Advertisement

Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture

, Volume 64, Issue 2–3, pp 145–157 | Cite as

Oxidative stress and physiological, epigenetic and genetic variability in plant tissue culture: implications for micropropagators and genetic engineers

  • Alan C. Cassells
  • Rosario F. Curry
Article

Abstract

A number of well defined problems in physiological, epigenetic and genetic quality are associated with the culture of plant cell, tissue and organs in vitro, namely, absence or loss of organogenic potential (recalcitrance), hyperhydricity (`vitrification') and somaclonal variation. These broad terms are used to describe complex phenomena that are known to be genotype and environment dependent. These phenomena affect the practical application of plant tissue culture in plant propagation and in plant genetic manipulation. Here it is hypothesised much of the variability expressed in microplants may be the consequence of, or related to, oxidative stress damage caused to the plant tissues during explant preparation, and in culture, due to media and environmental factors. The characteristics of these phenomena are described and causes discussed in terms of the known effects of oxidative stress on eukaryote genomes. Parameters to characterise the phenomena are described and methods to remediate the causes proposed.

DNA repair free radicals genetic engineering hyperhydricity in vitro culture juvenility micropropagation mutation reactive oxygen species somaclonal variation tissue culture 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Agrios GN (1997) Plant Pathology (4th edn.), Academic Press, San DiegoGoogle Scholar
  2. Amor Y, Babiychuk E, Inze D & Levine A (1998) The involvement of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase in the oxidative response in plants. FEBS Letts. 440: 1-7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Anon (1977) Manual on Mutation Breeding. International Atomic Energy Agency, ViennaGoogle Scholar
  4. Anon (1995) Induced Mutations andMolecular Techniques for Crop Improvement. International Atomic Energy Agency, ViennaGoogle Scholar
  5. Baker CJ & Orlandi EW (1995) Active oxygen in plant pathogenesis. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 33: 299-321CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Banzet N, Richaud C, Deveaux Y, Kazmaier M, Gagnon J & Triantaphylides C (1998) Accumulation of small heat shock proteins, including mitochondrial HSP22, induced of oxidative stress and adaptive response in tomato cells. Plant J. 13: 519-527PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Barciszewski J, Siboska GE, Pedersen BO, Clark BFC & Rattan SIS (1997) Mechanism for the in vivo formation of N-6-furfuryladenine, kinetin, as a secondary oxidative damage product of DNA. FEBS Letts. 414: 457-460CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Barna B, Adam AL, Gullner G & Kiraly Z (1995) Role of antioxidant systems and juvenility in tolerance of plants to disease and abiotic stresses. Acta Phytopath. Entomol. Hung. 30: 39-45Google Scholar
  9. Bartosz G (1997) Oxidative stress in plants. Acta Physiol. Plant. 19: 47-64Google Scholar
  10. Benson EE & Roubelakis-Angelakis KA (1994) Oxidative stress in recalcitrant tissue cultures of grapevine. Free Rad. Biol.Med. 16: 355-362PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Berglund T & Ohlsson AB (1995) Defensive and secondary metabolism in plant tissue cultures, with special reference to nicotinamide, glutathione and oxidative stress. Plant Cell Tiss Org. Cult. 43: 137-145CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bialkowski K & Olinski R (1999) Oxidative damage to plant DNA in relation to growth conditions. Acta Biochim. Pol. 46: 43-49PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Bohr VA & Dianov GL (1999) Oxidative DNA damage processing in nuclear and organellar DNA. Biochimie 81: 155-160PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Bolwell GP, Butt VS, Davies DR & Zimmerlin A (1995) The origin of the oxidative burst in plants. Free Rad. Res. 23: 517-532Google Scholar
  15. Brar DS & Jain SM (1998) Somaclonal variation: mechanism and applications in crop improvement. In: Jain SM, Brar DS & Ahloowalia BS (eds) Somaclonal Variation and Induced Mutations in Crop Improvement (pp 15-37). Kluwer Academic Publishers, DordrechtGoogle Scholar
  16. Burdon RH (1993) Stress proteins in plants. Bot. J. Scotl. 46: 463-475CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Caro A & Puntarulo D (1996) Effect of in vivo ion supplementation on oxygen radical production by soybean roots. Biochim Biophys Acta 1291: 245-251PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Cassells AC (1998) In vitro induced mutations for disease resistance. In: Jain SM, Brar DS & Ahloowalia BS (eds) Somaclonal Variation and Induced Mutations in Crop Improvement (pp. 367-378). Kluwer Academic Publishers, DordrechtGoogle Scholar
  19. Cassells AC (2000a) Contamination detection and elimination. In: Spier RE (ed) Encyclopedia of Plant Cell Biology (pp 577-586). Wiley, ChichesterGoogle Scholar
  20. Cassells AC (2000b) Aseptic microhydroponics: a strategy to advance microplant development. Acta Hortic. 530: 187-195Google Scholar
  21. Cassells AC & Jones PW (1995) TheMethodology of Plant Genetic Manipulation: Criteria for Decision Making. Kluwer Academic Publishers, DordrechtGoogle Scholar
  22. Cassells AC & Tamma L (1985) Ethylene and ethane release during tobacco protoplast isolation and protoplast survival potential in vitro. Physiol. Plant. 66: 303-308CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Cassells AC & Walsh C (1998) Characteristics of Dianthus microplants grown in agar and polyurethane foam using airtight and water-permeable vessel lids. In: Reuther G (ed) Physiology and Control of Plant Propagation in vitro (pp 122-126). European Commission, LuxembourgGoogle Scholar
  24. Cassells AC, Austin S & Goetz EM (1987) Variation in tubers in single cell-derived clones of potato in Ireland. In: Bajaj YPS (ed.) Biotechnology in Agriculture and Forestry 3: 375-391Google Scholar
  25. Cassells AC, Cocker FM & Austin S (1980) Ethylene release during tobacco protoplast isolation and subsequent protoplast survival. Plant Sci. Lett. 19: 169-173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Cassells AC, Deadman ML, Brown CA & Griffin E (1991) Field resistance to late blight (Phytophthora infestans (Mont.) De Bary) in potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) somaclones associated with instability and pleiotropic effects. Euphytica 56: 75-80Google Scholar
  27. Cassells AC, Croke JT & Doyle BM (1997) Evaluation of image analysis, flow cytometry and RAPD analysis for the assessment of somaclonal variation and induced mutation in tissue-culture derived Pelargonium plants. Angew. Bot. 71: 119-124Google Scholar
  28. Cassells AC, Kowalski B, Fitzgerald DM & Murphy GA (1999) The use of image analysis to study developmental variation in micropropagated potatoes (Solanum tuberosum L.). Potato Res. 42: 541-548CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Cassells AC, Joyce SM, Curry RF & McCarthy TF (1999b) Detection of economically important variability in micropropagation. In: A Altman, S Izhar, M Ziv (eds.) Plant Biotechnology and In Vitro Biology in the 21st Century (pp 241-244). Kluwer Academic Publishers, DordrechtGoogle Scholar
  30. Cassells AC, Doyle BM & Curry RF (eds) (2000) Methods and Markers for Quality Assurance in Micropropagation. Acta Hortic. 530 155Google Scholar
