting Telepanel, Amsterdam. Data management: Steinmetz Archive, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
  17. Forrest, R., Kennett, P. and Leather, P., 1999. Home Ownership in Crisis? The British Experience of Negative Equity. Ashgate, Aldershot.Google Scholar
  18. Ganzeboom, H.B.G., De Graaf, P. and Treiman, D.J., 1992. 'A standard international socio-economic index of occupational status'. Social Science Research 21: 1–56.Google Scholar
  19. Hantrais, L., 1997. 'Exploring relationships between social policy and changing family forms within the European Union', European Journal of Population 13: 339–379.Google Scholar
  20. Haskey, J., 1992. 'Patterns of marriage, divorce, and cohabitation in the different countries of Europe', Population Trends 69: 27–36.Google Scholar
  21. Haurin, D.R., Hendershott, P.H. and Kim, D., 1993. 'The impact of real rents and wages on household formation', Review of Economics and Statistics 75: 284–293.Google Scholar
  22. Hobcraft, J. and Kiernan, K., 1995. 'Becoming a parent in Europe', in Evolution or Revolution in European Population. EAPS/IUSSP European Population Conference, Vol. 1: Plenary Sessions. FrancoAngeli, Milano, 27–65.Google Scholar
  23. Huinink, J., 1995. Warum noch Familie? Campus, Frankfurt/New York.Google Scholar
  24. Ineichen, B., 1979. 'Housing factors in the timing of weddings and first pregnancies', in C.C. Harris (ed), The Sociology of the Family: New Directions for Britain. University of Keele (Sociological Review Monograph 28), Keele, 127–140.Google Scholar
  25. Ineichen, B., 1981. 'The housing decisions of young people', British Journal of Sociology 32: 252–258.Google Scholar
  26. Kendig, H.L., 1984. 'Housing careers, life cycle and residential mobility: implications for the housing market', Urban Studies 21: 283.Google Scholar
  27. Krishnan, V. and Krotki, K.J., 1993. 'Life cycle effects on home-ownership in Canada', Housing Studies 8: 120–127.Google Scholar
  28. Lassarre, D., 1986. 'Moving into home ownership', Journal of Economic Psychology 7: 161–178.Google Scholar
  29. Manting, D., 1994. Dynamics in Marriage and Cohabitation. An Inter-temporal, Life Course Analysis of first Union Formation and Dissolution. Thesis Publishers/PDOD, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
  30. Marini, M.M. and Singer, B., 1988. 'Causality in the Social Sciences', Sociological Methodology 18: 347–409.Google Scholar
  31. Mayer, K.U. and Brückner, E., 1989. Lebensverläufe und Wohlfahrtsentwicklung: Konzeption, Design und Methodik der Erhebung von Lebensverläufen der Geburtsjahrgänge 1954–1956 und 1959–1961. Max-Planck-Institut für Bildungsforschung (Materialien aus der Bildungsforschung Nr. 35), Berlin.Google Scholar
  32. Megbolugbe, I.F. and Linneman, P.D., 1993. 'Home ownership', Urban Studies 30: 659–682.Google Scholar
  33. Montgomery, M., 1992. 'Household formation and home-ownership in France', in J. Trussell, R. Hankinson and J. Tilton (eds), Demographic Applications of Event History Analysis. Clarendon Press, Oxford, 94–119.Google Scholar
  34. Mulder, C.H. and Wagner, M., 1993. 'Migration and marriage in the life course: a method for studying synchronized events', European Journal of Population 9: 55–76.Google Scholar
  35. Mulder, C.H. and Manting, D., 1994. 'Strategies of nest-leavers: 'settling down' versus flexibility', European Sociological Review 10: 155–172.Google Scholar
  36. Mulder, C.H. and Wagner, M., 1998. 'First-time home-ownership in the family life course: a West German-Dutch comparison', Urban Studies 35: 687–713.Google Scholar
  37. Murphy, M.J., 1984. 'The influence of fertility, early housing-career and socioeconomic factors on tenure determination in contemporary Britain', Environment and Planning A 16: 1303–1318.Google Scholar
  38. Murphy, M.J. and Sullivan, O., 1985. 'Housing tenure and family formation in contemporary Britain', European Sociological Review 1: 230–243.Google Scholar
  39. Mutchler, J.E. and Krivo, L.J., 1989. 'Availability and affordability: Household adaptation to a housing squeeze', Social Forces 68: 241–261.Google Scholar
  40. Oppenheimer, V.K., 1988. 'A theory of marriage timing', American Journal of Sociology 94: 563–591.Google Scholar
  41. Pampel, F.C., 1983. 'Changes in the propensity to live alone: evidence from consecutive crosssectional surveys, 1960–1976', Demography 20: 433–447.Google Scholar
  42. Pinnelli, A., 1995. 'Women's condition, low fertility, and emerging union patterns in Europe', in K.O. Mason and A.-M. Jensen (eds), Gender and Family Change in Industrialized Countries. Clarendon Press, Oxford, 82–101.Google Scholar
  43. Saunders, P., 1990. A Nation of Home Owners. Unwin Hyman, London.Google Scholar
  44. Stephens, M., 1993. 'Finance for owner occupation in the UK: the sick man of Europe?', Policy and Politics 21: 307–317.Google Scholar
  45. Sullivan, O. and Murphy, M.J., 1984. 'Housing pathways and stratification: some evidence from a British national survey', Journal of Social Policy 13: 147–165.Google Scholar
  46. Sweet, J.A., 1990. 'Changes in the life-cycle composition of the United States population and the demand for housing', in D. Myers (ed), Housing Demography. University of Wisconsin Press, Madison.Google Scholar
  47. Tomann, H., 1996. 'Private home-ownership finance for low-income households', Urban Studies 33: 1879–1889.Google Scholar
  48. Ultee, W.C. and Ganzeboom, H.B.G., 1993. Netherlands Family Survey 1992-93 [machine readable data set]. Codebook prepared by Harry B.G. Ganzeboom, Susanne Rijken, September 1993 edition. Changes and additions made by Harry B.G. Ganzeboom and Roland Weygold, January 1995 edition. Dept. of Sociology, Nijmegen University, Nijmegen, Netherlands.Google Scholar
  49. Whittington, L. and Peters, H.E., 1996. 'Economic incentives for financial and residential independence', Demography 33: 82–97.Google Scholar
  50. Yamaguchi, K., 1991. Event History Analysis. Sage (Applied Social Research Methods Series 28), Newbury Park.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Urban Research centre UtrechtUniversity of UtrechtTC Utrechtthe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations