International Journal of Thermophysics

, Volume 22, Issue 4, pp 1035–1043 | Cite as

Thermal Conductivity of the Refrigerant Mixtures R404A, R407C, R410A, and R507A

Article

Abstract

New thermal conductivity data of the refrigerant mixtures R404A, R407C, R410A, and R507C are presented. For all these refrigerants, the thermal conductivity was measured in the vapor phase at atmospheric pressure over a temperature range from 250 to 400 K and also at moderate pressures. A modified steady-state hot-wire method was used for these measurements. The cumulative correction for end effects, eccentricity of the wire, and radiation heat transfer did not exceed 2%. Calculated uncertainties in experimental thermal conductivity are, in general, less than ±1.5%. All available literature thermal conductivity data for R404A, R407C, R410A, and R507C were evaluated to identify the most accurate data on which to base the thermal conductivity model. The thermal conductivity is modeled with the residual concept. In this representation, the thermal conductivity was composed of two contributions: a dilute gas term which is a function only of temperature and a residual term which is a function only of density. The models cover a wide range of conditions except for the region of the thermal conductivity critical enhancement. The resulting correlations are applicable for the thermal conductivity of dilute gas, superheated vapor, and saturated liquid and vapor far away from the critical point. Comparisons are made for all available literature data.

hot-wire method refrigerants R404A R407C R410A R507A thermal conductivity vapor phase 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

REFERENCES

  1. 1.
    D. B. Bivens, A. Yokozeki, V. Z. Geller, and M. E. Paulaitis, in Proc. ASHRAE/NIST Refrigerants Conf. (Gaithersburg, MD, 1993), p. 73.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    N. Hoffmann, K. Spindler, and E. Hahne, Bestimmung der Transportgroessen von HFKW, Heft 2, Waermeleitfaehigkeit, Forschungsrat Kaeltetechnik E.V. (Frankfurt, 1996).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    K. Spindler, N. Hoffman, J. Sohns, and E. Hahne, High Temp.-High Press. 29:659 (1997).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    S. T. Ro, M. S. Kim, and S. U. Jeong, Int. J. Thermophys. 18:991 (1997).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    S. U. Jeong, M. S. Kim, and S. T. Ro, in Proc. of 5th Asian Thermophys. Prop. Conf. (Seoul, Korea, 1998), p. 423.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    X. Gao, K. Nomura, Y. Nagasaka, and A. Nagashima, High Temp. High Press. 29:39 (1997).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    X. Gao, Y. Nagasaka, and A. Nagashima, Int. J. Thermophys. 20:5 (1999).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Y. Tanaka, S. Matsuo, and S. Taya, Int. J. Thermophys. 16:121 (1995).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    M. O. McLinden, S. A. Klein, E. W. Lemmon, and A. P. Peskin, NIST Thermodynamic and Transport Properties of Refrigerants and Refrigerant Mixtures-REFPROP, Version 6.01 (Nat. Inst. Stds. Tech., Gaithersburg, Maryland, 1988).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • V. Z. Geller
    • 1
  • B. V. Nemzer
    • 1
  • U. V. Cheremnykh
    • 2
  1. 1.Thermophysics Research CenterSan FranciscoU.S.A.
  2. 2.Odessa State Academy of RefrigerationOdessaUkraine

Personalised recommendations