  31. Cerda S & Weitzman SA (1997) Influence of oxygen radical injury on DNA methylation. Mutation Res. 386: 141-152PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Chiatante D, Rocco M, Maiuro L, Scippa GS, Di Martino C & Bryant JA (1997) Cell division and DNA topisomerase I activity in root meristems of pea seedlings during water stress. Plant Biosystems 131: 163-173Google Scholar
  33. Christianson ML & Warnick DA (1985) Temporal requirements for phytohormone balance in the control of organogenesis in vitro. Dev. Biol. 112: 494-497CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Christou P (1995) Strategies for variety-independent genetic transformation of important cereals, legumes and woody species utilising particle bombardment. In: Cassells AC & Jones PW (eds) The Methodology of Plant Genetic Manipulation: Criteria for Decision Making (pp. 13-28). Kluwer Academic Publishers, DordrechtGoogle Scholar
  35. Cullis CA & Kunert K (2000) Isolation of tissue cultured-induced polymorphisms in bananas by representational difference analysis. Acta Hortic. 530: 421-428Google Scholar
  36. Curry RF & Cassells AC (1998) Callus initiation, maintenance and shoot induction: monitoring of spontaneous genetic variability in vitro and in vivo. In: Hall RH (ed) Methods in Molecular Biology 7 (pp 31-42). Humana Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  37. Czene & Harms-Ringdahl M (1995) Detection of single-strand breaks and formamidoprymidine-DNA glycosylase-sensitive sites in DNA of cultured human fibroblasts. Mutation Res. 336: 235-242PubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. D'Amato F (1964) Endopolyploidy as a factor in plant tissue development. Caryologia 17: 41-52 D'Amato F (1977) Cytogenetics of differentiation in tissue and cell cultures. In: Reinert J & Bajaj YPS (eds) Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture (pp 343-356). Springer-Verlag, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  39. D'Amato F, Bennici A, Cionini PG, Barocelli S & Lupi MC (1980) Nuclear fragmentation followed by mitosis as a mechanism for wide number variation in tissue culture; its implications for plant regeneration. In: Sala F, Parisi B, Cella R & Ciferri O (eds) Plant Cell Culture: Results and Perspectives (pp 62-72). Elsevier, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  40. Debergh P, Aitken-Christie J, Cohen D, Grout B, Von Arnold S, Zimmerman R & Ziv M (1992) Reconsideration of the term 'vitrification' as used in micropropagation. Plant Cell Tiss. Org. Cult. 30: 135-140CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. De Klerk G-J (1990) How to measure somaclonal variation. Acta Bot. Neerl. 39: 129-144Google Scholar
  42. De Vos CHR, Kraak HL & Bino RJ (1994) Ageing of tomato seeds involves glutathione oxidation. Physiol. Plant 92: 131-139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Doke N, Miura Y, Sanchez LM, Park H-J, Noritake T, Yoshioka H & Kawakita K (1996) The oxidative burst protects plants against pathogen attack: mechanism and role as an emergency signal for plant bio-defence-a review. Gene 179: 45-51PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Droog F (1997) Plant glutathione S-transferases, a tale of Theta and Tau. J. Plant Growth Reg. 16: 95-107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Elstner EF (1991) Oxygen radicals-biochemical basis for their efficacy. Klin. Wochenschr. 69: 949-956CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Ernst D, Schraudner M, Langebartels C & Sandermann HJR (1992) Ozone-induced changes of mRNA levels of beta-1,3-glucanase, chitinase and pathogenesis-related protein 1b in tobacco plants. Plant Mol. Biol. 20: 673-682PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Frahm C, Mahmoodzadeh S & Naderi M (1998) In: Jain SM, Brar DS & Ahloowalia BS (eds) Somaclonal Variation and Induced Mutations in Crop Improvement (pp 563-594). Kluwer Academic Publishers, DordrechtGoogle Scholar
  48. Gaspar Th (1998) Plants can get cancer. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 36: 203-204CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Geier T (1991) Chromosome variability in callus produced plants. In: Harding J, Singh F & Mol JNM (eds) Genetics and Breeding of Ornamental Species (pp 79-106). Kluwer Academic Publishers, DordrechtGoogle Scholar
  50. George EF (1993) Plant Propagation by Tissue Culture: Part 1-The Technology. Exegetics, BasingstokeGoogle Scholar
  51. George EF (1996) Plant Propagation by Tissue Culture: Part 2-In Practice. Exegetics, BasingstokeGoogle Scholar
  52. Gille G & Siegler K (1995) Oxidative stress and living cells. Folia Microbiol. 40: 131-152Google Scholar
  53. Gille JJPO, Van Berkel CGM & Joenje H (1994) Mutagenicity of oxygen radicals in mammalian cell cultures. Carcinogenesis 15: 2695-2699PubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Glandorf DCM, Bakker PAHM & Van Loon LC (1997) The influence of the production of antibacterial and antifungal proteins by transgenic plants on the soil microflora. Acta Bot. Neerl. 46: 85-104Google Scholar
  55. Gong M, Chen SN, Song YQ & Li ZG (1997) Effect of calcium and calmodulin on intrinsic heat tolerance in relation to antioxidant systems in seedlings. Aust. J. Plant Physiol. 24: 371-379CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Grunewaldt-Stocker G (1997) Problems with plant health of in vitro propagated Anthurium spp. and Phalaenopsis hybrids. In: Cassells AC (ed) Pathogen and Microbial Contamination Management in Micropropagation (pp 363-370). Kluwer Academic Publishers, DordrechtGoogle Scholar
  57. Gupta PK (1998) Chromosomal basis of somaclonal variation in plants. In: Jain SM, Brar DS & Ahloowalia BS (eds) Somaclonal Variation and Induced Mutations in Crop Improvement (pp 149-168). Kluwer Academic Publishers, DordrechtGoogle Scholar
  58. Gupta AS, Webb RP, Holaday AS & Allen RD (1993) Over expression of superoxide dismutase protects plants from oxidative stress. Plant Physiol. 103: 1067-1073PubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. Hagege D (1995) Habituation in plant cell cultures: adaptation to free radical attacks. CR Soc. Biol. 189: 1183-1190Google Scholar
  60. Halliwell B (1999) Oxygen and nitrogen are pro-carcinogens. Damage to DNA by reactive oxygen, chlorine and nitrogen species: measurement, mechanism and the effects of nutrition. Mutation Res. 443: 37-52PubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. Halliwell B & Aruoma OI (1993) DNA and Free Radicals. Ellis Horwood, ChichesterGoogle Scholar
  62. Harman D (1956) Ageing: a theory based on free radical and radiation chemistry. J. Gerontol. 11: 298-300PubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. Henry RJ (1998) Molecular and biochemical characterization of somaclonal variation. In: Jain SM, Brar DS & Ahloowalia BS (eds) Somaclonal Variation and Induced Mutations in Crop Improvement (pp 485-500). Kluwer Academic Publishers, DordrechtGoogle Scholar
  64. Hippeli S & Elstner EF (1996) Mechanism of oxygen activation during plant stress:biochemical; air pollution. J. Plant Physiol. 148: 249-257Google Scholar
  65. Howell SH (1998) Molecular Genetics of Plant Development. Cambridge, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  66. Huxley TJ & Cartwright PM (1994) Juvenility in micropropagated strawberries (Fragaria ananassa Duch) In: Lumsden PJ, Nicholas JR & Davies WJ (eds) Physiology, Growth and Development of Plants in Culture (pp 346-355). Kluwer Academic Publishers, DordrechtGoogle Scholar
  67. Jain SM, Brar DS & Ahloowalia BS (1998) Somaclonal Variations and Induced Mutations in Crop Improvement. Kluwer Academic Publishers, DordrechtGoogle Scholar
  68. James AC & Mantell SH (1994) Evidence for epigenetic inheritance of ontogenetic phase and tissue origin of characteristics in the performance of plants derived through adventitious shoots. In: Lumsden PJ, Nicholas JR & Davies WJ (eds) Physiology, Growth and Development of Plants in Culture (pp 339-345). Kluwer Academic Publishers, DordrechtGoogle Scholar
  69. Jemmali A, Boxus P, Keevers C & Gaspar T (1994) Flowering abundance of strawberry depending on the number of subcultures in vitro: relationship with growth, rooting and peroxidase activity. In: Lumsden PJ, Nicholas JR & Davies WJ (eds) Physiology, Growth and Development of Plants in Culture (pp 356-362). Kluwer Academic Publishers, DordrechtGoogle Scholar
  70. Jemmali A, Robbe A & Boxus Ph (1997) Histochemical events and other fundamental differences between axillary and adventitious stipular shoots in micropropagated strawberry. Acta Hortic. 439: 341-345Google Scholar
  71. Jia SR, Kumar PP & Kush A (1996) Oxidative stress in Agrobacterium- induced tumours on Kalanchoe plants. Plant J. 10: 545-551CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Jones PW & Cassells AC (1995) Criteria for decision making in crop improvement programmes-technical considerations. In: Cassells AC & Jones PW (eds) The Methodology of Plant genetic Manipulation: Criteria for Decision Making (pp 465-476). Kluwer Academic Publishers, DordrechtGoogle Scholar
  73. Joyce SM, McCarthy TF & Cassells AC (1999) PCR analysis of bisulphite modified DNA to investigate developmental variation in micropropagated potatoes (Solanum tuberosum L.). Potato Res. 42 (in press)Google Scholar
  74. Kaeppler SM & Phillips RL (1993) DNA methylation and tissueculture induced variation in plants. In Vitro Cell. Dev. Biol. 29: 125-130Google Scholar
  75. Kaeppler SM, Phillips RL & Olhoft P (1998) Molecular basis of heritable tissue culture-induced variation in plants. In: Jain SM, Brar DS & Ahloowalia BS (eds) Somaclonal Variation and Induced Mutations in Crop Improvement (pp 465-484). Kluwer Academic Publishers, DordrechtGoogle Scholar
  76. Karp A (1991) On the current understanding of somaclonal variation. Oxford Surveys Plant Mol. Cell. Biol. 7: 1-58Google Scholar
  77. Karp A (1995) Somaclonal variation as a tool for crop improvement. Euphytica 85: 295-302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Karp A, Isaac PG & Ingram DS (1998) Molecular Tools for Screening Plant Diversity. Chapman & Hall, LondonGoogle Scholar
  79. Kasai H (1997) Analysis of a form of oxidative damage, 8-hydroxy-2'-deoxyguanosine, as a marker of cellular oxidative stress during carcinogenesis. Mutation Res. 387: 147-163PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Keevers C & Gaspar T (1985) Vitrification of carnation in vitro: changes in ethylene production, ACC level and capacity to convert ACC to ethylene. Plant Cell Tiss. Org. Cult. 4: 215-223CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Keevers C, Bisbis B, Le Dily F, Billard JP, Huault C & Gaspar Th (1995) Darkness improves growth and delays necrosis in a non chlorophyllous habituated sugarbeet callus. In Vitro Cell. Dev. Biol. 31: 122-126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Koh YH, Yoon SJ & Park J-W (1997) Lipid peroxidation productmediated DNA damage and mutagenicity. Biochem. Mol. Biol. 30: 188-193Google Scholar
  83. Korystov YN & Narimanov AA (1997) Low doses of ionizing radiation and hydrogen peroxide stimulate plant growth. Biologia 52: 121-124Google Scholar
  84. Kowalski B & Cassells AC (1999) Mutation breeding for yield and Phytophthora infestans Mont. foliar resistance in potato (Solanum tuberosum L. cv. Golden Wonder) using computerised image analysis in selection. Potato Res. 42: 121-130CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Lamb C & Dixon RA (1997) The oxidative burst in plant disease resistance. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol. 48: 251-275PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Lambe P, Mutambel HSN, Fouche J-G, Deltour R, Foidart J-M & Gaspar T (1997). DNA methylation as a key process in regulation of organogenic totipotency and plant neoplastic progression? In Vitro Cell Dev. Biol. Plant 33: 155-162Google Scholar
  87. Landgraf P, Ohmann E & Tschiersch H (1997) Light induced stress in Euglena gracilis. Photosynthetica 33: 433-442Google Scholar
  88. Larkin PJ & Scowcroft WR (1981) Somaclonal variation — a novel source of variability from cell cultures for plant improvement. Theor. Appl. Genet. 60: 197-214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Larson RA (1995) Plant defenses against oxidative stress. Arch. Insect Biochem. Physiol. 29: 175-186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Witas I, Dolezych B & Migula P (1995) Iron ascorbate-stimulated lipid peroxidation in vitro: why is the method so controversial? Gen. Physiol. Biophys. 14: 3-18PubMedGoogle Scholar
  91. Laval J (1996) Role of DNA repair enzymes in the cellular resistance to oxidative stress. Path. Biol. 44: 14-24Google Scholar
  92. Lichtenthaler HK (1996) Vegetation stress: an introduction to the stress concept in plants. J. Plant Physiol. 148: 4-14Google Scholar
  93. Logemann E, Wu S-C, Schroder J, Schmelzer E, Somssich IE & Halbrock K (1995) Gene activation by UV light, fungal elicitor or fungal infection in Petroselinium crispum is correlated with repression of cell cycle-related genes. Plant J. 8: 865-876PubMedGoogle Scholar
  94. Lynch J & Brown KM (1997) Ethylene and plant responses to nutritional stress. Physiol Plant 100: 613-619CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Mahoney SR, Ghosh S, Peirson D & Dumbroff EB (1998) Paclobutrazol affects the resistance of black spruce to high light and thermal stress. Tree Physiol. 18: 121-127PubMedGoogle Scholar
  96. Maluszynska J & Heslop-Harrison JS (1991) Localization of tandemly repeated sequences of Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant J. 1: 159-166CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Matthews REF (1981) Plant Virology. Academic Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  98. Matzke MA & Matzke AJM (1998) Epigenetic silencing of plant transgenes as a consequence of diverse cellular defence responses. Cell. Mol. Life. Sci. 54: 94-103PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. MR, Clayton H,_ Mansfield TA & Hetherington AM(1996) Changes in stomatal behaviour and guard cell cytosolic free calcium in response to oxidative stress. Plant Physiol. 111: 1031-1042Google Scholar
  100. McKersie BD & Leshem YY (1994) Stress and Stress Coping in Cultivated Plants. Kluwer Academic Publishers, DordrechtGoogle Scholar
  101. Mehlhorn H (1990)Ethylene-promoted ascorbate peroxidase activity protects plants against hydrogen peroxide, ozone and paraquat. Plant Cell Environ. 13: 971-976CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. Mhiri C, Morel J-B, Vernhettes S, Casacuberta JM, Lucas H & Grandbastien M-A (1997) The promoter of the tobacco Tnt1 retrotransposon is induced by wounding and by abiotic stress. Plant Mol. Biol. 33: 257-266PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. Micke A & Donini B (1993) Induced mutation In: Hayward MD, Bosemark NO & Romagosa I (eds) Plant Breeding Principles and Prospects (pp 52-62). Chapman & Hall, LondonGoogle Scholar
  104. Murashige T (1974a) Plant propagation through tissue cultures. Annu. Rev. Plant. Physiol. 25: 135-166CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  105. Murashige T (1974b) Propagation through tissue cultures. Hort-Science 9: 2-3Google Scholar
  106. Nagl W (1990) Gene amplification and related events. In: Bajaj YPS (ed) Biotechnology in Agriculture and Forestry, Vol 11: Somaclonal Variation in Crop Improvement 1 (pp 153-193). Springer-Verlag, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  107. Navari-Izzo J, Quartacci MF & Sgherri CLM (1996) Superoxide generation in relation to dehydration and rehydration. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 24: 447-451PubMedGoogle Scholar
  108. Olmos E, Piqueras A, Martinez-Solano JR & Hellin E (1997) The subcellular localization of peroxidase and the implication of oxidative stress in hyperhydrated leaves of regenerated carnation plants. Plant Sci. 130: 97-105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  109. Palma JM, Garrido M, Rodriguez-Garcia MI & Del Rio LA (1991) Peroxisome proliferation and oxidative stress mediated by activated oxygen species in plant peroxisomes. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 287: 68-74PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  110. Patra J, Panda KK & Panda BB (1997) Differential induction of adaptive responses by paraquat and hydrogen peroxide against the genotoxicity of methyl mercuric chloride, maleic hydrazide and ethyl methyl sulphonate in plant cells in vivo. Mutation Res. 393: 215-222PubMedGoogle Scholar
  111. Pierik RLM (1990) Rejuvenation and micropropagation. Newslett. Int. Ass. Plant Tiss. Cult. 62: 11-21Google Scholar
  112. Pell EJ, Schlagnhaufer CD & Arteca RN (1997) Ozone-induced oxidative stress: mechanism of action and reaction. Physiol. Plant. 100: 264-273CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  113. Polyak K, Xia Y, Zweier JL, Kinzler KW & Vogelstein B (1997) A model for p53-induced apoptosis. Nature 389: 300-305PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  114. Preece JE & Sutter EG (1991) Acclimatization of micropropagated plants to the greenhouse In: Debergh PC & Zimmerman RH (eds) Micropropagation: Technology and Applications (pp 71-94). Kluwer Academic Publishers, DordrechtGoogle Scholar
  115. Preil W (1986)In vitro propagation and breeding of ornamental plants: advantages and disadvantages of variability. In: Horn W, Jensen CJ, Odenbach W & Schieder O (eds) Genetic Manipulation in Plant Breeding (pp 377-403). De Gruyter, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  116. Price AH, Taylor A, Ripley SJ, Griffiths A, Trewavas AJ & Knight MR (1994) Oxidative signals in tobacco increase cytosolic calcium. Plant Cell. 6: 1301-1310PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  117. Quicke DLJ (1993) Principles and Techniques of Contemporary Taxonomy. Blackwell, LondonGoogle Scholar
  118. Reichheld J-P, Vernoux T, Lardon F, Van Montagu M & Inze D (1999) Specific checkpoints regulate cell cycle progress in response to oxidative stress. Plant J. 17: 647-656CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  119. Weiss D & Lurie S (1998) Heat shock proteins and crosstolerance in plants. Physiol. Plant. 103: 437-441CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  120. M, Savini C, Bracale M, Pelucchi N, Yifan H & Arencibia A (2000) Somaclonal variation in transgenic plants. Acta Hortic. 530 (in press)Google Scholar
  121. Sanford JC, Weedon WF & Chui YSI (1984) Regarding the novelty and breeding value of protoplast-derived variants of Russet Burbank (Solanum tuberosum L.). Euphytica 33: 707-715CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  122. Sangwan RS, Bourgeois Y, Brown S, Vasseur G & Sangwan-Norreel B (1992) Characterization of competent cells and early events of Agrobacterium mediated genetic transformation in Arabidopsis thaliana. Planta 188: 439-456CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  123. Sautter C, Leduc N, Bilang R, Iglesias VA, Gisel A, Wen X & Potyrkus I (1995) Shoot apical meristems as a target for gene transfer by biolistics In: Cassells AC & Jones PW (eds) The Methodology of Plant Genetic Manipulation: Criteria for Decision Making (pp. 45-53). Kluwer Academic Publishers, DordrechtGoogle Scholar
  124. Walter MH & Hess D (1995) Primary metabolism in plant defense: regulation of a bean malic enzyme gene promoter in transgenic tobacco by developmental and environmental cues. Plant. Physiol. 108: 949-960PubMedGoogle Scholar
  125. Schreck S, Dornenburg H & Knorr D (1996) Evaluation of hydrogen peroxide production in tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum) suspension cultures as a stress reaction to high pressure treatment. Food Biotech. 10: 163-171CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  126. Shepard JF, Bidney D & Shahin E (1980) Potato protoplasts in crop improvement. Science 208: 17-24PubMedGoogle Scholar
  127. Sies H (1991) Oxidative stress. Amer. J. Med. 91: 31S-38SGoogle Scholar
  128. Skoog F & Miller CO (1957) Chemical regulation of growth and organ formation in plant tissues cultured in vitro. Symp. Soc. Exp. Biol. 11: 118-131Google Scholar
  129. Smirnoff N (1996) The function and metabolism of ascorbic acid in plants. Ann. Bot. 78: 661-669CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  130. Schneeberger RG & Cullis CA (1991) Specific DNA alterations associated with the environmental induction of heritable changes in flax. Genetics 128: 619-630PubMedGoogle Scholar
  131. Sree Ramulu K, Dijkhuis P & Roest S (1984) Genetic instability in protoclones of potato (Solanum tuberosum L. cv. Bintje): new types of variation after vegetative propagation. Theor. Appl. Genet. 65: 329-338Google Scholar
  132. Stadtman ER (1992) Protein oxidation and ageing. Science 257: 1220-1224PubMedGoogle Scholar
  133. Swartz HL (1991) Post culture behaviour: genetic and epigenetic effects and related problems. In: Debergh PC & Zimmerman RH (eds) Micropropagation: Technology and Application (95-122). Kluwer Academic Publishers, DordrechtGoogle Scholar
  134. Tilghman SM (1993) DNA methylation: a phoenix rises. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 90: 8761-8762PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  135. Tilney-Bassett RAE (1986) Plant Chimeras. Edward Arnold, Baltimor, MD.Google Scholar
  136. Tsang ETW, Bowler C, Herouart D, Van Kamp W, Villarroel R, Genetello C, Van Montagu M & Inze D (1991) Differential regulation of superoxide dismutases in plants exposed to environmental stress. Plant Cell 3: 783-792PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  137. Valente P, Tao W & Verbelen P (1998) Auxins and cytokinins control DNA endoreduplication and deduplication in single cells of tobacco. Plant Sci. 134: 207-215CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  138. Vonarx EJ, Mitchell HL, Karthikeyan R, Chatterjee I & Kunz BA (1998) DNA repair in higher plants. Mutation Res. 400: 187-200PubMedGoogle Scholar
  139. Wacksman JT (1997) DNA methylation and the association between genetic and epigenetic changes: relation to carcinogenesis. Mutation Res. 375: 1-8Google Scholar
  140. Wei YH (1998) Oxidative stress and mitochondrial DNA mutations in human ageing. Proc. Soc. Exp. Biol. Med. 217: 53-63PubMedGoogle Scholar
  141. Wiseman H & Halliwell B (1996) Damage to DNA by reactive oxygen and nitrogen species: role in inflammatory disease and progression to cancer. Biochem. J. 313: 17-29PubMedGoogle Scholar
  142. Yahraus T, Chandra S, Legendre L & Low PS (1995) Evidence for a mechanically induced oxidative burst. Plant Physiol. 109: 1259-1266PubMedGoogle Scholar
  143. Yamamoto K, Uraki F, Yonei S & Yukawa O (1997) Enzymatic repair for base modifications induced by oxygen radicals. J. Radiat. Res. 38: 1-4PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  144. Ziv M (1991) Vitrification: morphological and physiological disorders of in vitro plants. In: Debergh PC & Zimmerman RH (eds) Micropropagation: Technology and Applications (pp 45-70). Kluwer Academic Publishers, DordrechtGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • Alan C. Cassells
    • 1
  • Rosario F. Curry
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Plant ScienceNational University of IrelandCorkIreland

Personalised recommendations